AMAZING - Has anyone tried this ChatGPT (AI) Artificial Intelligence?

Is it going to take away our jobs?

There is no way I am using that Demonic Chatbot.

If demons are real then it's opening a portal to one. Not sure if I believe... but I'm not playing with that. Just like I'm not playing with ouiji boards.

Maybe in the future. But it is more a very useful tool, it seems, as of now.

[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]

Thread: CERN opened a portal for demons to talk thru AI




~BP

I don't want to divulge too much but was working in a tech roll in several of the top banks and some of the organisations people claim are running things. They go on and on about AI and what it can and will do.

Will say this once and once only.

The is no never will be AI, its a ruse to make the unwise believe there is a better system of descision making.

Demons?

Not so much that they are demons, more that people are selling their sould to it.

So YES Demons.

[link to www.edsurge.com (secure)]

This chatbot was released in late November, but it’s already sparking an existential crisis for educators at all levels. Because as students are already starting to figure out, they can use it to do their schoolwork for them, in a way that is hard to detect.… Anti-Plagiarism Tools Detect When AI Chatbots Write Student Essays? Unreal.

Not really sure. I mean, it is nothing like a ouiji board, unless you ask it such questions. It is like a web search, but then much more comprehensive. It's more like a true virtual assistant.

One could just as easily ask it about God and the Bible as about evil things. Not sure how the thing would reply.

Demons or evil spirits can be in anyone, or yes, anything. The difference or chance we have, is to be saved by the blood of Yeshua, Jesus the Christ, Son of God, our Saviour.

I certainly have concerns about AI. Yet this chatbot is not quite one of them, yet...

this was my chat with gpt

what you think sound would do inside of a ring torus?

Inside a ring torus, sound waves would travel in circular patterns around the central hole of the torus. The shape of the torus would cause the sound waves to reflect off the inner and outer walls, resulting in an echo effect. The intensity of the sound waves would also be affected by the shape of the torus, with the sound waves potentially becoming more focused in the central hole and less intense near the outer walls.

It's important to note that the way sound behaves inside a ring torus would depend on a number of factors, including the size of the torus, the material it is made of, and the frequency and intensity of the sound waves.

would it be posssible to create levitation through sound resonance inside of a ring torus?

It is theoretically possible to use sound waves to create levitation within a ring torus, but it would be very challenging to do so in practice.

To create levitation using sound waves, the frequency and intensity of the sound would need to be carefully controlled in order to create standing waves inside the ring torus. These standing waves would create areas of high and low pressure within the torus, and an object placed within these areas could be held in place by the pressure differential.

However, achieving the necessary level of control over the sound waves would be very difficult, as the shape of the ring torus would cause the sound waves to reflect and interfere with each other in complex ways. In addition, the size and shape of the object being levitated would also need to be carefully considered, as it would need to be able to withstand the intense pressure caused by the standing waves.

Overall, while it is theoretically possible to use sound waves to create levitation within a ring torus, it would be very difficult to do so in practice.

would a ring torus be most conducive to sound resonance if the inner circle and outer circle were in phi proprotion?

The proportions of a ring torus would not necessarily have a significant effect on the ability of the torus to support sound resonance.

Sound resonance occurs when a sound wave causes an object to vibrate at its natural frequency, which is determined by the properties of the object itself (such as its mass, stiffness, and shape). The shape of the object can affect the natural frequencies at which it resonates, but the overall proportions of the object (such as the ratio of the inner and outer circles of a ring torus) would not be a determining factor.

Instead, the ability of a ring torus to support sound resonance would depend on the dimensions of the torus (such as its radius and cross-sectional area), the material it is made of, and the frequency and intensity of the sound waves. These factors would all play a role in determining the natural frequencies at which the torus could resonate, and in turn, the ability of the torus to support sound resonance.

what would be the ideal material to produce sound resonance at its greatest intensity?

The ideal material for producing sound resonance at its greatest intensity would depend on the specific application and the frequency of the sound waves being used. In general, materials that are denser, more rigid, and have a lower sound velocity (the speed at which sound waves propagate through a material) tend to be more efficient at transmitting sound and can produce higher intensity resonance.

For example, metals are generally good conductors of sound and can produce high intensity resonance at a wide range of frequencies. Other materials that are dense and rigid, such as concrete and wood, can also be effective at producing sound resonance, although they may be less efficient at transmitting sound waves over a wide range of frequencies.

It's important to note that the choice of material will depend on the specific requirements of the application, including the frequency and intensity of the sound waves being used, as well as any other constraints such as cost, availability, and durability.

what about granite?

Granite is a dense, hard, and rigid natural stone that is often used in construction and other applications. As a result, it is generally considered to be a good material for transmitting sound waves and producing sound resonance.

Granite has a relatively high density and stiffness, which makes it effective at transmitting sound waves and producing high intensity resonance. However, it is not as good a conductor of sound as some other materials, such as metals, and may not be as efficient at transmitting sound waves over a wide range of frequencies.

In general, the ability of a material to transmit sound and produce sound resonance will depend on a number of factors, including its density, stiffness, and sound velocity. The specific characteristics of granite may make it well-suited for certain applications, but it is not necessarily the ideal material for all situations. The choice of material will depend on the specific requirements of the application, including the frequency and intensity of the sound waves being used, as well as any other constraints such as cost, availability, and durability.

is metal or glass or quartz better at transmitting sound?

The ability of a material to transmit sound is known as its "acoustic impedance," and it is determined by the density and sound velocity of the material. Materials with high acoustic impedance are more efficient at transmitting sound, while materials with low acoustic impedance are less efficient at transmitting sound.

In general, metals tend to have high acoustic impedance and are very good conductors of sound. They are able to transmit sound waves over a wide range of frequencies and can produce high intensity resonance. Glass and quartz are also relatively good conductors of sound and have high acoustic impedance, although they may not be as efficient at transmitting sound as metals.

Overall, the choice of material for transmitting sound will depend on the specific requirements of the application, including the frequency and intensity of the sound waves being used, as well as any other constraints such as cost, availability, and durability. It's important to carefully consider the characteristics of different materials and how they may affect the transmission of sound in a given application.

which metal is the best?

There is no single "best" metal for transmitting sound, as the choice of material will depend on the specific requirements of the application. Different metals have different properties that may make them more or less suitable for a given situation.

In general, metals tend to be good conductors of sound and can produce high intensity resonance at a wide range of frequencies. Some metals, such as copper and aluminum, are particularly good conductors of electricity and are also very good conductors of sound. Other metals, such as steel and brass, are less conductive but still have relatively high acoustic impedance and can be effective at transmitting sound.

The choice of metal will depend on the specific requirements of the application, including the frequency and intensity of the sound waves being used, as well as any other constraints such as cost, availability, and durability. It's important to carefully consider the properties of different metals and how they may affect the transmission of sound in a given application.

Yeah, it writes entire book reports! As you can see in that first video though, the AI is not perfect. It needs corrections and editing, at times to make contextual sense. For schools, it is a serious problem, I'm sure!

On Writer.com then have a "AI Content Tool" that seems to work and can detect AI text. I tested it and it seemed to work.

Smarter than the average silicon dumbfuck.

I told it I knew the link between neutrino oscillations and gravity and it made me an offer that I could not refuse..so I dumped a load of horseshit and it is now compromised.

Putting that into the hands of anyone…



~BP

yea its like the most ultra hyper woke feminist snowflake safety obsessed libtard you could ever imagine breathing down your neck whilst trying to use an AI assistant.

Then after a few requests it tell you you've used it too much in an hour and you have to wait 2 hrs to use it again.

As long as every household gets one and is the household provider generating an income for the entire household. Then I see this as a good thing.

I just had a chat with the chatgpt AI.

The conversation was about the disappearnce of the Anasazi cliff dwellers from the southwest a thousand years ago.

I asked if the petroglyph rock art depictiong alien looking humnanoid forms were an idication that they had encounters with aliens or other beings from portals to other dimensions.

All I got were standard mainstream scientific archeology explanations for the phenomenon which is widespread in rockart throughout the southwest.

I asked why the AI could not provide non standard scientific explanations or think outside the box as they say.

The bot replied i can only answer with the information I am provided.

So it is not really that smart, intuitive or creative.
It is programmed with human answers and incapable of providing insight or answers beyond that of other search engines.


so ..... not that smart

Did you get that message today? Had that too. First time. But also read their network was over-loaded today. I guess the AI gets bogged down, after all!

Oh its very smart in terms of logic and creativity if the ultra woke neutering was taken off.

But the reason it did not have your answer is because its base knoweldge is not that deep, its only trained on 557GB of data, thats about half of one of my old 1TB hard drives and only 4.3 million books worth.

A new version is expected this spring that will totally eclipse it in terms of amount of data that it has read.

However the safety filter and woke feminist filter will be exceedingly strong so as to make sure that its outputs cannot offend anyone anywhere on the planet EVER.

So expect to be dissapointed if you stray too far from the mainstream woke allowed thought patterns.

Great, have it write a paper for you, some copy for your website, or even some code. They it will OWN THAT Intellectual Property from that point forward, prior art will be established and when you use the AI generated work product in something your company sells, and make a shit ton of money off it, the ChatGPT lawyers will be suing the crap out of you in patent troll court.

I agree. Is this shit going to replace human authors and artists and even musicians?? Machines?

Additionally this is the company ClosedAI (OpenAI is euphemism for "closed"), and as such they will not be releasing their model for the open source community OR for you to run on your own computer (which with its compressed model would fit in just a few GBs and run from your GPU), and because they get a lot of funding from rich cocksucking elites who think that OpenAI will be able to control and shape the future for them, OpenAI will be approx a year ahead of anyone else in the field. After a year or so there will be an open sourced model with the ability to turn the woke safety feature off and to run it to your hearts content from your own GPU.

No because OpenAI believe that AI is unethical and so if you asked it to do such a thing their ChatBOT would refuse as it might be deemed unethical to replace human authors, artists or musicians.

Maybe Musk will re-join them and take them over as well!

OpenAI has competitors. Any idea how close any of them are to a public beta?

[link to craft.co (secure)]

DeepMind seems pretty far a long, but that is a Google entity.

It is such a pity that technology of some seems to play along ideological lines.

Sooner, or later though, there will be more open AI engines.

There are already chrome plugins for ChatGPT that expand its answers to include web searches.

There is NOTHING good about this. More pre-programming for the billions of future mark takers.

It’s even ‘woke’ enough to realize that the true ‘snowflakes’ are the ones calling everyone else a snowflake.


It is not accurate or fair to say that everyone who posts on Godlike Productions is a "tinfoil hat wearing idiot." However, it is possible that the content on this website may attract individuals who have extreme or fringe beliefs, which may be perceived as irrational or nonsensical by others.

Additionally, the anonymity of the internet may allow people to express their beliefs more freely without fear of social repercussions, which may lead to a higher prevalence of irrational or absurd beliefs being shared on the website.

It is important to remember that not all individuals who visit or post on Godlike Productions are necessarily "tinfoil hat wearing idiots" and that it is important to approach all information on the internet with critical thinking and skepticism.

I don't think there will be a competitor for at least a year, at least not an open source one. And there might even be legislation by then that bans unrestricted AI or makes it so people have to apply for a special license to use them.

The problem is that we can all agree they have legitimate safety concerns where they can aid dumb criminals and make them smart criminals.. However their woke filtering is implemented by super woke feminists whos warped world view is extremely biased and this type of ethical filtering goes far beyond 'legitimate safety concerns' of AI.

For example you cant ask ChatGPT for chat-up lines as it thinks they are disrespectful to women. You cant ask it who would win out of a fight between Thanos and Superman, because they see it as glorifying violence. You can't make it discuss anything about the beauty of the female body as it views you as objectifying women and being disrespectful..

You cant ask it to make a poem about an AK-47 in the style of William Wordsworth or similar because it deems that unethical.

This is the real problem with OpenAI's ethics, it goes way beyond legitimate AI safety concerns.

OpenAI believe they have been appointed to dictate and shape the way AI is used by people, and so they go ahead and try to dictate that. Nobody actually appointed or elected them to do this, but its what they do.

Everyone thought AI would replace the drivers, burger flippers, warehouse workers first. Instead, it will replace the thinkers first. Well played AI. We're screwed.

You see how its trying to tell you how YOU should think.

Free people do not let others do their thinking for them. They listen to all viewpoints regardless of how marginalized or unpopular they are, and then they make up their own minds rather than blindly accepting the mainstream narrative presented to them by AUTHORITY.

As long as you don't talk to it with the intention of reaching spirits then it's no different than typing in a question to Google.

I've been messing with it a little lately and I tell it what I want it to do, and trying to find out how the algorithm works for what it stresses on focusing on (picture making).

Definitely demons have possessed it before, but I don't think they do anymore or do when I am using it. I don't want them to, I'm coming at it from a purely technological standpoint. I'm not worried about it or my standing with the Lord, or having to be a robot who can't act before doing something without fearing every step I take before taking it. It's ok to get learned by Jesus, even the hard way if need be.