Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,952 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,865,901
Pageviews Today: 2,757,819Threads Today: 748Posts Today: 15,664
10:32 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

BREAKING: WINGS OVER DALLAS Airshow Goes Wrong . 2 PLANES COLLIDE MIDAIR, CRASH

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 78490578
United States
11/12/2022 04:21 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
BREAKING: WINGS OVER DALLAS Airshow Goes Wrong . 2 PLANES COLLIDE MIDAIR, CRASH
Already posted here. Sorry.
Thread: WW2 Bomber Destroyed in Mid-Air Collision at Dallas Air Show


"The FAA says the planes in question were a Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress and a Bell P-63. As the B-17 (the larger aircraft) is heading toward the airport, the smaller P-63 seems to come out of nowhere and clips the back of it ... which sends both of them plummeting."
Less than 50%.

[link to www.tmz.com (secure)]


[link to twitter.com (secure)]
GSB/LTD

User ID: 8080014
United States
11/13/2022 10:45 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BREAKING: WINGS OVER DALLAS Airshow Goes Wrong . 2 PLANES COLLIDE MIDAIR, CRASH
TMZ's typically slanted tabloid reportage really steamed me; that P-63 didn't "clip" the B-17, it plowed directly through that fuselage at a high rate of speed.

And if it wasn't an in-flight medical emergency or severe mechanical failure it sure in Hell looked like that pilot was stupidly grandstanding for the crowds below. Alternate-angle footage also shows the P-63 was part of an escort squadron but suddenly veered off and headed straight for that bomber.

-It's interesting to note that in the Bell P-63, the engine is BEHIND the cockpit so upon impact it blasted through that B-17 like a huge bullet and the pilot never had a chance of survival.

-Further, the U.S. considered the P-63 unsafe for their own use and it was instead sold to the Soviets who used them in WWII.

The NTSB report will likely chalk this crash up to one of the two causes mentioned above, with "pilot error" a fair bet since that vague, catch-all term can cover a multitude of sins.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 84732591
Greece
11/13/2022 11:12 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BREAKING: WINGS OVER DALLAS Airshow Goes Wrong . 2 PLANES COLLIDE MIDAIR, CRASH
idiot pilot
3abzzybee

User ID: 83757959
United States
11/13/2022 11:20 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: BREAKING: WINGS OVER DALLAS Airshow Goes Wrong . 2 PLANES COLLIDE MIDAIR, CRASH
TMZ's typically slanted tabloid reportage really steamed me; that P-63 didn't "clip" the B-17, it plowed directly through that fuselage at a high rate of speed.

And if it wasn't an in-flight medical emergency or severe mechanical failure it sure in Hell looked like that pilot was stupidly grandstanding for the crowds below. Alternate-angle footage also shows the P-63 was part of an escort squadron but suddenly veered off and headed straight for that bomber.

-It's interesting to note that in the Bell P-63, the engine is BEHIND the cockpit so upon impact it blasted through that B-17 like a huge bullet and the pilot never had a chance of survival.

-Further, the U.S. considered the P-63 unsafe for their own use and it was instead sold to the Soviets who used them in WWII.

The NTSB report will likely chalk this crash up to one of the two causes mentioned above, with "pilot error" a fair bet since that vague, catch-all term can cover a multitude of sins.
 Quoting: GSB/LTD


Thank you for the analysis.
Working on it





GLP