Europe and The West IMPOVERISHING, Africa, Asia and Others Prospering !

Everything depends on whom the moneyprinters hand the cash to.

True.

What the Illegal Kenyan President of the USA said he was g
oing to do...and is doing through his third term as puppettmaster with his hand up Joe's Ass

I don't think Obama, with minority background, was ever as influential to do all the harm on the country, white extremists accuse him having done. I guess, due to his minority status within a white nationalist institution, he was less influential than white presidents before him and after him.

Those who listen to white extremists, when they talk about Obama, they would think, he is a monster with supernatural powers of evil nature, of course that is not possible, given his status as a minority within a white nationalist institution.

The Africans and other "Southerners" don't need gift from anyone, they are automatically wealthy, if they can keep what is theirs.




Rank of continents on GDP (PPP) basis, should Western currencies be dumped

1. Asia

2. Africa

3. South America

4. Europe

5. North America

6. Australia


[link to www.atlasdigitalmaps.com (secure)]

ching chong smoke and mirrors. Africans did not build shiny shit. Ching Chongs did. Africans fucking around with ching chongs are finding out fast about the yellow devil! Meanwhile the invasion of American in Europe continues.

So you think Africa is prospering?

Maybe you should look a bit closer.

That is fine. During the Middle Ages, Europe was poorer, but Europeans still had a higher quality of life. The quality of life of the West, would be insanely vast, if there were no non Whites in the West.

Look,

the Chinese, the Italians and others are engaged in infrastructure projects all over the world, not just in Africa.



Quote:

This is absolutely fantastic !
























Dangote is one of the empire builder companies on the continent. These guys now have before them the biggest opportunity they could ever imagine, 1.5 billion consumers, on a continent with a free trade area since 2022 European calendar.



That company dominates the African market and is supplying many projects, including this one:






Quote:

"The Chinese are planning more military bases for Eastern Africa
They are gonna turn the continent into one big plantation to harvest and ship out its natural resources

Wanna watch how many Africans start studying Chinese"


The Chinese interest in the eastern half of Africa is strategic:

* It is the part of Africa closer to China (particularly the HOA with other regions in the Gulf region is of special interest)

* It is the potentially richest part of Africa

* It is mineral rich

* It is the most interesting part of Africa for tourism

* It is the region with diverse racial mix




Quote:

Lucky are the "Southerners".

These guys are blessed, they represent 80% of the global population, they are filthy rich and armed to the teeth.


FYI:

Almost 100% of the world's,

1. Resources

2. Industrial capacities and

3. Markets

are concentrated in the non-white regions Africa, Asia and Latin America.



[link to www.atlasdigitalmaps.com (secure)]



According to projections, the combined population of Africa (ca. 3 billion by 2050 European calendar) and Asia will reach 8 billion in few decades.

That development is of gigantic importance for some lucky (because strategically located) countries, that are located WITHIN THE CIRCLE THROUGH INDIA-HOA-TURKEY-IRAN (watch map above), as, due to the shift of the global economic center of gravity TO SOUTH-EAST (not to east as "white nationalists" say), they have become the center of the world. Sadly, on the other hand, this development made Europe only a periphery of the global center.

I've been to Luanda.

First row or two from the beach is nice and then it is purely a shithole.

Its like the very poor brother of Rio De Janero.

Every nation that does not have psychopath leaders putting sanctions on Russia in order to harm their own citizens is doing way better than those western nations with psychopath leaders.

There is 1 market for energy. All the Eastern and African nations are buying from the whole market and getting huge discounts on the always cheap and always reliable Russian energy. Nice profits in everything they do with that cheap and reliable energy.

The western nations are buying from a slave energy market that is not free. They are all paying huge premiums on the expensive and unreliable energy. They are losing their arses and will continue to experience way more inflation as their psychopath leaders rape them to death.

And the funniest thing of all is this. They are still all buying Russian energy at huge premiums with tons of profit built in for the free nations who are 3rd partying the Russian energy to them. India, Saudi Arabia, Nigeria...tons of others are buying cheap Russian energy and then reselling to the west at much higher prices.

Moral of the story. If you are in the west the war is on you. The sanctions are on you. The intentional inflation is directed at you. Your main enemies are your leaders. You have no hope other than suffering to complete destruction under such pathetic western leaders.

Neanderthal, you are not good even at lying.

They have new infrastructure and their economies are falling apart crazy shillstein.

THIS KIND OF TARD SHIT MAKES ME CRAZY!! MO PEOPLE MEANS MO PROBLEMS IDIOT! WE ARE POST INDUSTRIAL OR DO THEY NOT TEACH YOU THAT IN GRADE SCHOOP ON RUSSIA?

Hard times are coming for the West !

Losing reserve currency statuses for USD, EUR, Pound, Franc, ... would be catastrophic for Western countries !

I think, that is the main reason we have the Ukraine conflict.



Quote:

... Are Western countries wealthy ?

Not really (eg. 70% don't own homes in Germany, over 50% depend on welfare):


They can not feed themselves

They must import raw materials from developing countries for their industries

In the meantime, developing countries produce everything Western countries produce, that means, Western countries are f**ked if they have no access to markets in developing countries.

Western countries' only "wealth" are their currencies or their control of the global financial system, sadly, they are about to lose that control.



===> In the meantime, developing countries produce everything Western countries produce, that means, Western countries are f**ked if they have no access to markets in developing countries.


That is a gigantic development !

When Western currencies are dumped and Africa, China, India (each with 1.5 billion consumers) and other developing regions trade with each other, HOW ARE WESTERN COUNTRIES GONNA PAY FOR IMPORTS FROM DEVELOPING COUNTRIES ?

Guys,

even Germans, one of the most Eurocentric peoples out there, are agreeing with what is said here:

You know what ?

USA paid a gigantic price for its anti-Africanism, sad, but true !



Quote:

... It looks like, Africans have not yet a clear opinion about USA, THE MOST ANTI-AFRICAN SUPERPOWER IN HISTORY (that is out of ca. 16 superpowers of the last 5000 years).

Did you guys hear USA insiders, that means Congress members and officials, call the CIA "the most evil organization ever created" ?

Or, did you hear Bush senior, linked with the CIA for decades, long before becoming director in 1976 European calendar, say: "If the American People ever find out what we have done, they will chase us down the street and lynch us." ?

Do you realize, given the fact that the CIA's records were worst in Africa, that those US Americans were talking about CIA's horrible crimes in Africa ?


Quote:

Sad, sad, sad, the USA is now paying for anti-Africanism with an untimely end of its empire !


Who would have thought and anticipated in 1945 European calendar, that a superpower with a huge black minority with African ancestors, would become the most anti-African superpower in history, just for that reason ?

The evaluation of all facts leads to the conclusion that the USA is the biggest enemy Africa ever encountered.

It is the country that had a secret "economic sabotage" policy against the continent since 1945 European calendar, that it implemented using the IMF, World Bank, CIA, Wall Street and others: "... Having undone Nkrumah, the United States started to control affairs with the IMF putting a stop to Nkrumah’s industrialisation policy."

Unfortunately ;) ,for this hostility USA is paying with the untimely end of its empire and global rule. What we need to know here is, USA can't get anywhere without the support of Africans and Asians, so gigantic is their influence over the fate of that country.

Really, USA is not that smart, as this hostility is most likely linked to the presence of African Americans in the country.


There are evidences about cooperations between African leaders and African American activists. The idea of creating an African Union, realized in 1963 European calendar, with one of its goals to decolonize the whole continent, which alarmed the West, including former colonial powers like Portugal, might even have come from Malcolm X.

Also, there are evidences about USA government concerns about the cooperations between African leaders and African American activists. Also plans how best to deal with such cooperations.

When studying Africa-USA relations, the role of African Americans should not be underestimated.

1. USA, or better European Americans (EAs), have a deep seated desire to make African Americans (AAs) feel that, they are better off in the USA than if they would have remained in Africa.
AAs are often told by EAs: " hey n-word, don't complain ! Be grateful that you live in the USA. Hadn't we brought you here, you would live like "those" (here are meant the stereotypes) n-word in Africa ". Here we see USA has a strong desire to "sabotage economic development" in Africa in order to keep AAs content with their lives in the USA or to silence them when they complain. European Americans are convinced that, development in Africa = trouble with African Americans in the USA.

2. USA, or better EAs, well aware of the crimes they committed against AAs and others, are scared of revenge. So, for security reasons, that means to prevent Africans from building armies and navies and send them to USA to liberate AAs, the USA/EAs have a strong desire to prevent industrialization in Africa.

Ha ha, USA and the West foaming at their mouths.



Quote:

Loss of Economic/Financial Influence Over Africa is MOST MADDENING To Tiny West


We hear things like, African countries (also others) don't need foreign or Western loans to finance infrastructure projects, they can simply print their own currencies, provided, the inputs for the projects are found locally.


What inputs are necessary in infrastructure projects ?

Steel

Cement

Manpower

Machinery


Most African countries have those things locally available.



Guys, the Western era ends now. We are extremely pleased to have contributed in this development.



Here, an expert explains why foreign currency is not necessary in certain cases, that means, by availability of inputs locally.


Quote:

Bonnie Faulkner: You write that, “The objective of the coup d’état was to deny Brazil’s sovereignty in the formulation of macroeconomic policy.” Why is Wall Street or the United States against a nation’s sovereignty?

Michel Chossudovsky: That’s a very important question and it really has to do with monetary policy. Monetary policy really defines the sovereignty of a country. It’s the ability of a country to actually finance its own development through lending to the private sector, the building of public infrastructure and so on. To do that, you have to be able to increase the levels of internal debt. We do it in the United States and Canada and so on. We use debt operations to fund the infrastructure, roads, schools and hospitals.

But what is at stake in developing countries is that the currency is dollarized and in currency markets it’s upheld by dollar-denominated debts, which have to be incurred to support the currency. So that when you start expanding the money supply to finance development – it’s a difficult and complex mechanism – you really have to borrow in dollars, and really what it means is that your currency really is a proxy. It’s a dollarized currency, so that each time you want to build a road or a bridge or a hydroelectric complex using your domestic resources, you have to increase your indebtedness in dollar terms. In other words, the internal debt becomes a foreign debt.

That is ultimately what happened in Brazil with the Real Plan. The Real Plan established the real as the Brazilian currency on a peg with the US dollar, sustained by persistent propping up of the currency to maintain that parity. And what it meant is that Brazil was indebting itself in terms of dollars and each time it expands let’s say its levels of expenditure and so on so forth it ultimately has to borrow in dollars. What that means, to get back to the question, is that it’s Wall Street that controls monetary policy and all actions of internal development, funding infrastructure, schools, roads and so on, requires borrowing dollars to do it.

I’ll give one example of this. Vietnam, in the wake of its normalization with the United States, decided to initiate a major project of repairing the country’s main highway, which links the capital, Hanoi, in the north to Ho Chi Minh City, or what was formerly known as Saigon. It’s called Road Number 1. The east coast of the United States also has a road linking New York right down to Miami.

What happened is that the project was to repair the road, and for that they had to have an international tender by construction companies coming in – big multi-million dollar contracts – and to repair the roads they needed foreign capital. But in fact, what the foreign capital would do was to subcontract with local enterprises which then would build the road. What happens under that type of mechanism is the transformation of an internal debt into an external debt. You don’t need to bring in foreign capital to repair a road, or even to build a road. The technologies are there, the know-how is there, and you don’t need much investment in terms of capital or materials. It’s all local.

And that disturbs the mechanics. Immediately these financial institutions, once they normalize with the country they will say, ‘Okay, we’re going to lend you money under World Bank project to build a road but there has to be an offer of tender to international construction companies, etc. And then the money we lend you, you use it to pay these companies.” That’s how countries get indebted and they are unable under World Bank, IMF auspices to mobilize internal debt operations. I’ve seen this in numerous countries. There’s what is called the PIP, Public Investment Program, which is a list of projects and the World Bank ultimately goes through this list and they can choose which ones they want to finance, and they override the government in the choice of investment projects.

That is ultimately what economic sovereignty is all about: It’s the ability of a country to use its monetary instruments to finance development, and that ability is denied under the prevailing relations that these countries have with the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank and the creditors.

I want all peoples of the world to prosper.
Quit kulling animals for fun + profit.

This is an automatic outcome, inability to parasitize, because the hosts have become aware of the parasitism, leads automatically to impoverishment.

The west is being impoverished by africans, muslims, and people south of the border.

Op, has no idea what the plans are for the future