...
Or could be used against him...works both ways.
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79948074 Uggg that's very true as well.
The prosecution can use it against their claim if they go the drug route, why wouldn’t they point that out?
Each side has ammo since she decided to take BCK’s case while actively repping CK, why not just let one of the 13 other DP qualified lawyers take on BCK?
This case is so full of holes, ME is an attorney, AT reps mother of the child allegedly killed by BCK
What a mess
Well first you have to prove drugs were even involved. K family has already been on tv saying they weren't on drugs. So the drug aspect is irrelevant at this point as le said they could not find any connection between bk and the 4 also.
And no, a public defender is a public defender, she could still represent c kernodle if she wanted right now. They literally don't sit down with you and ask you everyone you know is and check to see if they ever represented them before being assigned to your case because it is irrelevant. You have to remember bk is not guilty, now if he were found guilty that would be different in any new case after he has been found guilty. I seriously don't see your point, If you are saying it would benefit bk, how?
I’m not saying it just benefits him at all, unless they go the route of drug trafficking, like you said it can go both ways, prosecution could use it too
He can say he did and bought drugs from the house and that’s why he was in the area all the time
It’s all over the internet that this was a huge drug house, he has fans building a case for him, who knows what they will use but right now, they have people believing BCK was set up, it was a drug house, parents did drugs, etc.
They, the defense, don’t have to prove anything, they just have to instill doubt
Now say they use the drug angle, the parents are called to the stand to say their kids didn’t sell drugs and nor do they but CK can’t say that and AT has intimate knowledge of her cases and what she did, she will have to question CK about what X may have been involved in, if she gave X drugs to sell, etc. instill doubt
AT owes a duty of confidentiality to both CK and BCK so how does she set aside all she knows about CK in order to rep BCK if they use that defense?
If it goes to DP phase, AT will certainly speak to all the parents about their position on it, how is it not adverse to have one of your former clients say they want the DP against your current client?
Time will tell, if I were the prosecution, I would want her recused based on potential conflict of interest and what DM may have told the cops about what was going on for that 8 hours
