1st TIME IN 50 YEARS: NASA Space Capsule Rounds The Moon | |
Farrrrrrout User ID: 84798875 Australia 11/22/2022 03:59 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 82200947 Germany 11/22/2022 04:02 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 83763034 United States 11/22/2022 04:02 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | We now have 8K video, cell phones with 100 megapixels, and still no pics of stars? Quoting: javierruizleon Do you see stars in the daytime? If you set the exposure to show stars, the moon would look like the sun. Stars are pretty faint to a camera, you need more exposure to capture them. With a bright up close scene, exposing both would be difficult without compositing 2 different images together in photoshop. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 82200947 Germany 11/22/2022 04:03 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 84171992 Netherlands 11/22/2022 04:06 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | NASA returns to moon for the first time in 50 years with new Orion space capsule Quoting: PURA SANGRE (FOX NEWS) A NASA space capsule swooped around the moon on Monday, marking the first time the space agency has reached the lunar object with a vessel designed for occupancy since 1972. NASA's Orion capsule left earth during the early morning hours on Nov. 16, on top of the space agency’s most powerful rocket ever made for a mission, expected to last 25 days, 11 hours, and 36 minutes. [link to www.foxnews.com (secure)] https://twitter.com/_/status/1594797668018311170 They really phone in the photoshopping these days. Not even a half assed attempt at fabricating a somewhat believable image. |
Hiram's Apprentice
User ID: 80575894 United States 11/22/2022 04:07 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Scale is a little off, or should i just says scale is WAY OFF. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 55229531 The recent capsule "images" have to match the scale of the bogus earth-rise pic from apollo. But what about the vid below, did they think we would not notice that this contradicts. The earth SHOULD be taking up 50% to 100% of the background...not 1%. It's all BS [link to www.youtube.com (secure)] Not quite correct. It's all dependant on perspective, altitude of the orbit above the moon gives the scaling of size between earth and the moon. Astromutt would be able to chime in on this with far better parameters if he was following this thread. wow, talk about a weak rebuttal...perspective? orbit altitude? L O L good grief you are clueless. Astromutt will NOT be able to reconcile these difference. Which vid is false? Doesn't really matter, because NASA says both are real. btw why couldn't they snap some photos of the lunar lander or the moon buggy? Lmao YOU are the clueless one. Guess my comment went WAAY over your head. "Tempus Fugit" |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79507938 Portugal 11/22/2022 04:09 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | We now have 8K video, cell phones with 100 megapixels, and still no pics of stars? Quoting: javierruizleon Do you see stars in the daytime? If you set the exposure to show stars, the moon would look like the sun. Stars are pretty faint to a camera, you need more exposure to capture them. With a bright up close scene, exposing both would be difficult without compositing 2 different images together in photoshop. Good one. That's about all the explanation anyone should need. "If you set the exposure to show stars, the moon would look like the sun." |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 82200947 Germany 11/22/2022 04:11 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | LIESA tell us how you do it with your cell phone system? Why don't Verizon have this technology? I can't even make local calls at times within a mile to the location in certain areas. You'd think if you had that technology we'd be using it by now. LIESA HOAX |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 84171992 Netherlands 11/22/2022 04:12 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Exciting subject line but remembering from 50 plus years ago has to be a manned mission to be amazing and truly worthy Quoting: Anonymous Coward 84799574 Even 15 or 20 years ago a rover was on the surface of Mars sending back video. Step it up your game NASA. The old NASA did some amazing stuff….this generation’s space scientists have a ways to go yet. Maybe then this 13 year old kid at Christmas time 1968 will get the same spark he first felt when the astronauts of Apollo 8 first orbited the moon back then. Waiting patiently… They don't have to "step up their game." They know enough people are so deluded, naïve and impressionable that 'not a space agency' can throw together a 'mission' with minimum production value and phone in a few cheap photoshops which will be more than enough to fleece vast sums of money off the naïve and deluded. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 84187880 United States 11/22/2022 04:14 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Mock and discount all you want, but this is mission is a significant milestone for USA efforts towards nuclear fusion. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 84010768 The moon is chock full of H3, which is a rare element that would rocket nuclear fusion to the top of US energy production. The sooner we get back there and establish mining outposts, the sooner we get nuclear fusion. Flat-tards and Fake-tards can fuck off. Fucking colonialists just never stop…. |
Hiram's Apprentice
User ID: 80575894 United States 11/22/2022 04:14 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 84790338 Yeah, the Moon is too low contrast... no details much. The Earth looks comparatively smaller, probably because of a wide angle view, don't know. Should be way more detail showing on the Moon though. That one thing sort of stuffs up the whole thing. This is a fake image. Haven't they got any decent photoshop-tards on their team? Earth's image has more details, and the moon is just grey, lol And the spacecraft was designed to carry astronauts but they were all busy as it seems, so it went empty, very convincing and logical. And it will not land on the moon, it will just swoop the moon, it went there to swoop the moon, it is like you go to a trip and you do not get out of the car, you just go there swoop your vacation land and you return. lol. You must not know much about cameras and photography. The camera was focused on earth, so the moon, which is far closer to the camera than what it is focused on, is out of focus. Why is the spaceship which is even closer to the camera not blurred too then smartass? You don't understand photography. The ship is RIGHT THERE at the cam so of course it appears sharp. The moon is hundreds is not thousands of miles off, it comes in blurry. The focal point is exponentially further off, thank digital imaging for this. Sorry if this is beyond your comprehension. "Tempus Fugit" |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 84171992 Netherlands 11/22/2022 04:14 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | We now have 8K video, cell phones with 100 megapixels, and still no pics of stars? Quoting: javierruizleon Do you see stars in the daytime? If you set the exposure to show stars, the moon would look like the sun. Stars are pretty faint to a camera, you need more exposure to capture them. With a bright up close scene, exposing both would be difficult without compositing 2 different images together in photoshop. Good one. That's about all the explanation anyone should need. "If you set the exposure to show stars, the moon would look like the sun." Mental gymnastics worthy of the special olympicsm |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 84171992 Netherlands 11/22/2022 04:18 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 84048663 Earth's image has more details, and the moon is just grey, lol And the spacecraft was designed to carry astronauts but they were all busy as it seems, so it went empty, very convincing and logical. And it will not land on the moon, it will just swoop the moon, it went there to swoop the moon, it is like you go to a trip and you do not get out of the car, you just go there swoop your vacation land and you return. lol. You must not know much about cameras and photography. The camera was focused on earth, so the moon, which is far closer to the camera than what it is focused on, is out of focus. Why is the spaceship which is even closer to the camera not blurred too then smartass? You don't understand photography. The ship is RIGHT THERE at the cam so of course it appears sharp. The moon is hundreds is not thousands of miles off, it comes in blurry. The focal point is exponentially further off, thank digital imaging for this. Sorry if this is beyond your comprehension. lol |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77765587 United States 11/22/2022 04:23 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 82283839 United States 11/22/2022 04:27 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | No live video feed? Any chance of using google earth tech and taking hi res images of the moon we can zoom in on, heck even any one of the alleged Apollo landing sites Quoting: Farrrrrrout 84798875 Don't worry I tracked it with my k-nine cam. I can sure you it is real. I saw the blips on the screen. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 55229531 United States 11/22/2022 04:28 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Hiram's Apprentice
User ID: 80575894 United States 11/22/2022 04:30 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Hiram's Apprentice You must not know much about cameras and photography. The camera was focused on earth, so the moon, which is far closer to the camera than what it is focused on, is out of focus. Why is the spaceship which is even closer to the camera not blurred too then smartass? You don't understand photography. The ship is RIGHT THERE at the cam so of course it appears sharp. The moon is hundreds is not thousands of miles off, it comes in blurry. The focal point is exponentially further off, thank digital imaging for this. Sorry if this is beyond your comprehension. lol Laugh all you want. In just a few years from now you'll be choking on those giggles. NASA/SPACE-X is behind the times with propulsion tech, the Artimis mission is 20+ year outdated technology. Just you watch how things transpire. "Tempus Fugit" |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 84634997 United Kingdom 11/22/2022 04:31 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 84048663 Earth's image has more details, and the moon is just grey, lol And the spacecraft was designed to carry astronauts but they were all busy as it seems, so it went empty, very convincing and logical. And it will not land on the moon, it will just swoop the moon, it went there to swoop the moon, it is like you go to a trip and you do not get out of the car, you just go there swoop your vacation land and you return. lol. You must not know much about cameras and photography. The camera was focused on earth, so the moon, which is far closer to the camera than what it is focused on, is out of focus. Why is the spaceship which is even closer to the camera not blurred too then smartass? You don't understand photography. The ship is RIGHT THERE at the cam so of course it appears sharp. The moon is hundreds is not thousands of miles off, it comes in blurry. The focal point is exponentially further off, thank digital imaging for this. Sorry if this is beyond your comprehension. If the camera is focused on the most distant object, the object at an intermediate distance is blurred but the closest object to the camera is not. Is this what you are saying? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 84171992 Netherlands 11/22/2022 04:33 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 84634997 Why is the spaceship which is even closer to the camera not blurred too then smartass? You don't understand photography. The ship is RIGHT THERE at the cam so of course it appears sharp. The moon is hundreds is not thousands of miles off, it comes in blurry. The focal point is exponentially further off, thank digital imaging for this. Sorry if this is beyond your comprehension. lol Laugh all you want. In just a few years from now you'll be choking on those giggles. NASA/SPACE-X is behind the times with propulsion tech, the Artimis mission is 20+ year outdated technology. Just you watch how things transpire. LOL "Just you watch..." |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 82283839 United States 11/22/2022 04:36 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 84048663 Earth's image has more details, and the moon is just grey, lol And the spacecraft was designed to carry astronauts but they were all busy as it seems, so it went empty, very convincing and logical. And it will not land on the moon, it will just swoop the moon, it went there to swoop the moon, it is like you go to a trip and you do not get out of the car, you just go there swoop your vacation land and you return. lol. You must not know much about cameras and photography. The camera was focused on earth, so the moon, which is far closer to the camera than what it is focused on, is out of focus. Why is the spaceship which is even closer to the camera not blurred too then smartass? You don't understand photography. The ship is RIGHT THERE at the cam so of course it appears sharp. The moon is hundreds is not thousands of miles off, it comes in blurry. The focal point is exponentially further off, thank digital imaging for this. Sorry if this is beyond your comprehension. You are saying that the camera was focused on a distant object so a nearer object is out of focus but an even nearer object is in focus? |
Hiram's Apprentice
User ID: 80575894 United States 11/22/2022 04:39 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Hiram's Apprentice is gasping for air. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 55229531 "In Space no one can hear you scream" Piss off retard. Can't teach logic to the illogical. Come at me in a year and we'll discuss where all this sits. Until then, we'll see who is "gasping for air". Hear me, bruh? "Tempus Fugit" |
Hiram's Apprentice
User ID: 80575894 United States 11/22/2022 04:41 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Hiram's Apprentice You must not know much about cameras and photography. The camera was focused on earth, so the moon, which is far closer to the camera than what it is focused on, is out of focus. Why is the spaceship which is even closer to the camera not blurred too then smartass? You don't understand photography. The ship is RIGHT THERE at the cam so of course it appears sharp. The moon is hundreds is not thousands of miles off, it comes in blurry. The focal point is exponentially further off, thank digital imaging for this. Sorry if this is beyond your comprehension. You are saying that the camera was focused on a distant object so a nearer object is out of focus but an even nearer object is in focus? Research how digital cameras work. "Tempus Fugit" |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 84634997 United Kingdom 11/22/2022 04:44 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | We now have 8K video, cell phones with 100 megapixels, and still no pics of stars? Quoting: javierruizleon Do you see stars in the daytime? If you set the exposure to show stars, the moon would look like the sun. Stars are pretty faint to a camera, you need more exposure to capture them. With a bright up close scene, exposing both would be difficult without compositing 2 different images together in photoshop. Makes sense but the thing is no images of the opposite are available at all AFAIK, eg images made with longer exposure or faster film showing stars taken from space with a camera. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 84800155 Hong Kong 11/22/2022 04:44 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Mock and discount all you want, but this is mission is a significant milestone for USA efforts towards nuclear fusion. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 84010768 The moon is chock full of H3, which is a rare element that would rocket nuclear fusion to the top of US energy production. The sooner we get back there and establish mining outposts, the sooner we get nuclear fusion. Flat-tards and Fake-tards can fuck off. these round earth tards actually believe we are gonna mine the moon and create free energy there Elon is that you? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79384147 Germany 11/22/2022 04:45 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 84048663 Norway 11/22/2022 04:49 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 37127709 There is something totally wrong with that "photo" lmfao. You tards believe anything Yeah, the Moon is too low contrast... no details much. The Earth looks comparatively smaller, probably because of a wide angle view, don't know. Should be way more detail showing on the Moon though. That one thing sort of stuffs up the whole thing. This is a fake image. Haven't they got any decent photoshop-tards on their team? Earth's image has more details, and the moon is just grey, lol And the spacecraft was designed to carry astronauts but they were all busy as it seems, so it went empty, very convincing and logical. And it will not land on the moon, it will just swoop the moon, it went there to swoop the moon, it is like you go to a trip and you do not get out of the car, you just go there swoop your vacation land and you return. lol. You must not know much about cameras and photography. The camera was focused on earth, so the moon, which is far closer to the camera than what it is focused on, is out of focus. NASA did the same procedure back in the 60's as well, sent an orbiter to orbit our satellite and return BEFORE sending a mission to touch down. I agree it was a waste to not send astronauts but I'm sceptical about the original moon landing being legit. NASA is studying radiation for the duration of this mission, something they SHOULD have done back in the 60's if they really did send men to the moon. I do lean to the 1969 apollo landing being pure propaganda to make the soviets sweat (and boost American morale). But as for the whole "flat-earth-firmament" bullshit... it's just that. Bullshit. I've been up in SOFIA (a joint NASA/DLR project)--- I've seen the curvature of the horizon very distinctly. You doubting tards would be better off trying to figure out what is going on with the TR3B currently than nit-picking at a reconnaissance mission. Considering the fact a flat-earther can't be convinced otherwise by anything short of a one-wat ticket to the moon or elsewhere... I'll leave off with that. ok, tried that with a fake moon and Earth, put the camera in the exact same position, true it is out of focus the fake moon, however, it is not grey. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 84634997 United Kingdom 11/22/2022 04:49 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 84634997 Why is the spaceship which is even closer to the camera not blurred too then smartass? You don't understand photography. The ship is RIGHT THERE at the cam so of course it appears sharp. The moon is hundreds is not thousands of miles off, it comes in blurry. The focal point is exponentially further off, thank digital imaging for this. Sorry if this is beyond your comprehension. You are saying that the camera was focused on a distant object so a nearer object is out of focus but an even nearer object is in focus? Research how digital cameras work. Perhaps you should explain in few words. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 84048663 Norway 11/22/2022 04:53 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | just out of curiosity since they spent so much money for that whatever it is, why did they not keep it simple, put one iphone on each window, take snapshots every x seconds, send them to all to see, why did they post only one image and they act like in x-files, are they morans. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 84048663 Norway 11/22/2022 05:00 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The second question that all should ask is the simple one, if you had billions, like elon musk has and others have, but let us focus on elon musk that he is addicted to space, he has billions, why has he not built a spaceship, not a rocket, a small space ship and just go to the moon and drink coffee, whilst taking snapshots of Earth as he drinks his coffee. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 84048663 Norway 11/22/2022 05:02 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |