Paul is a false apostle

Good grief, not again.

The Bible is not God speaking in the first person.

Is that what you think it is?

Inspired, yes.

Context yes.

There's your point of confusion. Scripture has lots of lies in
it told by men, because scripture is truth, and the truth is men lie.

That's why it's called the word OF God and not the word BY God.

Why do you feel the need to deceive?

John Chapter 8 has the answer.

Jesus refused to preach where the "Israelis" were, because they were trying to kill him.

So much for everything you just said lol.

They also say the sun rises in the morning, what's your point?

[link to ripensaresanpaolo.wordpress.com (secure)]

^ one of literally dozens of web pages found within minutes that prove you wrong

Whatever.

Paul preaches Jesus Christ.

You are against Jesus Christ.

PAUL COULD VERY WELL HAVE BEEN UH HERETIC.

ALSO, HE TRAVELED TO CYPRUS AND HAD A BATTLE WITH A WORLOCK.

I THINK IT IS AT LEAST POSSIBLE THAT PAUL DID NOT COME BACK

FROM CYPRUS..THE WORLOCK DID. IT'S A LONG SHOT BUT, FEASIBLE.

Well, he died a martyr so does that change your mind?

It’s not the man but the massage the demons hate. Paul was an apostle, approved by Peter and chosen by Jesus Christ.
Anyone who hate Paul, hates Jesus, The one who chose him and made him the most prolific biblical writer on record.

If you think the scriptures are deception, put down the crack pipe boy.

Well you certainly got a healthy dose of garbage thinking from the church. If you actually understood the context of the OT you would understand that there is a major flaw in your thinking. There is no Israel/church divide. We are all under the same program.

Isaiah 56:6-7

6 Also the sons of the stranger, that join themselves to the Lord, to serve him, and to love the name of the Lord, to be his servants, every one that keepeth the sabbath from polluting it, and taketh hold of my covenant;

7 Even them will I bring to my holy mountain, and make them joyful in my house of prayer: their burnt offerings and their sacrifices shall be accepted upon mine altar; for mine house shall be called an house of prayer for all people.


No one can know what race they are, now especially but even back during the OT. The gospel of Christ was for all men.

Yes he did choose him. What's with the lies?

Peter doesn't agree for starters. What is your real agenda?

Are you a dual citizen?

I don't hate you .

But your very wrong about the satanic rapture doctrines

Paul is false. Hallelujah

Easy to understand. The two are the same/

2 Peter 3: 15. And account that the longsuffering of our Lord is salvation; even as our beloved brother Paul also according to the wisdom given unto him hath written unto you; 16. As also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things; in which are some things hard to be understood, which they that are unlearned and unstable wrest, as they do also the other scriptures, unto their own destruction. 17. Ye therefore, beloved, seeing ye know these things before, beware lest ye also, being led away with the error of the wicked, fall from your own stedfastness. 18. But grow in grace, and in the knowledge of our Lord and Saviour YAHshua Christ. To him be glory both now and for ever. Amen. - Bible Offline

The Favorite classic argument always proposed against apostle Paul is the revelation passage regarding Ephesus and the false apostles, plural.

Now we are told that they will twist and distort scripture unto their own destruction - all scripture including Paul’s letters.

They twist and distort PLURAL false apostles to read only one person, the apostle Paul.

If they are willing and able to twist one plural word into a singular word there is truly no end to what they won’t twist and distort of scripture

True.

Lord expose their agenda world wide. So that Your sheep be not decieved further Amen YAHshua

So here is th problem with Paul, as I see it.

First of all, yes Paul preached Christ, and I will even allow that
he had good intentions. However, Paul also preached Paul.

Paul became a pillar of Peters church (simon peter the sorcerer who
tried to sell salvation with Phillip, Bible calls it LICENTIOUS GRACE
the church called it indulgences., and let's not forget that Christ
called Peter satan) so in essence Paul helped to create the
substitute for Christ.

THe "vicar" (substitue) of Christ evolved to the most elevated,
most holy an in the minds of many, actually supernatural and somehow
qualified to dictate the mind of God.

Paul even contradicts himself when writing to Timothy, stating
plainly that there is one mediator between God and man, Jesus Christ.

Granted, Paul said a lot of accurate, likely inspred things.

However, also wrote his own little book of rules for "Christians" to follow.

He got carried away with himself, and in my opinion consequently
created misleading doctrine.

Another hallmark of the “Jesus words only” cult is that they preach that anomia doesn’t really mean lawlessness but rather “a negatiion of the law of Moses”

That right there is the heart of what they believe - that one must practice the law of Moses in order to be saved.

Here is what this “Jesus’ words only” crowd believe:

“ Because if we accept Jesus as the sole prophetic authority in the New Testament, we have a dilemma. Paul had many novel and unusual lessons of what the gospel represents. If Paul is no longer on par with Jesus, then Pauline salvation doctrine would lose its grip and legitimacy. A different salvation doc-
trine would emerge. If we only had Jesus, then Jesus’ message on initial justification by repentance from sin would emerge unmolested. Jesus’ message had sole emphasis, salvation would be a pro- cess that requires ongoing repentance from sin to stay justi- fied with God and be saved. (1 John 1:9; John 15:1-6.) We would no longer have the freedom to sin without losing salvation, contrary to what Paul is viewed to teach. “
“ Instead, if we relied upon Jesus’ words without any constraint to make them fit Paul’s doctrines, we would have to trust Jesus’ promise of salvation for endurance and obedi- ence in keeping His words. ”

In essence when they get rid of the apostle Paul they are left with the following doctrine of salvation:
“salvation would be a process that requires ongoing repentance from sin to stay justified with God and be saved.”
“That salvation is lost upon sinning and requires another round of repentance”
“We must endure and obey in keeping his words”
“And that keeping his words means keeping the law of Moses, the breaking of which constitutes sin”

So they are the crowd that demands one cannot be saved apart from obedience to the law of Moses.

They reject the heart of the gospel - the GOOD NEWS - and that being

Romans 5:
17For if, by the trespass of the one man, death reigned through that one man, how much more will those who receive an abundance of grace and of the gift of righteousness reign in life through the one man, Jesus Christ!

18So then, just as one trespass brought condemnation for all men, so also one act of righteousness brought justification and life for all men. 19For just as through the disobedience of the one man the many were made sinners, so also through the obedience of the one man the many will be made righteous.

One act of righteousness BY ONE MAN brought justification and life for all men. Through the obedience OF THE ONE MAN the many will be made righteous.

The Jesus words only cult deny that and substitute themselves in his place.
They preach your own justifications comes through you repenting and your obedience to the law of Moses.

The actual good news is about JESUS’ OBEDIENCE AND ACT ACCOMPLISHED FOR US - OUR JUSTIFICATION AND OUR RIGHTEOUSNESS FOR HE IS OUR RIGHTEOUSNESS