Now they come for the Land: 30% of the Land and Oceans to be declared "protected areas" under 30x30 plan

yes indeed...the solutions are not addressing the ultimate core problem.
They remind me of wildland fire fighters who are just doing what they can to slow the progress of the fire.

The real problem is our resource/population ratio...and the writing appears to be on the wall about what "their" solution to that one is.


Wind in my hair...

Seems to me they made it pretty clear even 20 years ago

"
From the December 2009 Idaho Observer:

Explanation of the Biodiversity Treaty and the Wildlands Project
by Dr. Michael Coffman
As residents of the state of Idaho, we are particularly concerned with the red areas on the below map since our homes lie there and our Congressman Walt Minnick (D-ID) has set up a “Panhandle Collaborative” with local county commissioners and a myriad of environmental groups in order to devise a forest management plan that would eliminate human use of over two million acres of national forest land in North Idaho and Montana. Local Commissioner Cornel Rasor stated that our county seat is a member of ICLEI and “sustainable development” is on the move into North Idaho.

Magnitude of the Wildlands Project

“Conservation must be practiced on a truly grand scale,” claims Noss. And grand it is. In the article “The Wildlands Project Land Conservation Strategy” in the 1992 special issue of Wild Earth, Noss provides the whopping dimensions of this effort:
Core reserves are wilderness areas that supposedly allow biodiversity to flourish.

“It is estimated,” claims Noss, “that large carnivores and ungulates require reserves on the scale of 2.5 to 25 million acres .... For a minimum viable population of 1000 [large mammals], the figures would be 242 million acres for grizzly bears, 200 million acres for wolverines, and 100 million arces for wolves. Core reserves should be managed as roadless areas (wilderness). All roads should be permanently closed.”

Corridors, he writes, are “extensions of reserves....Multiple corridors interconnecting a network of core reserves provide functional redundancy and mitigate against disturbance.... Corridors several miles wide are needed if the objective is to maintain resident populations of large carnivores.”

Buffer zones should have two or more zones “so that a gradation of use intensity exists from the core reserve to the developed landscape. Inner zones should have low road density (no more than 0.5 mile/square mile) and low-intensity use such as hiking, cross-country skiing, birding, primitive camping, wilderness hunting and fishing, and low-intensity silviculture (light selective cutting). Outer zones may have higher road densities (but still no more than 1 mile/ square mile)...and heavier recreational use (but no off-road vehicles) and campgrounds. New forestry silviculture (e.g., partial retention harvests), selection forestry, or other forestry experiments” would be permitted. More intensive harvesting would not be allowed.

What do Reserves and Corridors really mean?
While this effort has a noble mission, the implications are staggering. As noted in the June 25, 1993 issue of Science, it “is nothing less than the transformation of America to an archipelago of human-inhabited islands surrounded by natural areas.”

The 100 million acres of core area required for 1000 wolves is greater than the total land area of Maine, New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Rhode Island and Connecticut, (71 million acres). It would mean the nationalization of private land through regulation or other means, forcing people to move to areas zoned for occupation, and shutting down half of the agriculture, forest products and mining industries. Scarce resources means the rest of us paying double and triple for products made from these resources."

How do we fight against it? By being righteous individuals under Christ. The Book has the instructions, but you have to read it for yourself; don’t let anyone else try to explain it.

Understand, however, that at the end of things, evil HAS to be given full reign and reach fulsomeness, in order for it to be not only harvested and burned, but to prove from a legal standpoint that is forever unworkable, and thus never to be allowed to flower again.

i agree...i'm just suggesting that in the end, should they succeed, the human "island population" will be far less than even these first maps suggest.

I would be ok with this if it would remove all the buildings a half mile from coast. Shoulda never let that be personal property to begin with.

People giving up. System is rigged, no point in talking about our demise.

If the Covid vaxxes are indeed slowly killing people off, then by 2030 the US will have less than 1/3 of its current population. Even with any purported Wildlands project, there will be a lot more room in the country.

precisely.

one has to look at all of the aspects in order to grog what is really happening.

throw in the digital money system and the wrecking of the fossil fuel industry, you'll wind up with smart cities and 100% compliance....in a worst case scenario.

the onslaught of indoctrination in education over the past 3 decades is the issue that strikes me as the most formidable to reverse, as most of it is laced with super positive ideology, while the devil is in the details.

that is why they are fracking it now. all the public lands. in preparation for more fracking later. frackzilla. the vader

Very well-stated.

I don’t think that a worst-case scenario will unfold; however, they would be very happy to get even halfway to their goals.

Remember the symbol of the Fabian Society - the turtle - and it’s motto: “Make Haste Slowly”.

their plan already failed and AI is on the self destruct trajectory. we are witnessing its messy demise. that's all. cheers mate. teh vader

I am guessing the annual Hunger Games will follow suite...

I don't either. I can't even speculate on an outcome, as there are many things that could happen, IMO.

Things are going to change, that's certain


"Make Haste Slowly"....this is what I think the vax is really about..., sterilization.
It would be the most "humane" way to reduce the population and it would take a couple of decades.

It seems we have ridden technology into a deadly cul de sac, yet we are relying on that same vehicle to move us beyond the problem.

It strikes me as a foolish notion.

I still believe there is a wildcard at play.

Your right OP, this is a very important post. If I suspend my judgements for a moment I have to admit they are right. We do need to learn how to co-exit with nature. It's kind of obvious that the earth is being exploited by man or am I suppose to say "persons" now. We do seem to take and take and never give back. Its true I have to admit that. I moved out from the city to a quieter slower area and 20 years later the place has become another city with more and more people which causes more and more laws to manage those people. Crimes are up now and nature is being destroyed.

It seems as an area grows in population socialism seems to naturally take root as a way to manage that population. I've noticed how densely populated areas seem to be more blue and the more spread out the population is seems to be more red.

The problem is how to solve it. I have worked hard on my property and invested a lot of my time and money to make my property what it is. It is where I feel safest in this world. I'm willing to make changes on my property to help nature but need to be educated on how to do that. Is someone just going to throw me off of it and say that I have no rights to live out my life on it? I'm not worthy of natures presence? I've followed all their laws and helped more people then have helped me. Is someone just going to force me into a stacked Tesla room in a giant city and control what I eat, how I live, and force injections into my body when they decide? I'm not willing to live that way. So now I get to live out my golden years and as I become more vulnerable, I'm saddened to realize that my greatest predator is not "the tiger in the bush", but man.

So what.

I don't think you understand how they go about it.

My family has been in SA for 350 years, and they took it all, first the British, and then the government they handed it over to.

First they turn you into the enemy, discriminate against you, then declare open season on you as a domestic terrorist/enemy of their state.

It happens overnight, here today, gone tomorrow.

Good luck with all that.

Can't find any map in this monstrosity

scroll up, someone was nice enough to embed it

...and the remaining 9.8% will be forced to live in their cities...the .2% of elites will still be living in the Hamptons, Bratenahl,... etc.

LMFAO! Help the sky is falling….. over 30% of the land in the ISA is already held by state and federal government. Do some damned research lazy asses!

Biden signs treaties that he can't sign and they seem to think
it is normal for a president to sign a treaty, only the senate can sign and they can't if it is outside the laws of our constitution and this is against our constitution. The president cannot sign a legal treaty if he signs one that is null and void, the UN is not part of our government nor do we listen to what they say. Someone joined the UN but we have no treaty with the UN, it is even illegal in our country by the constitution. Nothing Biden has signed about agreements which is a treaty if signed or anything else if it does not match or constitution maybe some people need to study up some on the laws of our country then you can scream.

The Supreme court is there for this very reason, people trying to grab more power than is in their rights to do.

This idea is already in the US wetlands guidance. I won't take the time to dig up the link, maybe it's under US Fish and Wildlife service. It's a small paragraph but it's there.

This means that if you are a landowner, they are coming for YOU. I've already seen them trying to convert a drainage ditch in my area, which is naturally a bit wetter than the surrounding area after heavy rains, into wetland. If they can get certain plants to grow there, even in a small area (5x5 feet? I don't recall exactly) they can designate it. It's a surprise to you, and then it's done, almost impossible to reverse.

New York Fern is one of those plants, and it doesn't require a true wetland for it to grow. But if they find a concentration of it, they're allowed to designate the area. And then you would lose the use of your land for maybe 100 feet around the designated area. One little bit of wetland designation can interrupt your enjoyment of a large part of your property. That's part of why they love the idea.

Keep up with your property. I've even seen them surreptitiously planting wetland plants in the early morning. So patrol your property esp. around the boundaries where they can enter without trespassing, and clean up any potential problems.

Shifting and drifting.

I would wager that this has much less to do with climate and wildlife and much more to do with creating special regions of the world for the parasitic elite. Think Bohemian Grove and Epstein island, but on a much greater scale.

I care!

I care about sex!

Yeah. Hard to navigate.

But this 2030 Vision Plan is part of the OPEC/Saudi plan. They are building "line" cities that don't impact the environment... and look like human processing places. That hold over 1 MILLION each. No cars, no pollution, no impact on the environment. Yeah right.

It is the Secret Treaty of Verona on steroids.

Everybody should be on this shit, these rich globalists are evil to the core!!! This is our true threat!!!