B52 on track to Russian Border | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 43579417 Netherlands 03/20/2023 12:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | LOL, if the russian missiles were so great, why they can't take Bakhmut village after 9 months of fighting That’s what I thought of American military after 20 years in Afghanistan. Those “superior” weapons did nothing to the Afghanis. This raises a valid point. We spent 20 years fighting farmers wearing homemade sandals and cloths. Spent 10s billions and 100s billions against their 400 million. They won we evacuated and left them all of our gear. Ukraine had an army 100x greater than Afghanistan 100s of billions of budget and high tech arms. Russia has spent 9 Billion and used mainly old surplus equipment reserves conscripts and prison released soldiers and its actually winning nearly continuously net land gains. Interesting..... Money is only better gear and material but in combat doesn’t make all the difference . Pay to win doesn’t work in real life like in video games. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 48171822 United States 03/20/2023 12:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Patriot_In_Waiting
User ID: 58360223 United States 03/20/2023 12:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | LOL, if the russian missiles were so great, why they can't take Bakhmut village after 9 months of fighting That’s what I thought of American military after 20 years in Afghanistan. Those “superior” weapons did nothing to the Afghanis. This raises a valid point. We spent 20 years fighting farmers wearing homemade sandals and cloths. Spent 10s billions and 100s billions against their 400 million. They won we evacuated and left them all of our gear. Ukraine had an army 100x greater than Afghanistan 100s of billions of budget and high tech arms. Russia has spent 9 Billion and used mainly old surplus equipment reserves conscripts and prison released soldiers and its actually winning nearly continuously net land gains. Interesting..... All that being said….they have to want to win, not just be able to. Which is why we didn’t. Patriot_In_Waiting My name is patriot_in_waiting and I'm a GLPTARD If we get caught.....I'm deaf, and you don't speak English |
Exusiai
User ID: 80579687 United States 03/20/2023 12:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | its a nothing burger.. probably training for CAS manuvers or interdictions with conventional weapons.. they no longer carry nuclear weapons.. [link to www.military.com (secure)] Won't carry gravity bombs like the B-61 according to the link. It mentions it still can use the AGM-86 series which are nuclear capable cruise missiles that could fire from the hold point in Estonia and hit Moscow if using the AGM-86B variant (range of 1500 ish miles). [link to www.military.com (secure)] Makes sense. B-52's wouldn't fare well in the modern SAM environment, even one as poorly proven as Russia's. Leave the gravity bomb types to the B-2 and B-21's as they come online. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79412823 United Kingdom 03/20/2023 12:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | awesome planes. but they are slow as molasses and would be the first to be shot down in a war with a worthy adversary. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 52840768 Right after ALL NWO satelites are shot down by Russian missiles. LOL, if the russian missiles were so great, why they can't take Bakhmut village after 9 months of fighting That’s what I thought of American military after 20 years in Afghanistan. Those “superior” weapons did nothing to the Afghanis. Neither did the Russians... No one actually has any idea how it will go down between these two powers. |
bro tim
User ID: 84136394 United States 03/20/2023 12:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | awesome planes. but they are slow as molasses and would be the first to be shot down in a war with a worthy adversary. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 52840768 lol b52 is an embarrassment in 2023 Couldn't even beat afganistan over 21 years its time to shut the fuck up and leave russia and europe the fuck to them selfs You're talking about a plane that has been through a lot and come out strong! I was in the Air Force. I've been inside the B-52 have you? Don't talk bad about things that you don't understand. Bombing the crap out of people that hide in caves in multiple thousands of acres of land is a difficult thing to achieve. You have to have boots on the ground. The Russians couldn't handle it and they got out |
bro tim
User ID: 84136394 United States 03/20/2023 12:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | awesome planes. but they are slow as molasses and would be the first to be shot down in a war with a worthy adversary. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 52840768 lol b52 is an embarrassment in 2023 Couldn't even beat afganistan over 21 years its time to shut the fuck up and leave russia and europe the fuck to them selfs But I really agree with you that we need to leave foreign lands alone. Aside from us having bases all around which is a good thing. Thomas Jefferson even warned against foreign entanglements |
Icguy42
User ID: 83637143 United States 03/20/2023 12:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 85400021 Italy 03/20/2023 12:53 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
BrainGuy: Comedic wisdom.
White heteropatriarchal supremacist chemophob User ID: 46275904 United States 03/20/2023 12:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 85401497 United States 03/20/2023 01:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 71214588 United States 03/20/2023 01:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Just so you know, both the US and Russia understand that 1 bomber will never start a preventive nuclear strike on the US. So, nobody in Russia really cares about that. They will say that an American nuclear bomber came close to Russia to galvanize Russians against the West, and the Russians will get angry at the West over it, but the reality is that nobody in the military is really scared. This is an act to put America's vassals in Eastern Europe at ease. They still believe that a single plane can scare Russia so America flys it for them to make them feel "safe" and they, like idiots, actually believe that. FYI, if the US will ever decide to carryout a preventive nuclear strike against any country, it will have to use its entire military. |
DOORBERT IS ALIVE
(OP) User ID: 84004714 United States 03/20/2023 01:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
LadyeJaneSmith
Forum Administrator 03/20/2023 01:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | My computer gets updated and refitted all the time. Doesn't seem to make it a new computer, does it? When I was 19 I bought a 72 biscayne, completely oem with a 2bbl 327 and a th350. one year later it had a 450hp fuel injected merlin crate engine with a rock crusher. was it newer? of course not. but it left behind just about everything in a major metropolis county. Newer does not mean better. You're saying that 72 Biscayne is gonna compete with a brand new top of the line charger? Bottom line here kids: Russia has newer military tech than we do. Sure they still use old Turbo prop bears, but they've also developed hypersonic missiles. Our 1950s tech B52 and aircraft carriers are now antiquated technology. Just like your Biscayne was cool back in the 70s, its trash today and wouldn't keep pace with any new tech muscle car except maybe in a straight line. Maybe. Unless you are referring to a Hellcat (unlikely), Chargers are the future trailer park cars, not unlike the Trans Am of past. Noise does not equal speed, and they are fugly. To the topic at hand hand, I agree, we do not really know what Russia has, but on the same note, we don't really know what we have either. For all we know, both sides may have weapons that make nukes look like child's play; thus, putting us all in far more danger than we realize. Fate whispers to the warrior "You cannot withstand the storm" the warrior whispers back "I am the storm" INTJ-A |
Big Duke6
User ID: 84935576 Canada 03/20/2023 01:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78171793 Netherlands 03/20/2023 01:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 82547240 Canada 03/20/2023 01:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
IAMABADMUTHAFUKKR
User ID: 75032923 United States 03/20/2023 01:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | awesome planes. but they are slow as molasses and would be the first to be shot down in a war with a worthy adversary. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 52840768 lol b52 is an embarrassment in 2023 Couldn't even beat afganistan over 21 years its time to shut the fuck up and leave russia and europe the fuck to them selfs You're talking about a plane that has been through a lot and come out strong! I was in the Air Force. I've been inside the B-52 have you? Don't talk bad about things that you don't understand. Bombing the crap out of people that hide in caves in multiple thousands of acres of land is a difficult thing to achieve. You have to have boots on the ground. The Russians couldn't handle it and they got out Afghanistan was outstanding Russia 3 to 1 thanks to the USA. Building DUMB's bunkers. Sending load after load of munitions manuals etc. Training their leaders. Same thing happening in 🇺🇦. If the USA ever has to go against a real adversary not fishermen and farmers 40 years behind us ugh. Lord help us.... IAMABADMUTHAFUKKR |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 80153225 United States 03/20/2023 01:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | awesome planes. but they are slow as molasses and would be the first to be shot down in a war with a worthy adversary. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 52840768 lol b52 is an embarrassment in 2023 Couldn't even beat afganistan over 21 years its time to shut the fuck up and leave russia and europe the fuck to them selfs You're talking about a plane that has been through a lot and come out strong! I was in the Air Force. I've been inside the B-52 have you? Don't talk bad about things that you don't understand. Bombing the crap out of people that hide in caves in multiple thousands of acres of land is a difficult thing to achieve. You have to have boots on the ground. The Russians couldn't handle it and they got out Afghanistan was outstanding Russia 3 to 1 thanks to the USA. Building DUMB's bunkers. Sending load after load of munitions manuals etc. Training their leaders. Same thing happening in 🇺🇦. If the USA ever has to go against a real adversary not fishermen and farmers 40 years behind us ugh. Lord help us.... Nice propaganda, but US troops obliterated Russian troops in Syria. USA was nation building in Afghanistan, not genociding and annexation like what Russia is doing to Ukraine. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 85297011 United Kingdom 03/20/2023 02:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 85395655 United States 03/20/2023 02:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | https://twitter.com/_/status/1637874131654828032 and also... https://twitter.com/_/status/1637880677474377734 |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76877710 Switzerland 03/20/2023 02:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | its a nothing burger.. probably training for CAS manuvers or interdictions with conventional weapons.. they no longer carry nuclear weapons.. [link to www.military.com (secure)] Won't carry gravity bombs like the B-61 according to the link. It mentions it still can use the AGM-86 series which are nuclear capable cruise missiles that could fire from the hold point in Estonia and hit Moscow if using the AGM-86B variant (range of 1500 ish miles). [link to www.military.com (secure)] Makes sense. B-52's wouldn't fare well in the modern SAM environment, even one as poorly proven as Russia's. Leave the gravity bomb types to the B-2 and B-21's as they come online. B-52s will fly 200 feet above the ground and reach the Target. |
IAMABADMUTHAFUKKR
User ID: 75032923 United States 03/20/2023 02:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 84346097 lol b52 is an embarrassment in 2023 Couldn't even beat afganistan over 21 years its time to shut the fuck up and leave russia and europe the fuck to them selfs You're talking about a plane that has been through a lot and come out strong! I was in the Air Force. I've been inside the B-52 have you? Don't talk bad about things that you don't understand. Bombing the crap out of people that hide in caves in multiple thousands of acres of land is a difficult thing to achieve. You have to have boots on the ground. The Russians couldn't handle it and they got out Afghanistan was outstanding Russia 3 to 1 thanks to the USA. Building DUMB's bunkers. Sending load after load of munitions manuals etc. Training their leaders. Same thing happening in 🇺🇦. If the USA ever has to go against a real adversary not fishermen and farmers 40 years behind us ugh. Lord help us.... Nice propaganda, but US troops obliterated Russian troops in Syria. USA was nation building in Afghanistan, not genociding and annexation like what Russia is doing to Ukraine. I see you're a news watcher. Keep watching your news Obliterated bwahahaha. Like when Russians rammed our buffalo and 3 of our soldiers hit the infirmary with "jolted necks" IAMABADMUTHAFUKKR |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 82251208 Canada 03/20/2023 02:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | its a nothing burger.. probably training for CAS manuvers or interdictions with conventional weapons.. they no longer carry nuclear weapons.. [link to www.military.com (secure)] Won't carry gravity bombs like the B-61 according to the link. It mentions it still can use the AGM-86 series which are nuclear capable cruise missiles that could fire from the hold point in Estonia and hit Moscow if using the AGM-86B variant (range of 1500 ish miles). [link to www.military.com (secure)] Makes sense. B-52's wouldn't fare well in the modern SAM environment, even one as poorly proven as Russia's. Leave the gravity bomb types to the B-2 and B-21's as they come online. B-52s will fly 200 feet above the ground and reach the Target. They are used as cruise missile platforms. they can carry 8 internally and 12 externally. If there was a war, you would see multiple B-52's with plenty of fighter escort. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 80068884 United States 03/20/2023 02:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | its a nothing burger.. probably training for CAS manuvers or interdictions with conventional weapons.. they no longer carry nuclear weapons.. [link to www.military.com (secure)] Won't carry gravity bombs like the B-61 according to the link. It mentions it still can use the AGM-86 series which are nuclear capable cruise missiles that could fire from the hold point in Estonia and hit Moscow if using the AGM-86B variant (range of 1500 ish miles). [link to www.military.com (secure)] Makes sense. B-52's wouldn't fare well in the modern SAM environment, even one as poorly proven as Russia's. Leave the gravity bomb types to the B-2 and B-21's as they come online. I suspect that the B-52's are being fitted to carry multiple hypersonic nuclear missiles. The U.S. has had two successful tests of the hypers so far, and may be further along in development than we have been told. The U.S. will make Russia complacent seeing B-52's flying close to their border, until they launch hypersonic's at Moscow in an attempt to destroy Russia command and control systems, at the beginning of the U.S./NATO attack on Russia. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 81285582 United States 03/20/2023 02:38 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | its a nothing burger.. probably training for CAS manuvers or interdictions with conventional weapons.. they no longer carry nuclear weapons.. [link to www.military.com (secure)] Won't carry gravity bombs like the B-61 according to the link. It mentions it still can use the AGM-86 series which are nuclear capable cruise missiles that could fire from the hold point in Estonia and hit Moscow if using the AGM-86B variant (range of 1500 ish miles). [link to www.military.com (secure)] Makes sense. B-52's wouldn't fare well in the modern SAM environment, even one as poorly proven as Russia's. Leave the gravity bomb types to the B-2 and B-21's as they come online. B-52s will fly 200 feet above the ground and reach the Target. B-52's won't be dropping B-61's at 200ft above the ground unless the USAF wants to lose every single aircraft. Any mission to enter Russian airspace would be given to the B-2 and soon B-21 in today's age. The B-52 would be stand off, firing cruise missiles. Regardless, if we have aircraft heading in to Russia to attack, it's the worst case scenario because that would mean Russian ICBM's have already hit the US or in route to do so. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76877710 Switzerland 03/20/2023 02:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: godsgreengrass its a nothing burger.. probably training for CAS manuvers or interdictions with conventional weapons.. they no longer carry nuclear weapons.. [link to www.military.com (secure)] Won't carry gravity bombs like the B-61 according to the link. It mentions it still can use the AGM-86 series which are nuclear capable cruise missiles that could fire from the hold point in Estonia and hit Moscow if using the AGM-86B variant (range of 1500 ish miles). [link to www.military.com (secure)] Makes sense. B-52's wouldn't fare well in the modern SAM environment, even one as poorly proven as Russia's. Leave the gravity bomb types to the B-2 and B-21's as they come online. B-52s will fly 200 feet above the ground and reach the Target. B-52's won't be dropping B-61's at 200ft above the ground unless the USAF wants to lose every single aircraft. Any mission to enter Russian airspace would be given to the B-2 and soon B-21 in today's age. The B-52 would be stand off, firing cruise missiles. Regardless, if we have aircraft heading in to Russia to attack, it's the worst case scenario because that would mean Russian ICBM's have already hit the US or in route to do so. What a simpleton. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 68967912 Canada 03/20/2023 02:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | awesome planes. but they are slow as molasses and would be the first to be shot down in a war with a worthy adversary. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 52840768 Right after ALL NWO satelites are shot down by Russian missiles. Lmfao lay off the crack mate. Your hel ets getting a little tight. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78171793 Netherlands 03/20/2023 02:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | its a nothing burger.. probably training for CAS manuvers or interdictions with conventional weapons.. they no longer carry nuclear weapons.. [link to www.military.com (secure)] Won't carry gravity bombs like the B-61 according to the link. It mentions it still can use the AGM-86 series which are nuclear capable cruise missiles that could fire from the hold point in Estonia and hit Moscow if using the AGM-86B variant (range of 1500 ish miles). [link to www.military.com (secure)] Makes sense. B-52's wouldn't fare well in the modern SAM environment, even one as poorly proven as Russia's. Leave the gravity bomb types to the B-2 and B-21's as they come online. B-52s will fly 200 feet above the ground and reach the Target. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79167801 United States 03/20/2023 02:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | My computer gets updated and refitted all the time. Doesn't seem to make it a new computer, does it? When I was 19 I bought a 72 biscayne, completely oem with a 2bbl 327 and a th350. one year later it had a 450hp fuel injected merlin crate engine with a rock crusher. was it newer? of course not. but it left behind just about everything in a major metropolis county. Newer does not mean better. You're saying that 72 Biscayne is gonna compete with a brand new top of the line charger? Bottom line here kids: Russia has newer military tech than we do. Sure they still use old Turbo prop bears, but they've also developed hypersonic missiles. Our 1950s tech B52 and aircraft carriers are now antiquated technology. Just like your Biscayne was cool back in the 70s, its trash today and wouldn't keep pace with any new tech muscle car except maybe in a straight line. Maybe. Any day i would put my beater biscayne up against a hell cat or demon or whatever pos comes off the factory line. The fact is you are unable to look past the first pass. Not only would that car take anything coming off the assembly line, it would do it for far longer and would survive and thrive refit after refit. but you can keep your crappy italian-made chinese -owned fragile uniframe shitbox if it makes you feel better. Just know there are more chargers and challengers in the scrap yard right now than there are on the road. newer is not better. it could be, but it's not. |