Evolution was the first "Trust the Science" scam. | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 84299164 United States 10/01/2022 12:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
CopyNinja87
User ID: 83812388 United States 10/01/2022 12:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Very good |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 80634916 Bahamas 10/01/2022 12:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 82641900 United States 10/01/2022 12:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Why does the Jurassic Park scientist refuse to do a scientific dating test to get scientific results in a real science examination? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 62416233 All related testing expenses covered, and still he refuses to scientifically test the samples. This is today's "Science" from "the Scientists". Who would dare deny them? Listen for yourself: 10y ago I take it answ was no Yes I agree much of institutional science is politicized and can't be trusted entirely They should've done the test Maybe they did? I don't know The researchers found plenty of C-14 in their mosasaur—enough to calculate "an age of 24,600 BP [years before present]."2 To explain how any C-14 could be present at all after millions of years, the study authors speculated that the C-14 could have come from recent bacteria. [link to www.icr.org (secure)] Different case but they dated it |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 80634916 Bahamas 10/01/2022 12:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You're caught up in the whole "evolution vs God" false paradigm. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80634916 You only see 2 options. You are a limited thinker caught in a mental prison. But at least you think you sound intellectual. You are as religious as anyone else. You think you are smarter. You're not. I'm not falling for the evolution religion or the other man-made religions. It may not make me the smartest guy in any room. But it is common sense, which is lacking in academia and churches of all religions. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 82641900 United States 10/01/2022 01:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Why does the Jurassic Park scientist refuse to do a scientific dating test to get scientific results in a real science examination? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 62416233 All related testing expenses covered, and still he refuses to scientifically test the samples. This is today's "Science" from "the Scientists". Who would dare deny them? Listen for yourself: 10y ago I take it answ was no Yes I agree much of institutional science is politicized and can't be trusted entirely They should've done the test Maybe they did? I don't know The researchers found plenty of C-14 in their mosasaur—enough to calculate "an age of 24,600 BP [years before present]."2 To explain how any C-14 could be present at all after millions of years, the study authors speculated that the C-14 could have come from recent bacteria. [link to www.icr.org (secure)] Different case but they dated it I like this it's interesting I'm not ready to believe dinosaur are 25k years ago But it should be better understood |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 84297627 United Kingdom 10/01/2022 01:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | No. A good portion of Darwin’s original hypothesis has been rejected….by science. However his basic claim of diversity of life via adaptation and genetic changes has been repeatedly been demonstrated. Now tell me when blantenly false claims in the Bible have been deleted? You can’t. That’s the difference between science and religion. Science is not trying to prove anything except to understand the natural universe around us and why things happen. If that conflicts with your magic man claims…that’s your problem. Oddly you enjoy science. You are on the internet, science. Powered by electricity via a power grid that generated it via complex multiple sciences. Drive a car or ride in a plane? Multiple hard science did that. Get sick? Go to a doctor? Darn science again. Check the weather for a up coming trip? Let’s see…science via satellites taking photos and tracking changing conditions! Darn science again. Evolution is the current accepted theory on the diversity of life. Oddly, if tomorrow it was found to be totally wrong…that doesn’t prove anything about a god. Further, science will discover if evolution is wrong not god claims. We are not talking about rejecting science; we are concerned about the ongoing corruption of scientific knowledge by ideolgues for corporate gain and societal manipulation. As you display; evolution has become an ideological concept that people will stick to no matter the evidence to the contrary. Evolution as espoused by the corporate led scientific establishment in our educational institutions and media networks IS NOT TENABLE. It’s not science anymore; its a philosophy; an ideology; a cult. And is used to perform all kinds of horrors and excuses by eliminating fundamental concepts that a) there is no higher purpose or judgement to existence other than physical matter and b) that all relationships are based on dominance and we can do as we wish to species less equipped than us Evolution is essentially a socio-pathic ideology or at least has been used to excuse it. Imagine looking at your son/daughter and thinking; its just a conglomeration of genetic cells controlled by stimulant chemicals. Psychopathic. Excellent word salad of your conspiracy of all science that agrees with evolution theory. Now, rather rebut my shredding of your scientific conspiracy to disprove God, which evolution doesn't, you ramble on and on. Wrap your brain around this, if the bronze ago ignorant unknown authors got the story wrong....so what? Again. evolution wrong is not God right. If you have a better hypothesis for the diversity of life, not supernatural unproven claims, a nobel prize and fame and fortune and booster the faithful! But no, you can't and won't. Even worse you slander men and women who spend their lives trying to figure out how stuff happens besides a god did it. Your mind can't accept even the chance a tale in a book of many unproven tales might not be correct and you lie. Read this; scientists and corporations don’t care about you. God does. The Theory of evolution is as dead as a dodo. • Acquired physical traits are NOT passed down, only genes are passed down, to subsequent generations. Disproving Darwins notion that acquired traits accumulated over subsequent generations and generated different living species. There were no inheritable variations for natural selection to choose from. They re-wrote the theory to include Mutation. • Mutation. Mutations do not add genetic information for species to ‘mutate’ into different kinds of species. • The fossil record shows all forms of life, many of which currently exist, coming into existence almost simultaneously in the Cambrian Explosion, this is contrary evidence to a slow mutating naturally selective tree of transforming species. Abiogenesis has not been seen to possible for 170 years and counting. • Minimal Gene Set concept. Evolutionists needed a beginning from 0 gene but you cannot get down to below 397 gene sets to create a functional cell. That is the minimal gene set for a living cell. • Dembski’s 1995 Complex Specified Information theorem (CSi) shows that it is impossible for the complex genome of biological cells to have been formed by horizontal causation and a vertical cauaslity Or intelligent design Or a structure to follow, would have to be integrated into the calculation for it ever to be realised in physical nature. • Plants and insects have symbiotic interdependent relationship for survival. In some cases this would not be able to form overtime but quite rapidly in order for the both life forms to have survived. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 82641900 United States 10/01/2022 01:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 10y ago I take it answ was no Yes I agree much of institutional science is politicized and can't be trusted entirely They should've done the test Maybe they did? I don't know The researchers found plenty of C-14 in their mosasaur—enough to calculate "an age of 24,600 BP [years before present]."2 To explain how any C-14 could be present at all after millions of years, the study authors speculated that the C-14 could have come from recent bacteria. [link to www.icr.org (secure)] Different case but they dated it I like this it's interesting I'm not ready to believe dinosaur are 25k years ago But it should be better understood A theory of why soft tissue is there is iron from blood gets in and preserves it Is this consistent with idea c14 is from bacteria that got in? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 84100796 United States 10/01/2022 01:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 80634916 Bahamas 10/01/2022 01:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymist User ID: 84297627 United Kingdom 10/01/2022 01:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | • First it was the atheistic materialistic ‘science’ institutions attempting to weaken peoples belief in their culture and religion (Royal Society, Smithsonian etc.) • Then came the elite colonial genocidalists who used it to justify their superiority and enslavemnent and genocide of the native americans, aborigines and other indonesian tribes. • Then came the eugenicists; elite families who needed to justify living in overwhelming luxury whilst the underdogs worked in impoverished crap, then they sought to ‘create the perfect man’. • Then into the 20thC and every nutjob autocrat used it to cause absolute decimation of Europe and Asia. Causing more war death than in every century in history put together. • Then came the lovely government institutions who sought to eliminate any ‘unfit’ human by sterilising the handicapped. What a nice bunch of people; just be aware of who you support when you bang on about this completely unhinged scientifically disproven fantasy. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 50271884 Canada 10/01/2022 03:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Why do you dumb fuckers not accept that God created evolution? There's obvious evidence of evolution and it's already been observed in microbiology. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 48934714 It's incredible how hard the evolution religion followers cry heresy when their religion is questioned. No - there isn't obvious evidence of evolution - in fact ALL science points to spontaneous explosion of highly developed life forms - NOT creeping mutation. Sorry. You are wrong. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 50271884 Canada 10/01/2022 03:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | OP couldn't win a game of "Are You Smarter Than A Fifth Grader" because they're not. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 84100796 That's a great argument. Can you explain the existence of life or why the LAW of Thermodynamics doesn't apply when discussing evolution? A scientific LAW is fact - evolution should be thrown out because it goes against a scientific law. |
Centex7
User ID: 75583697 United States 10/01/2022 03:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Centex7 No. A good portion of Darwin’s original hypothesis has been rejected….by science. However his basic claim of diversity of life via adaptation and genetic changes has been repeatedly been demonstrated. Now tell me when blantenly false claims in the Bible have been deleted? You can’t. That’s the difference between science and religion. Science is not trying to prove anything except to understand the natural universe around us and why things happen. If that conflicts with your magic man claims…that’s your problem. Oddly you enjoy science. You are on the internet, science. Powered by electricity via a power grid that generated it via complex multiple sciences. Drive a car or ride in a plane? Multiple hard science did that. Get sick? Go to a doctor? Darn science again. Check the weather for a up coming trip? Let’s see…science via satellites taking photos and tracking changing conditions! Darn science again. Evolution is the current accepted theory on the diversity of life. Oddly, if tomorrow it was found to be totally wrong…that doesn’t prove anything about a god. Further, science will discover if evolution is wrong not god claims. We are not talking about rejecting science; we are concerned about the ongoing corruption of scientific knowledge by ideolgues for corporate gain and societal manipulation. As you display; evolution has become an ideological concept that people will stick to no matter the evidence to the contrary. Evolution as espoused by the corporate led scientific establishment in our educational institutions and media networks IS NOT TENABLE. It’s not science anymore; its a philosophy; an ideology; a cult. And is used to perform all kinds of horrors and excuses by eliminating fundamental concepts that a) there is no higher purpose or judgement to existence other than physical matter and b) that all relationships are based on dominance and we can do as we wish to species less equipped than us Evolution is essentially a socio-pathic ideology or at least has been used to excuse it. Imagine looking at your son/daughter and thinking; its just a conglomeration of genetic cells controlled by stimulant chemicals. Psychopathic. Excellent word salad of your conspiracy of all science that agrees with evolution theory. Now, rather rebut my shredding of your scientific conspiracy to disprove God, which evolution doesn't, you ramble on and on. Wrap your brain around this, if the bronze ago ignorant unknown authors got the story wrong....so what? Again. evolution wrong is not God right. If you have a better hypothesis for the diversity of life, not supernatural unproven claims, a nobel prize and fame and fortune and booster the faithful! But no, you can't and won't. Even worse you slander men and women who spend their lives trying to figure out how stuff happens besides a god did it. Your mind can't accept even the chance a tale in a book of many unproven tales might not be correct and you lie. Read this; scientists and corporations don’t care about you. God does. The Theory of evolution is as dead as a dodo. • Acquired physical traits are NOT passed down, only genes are passed down, to subsequent generations. Disproving Darwins notion that acquired traits accumulated over subsequent generations and generated different living species. There were no inheritable variations for natural selection to choose from. They re-wrote the theory to include Mutation. • Mutation. Mutations do not add genetic information for species to ‘mutate’ into different kinds of species. • The fossil record shows all forms of life, many of which currently exist, coming into existence almost simultaneously in the Cambrian Explosion, this is contrary evidence to a slow mutating naturally selective tree of transforming species. Abiogenesis has not been seen to possible for 170 years and counting. • Minimal Gene Set concept. Evolutionists needed a beginning from 0 gene but you cannot get down to below 397 gene sets to create a functional cell. That is the minimal gene set for a living cell. • Dembski’s 1995 Complex Specified Information theorem (CSi) shows that it is impossible for the complex genome of biological cells to have been formed by horizontal causation and a vertical cauaslity Or intelligent design Or a structure to follow, would have to be integrated into the calculation for it ever to be realised in physical nature. • Plants and insects have symbiotic interdependent relationship for survival. In some cases this would not be able to form overtime but quite rapidly in order for the both life forms to have survived. Thank you for not quoting the source and peer review of these claims. Start with assume a god and reject anything that doesn't conform to your claim. Just say God did it and the Bible tells me so. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 80679271 United States 10/01/2022 04:38 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The US Bill of Rights correctly acknowledges each individual's personal autonomy as a GOD-given right. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 72530568 Each person IS free. You don't need a government to state you are free - you ARE free. It's just that people don't understand this anymore and have allowed themselves to believe they require and need the government to grant them permission to do whatever. They have exchanged GOD given freedom with government permitted actions. No. That is not life. That is not how and why we were created. And that is why the evolutionary theory was so important to push for the last 150 years. It makes humanity a non-entity. Basically claiming that YOU are the result of millions of years of accidents and happenstance and your life has ZERO importance. TPTB pushed this (evolution) hard because once you get people to believe there is no GOD, then they have no GOD-given rights and the government becomes the be-all and end-all. Evolution was the first "trust the science" scam. Evolution is actually anti-scientific. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 80995053 United States 10/01/2022 04:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Weyoun
User ID: 81110693 United States 10/01/2022 05:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The baby murderers like to compare unborn human babies with pig fetuses or similar. What's the difference between killing a pig and a baby? The ultimate conclusion of evolution cult is that human are just animals and therefore can be treated as animals, herded , culled, forced-jabbed, GMOed, and slaughtered just like animals. |
canalien*
User ID: 47078230 Canada 10/01/2022 05:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 84300479 United States 10/01/2022 05:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Centex7
User ID: 75583697 United States 10/01/2022 05:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The baby murderers like to compare unborn human babies with pig fetuses or similar. What's the difference between killing a pig and a baby? The ultimate conclusion of evolution cult is that human are just animals and therefore can be treated as animals, herded , culled, forced-jabbed, GMOed, and slaughtered just like animals. Quoting: Weyoun Who do we know who killed ALL the pigs and babies except for those on a ship? It wasn’t a scientist. It wasn’t a person who accepts evolution. Who the hell did that? Who slaughter animals and people just like animals? ALL OF THEM! Even the ones in the womb. Some folks love that character. Sick isn’t it! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 84300479 United States 10/01/2022 05:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 10y ago I take it answ was no Yes I agree much of institutional science is politicized and can't be trusted entirely They should've done the test Maybe they did? I don't know The researchers found plenty of C-14 in their mosasaur—enough to calculate "an age of 24,600 BP [years before present]."2 To explain how any C-14 could be present at all after millions of years, the study authors speculated that the C-14 could have come from recent bacteria. [link to www.icr.org (secure)] Different case but they dated it I like this it's interesting I'm not ready to believe dinosaur are 25k years ago But it should be better understood 4,000 years ago... |
Weyoun
User ID: 81110693 United States 10/01/2022 05:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The baby murderers like to compare unborn human babies with pig fetuses or similar. What's the difference between killing a pig and a baby? The ultimate conclusion of evolution cult is that human are just animals and therefore can be treated as animals, herded , culled, forced-jabbed, GMOed, and slaughtered just like animals. Quoting: Weyoun Who do we know who killed ALL the pigs and babies except for those on a ship? It wasn’t a scientist. It wasn’t a person who accepts evolution. Who the hell did that? Who slaughter animals and people just like animals? ALL OF THEM! Even the ones in the womb. Some folks love that character. Sick isn’t it! THe Potter can shape the clay however He wants. It is His creation. It is His right and His right alone. It is only "sick" to those who think of themselves as gods that try to play god, becuse they try to usurp God's domain, just like satan did. God can kill everyone and not commit murder. You can't, becuse you are not god. |
Weyoun
User ID: 81110693 United States 10/01/2022 05:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 81985204 10y ago I take it answ was no Yes I agree much of institutional science is politicized and can't be trusted entirely They should've done the test Maybe they did? I don't know The researchers found plenty of C-14 in their mosasaur—enough to calculate "an age of 24,600 BP [years before present]."2 To explain how any C-14 could be present at all after millions of years, the study authors speculated that the C-14 could have come from recent bacteria. [link to www.icr.org (secure)] Different case but they dated it I like this it's interesting I'm not ready to believe dinosaur are 25k years ago But it should be better understood 4,000 years ago... Yep, the post-flood ice age did them in. |
canalien*
User ID: 47078230 Canada 10/01/2022 05:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Why can’t it be both? Quoting: canalien* The universe is infinite. Earth is infinite. Species come and go. We will all be gone. But the universe keeps on and on. Why do not want to believe God? I believe in Jesus Christ. I have faith in him. In my heart. Maybe to take away the fear of death. |
Weyoun
User ID: 81110693 United States 10/01/2022 05:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The original sin was Adam and Eve seeking equality with God. To this day, man continues to try to play god, that's why they come up with all that evolution crap. Evolution is a sort of "equalization" to squash all things to the same level as some random happenstance. Under evolution theology, all things are just random arrangements of stuff out of nothingness, so everything is just nothing, so there is no truth either, just as Pilate infamously said, "What is truth?" |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 2211954 New Zealand 10/01/2022 05:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Something like 90% of dog breeds didn't exist only 100 years ago. Yet look at how specialized they all are now. Yet here you are unable to recognize that selection pressure can drive meaningful physiological and anatomical adaptations. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80408362 This is almost as dumb as the flat earth thread. Micro evolution? sure. Macro evolution? BS. Cat becomes different sort of cat? yes. Cat becomes a bird? no. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 2211954 New Zealand 10/01/2022 05:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The original sin was Adam and Eve seeking equality with God. To this day, man continues to try to play god, that's why they come up with all that evolution crap. Evolution is a sort of "equalization" to squash all things to the same level as some random happenstance. Under evolution theology, all things are just random arrangements of stuff out of nothingness, so everything is just nothing, so there is no truth either, just as Pilate infamously said, "What is truth?" Quoting: Weyoun Exactly right. It exists because if there is no God, then we are god. The first lie is alive and well. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77629450 United States 10/01/2022 06:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 82641900 The researchers found plenty of C-14 in their mosasaur—enough to calculate "an age of 24,600 BP [years before present]."2 To explain how any C-14 could be present at all after millions of years, the study authors speculated that the C-14 could have come from recent bacteria. [link to www.icr.org (secure)] Different case but they dated it I like this it's interesting I'm not ready to believe dinosaur are 25k years ago But it should be better understood 4,000 years ago... Yep, the post-flood ice age did them in. The Flood did them in. |
Weyoun
User ID: 81110693 United States 10/01/2022 06:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 82641900 I like this it's interesting I'm not ready to believe dinosaur are 25k years ago But it should be better understood 4,000 years ago... Yep, the post-flood ice age did them in. The Flood did them in. Noah had dinosaur kinds on the ark, but the post-flood climate changes (yes, "climate change" is real but due to the flood) killed them off. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77973018 United States 10/01/2022 06:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |