|
REPORT COPYRIGHT VIOLATION IN REPLY
|
|
Message Subject
|
Idaho 4 Murders!!!!Bryan Kohberger arrested!!Waived right to speedy trial!
|
|
Poster Handle
|
Proud2bUntested_Unvaxxed |
|
Post Content
|
...
We won’t know what they have until the trial, we’ve only been given a very small inkling, I hope lol or your right, there is not enough
Quoting: ~kpm~ Unfortunately, imo it is not just a small inkling, it is what they have. If they had something better they would not use an unidentified white car and pings that totally contradict other pings where he was pinging but not in the area, they spent alot of time focusing on the unidentified white sedan where the driver is unidentified and the unidentified white sedan was never at the house, it drove by it. Honestly I can't believe a judge approved any of this. A PCA is to just show enough information “Probable Cause” It’s not to try the case and give all your evidence You know, I hear alot of people saying that but it is completely wrong. There is supposed to be enough evidence to convince a judge to take away your freedoms. This is exactly what is presented to the judge. The next hearing is regarding the probable cause affidavit, if it is lacking or misinformation on it then guess what, he walks. By time the arrest is made they should have substantial evidence that proves thus person did it, again your taking away someone's freedoms on a pca based on hearsay...This will be impossible to move forward to trial. Again no law enforcement is going to withhold anything provable, they will included it 100 percent for this reason. Agreed 100%, this document was used to imprison someone, and without possibility of bail on top of that, on frankly less than circumstantial evidence, well no let's say evidence that was made to look important but that really is not when you start understanding said evidence. As I've said plenty of times, this PCA should have never been signed off on, and the officers should have been told to get more to get a charge. The touch DNA in the PCA did manage to sway the court of public opinion, and I guess the person who signed off on the PCA, but when you understand how easily DNA can be transferred it becomes a less than circumstantial piece of evidence (added to the fact that that is the only piece of potential DNA found, which seems highly unlikely). I mean maybe he is guilty, and incompetence may allow him to walk, or maybe he is innocent and incompetence has locked up an innocent person, but in all cases there's incompetence.
|
|
|
Please verify you're human:
|
|
|
Reason for copyright violation:
|
