THIRD RUSSIAN AIRBASE SET ABLAZE BY DRONE STRIKE AS UKRAINE EXTENDS WAR ACROSS BORDER | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 75162711 United States 12/06/2022 04:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | At the start of this, either Putin was prepared to launch a premptive strike on the US or he never was. It's clear Putin lacks the nerve or means to strike the US hard enough to force them to back down. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 84885692 It's not good choice Biden's handlers are forcing on him. It means Putin will keep stepping back from the US until his system can't politically bear it anymore. Then one of two things will happen. 1. The US is vaporized. 2. Russia retreats and keeps drawing meaningless red lines. Only a simple mind thinks that a preemptive strike is a possibility. The reality is that Putin and probably most of his generals and their families prefer living. Vaporizing the US would result in a fully reciprocal vaporizing of Russia. Russia might have more nukes, the US ones are more likely to work and land where they were aimed. Either way, no winners -- everyone dies in the scenario. If you believe otherwise, you have spent too much time playing video games. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 80082094 Portugal 12/06/2022 04:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 75162711 United States 12/06/2022 04:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | THIRD RUSSIAN AIRBASE SET ABLAZE BY DRONE STRIKE AS Quoting: Blizzard Lizzard You aren't the OP stupid. You deserve to get your teeth kicked out ! Ukraine doesn't have the means or the tech to attack Russia The only people that do are England and the US Laughable. Even Iran can piece together a small drone. Ukraine was some of the most technologically literate portions of Russia. What makes you think this stuff is particularly high-tech. GPS, Servos, and a small jet or engine + propeller. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 80082094 Portugal 12/06/2022 04:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Shoot 100 very low cost drones at a time while Russia fires S-300 to S-500 missile inventory wherein they will run out, cannot build quickly enough nor transport, as well as financially bankrupt their defense budget. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80044884 You certainly are a MSM believer... S-300, 400, 500, are anti-aircraft systems. Just today analysts in Ukraine said that the debris of missiles falling in Kiev show that they were manufactured very recently. So much for "Russia is running out of missiles". You don't know what you are talking about. Neither do most MSM "experts". |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 75162711 United States 12/06/2022 04:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Shoot 100 very low cost drones at a time while Russia fires S-300 to S-500 missile inventory wherein they will run out, cannot build quickly enough nor transport, as well as financially bankrupt their defense budget. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80044884 You certainly are a MSM believer... Yet many here will believe almost any pro-Russian drivel. Simple question -- how is that 3 day special military operation going as we approach day 300? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 84793875 Ireland 12/06/2022 04:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | At the start of this, either Putin was prepared to launch a premptive strike on the US or he never was. It's clear Putin lacks the nerve or means to strike the US hard enough to force them to back down. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 84885692 It's not good choice Biden's handlers are forcing on him. It means Putin will keep stepping back from the US until his system can't politically bear it anymore. Then one of two things will happen. 1. The US is vaporized. 2. Russia retreats and keeps drawing meaningless red lines. Only a simple mind thinks that a preemptive strike is a possibility. The reality is that Putin and probably most of his generals and their families prefer living. Vaporizing the US would result in a fully reciprocal vaporizing of Russia. Russia might have more nukes, the US ones are more likely to work and land where they were aimed. Either way, no winners -- everyone dies in the scenario. If you believe otherwise, you have spent too much time playing video games. You have spent too much time playing videogames. US uses Minuteman 3 and Trident both from 70/80s and designed by companies that do not even exist anymore. Russian has been fielding new ICMBs every year. It is also the only country with the scramjet gliding vehicle operational (Avangard). Also with hypersonic cruise missiles which if used from nuclear attack subs like Akula or Yasen allow a first strike capability. White house hit in 5 minutes. These are facts. BTW here it is my request number 5784354308574 of what NATO weapons are better than the russian equivalent? But I know you wont answers because you need to play your videogame. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 83988712 United Kingdom 12/06/2022 04:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | From what I understand Russia is retaliating and as of now about 70% of Ukrainian is without power? It’s hard to know what’s truly going on over there with the fake media. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 84181707 Ukraine defeats Russia militarily in Kherson - so Russia retaliates by attacking civil infrastructure (electricity grid, district heating etc.) That's how a pussy fights. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 75162711 United States 12/06/2022 04:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Shoot 100 very low cost drones at a time while Russia fires S-300 to S-500 missile inventory wherein they will run out, cannot build quickly enough nor transport, as well as financially bankrupt their defense budget. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80044884 You certainly are a MSM believer... S-300, 400, 500, are anti-aircraft systems. Just today analysts in Ukraine said that the debris of missiles falling in Kiev show that they were manufactured very recently. So much for "Russia is running out of missiles". You don't know what you are talking about. Neither do most MSM "experts". The S-400 is spec'd to intercept cruise missiles at distances of up to 40km. The S-300 was also spec'd to intercept cruise missiles. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 83988712 United Kingdom 12/06/2022 04:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | At the start of this, either Putin was prepared to launch a premptive strike on the US or he never was. It's clear Putin lacks the nerve or means to strike the US hard enough to force them to back down. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 84885692 It's not good choice Biden's handlers are forcing on him. It means Putin will keep stepping back from the US until his system can't politically bear it anymore. Then one of two things will happen. 1. The US is vaporized. 2. Russia retreats and keeps drawing meaningless red lines. Only a simple mind thinks that a preemptive strike is a possibility. The reality is that Putin and probably most of his generals and their families prefer living. Vaporizing the US would result in a fully reciprocal vaporizing of Russia. Russia might have more nukes, the US ones are more likely to work and land where they were aimed. Either way, no winners -- everyone dies in the scenario. If you believe otherwise, you have spent too much time playing video games. You have spent too much time playing videogames. US uses Minuteman 3 and Trident both from 70/80s and designed by companies that do not even exist anymore. Russian has been fielding new ICMBs every year. It is also the only country with the scramjet gliding vehicle operational (Avangard). Also with hypersonic cruise missiles which if used from nuclear attack subs like Akula or Yasen allow a first strike capability. White house hit in 5 minutes. These are facts. BTW here it is my request number 5784354308574 of what NATO weapons are better than the russian equivalent? But I know you wont answers because you need to play your videogame. Trident D5 SLBM designed in the 1980's has superior accuracy than the latest Russian SLBM's. So good in fact that has a true first-strike capability. Trident D5's are regularly test launched by the US Navy and Royal Navy to confirm they still work as advertised. Russia's most numerous tank in use in Ukraine is the T-72B3. It doesn't even have a stabilised Commander's Sight, just a periscope sight with night vision. The commander cannot search for and cue the gunner on targets while the tank is moving because his sight picture is bouncing around. Every major NATO country has got tanks with stabilised Commander's Sights giving true hunter killer capability. M1A2 Abrams, Leopard 2A6 & A7, Leclerc etc are the main tanks in service in NATO armies and totally outclass the T-72B3, & T-80BVM that make up the bulk of Russian tanks. The T-90A is also outclassed, the T-90M might be nearly as good, but is too few in number to matter. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 75162711 United States 12/06/2022 04:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | At the start of this, either Putin was prepared to launch a premptive strike on the US or he never was. It's clear Putin lacks the nerve or means to strike the US hard enough to force them to back down. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 84885692 It's not good choice Biden's handlers are forcing on him. It means Putin will keep stepping back from the US until his system can't politically bear it anymore. Then one of two things will happen. 1. The US is vaporized. 2. Russia retreats and keeps drawing meaningless red lines. Only a simple mind thinks that a preemptive strike is a possibility. The reality is that Putin and probably most of his generals and their families prefer living. Vaporizing the US would result in a fully reciprocal vaporizing of Russia. Russia might have more nukes, the US ones are more likely to work and land where they were aimed. Either way, no winners -- everyone dies in the scenario. If you believe otherwise, you have spent too much time playing video games. You have spent too much time playing videogames. US uses Minuteman 3 and Trident both from 70/80s and designed by companies that do not even exist anymore. Russian has been fielding new ICMBs every year. It is also the only country with the scramjet gliding vehicle operational (Avangard). Also with hypersonic cruise missiles which if used from nuclear attack subs like Akula or Yasen allow a first strike capability. White house hit in 5 minutes. These are facts. BTW here it is my request number 5784354308574 of what NATO weapons are better than the russian equivalent? But I know you wont answers because you need to play your videogame. You have missed the point completely with your nationalistic chest thumping. You offer no explanation of how a preemptive strike could work. As I stated before, the end result is zero winners, only losers. Russia fires missiles, then there is the US return volley. If you can't offer a counter to that statement, then you are playing video games or are caught in the Russian propaganda echo chamber. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 83988712 United Kingdom 12/06/2022 04:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 84793875 Ireland 12/06/2022 04:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | At the start of this, either Putin was prepared to launch a premptive strike on the US or he never was. It's clear Putin lacks the nerve or means to strike the US hard enough to force them to back down. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 84885692 It's not good choice Biden's handlers are forcing on him. It means Putin will keep stepping back from the US until his system can't politically bear it anymore. Then one of two things will happen. 1. The US is vaporized. 2. Russia retreats and keeps drawing meaningless red lines. Only a simple mind thinks that a preemptive strike is a possibility. The reality is that Putin and probably most of his generals and their families prefer living. Vaporizing the US would result in a fully reciprocal vaporizing of Russia. Russia might have more nukes, the US ones are more likely to work and land where they were aimed. Either way, no winners -- everyone dies in the scenario. If you believe otherwise, you have spent too much time playing video games. You have spent too much time playing videogames. US uses Minuteman 3 and Trident both from 70/80s and designed by companies that do not even exist anymore. Russian has been fielding new ICMBs every year. It is also the only country with the scramjet gliding vehicle operational (Avangard). Also with hypersonic cruise missiles which if used from nuclear attack subs like Akula or Yasen allow a first strike capability. White house hit in 5 minutes. These are facts. BTW here it is my request number 5784354308574 of what NATO weapons are better than the russian equivalent? But I know you wont answers because you need to play your videogame. Trident D5 SLBM designed in the 1980's has superior accuracy than the latest Russian SLBM's. So good in fact that has a true first-strike capability. Trident D5's are regularly test launched by the US Navy and Royal Navy to confirm they still work as advertised. Russia's most numerous tank in use in Ukraine is the T-72B3. It doesn't even have a stabilised Commander's Sight, just a periscope sight with night vision. The commander cannot search for and cue the gunner on targets while the tank is moving because his sight picture is bouncing around. Every major NATO country has got tanks with stabilised Commander's Sights giving true hunter killer capability. M1A2 Abrams, Leopard 2A6 & A7, Leclerc etc are the main tanks in service in NATO armies and totally outclass the T-72B3, & T-80BVM that make up the bulk of Russian tanks. The T-90A is also outclassed, the T-90M might be nearly as good, but is too few in number to matter. Latest Russian ballistic missiles have pin point accuracy. You can easily find videos of for example Iskander hitting a specific point and we are talking about nukes so I dont think centimeters really matter here. Besides them being perfect in terms of accuracy there are other specs that you dont even mention. Regarding tanks, thats wrong maybe the earlier versions of t72 but not all of them and in any case you are comparing tanks from the 70s to tanks from the 90s. Do you realize that every single tank technology used today was invented by russia? We can tank about it and you will cry. T90 outclassed? Maybe thats why you can easily find on youtube a abrams being hit with one kornet and is destroyed and one t90 being hit by a TOW and nothing happens. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 84793875 Ireland 12/06/2022 04:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Shoot 100 very low cost drones at a time while Russia fires S-300 to S-500 missile inventory wherein they will run out, cannot build quickly enough nor transport, as well as financially bankrupt their defense budget. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80044884 You certainly are a MSM believer... S-300, 400, 500, are anti-aircraft systems. Just today analysts in Ukraine said that the debris of missiles falling in Kiev show that they were manufactured very recently. So much for "Russia is running out of missiles". You don't know what you are talking about. Neither do most MSM "experts". The S-400 is spec'd to intercept cruise missiles at distances of up to 40km. The S-300 was also spec'd to intercept cruise missiles. S-400 has much more range. Subsonic cruise missiles are probably the easiest target so 40kms does not make sense. Thats probably the range for ballistic targets. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79359978 United States 12/06/2022 04:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | From what I understand Russia is retaliating and as of now about 70% of Ukrainian is without power? It’s hard to know what’s truly going on over there with the fake media. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 84181707 Ukraine defeats Russia militarily in Kherson - so Russia retaliates by attacking civil infrastructure (electricity grid, district heating etc.) That's how a pussy fights. No, the gloves come off when Ukraine starts attacking near Moscow |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 84889142 United States 12/06/2022 04:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 72046591 United States 12/06/2022 04:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 84793875 Ireland 12/06/2022 04:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | At the start of this, either Putin was prepared to launch a premptive strike on the US or he never was. It's clear Putin lacks the nerve or means to strike the US hard enough to force them to back down. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 84885692 It's not good choice Biden's handlers are forcing on him. It means Putin will keep stepping back from the US until his system can't politically bear it anymore. Then one of two things will happen. 1. The US is vaporized. 2. Russia retreats and keeps drawing meaningless red lines. Only a simple mind thinks that a preemptive strike is a possibility. The reality is that Putin and probably most of his generals and their families prefer living. Vaporizing the US would result in a fully reciprocal vaporizing of Russia. Russia might have more nukes, the US ones are more likely to work and land where they were aimed. Either way, no winners -- everyone dies in the scenario. If you believe otherwise, you have spent too much time playing video games. You have spent too much time playing videogames. US uses Minuteman 3 and Trident both from 70/80s and designed by companies that do not even exist anymore. Russian has been fielding new ICMBs every year. It is also the only country with the scramjet gliding vehicle operational (Avangard). Also with hypersonic cruise missiles which if used from nuclear attack subs like Akula or Yasen allow a first strike capability. White house hit in 5 minutes. These are facts. BTW here it is my request number 5784354308574 of what NATO weapons are better than the russian equivalent? But I know you wont answers because you need to play your videogame. You have missed the point completely with your nationalistic chest thumping. You offer no explanation of how a preemptive strike could work. As I stated before, the end result is zero winners, only losers. Russia fires missiles, then there is the US return volley. If you can't offer a counter to that statement, then you are playing video games or are caught in the Russian propaganda echo chamber. I just mention pure facts...pure logic. The result of nuclear war would be bad for both sides but we here in Europe and US would be more affected because their nuclear weapons are far superior and they have more bunkers etc for the average joe. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 84793875 Ireland 12/06/2022 04:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | People do not understand anything. You keep joking about the 3 days and nuke threats but as things are going this is going to happen 100% and then you will cry if you dont die first. Russia is not backing down...they wont allow Ukraine to have nato bases etc. Most likely Russia will do a nuclear attack on Europe...and it is going to be unexpected. What are you going to say then? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 84793875 Ireland 12/06/2022 04:53 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 84876374 Belarus 12/06/2022 04:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 84876374 Belarus 12/06/2022 04:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | People do not understand anything. You keep joking about the 3 days and nuke threats but as things are going this is going to happen 100% and then you will cry if you dont die first. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 84793875 Russia is not backing down...they wont allow Ukraine to have nato bases etc. Most likely Russia will do a nuclear attack on Europe...and it is going to be unexpected. What are you going to say then? Russia will not do an preemptive attack. Have you forgotten, it was the US that dropped 2 nuclear bonbs on Japan?? Official word was they were saving American soldiers lives if Japan hadvto be invaded. Yeah, ok !! . |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77771422 Canada 12/06/2022 05:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 84041089 United States 12/06/2022 05:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 84793875 Ireland 12/06/2022 05:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 80912946 Ukraine 12/06/2022 05:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | From what I understand Russia is retaliating and as of now about 70% of Ukrainian is without power? It’s hard to know what’s truly going on over there with the fake media. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 84181707 Ukraine defeats Russia militarily in Kherson - so Russia retaliates by attacking civil infrastructure (electricity grid, district heating etc.) That's how a pussy fights. The Whole idea of War is to kill the Enemy until he surrenders unconditionally. is that my fault? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 80082094 Portugal 12/06/2022 05:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | From what I understand Russia is retaliating and as of now about 70% of Ukrainian is without power? It’s hard to know what’s truly going on over there with the fake media. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 84181707 Ukraine defeats Russia militarily in Kherson - so Russia retaliates by attacking civil infrastructure (electricity grid, district heating etc.) That's how a pussy fights. Foolish! They didn't defeat Russia, the Russians withdrew from the city. Believe what you want. You will soon see what happens. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 24373886 United States 12/06/2022 05:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous User ID: 84889630 12/06/2022 05:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 24373886 United States 12/06/2022 05:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | From what I understand Russia is retaliating and as of now about 70% of Ukrainian is without power? It’s hard to know what’s truly going on over there with the fake media. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 84181707 Ukraine defeats Russia militarily in Kherson - so Russia retaliates by attacking civil infrastructure (electricity grid, district heating etc.) That's how a pussy fights. Foolish! They didn't defeat Russia, the Russians withdrew from the city. Believe what you want. You will soon see what happens. Are any of the Ukrainian forces advancing after 100k minim military deaths? Ask an American merc: |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 84705849 United States 12/06/2022 05:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The Russian government and military are a joke! Pure idiots who are cowering before the USA and it’s total domination of the planet earth! Russia is doomed to oblivion as they are nothing but full of hot air and bluffing fools! A joke on history…Russian historical figures are rolling in their graves spitting in the face of Putin! |