It fit together alright but it was not millions of years before it divided because it happened after the water of the deep oceans broke through and caused the flood. I guess he forgot that part. Yes, at one point there was one landmass. Science has a problem with their fiddling, they forget little points about creation. The water was separated to create the land so it went down, the it broke to come back during the flood. That does not mean there were no bodies of water, there was. There can't be a test of the age of rocks without a theory and just because they believe the theory it doesn't mean it lives up to facts. You can see the new valley in Turkey now because of an earthquake and the time Organ had a big change in their state because of the volcano eruption, it now has a whole change in one area, you really have to see before and after.

By the way, why do you think earth has fault lines? The earth broke and the water from the deep, "underground", if you read the bible it laid out, first he divided he water and made the land, the water was under the land but there were water that life was put in, the earth hadn't been finished, the oceans were just not as many or as big as now, or maybe they were in a separate from the land because it also tells of the earth separating at and after the water from the deep broke forth, came up, and it was with great force. That would really move land and make land changes, volcanos and earthquakes happened after the flood also. I don't even think there is much evidence of an ice age the way they tell it, flood yes, ice age, it may have some very cold time but the other, probably not as they say. Nothing fits well with their theories. There is still snow and ice at the north pole and if we are a sphere and magnetic, the south pole should not be an icy place it would be the north that ice and the south warm, opposite reactions, so if it got ice, the poles are right. Now you have Chile that fits the bill for ice but that because of mountain ranges and that is also true for Antarctica, doesn't mean every place is covered with ice and snow.

I got to the point of questioning every thing they say because the things they said don't fit the way things have been working and changing. After a while you can see how thing can change is a small time and not even a week let along millions of year which is so out there really I wonder who decided to put it out this way. By the way it really doesn't take long for some places to for things that are carbon base into rock, this one is has happened in a very short time so fossil can be a lot newer than they said also.

They would not lie to us would they? Yes, they would and are still doing it.