Origin of Life: Controversial Chemist Shakes up Scientific Community | Problems with Primordial Soup

Yet idiot atheist libtards bought into it from day one.

Atheists decline belief in the unproven claim of gods. Anything else they believe or reject is a separate matter. Declining acceptance of claims with little or poor evidence is not the act of idiots, accepting them is.

Well, since there is a huge amount of proof for Christ and God, why then still embrace unproven Atheism?

Such as?

Do you expect people to think for you? How about using the brain God gave you for once?



Frank Tureks "i dont have enough faith to be an atheist":

There are tales of the supernatural. That’s not evidence, it’s tales. Some folks claim there are aliens flying about, Elvis was at Waffle house, Bigfoot, god(s). I think you don’t know the difference evidence and confirmation biases. I have an invisible, undetectable unicorn in my nose. Do you need to disprove it? Or can you just decline to believe? The claim of a man called Jesus I won’t refuse to believe might be true. I believe there was a George Washington. But not that he chopped down a cherry tree or never told a lie or threw a coin across the river. The stories that swirl about your god pretty much have many things in common with lots of other gods. If you want to believe in gods don’t look to closely at what and why you believe.

But you expect us to believe that the world just popped out of the blue from nothing by random chanse? If one reject such a stupid premise, the only conclusion youre left with is that a designer/mind outside of time and space created everything (God).