The Quickening Issues of Governance, Security, and Interspecies Exopolitical Relations - Anunnaki Inter-clan Civil Conflict and the Return of Nibiru

Intresting read.

WELL DONE ... NOW MAYBE A MORE APPROPRIATE ONE.

Lets not forget we all carry the reptilian genes, albeit some more than others ;-)

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL






Its rare that one sees a crock of shit this big...and its pilled so high and its still steaming.

Must be cold outside huh?

I. GOVERNANCE AS INSTITUTIONAL RESPONSE SETS TO THE PRESENCE OF EARTHBOUND AND INCOMING ANUNNAKI


These are evident from FIOA documents retrieved under the United States Freedom of Information Act concerning UFOs, aliens, extraterrestrials, codified rules (as in Code of Federal Regulations and certain military manuals), the U.S. military sources of public and leaked classified information, and leaks to unvetted , unwitting informants. Another stream has also been manifested as governmental and military sources of public and leaked information in England, NATO, and the European Union. A third stream was manifested as a conjunction of interest compact initiated by the U.S. National Space Council in association with unspecified developed-industrial nations within a United Nations umbrella, again as public and leaked information. And a fourth stream has been the witting informant (both out of government and military services, as well as still in government and military service) willing and able to provide hints, partial disclosures, confirmations, and information pattern reconstruction assistance on a case by case basis. The latter are few and far between, speak by statements in response to specific questions (never face to face, until very recently) and are here further protected as numbered informants.{1} Information obtained and culled through these sources are used in this essay to indicate past and current policy directions of interest in examining matters associated with national and planetary governance, safety and sovereignty issues.

Governance as an issue seems to had taken a new shade of meaning in the late 1970s, when in the words of Informant One, “things went kind of haywire, when the people from the incoming [NI.BI.RU.] made contact through unexpected assets requesting a meeting with representatives of the United States” (2003). According to this source and a corroborating one, “the only thing that saved the day was the cool-headed handling of matters related to this contact, and the delegation made by the president to his close friend from Navy days to head the group that met with them up in the tundra” (Informant One 2003, Informant Four 2004). “A semi-formal arrangement was set up for exchanges and contacts directly through the interagency directorate set up by the White House and [an unspecified agency] to handle them and facilitate the settlement and acclimation of one of theirs at one of our [unspecified] installations in [an also unspecified] desert” (Informant One 2003, Informant Two 2002, Informant Four 2004). At the time, we were in the throes of the first Iran situation, “and the people from the incoming filled us in on the actual conflict being played out at that time” (Informant Four 2004).

Governance then ceased being a matter of mere elections and political parties, and more of a two-track affair of state – one involving politics as usual on the domestic side and a carefully orchestrated foreign policy enriched by the revelations on the nature and genesis of the Iranian about-face (the invisible hands of the Serpent Faction in fomenting the uprising of Sunnis and the subsequent establishment of a theocracy dominated by Serpent Faction minions); the other involving more of a managing of relationships with those who were coming in, mostly through the one whom Informant One referred to as “the ambassador” (2003). The new intelligence available through such contacts “concerning Serpent Faction activities in fomenting division by religious fundamentalism was heard but not heeded – at least not until the next administration” (Informant Two 2002). How much of what had transpired in the ten months prior to the 1980 election was passed on during the transition is unknown, but several informants (One, Two, Four, Five and Six), especially those in the military attached to the interagency directorate, did confirm that “awareness of what was going on was palpable from day one, but how much the old man knew was anybody’s guess. Everything was still being handled in compartments and very few of us had access to the latest [intelligence] from them out west [Anunnakis in the desert?]” (Informant Four 2004). “The thing that changed everything were the reports coming in from the Naval Observatory and the project that was handling the [astronomical] observations in South America and Australia. By then we knew that this whole thing was for real, and that there were needs superceding the way we were then organized” (Informant One 2002, Informant Four 2004). But it would apparently take nearly six years for pertinent information to reach the summit of power in the White House – even though the interagency directorate was said to have functioned out of the Executive Office Building and one of the subfloors under the White House. Why this took so long, and by what means did Reagan become aware of things concerning the Anunnaki is unknown, and remains so.

In 1986, then President Reagan met with then Secretary General Gorbachev in Reykjavik, Iceland, for a mini-summit. In a private session, which is said to have included their respective wives, Nancy and Raisa, the foursome is reported to have received a formal briefing on information culled from astrophysical, technological and historical sources concerning what cannot be anything other than the 10th planet in our solar system, the historical record of anthropological and archeoastronomical information concerning NI.BI.RU. and its inhabitants, and the “apparent civil conflict between members of an asset group [Nibiruan Anunnaki on Earth] and the [NI.BI.RU.-borne] governing body of the incoming” (Informant One 2002). The occurrence of this briefing was verified to have taken place by six of the eleven sources {2} we cultivated over the years. It was also said that reference was made during the briefing to “the handling of understanding with those here concerning matters of mutual interest,” which were discussed by the principals and questions asked of the briefers – ostensibly, “senior military officers in civilian clothes” (Informant One 2002; Informant Two 2003; Informant Five 2004) quite possibly attached to the interagency directorate and/or NSA. Additionally, Reagan and Gorbachev both wished to know how extensive was the institutional awareness of this “threat” on the part of the other major powers and industrialized nations of Earth. The answer was said that awareness was highly restricted to “intelligence sharing of certain compartmented information on a need to know basis” and “only with those who’ve assisted us in term of recoveries [of extraterrestrial artifacts] in the past” (Informant Two 2002, Informant Five 2004).

{2}Informant Backgrounds
Thread: The Quickening Issues of Governance, Security, and Interspecies Exopolitical Relations - Anunnaki Inter-clan Civil Conflict and the Return of Nibiru (Page 2)

Issues of national governance raised by both heads of state concerned “both internal issues of disclosure and preparation” (Informant One 2003; Informant Give 2004), “and issues on how to handle them.” Gorbachev was said to be more concerned with the managing of relations with the asset group and its leadership, while the American president was said to have voiced concerns about the position in which the U.S. was finding itself with respect to the asset group on planet surface and what stance was the proper one to take on this matter. The president was said to have been reminded that the information compartment, though inclusive of major aspects, was also still restricted to the highest level, to those having a [certain specific compartment] clearance, “and to those serving on the [National Space] Council,” and that “all previous contacts and understandings with them [the Earthbound asset group] remain in place” (Informant One 2003; Informant Four 2003; Informant Five 2004). The president was also reported to have asked for recommendations on possible options for the handling of the situation at hand.

It was then said that, as an initial step, Gorbachev recommended the matter be disclosed to the United Nations both privately and publicly “in the strongest possible terms,” but avoiding unnecessary and premature full disclosures. Both heads of state also are said to have requested and received descriptive information on “what these people looked like.” The briefing was said to have been sober and business-like, with the wives remaining quiet and attentive, but with Nancy taking some notes. It was also said they were reminded that the matter would not arise as “a tangible” until the beginning of the second decade of the next century” and that “there was still some time to organize an infrastructure for the handling of contact, intelligence and positioning of assets with the aim of establishing a basis for future diplomacy” (Informant One 2003; Informant Five 2004; Informant Six 2004; Informant Nine 2005).

Interestingly enough, a relatively short time after the briefing, Reagan publicly addressed the United Nations General Assembly and is reported to have held private meetings with a select group of NATO allies and other industrialized nations (Informant Two 2003; Informant Four 2004). Towards the end of his speech to the Forty-second Session on September 21, 1987, the President said that, "in our obsession with antagonisms of the moment, we often forget how much unites all the members of humanity. Perhaps we need some outside, universal threat to make us recognize this common bond. I occasionally think," continued Reagan, "how quickly our differences worldwide would vanish if we were facing an alien threat from outside this world. And yet, I ask" -- here comes the clincher -- "is not an alien force ALREADY among us?" The President now tries to retreat from the last bold statement by posing a second question: "What could be more alien to the universal aspirations of our peoples than war and the threat of war?"
[link to www.youtube.com]

There are indications also that Reagan and Gorbachev had already spoken about aliens during their previous Geneva summit. And there are further indications in the public domain that the president had awareness of the presence of “aliens” on Earth. Earlier during the second term, the astrology flap had caught public attention, and when the next time Reagan mentioned “a threat” from outer space, it was a further attention getter. The media was having a field day with horoscopes at the White House when Reagan talked about the possibility of Earth uniting against a threat by "a power from outer space." Although the idea wasn't new for the President, as we shall soon see, this time everybody paid attention. More as a joke than a serious thought, however. The AP story on the speech, for example, had the headline, "Reagan follows astrological flap with comment on space invaders." The President first disclosed his thoughts about "an alien threat" during a 4 December 1985 speech at Fallston High School in Maryland, where he spoke about his first summit with General Secretary Gorbachev in Geneva. According to a White House transcript, Reagan remarked that during his 5-hour private discussions with Gorbachev, he told [Gorbachev] to think, "how easy his task and mine might be in these meetings that we held if suddenly there was a threat to this world from some other species from another planet outside in the universe. We'd forget all the little local differences that we have between our countries ..."
[link to www.youtube.com]

Except for one headline or two, people didn't pay much attention. Not then and not later, when Gorbachev himself confirmed the conversation in Geneva during an important speech on February 17, 1987, in the Grand Kremlin Palace in Moscow, to the Central Committee of the USSR's Communist Party. Not a High School in Maryland, precisely! There, buried on page 7A of the Soviet Life Supplement, was the following statement:

"At our meeting in Geneva, the U.S. President said that if the earth faced an invasion by extraterrestrials, the United States and the Soviet Union would join forces to repel such an invasion. I shall not dispute the hypothesis, though I think it's early yet to worry about such an intrusion..."

It is significant that Gorbachev didn’t consider this to be an incredible proposition; he just said that it's too early to worry about it.

If Gorbachev elevated the theme from a high school to the Kremlin [Politburo], Reagan upped the ante again by including the "alien threat", not in a domestic speech but to a full session of the General Assembly of the United Nations. Unlike the off-the-cuff remarks to the Fallston High School, we must assume that the President's speech to the General Assembly was written very carefully and likewise, it merits close consideration. Ronald Reagan has told us that he thinks often about this issue, yet nobody seemed to be paying attention. When the President mentioned on 4 May 1988 in Chicago for the third time the possibility of a threat by "a power from another planet," the media quickly dubbed it the "space invaders" speech, relegating it to a sidebar in the astrology flap. The ET remark was made in the Q&A period following a speech to the National Strategy Forum in Chicago's Palmer House Hotel, where he adopted a more conciliatory tone towards the Soviet Union.

Significantly, Reagan's remark was made during his response to the question, "What do you consider to be the most important need in international relations?"

"I've often wondered," the President said, "what if all of us in the world discovered that we were threatened by an outer -- a power from outer space, from another planet." And then he emphasized his theme that this would erase all the differences, and that the "citizens of the world" would "come together to fight that particular threat..." There is a fourth, unofficial, similar statement from Ronald Reagan about this particular subject, which was reported in the New Republic by senior editor Fred Barnes. The article described a luncheon in the White House between the President and Eduard Shevardnatze, during the Foreign Minister's visit to Washington to sign the INF Treaty on September 15, 1987. "Near the end of his lunch with Shevardnadze," wrote Barnes, "Reagan wondered aloud what would happen if the world faced an 'alien threat' from outer space. “Don't you think the United States and the Soviet Union would be together?” he asked. Shevardnadze said, “yes, absolutely. And we wouldn't need our defense ministers to meet." In terms of secrets, there is also an unconfirmed story of a special screening in the White House of the movie ET years ago, with director Steven Spielberg and a few select guests. Right after the movie, Reagan is reported to have turned to Spielberg and to have had a whispered conversation for a few minutes. Then, as they stood up, Reagan said, more audibly, "There are only a handful of people who know the whole truth about this." If true, Reagan knew.

During the Reykjavik briefing, it is also reported that both heads of state pushed for the formation of a “response network set to handle aerial reconnaissance, surveillance and chase,” over the national skies of participating nations under an integrated command “ostensibly controlled by the American and Soviet higher commands” (Informant Two 2003; Informant Six 2004). But, as other informants reported, “this suggestion, in practice, met with so much resistance that it was ultimately dropped” (Informant One 2004; Informant Five 2004). Thus, at this juncture and on the basis of informant reports, we can discern neither the extent to which the matter developed and materialized, nor which countries led in the effort.

In the United States, the president is reported to have formally organized diverse American space security assets under a National Geospatial Intelligence Agency (or NGA), which is said to have been charged with providing “warning systems and means of downward and outward surveillance of matters and astronomical objects of interest to the national security” (Informant Five 2004; Informant Six 2004; Informant Eight 2005). This is said to have been accomplished through a secret presidential executive order (Informant One 2002; Informant Four 2004; Informant Five 2004). The primary concerns at the time were reported to be practical and their nature institutional in tone – what needs to be organized as networks of response to the threat on a case by case basis, how to organize participants and assets, how to orchestrate and make use of assets, and disposal of the same under an integrated domestic command when events warranted it (Informant One 2002; Informant Two 2002, 2003; Informant Four 2003, 2004; Informant Five 2005; Informant Seven 2005; Informant Nine 2005).

On the domestic side, lead in event response was said to have been given to NGA, the National Space Council and its contact committee, and to “a kind of space security czar” (Informant Seven 2005; Informant Eight 2005; Informant Nine 2005). All intelligence agencies, both on the civilian and military sides, were said to have been directed to provide support and assets as needed (Informant Two 2003; Informant Four 2003; Informant Five 2004, 2005; Informant Ten 2005). Another, albeit not fully vetted, informant provided information concerning the formation of what was referred to as a “National Security Council-Augmented” group to provide “specific constituencies within USGov and certain foreign constituencies” with what was described as “voice participation and recommending function” in discussions of issues and problems connected to presidential tasking, event response situations, and crises (Informant Three 2003). We were not able to verify this report with information from other independent informants, but it is included here because it is suggestive of the institutional response set initiated under Reagan, and because it fits the preparatory and crisis handling patterns following the initiation of institutional responses to the perceived threat.

Two of our informants (Two and Five) also reported that the initial focus on in-situ Anunnakis declared by Reagan had changed during the next administration, only to have it reversed and amplified in the next two. When queried about these changes in focus as possible institutional inconsistencies, the reply was that “these were not so much structurally driven inconsistencies, either from the White House or from the foreign constituencies, but rather they were more like a floating focus driven by events and situations” (Informant Two 2004), “some of [which] were surface [i.e. domestic and foreign political and military] events and situations stemming from administration policies” (Informant One 2004). In other words, “the pucker factor [fear] was much higher during the administration immediately following Reagan than during any of the other two following, including the present one” (Informant Five 2004; Informant Six 2004; Informant Ten 2005). The framework within which the remnant Anunnaki situation was conceived and dealt with was, in the words of Informant Five, “as something ongoing and not readily subject to change. It was something that had to be managed, and managed carefully, choosing levels of engagement as carefully as if dealing with a live cobra” (2005). Interesting choice of words, given the moniker chosen by those who are here – Serpent clan. This meant, Informant Five explained further, that “when, for example, those who are here began making moves to meet and begin securing allegiance and loyalty oaths from members of groups like retired military, retired military intelligence and civilian intelligence people, de facto and ad hoc groups pretty much on their own initiative around the turn of the century, meetings with official USG people started taking place as pro-forma, but in some cases obligatory contacts arranged, managed and conducted from the highest levels. But those who would be sent to meet with them were at most deputy level people” (2005).

We also asked if, and how, governance was conducted following the institutionalization of what we baptized as the NI.BI.RU. event response. Was safety and security (personal, public, institutional) ever an issue at any time? With regard to governance, “once the realization set in that things were not imminent, that the arrival [in southern skies] of the incoming would not be until the second decade of this century, governance as an issue was forestalled by putting in place a multitrack program for managing anything from suppression and disinformation to public information and conditioning – all of that through about damn near 800 ST/SCI/SARs. All in the hands of an umbrella project [not the infamous MJ-12] that had superceded the one that had been handling things for the last forty or fifty years” (Informant Five 2005; Informant Nine 2005).

Governing was more or less a two track affair after Reagan, according to Informants Four and Seven: “after Reagan and the fall of the Soviet Union, things got a little hairy for a while, but they turned less so after No. 41 [Bush senior] left office and the dust settled in Iraq” (Four, 2004). “Governing went back to politics as usual, the winning and losing of elections, etc., on one side, and on the other, not visible side, it became a kind of tap dance – managing carefully requirements by both sides [those who are here and those who are coming] “ (Informant Seven 2005).

Both sides? Was there formal contact with the home planet before Reagan? Was this contact ongoing? “No to the latter; yes to the former, but through a more self-contained and insulated group who pretty much was left to it own devices for keeping the [Anunnaki] here happy” (Informant Seven 2005). “It was only after the detection of NI.BI.RU. in the late ‘70s that things went into higher gear” (Informant Four 2004). “When the interagency directorate was set up, things moved to the White House and the tap dance began. Now there were two groups to contend with and the [exo]politics at times would get intense” (Informant Seven 2005).

Was the group that handled things then the same as that which led the umbrella project mentioned earlier? “Yes, with some additions after the other side [those who were on the incoming] requested and got a formal meeting up in the tundra [unspecified whether in Canada or Alaska, or Antarctica], when things started to go slightly crazy, sort of being between the devil and the incoming rock. But all of that happened before Reagan” (Informant Two 2004; Informant Four 2005; Informant Five 2005; Informant Six 2005)

if the threat was true , why is the world on such a war footing ? dont you think we would all be working together on this ???
sorry but

well hes got you there

GET A CCLUE

of coarse all the reptillian shills come out of hiding with personal attacks and NO PROOF.

I love how you just used the arguement of 'No Proof' against the 'shills'. Makes me head explode!

Aliens have been on the planet since before man was, in fact the Ultimate alien made the planet(ie YHVH/God), and then there are the darkside aliens, ie helel/lucifer and the fallen
acursed ones. Scripture(the bible) and its related references have never made a secret of this.
What is considered cutting edge though by all those who wish the "aliens" to be interplanetary reps, is that now millions of those who don't want to accept God as creator and therefore owner, will gladly accept any shiny alien/angel of light as freedom from what they perceive this world and its realities to be(prison, hell on earth, slave. matrix controlled etc etc), and the prophesies of scripture will surely come to pass when the two beasts with their walkin aliens offer supposed universal solutions (which indeed they wont be), but the terrified and selfish will lap it all up on primetime media and reap the rewards of fraternizing with evil aliens dressed as saviors.

Simply put, yes there are, were and will be aliens, but the real origins of both the good and evil aliens were exposed well before modern man decided to find alternative itching ear answers and then make them out as better than what has been shown by the bible. Go ahead and rant a rave, say whatever in denial and obfuscation, scripture is being entered into deeper and deeper fulfillment before your denting eyes and Jerusalem is one of the major keys chronophrophetic clocks to this, all nations are and will be drawn there, there the 2 witnesses will withstand the beast system for 3 and half years, and no spiritualizing it doesn't cut it, that is only but a facet of the truth of the matter. If you don't take it all into account you will major on minor bits(of course to your choosing) and fail to because you choose/choose to believe a lie.
Sincerely don't be fooled, all who call on the name of YHVH/YAH/shua in sincerity/ and or desperation will be saved, those that take the mark of the beast literally are doomed forever to be alien/ated from God/YHVH the source of love/goodness/truth/life/light/liberty and all thats is good.

The duality of the physical universe breeds some
interesting suppositions and myths as well as
facts.
Separating the two is a monumental task.

All the same scumbag mega-low-manic repturds, they neither created earth nor us, they just cut us of from our true creator by manipulating our DNA and shortening our life span considerably.

When something seems so impossible and minds are made up the rug is then in place to be ripped out from under.

The evidence of non human's being part of earth history and human's screams so loud that it is deafening.

Yahweh, Jehovah, Satan, Lucifer, the Annunaki, the Nefilim, good angels, bad angels are all reptilians playing roles ...

Why is it that so many people feel the need to have or invent a supreme overlord that looks on us as insects, vermin to be extinguished on a whim, be it a god, annunaki or lizards in spacesuits?

Freeflow, I am going to pray for you, you appear to have become blind, and because I like you.
Father God have mercy on Freeflow as you lead her to salvation in Yahshua, let her know and understand her errors and repent to You, not men/women, finally let her know the beginning of wisdom, and find the peace and rest she so longs for but does not have as she seeks to fill the void in her being that only You can fulfill, heal and make whole, amen Yahshua/Jesus

Thanks AC but I am safe and same as you I do believe Jesus doesn't belong to the reptoid faction tho you have to take into account that any Yehova non-deity for sure never was his father.

Christians should try to discern this.

Didn't Reagan make a speech at the U.N.?

It's not like you haven't been warned.

At least under George W. we haven't had an alien attack in years.

I honor our President for his effort.

Cheers Mr. President.

^^As if we had alien attacks under any other prezy ...^^

No the operate cloaked and attack people on a broad and daily bases under the acceptance from the govt, suck off their energies and take care that the never ending meat supply through wars catastrophes and other deadly incidents always works.

who is the brave and cool mod pinning these things today?

ah, i see SHR is on here now, must be him. way cool dude. a breeze of fresh air. much needed. the people speak..

yah right...the world working together. not possible since there is a war on, the ancient war, which i guess you have no knowing of, but that's ok, not many do.

umm.interesting..i hope they dont plan on dealing with the Annunaki i'm thinking of..unless they are now of the light.

currently we are being led by evil......i want to live in heaven


this video will explain the situation..

i ask for help from the galactic federation of light aka.the good guys/gals...we need help imo

sign the petition!:)

the vid..



the message..
[link to www.geocities.com]




the petition..
[link to www.petitiononline.com]






my soul is tired of the draconian laws we have now....please for the love of humanity let's deal with beings of light and only light/love.

B L U E B E A MDUH!

Why is this pinned?

This is an elaborate game played by a large group of delusional people in their late teens to early twenties who keep perpetuating this nonsense by going on forums all over the Internet and posting this crap. They have woven a web of quite a cult following.

To steal a quote from the OP's original post "not everything is as it seems."

Grow up and get a life.

yeah this message seems to me to be a set up for project Blue Beam...

please look into that project...


i feel there will be major things going on soon and we need to know the truth

I doubt that "we"would be working together. These folks want it all. They want an edge. Greed, fear, etc.

Don't forget about people such as Edgar Mitchell (apollo 14 astronaut) coming out of the closet to admit that aliens DO exist and that the government(s) have been covering this up for at least 60 years.

anunnaki? nibiru? what you smoking dude