Let's be honest, a majority of GLPers hate renewable energy because the science behind it seems gay

Sounds like a personal problem.

If by 'gghay' you mean it is a failed concept that leads nowhere....sure, ok.

Tell us about the science. I doubt you can.

Noooo....

Its because it connects everything INDIVIDUALLY to the grid.

Second, it relies on one maybe two resources which in return only gives CONTROL and POWER to few.

Got it dip shit?

You are so damn retarded, I decided to highlight said retardation, so others can more easily discern your type, if they run across such retardation, IRL.

No. It simply does not work when you need it. Period.

I am over going to the gas station because there is always a line because somebody is gambling.

Solar and wind are absolute dog shit solutions.

Solutions conjured up by some of the dumbest people on Earth.

This is why INTELLIGENT people despise the "green" agenda and the Seinfelds involved.

Wind is gey, but solar is interesting if you live in an area that is always 60-85 degrees and have a solar tracker. If you don't, it's probably gey too.

I appreciate the special cases

I worked in the wind (farm) industry for years...it is a scam, it would simply not exist without huge tax payer subsidies..it is all a sham. They disrupt more than they help.

You're ghey.

We could cover the planet in solar and wind farms, yet still one day we would need more

But we don’t have the resources to do that anyway, so why even try? Gas won’t last forever either..

Solar and Wind are inefficient too as they stand. Solars getting better but wind is getting worse. Also a lot of dirty electricity is produced by ‘green’ methods, living near one windmill is like having a 15kV line near you

Gotta long way to go before the technology makes actual sense.
We are not there yet.

Unless the aliens get involved...

Renewable energy is awesome. So awesome, you should only be allowed to charge your EV using wind or solar. See you on the road next month!

They're OK as supplimental sources.

A few solar panels on the roof help lower your energy bill and allow the grid to lighten the load, but the only true renewable reliable energy source is nuclear.

Wind farms, solar panel farms and the like all have maintenance and legacy costs that can't be ignored.

OP is a homosexual.

or

It could be that most of us are aware that said devices use more energy in the production of said devices then said devices produce over their product lifetimes.

Which is both lame and ghay.

OP dreams of being penetrated by Klaus

I'd love to see hydrogen internal combustible engines.

I'd also like to see Tesla's (the original)
Wireless energy transfer technology.

Unfortunately it's not useful to corporate interest to have real renewable tech so it's not going to be anything but more good for government control and corporate profit tech allowed to see widespread use.

there was science behind the safe and effective vaccine

Diesel generators running 24/7 to charge charge stations for EVs?

Does not compute.

Only ghey scientists could think it.

gtfo, you did not earn your tree-fiddy!

This

No, I hate solar & wind because they're inefficient, bad for the wildlife (birds) and will never produce the energy it took to create them.
Hydropower is efficient, effective and has carried our country for years.
I'm not just talking about the big dams across rivers. In some areas reserving the water has been wonderful for farming and agriculture.
There are many new designs available. People have been harnessing the power of water since the advent of the wheel. Just utilizing the power as it flows by.
My favorite hydropower design is turbulent.
Here's a link if you're interested
[link to www.turbulent.be (secure)]
In my world designs like this would be up & down rivers and creeks to provide our power needs without polluting our world, killing our birds or destroying our landscape.

If by the science behind it is gay, you mean completely contrary to the natural order of how things work then yes. It’s like buying meat from the grocery store rather than making animals have to die. Umm . . . there’s a few steps in the middle there that you’re missing that makes you a complete fucking idiot. So in that case, yes, I completely agree. The science behind it is gay.

#1 - it's not reliable

#2 - it's way more costly

#3 - it actually harms the environment more when you look at the big picture (plastics, rare earth metals, disposal, etc.)

/thread

NO. SOME of us do NOT like it cuz it is 100% FRAUD.