Everything you need to know to be Sovereign - Keith: Livingway / FREE AUDIOS - Listen Online / UPDATED 8-25-8

thanks for this Hanged Man. do you know if the info applies to people in the UK?

There is no place that it does not apply, friend, as the Law Merchant and Admiralty Laws of the seas have covered the lands all over the globe.

Following lessons from Kieth will follow, and will be uploaded soon, and lots of other information with it, comprising 144 megs. I hope people understand the power in this knowledge. The judges and other foreign agents in the field that have engaged those that have applied it will certainly not forget.

Thanks for the post; and THANKS from the uneducated who MAY read it, but STILL not understand the implications.

Eagle

Educational bump !

NOT approved by the corporation called the United States of America !

Imagine being free, truly free to stand on the land as Man or Woman instead of in servitude. Imagine having valid documentation that gives One possession of the land as a Steward of the land, bette still, a King or Queen of One's possession. Imagine true inheritance without question. Imagine being free to move fom place to place in any manner witthout need if licensure. That is just the tip of the iceburg of what this information provides. But most, imagine the feeling inside knowing that you are not subservient to anyone except by your own choosing.

These teachings are ancient teachings, based on things that never change, things that stand on their own, true and pure. And all other principalities and powers must yield to them. And when they don't, one has the standing and right to call them before the assembly and be disciplined for the good of all the community.

If Men stood together on this on the local level in many places, they would have more peace, and the dark forces would not have power over them bthrough the illusion of peace and the fear of ghosts fabricated of their own design to instill terror to justify what they deem to be necessary. As long as Men take their benefits and "security" they will remain in bondage until the firey trial that will cause Men's hearts to fail and their minds to become insane - unless they find the peace that comes with a clear conscience.

They're uploading more audio today, Lesson 2.

ATTORNEY REPELLANT PACKAGE
From Sam Kennedy:

(a few typos)

For questions, please send your email to [email protected]

Hello folks,

My apologies for having taken so long, but I believe the wait has been worthwhile. This email concerns my promise to end the stranglehold of attorneys. I am pleased to announce that the ATTORNEY REPELLANT PACKAGE has indeed materialized as a versatile usable technology for patriots facing the threat of a civil lawsuit. I could not be more optimistic about its potential to rewrite the rules.

The Package is an expansion of the unique commercial technology I discussed on my July 6th and 13th 2008 broadcasts for ending the controversy, ending the threats, relieving the stress, and discouraging attorneys from suing or even getting involved - even after months of intimidation. It has been adapted to address four specific situations:

1. Threat of a lawsuit,

2. Threat to hire an a-turn-on-me,

3. Demand from an at-turn-on-me for payment or performance,

4. A novation (new contract offer) by an a-turn-on-me demanding payment of a claim which was previously settled with a BIC payment instrument under public policy.

Using this technology, we have found that the opponent has not even been able to find an attorney to respond to our presentments. Instead, they find themselves forced to write their own responses without any knowledge of the perils of commercial dishonor. At that point, it’s checkmate. The Attorney Repellent Package is designed to:

1. discourage an attorney from taking the case (time is money)
2. discourage a lawsuit if an attorney is already involved (using their own rules as the estoppel)
3. transfer the liability to the attorney if he proceeds to make an offer (ising their own UCC)
4. provide an abundance of public policy liability if he attempts to redraft the previous settlement (ie. if he demands payment of an account previously paid with a promissory note, ZYA money order, or other negotiable instrument), and
5. arm the patriot with an administrative judgment and estoppel so if he feels compelled to appear in court he can say, “Excuse me, but why are you letting him speak? Is the court not aware that there is an estoppel in place? That Mr. Jones has waived the privilege of objection?” and then follow through with the enforcements discussed on the July 20 and 27, 2008 broadcasts.

Depending on the stage of the controversy, the offer/demand is met by offering FULL SETTLEMENT and an OPPORTUNITY TO EXHAUST HIS ADMINSTRATIVE REMEDY. This simple step – OFFERING TO PAY INSTEAD OF ARGUING - usually incapacitates the a-turn-on-me and takes him out of his game (out of equity). Thirty years defiling his brothers and suddenly he can’t file a lawsuit. He has an offer of complete satisfaction on the table. If he ignores it, he has failed to exhaust his administrative remedy. He will have to lie to the court to file suit. He will have to concoct a controversy. He will have to risk his license. All for a case where the Defendant can dismiss the action with a simple petition for ”failure to state a claim and exhaust the administrative remedy” based upon the evidence (notary certification). He will have to waste time and money on a single pesky adversary instead of playing golf. As time IS money (or the loss of it) to the legal profession, he will usually decide to bail or decline to intervene.

The ATTORNEY REPELLENT PACKAGE applies these principles to the four situations noted above. If he does try to file, he soon discovers that he may face a substantial fee for trespassing on a private contract. He may be paid a perfectly sound monetary instrument that he is ill-trained to negotiate. He may face IRS trying to collect the associated liability or punitive liabilities for his intrusions. He may face DR charges. He may face service of a warrant for the arrest of his bond on the underwriters. Every such contingency is repugnant to his desire to generate revenues. And every such procedure is available to any law merchant who simply decides to stand up and take the initiative.

I have tried to refine this package and make it easily adaptable. It includes dual modalities for communicating as a sovereign, OR camouflaged in-the-box. Alternative paragraphs are provided for common situations (cut and paste). Guess work and wasted time have been minimized to the best of my ability. Every step has written instructions. The various choices for differing situations are segregated with color coding. The writing has been edited and re-edited.

Using this technology, patriots have reported an immediate sense of relief. Suddenly the threats become pleas for additional time. Even vicious opponents turn docile. They go from bluster to floundering in our world of commerce. When counsel does appear, their law school education becomes their Achilles heel. They literally know not what they do. When we OFFER TO PAY, request that they STATE A CLAIM, and provide an opportunity to EXHAUST THEIR ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDY, we incapacitate them with their own language. Can they sue with an offer of full satisfaction on the table? Can they do anything except state a claim? And when they do, boom—it’s paid using the principles of BIC. They usuall don't know what hit them. Once they realize that THEY are holding all the liability as holder in due course and IRS is not as casual about the value of negotiable instruments, they begin to realize they are in over their heads. The Attorney Repellant Package makes it abundantly clear that the a-turn-on-me is drowning in public policy - and it gives him a way to back out BEFORE he gets involved.

This is usable technology that does not require withdrawing from commercial society, terminating life insurance, credit cards and bank accounts, bowing out of wills, or suing the attorney in an equity court. The beauty of commerce is our ability to drag them out of equity ainto our court of comfort, and then return to our normal lives. Although there are no guarantees, and there are always risks when dealing with knee-jerk a-turn-on-me’s, most trespassers have simply disappeared.

The ATTORNEY REPELLENT PACKAGE is NOT for court cases, tax cases, criminal cases, foreclosure or family court. It is available with and without the latest BIC instruments and tax remedies I use personally. As with the CONTRACT DISPUTE SETTLEMENT PACKAGE, I have donated the package to a local ministry to allow their good works to reap the fruits of the many months of labor and years of research that went into this technology. When you make the donation, you are helping others in dire need. It's a win-win. I apologize to those who believe that all of my labor should be donated to the world at large to prove my good intentions, and ask for your understanding. You can order the package from:

[email protected]

Friends, Sharon is NOT a member of our patriot community so please do NOT include her on your mass-mailing list or send her questions about BIC or angry responses when she can't provide answers. She’s just a messenger following my criteria for distributing the Package (see next paragraph).

The Attorney Repellant Package is ordered by EMAIL and delivered by EMAIL. It is NOT for general distribution. It can only be ordered using a credit card issued in the name of the ordering party (not a disposable gift card, even if registered). NO orders are processed without ALL of the requested personal information on the order form (including social security number) as part of our screening and security measures. Your personal information is embedded in your copy of the package to discourage distribution, and copying is reported to our server. I regret the need for such measures, and appreciate your understanding. Past abuses which have injured our colleagues require these precautions. As I do not want you to waste funds, orders are reviewed to screen out inappropriate uses such as foreclosures, IRS disputes, divorce, custody and court cases, among others.

Please listen to my discussion of the a-turn-on-me repellant technology on the July 6th and 13th 2008 editions of TAKE NO PRISONERS which can be downloaded from the Republic Broadcasting Network archives. I can’t guarantee these measures will always work, but I can guarantee that it’s MY best work. It’s designed to give relief when an a-turn--on-me’s belief that he has the right to trespass on our private affairs is making our lives hell.

AND PLEASE JOIN ME (SUNDAY), LIVE ON TAKE NO PRISONERS for an important announcement about a SAFETY MODIFICATION to the bedrock BIC technology that will be applied across the board. And an announcement regarding the North American BIC Law Merchant Event being held in Northern, New York on October 30 – November 3. I am invigorated by the prospect of sharing usable tangible technology with our Canadian counterparts, while providing my fellow Americans with an additional opportunity to learn and refine their BIC commercial skills in comprehensive networking with fellow law merchants from around the country.

That’s 9 PM EST on the Republic Broadcasting Network:

[link to www.republicbroadcasting.org]

We will also be taking your questions at 1 (800) 313-9443.

I thank you for reading. If you have no objection, would you kindly forward this email to your list?

God bless,
Sam Kennedy

PS. Regarding all those emails I receive which report imminent foreclosure and eviction, the COLLECTING IN BANKRUPTCY seminar is available for those whose back is up against the wall through Brian at:

[email protected] (please not the “dot”)

Whether or not you order the course, every such party needs to STOP THE ACTION IMMEDIATELY - a simple process of filing a bankruptcy action in Federal court.
__________________________
The Save America Crusade
FOR ENTERTAINMENT PURPOSES ONLY - NOT LEGAL ADVICE.
PLEASE BE CAUTIOUS. MOST PROBLEMS ARE SELF-CREATED.

- Attorney Repellant Package: [email protected]
- Contract Dispute Settlement Package: [email protected]
- Collecting in Bankruptcy Seminar on CD: [email protected]
- Rockland Mass. Seminar: [email protected]
- To be removed from this email list, please send a blank email to “[email protected]” from the address you wish removed with the words: REMOVE FROM LIST in the subject line for prompt action.

*BIC = Beneficiaries-in-common

** PLEASE NOTE: The email address from where these weekly emails are sent is not monitored. Questions sent to that address are lost forever.

thanks for links!

5 indicted for using fake diplomatic id's
By MARIA SUDEKUM FISHER
(Published August 13, 2008)

KANSAS CITY, Mo. — A federal grand jury has indicted five men for participating in a conspiracy to use fraudulent diplomatic credentials in order to identify themselves as individual sovereign states, U.S. attorney John F. Wood said Wednesday.

The government said the men were involved in sovereign citizen groups that reject the legitimacy and authority of the U.S. government.

David L. Robinson, 65, of Lawrence, Kan.; Daniel W. Denham, 49, of Kingsville, Mo.; Larry P. Goodyke, 51, of Henderson, Nev.; Blake W. Bestol, 47, of Cheyenne, Wyo., and John D. Conrey, 43, of Foristell, Mo., were charged in the 18-count indictment.

The indictment, which was reached earlier this month, was announced Wednesday after initial court appearances by Robinson and Denham. Robinson and Denham had originally been charged in December 2007. But the new indictment announced Wednesday added Goodyke, Bestol and Conrey.

In addition to the charge of conspiring to defraud the U.S. government, the defendants were charged with multiple counts of transferring the fake diplomatic credentials bearing the seal of the U.S. Department of State. Robinson faces an additional charge of wrongfully using a government seal or instrument.

Denham and Robinson both pleaded not guilty to the original charges, and Robinson would plead not guilty to the charges in the new indictment, said his lawyer, Kenton Hall of Kansas City.

"And I anticipate there will be a trial," Hall said.

A call to Denham's lawyer, David Johnson, was not returned Wednesday. It was unclear if the other men had lawyers.

The indictment alleges that the men conspired to buy and sell the fraudulent identification cards from about July 2006 until October 2007. The three-by-four-inch laminated cards, which identified the bearer as an "Ambassador," contained a photograph of the bearer of the card, the seal of the U.S. Department of State and the words "Diplomatic Identification."

Wood said customers paid from $450 to $1,500 to get the cards and that customers were told the benefits of obtaining the card included not having to pay taxes and immunity from being stopped, detained, or arrested by law enforcement personnel.

Robinson said he is involved in the sovereign citizen movement and that the ID cards helped identify people as "sovereign 'de jure' citizens separate from the 'de facto' government that's in place now."

But he said he felt prosecutors were over-reacting.

"How great is a conspiracy when you help 10 people over three years get ID cards? That's worth 65 years in prison?" said Robinson, a retired businessman.

Robinson said the cards offer no privileges and that he did not receive more than $400 for a card. He said he sent the money to "the people who made the cards."

The indictment said Goodyke and Bestol were customers of Robinson and Denham and ordered fraudulent identification cards from them. Conrey is accused of receiving one of the fraudulent identification cards from Denham through Bestol, the indictment said

Thanks, I'll look at it now!

Hey link says click start button, but its not there. How do I play the link?

Couldn't see it in Firefox, but the 'Play' button is there in IE

I have IE, but its not there, thank anyway...would have loved to hear it..
If anyone could post a link of the "start" button here on glp it would be appreciated!

On the bars that look like text dividers there are triangles on the left (pointing to the right) - click on it. They are working fine on my PC.

All lessons now uploaded.

online documents being uploaded this week.

At last, intellectual food for thought with much needed contemplation.

You'll enjoy this from Dr Sam Kennedy:

For questions, please send your email to [email protected]

ESSENTIAL TECHNOLOGY IN THE COURT


Folks,

How would you like to be able to handle your own affairs in court once and for all? During the first hour of this Sunday’s broadcast of TAKE NO PRISONERS (9 PM EST, Republic Broadcasting Network), I will dissect and analyze a recent court hearing demonstrating line by line how easily we might turn such a thing around and STOP THE ASSUMPTION OF AUTHORITY. The transcript is enclosed at the end of this email. I am sending it out now so that you may review it BEFORE the broadcast and identify the problems and areas for improvement among the wide array of tools at our disposal. That exercise alone is the remedy many of you have been seeking.

How might you have handled the question about the patriot’s name without confessing to the status of an artificial person within the first five seconds? How might you have used questions to secure THEIR confession to impotence ON THE RECORD instead of YOU confessing into the jurisdiction by arguing? How might you have secured their confession to crimes against mankind, and used such confession to end the proceedings? How might YOU have deflected the nonsense about charges and statutes and instead sought their confession ON THE RECORD to crimes against mankind? Are you able to see the opportunity to use questions like a scalpel instead of using argument and inadvertent testimony? Are you cheering his focus on jurisdiction or wishing for alternatives? Could you have converted their attack into THE WORST DAY OF THEIR PROFESSIONAL LIVES - the day they are forced to confront their own incivility and Law-lessness as collection agents for U.S. Inc.?

By the end of the first hour of the broadcast, I hope you will appreciate just how unpleasant such a day can be in the life of a judge, and why he would seek to have the case disappear. With that understanding, I hope you will appreciate THEIR dilemma and better understand that we do NOT have to be confrontational or insulting. Ratherm as sovereigns, we can have compassion for the reality that in that single day their entire world of Sacred Fictions comes crashing down around their head. I very much appreciate the listener who shared this transcript for the purpose of learning.

During the second hour, Tom Shaults will bless us with his continued discussion of conducting a trial in their de facto courtroom as a sovereign man, supreme authority and observer of criminal activity – beginning with everyone’s nemesis: the threat of contempt to suppress the truth. I am very excited about the value of Sunday’s program in our collective advancement as sovereign men and women.

Folks, permit me to reassure those who have inquired. Sunday's lessons, and the many previous ideas offered on TAKE NO PRISONERS, are being compiled feverishly as the first curriculum of it’s kind: a stepwise hotlinked manual and training curriculum of LEARNABLE law merchant and sovereign courtroom techniques presently entitled:

Deconstructing the De facto Courtroom:
Lawful remedy to “legalized” kidnapping under color of law

**** Somehow, some way, I will make this material available TO MENTORS beginning with the final two days of the North American Event. COMPETENCY IS ESSENTIAL if the decades of victimization are to end. Have you not seen the ease with which a-turn-on-me’s, corporate agents, and promoters of fear can sabotage the entire patriot community with a single email that says: “John did this; now we’re all screwed”? IN GOOD CONSCIENCE, I WILL NOT FACILITATE THE DESTRUCTION OF THIS TECHNOLOGY by fostering casual knowledge and ill-prepared usage that provides the slave masters with their satanic sound-bites. One way or the other, I will see that every patriot has access to comprehensive training, mock courtrooms, strident judges, and deprogramming of their fears, in formalized forums AND THROUGH THIS BROADCAST AS A FREE SOURCE OF IMMEASURABLE VALUE. I urge you to seek out the Event ([email protected]), or a comprehensive advanced training forum if and when they become available, or a trained mentor who has demonstrated dedication to freedom competency. What will be the results if thousands embrace these formidible skills instead of facilitating fear? I apologize for the inconvenient location of the Event, it did not start out with an eye on enforcement issues. But the combining of BIC with these in-court enforcement strategies will make the couple of hours drive worthwhile for Americans as well as Canadians. ****

Also on Sunday night, I will be reporting on a technology that I believe will be as revolutionary as the Instant Affidavit. It began as a mere thought Tuesday night (as did the Instant Affidavit), and was completed within 24 hours. Hereafter, we will be able to prove the value and validity of the BIC instruments to the public in a manner that will make it impossible to deny or file false affidavits or misappropriate the funds. With this addition to BIC, I see a whole army of creative enforcements once outside-the-box thinkers get their hands on it. Folks, the harder the cases become, the more the Lord blesses us with His insights.

Hope to see you Sunday night (9 PM EST; [link to www.republicbroadcasting.org] And if you have no objection, would you kindly forward this email to your list?

God bless,
Sam Kennedy

PS. Transcript appears below
__________________________
The Save America Crusade
FOR ENTERTAINMENT PURPOSES ONLY - NOT LEGAL ADVICE.
PLEASE BE CAUTIOUS. MOST PROBLEMS ARE SELF-CREATED.

- Attorney Repellant Package: [email protected]
- Contract Dispute Settlement Package: [email protected]
- Collecting in Bankruptcy Seminar on CD: [email protected]
- Rockland Mass. Seminar: [email protected]

* BIC = Beneficiaries-in-common
* To be removed from this email list, please contact “[email protected]” from the address you wish removed.
* PLEASE NOTE: The email address from where these weekly emails are sent is not monitored. Questions sent to that address are lost forever.


TRANSCRIPT OF HEARING

LOCAL COURT

TANGLEWOOD



MAGISTRATE JAMESON



WEDNESDAY 30 JULY 2008


Commissioner of Taxation v John WILLIAMS



OFFENCE Failing to comply with a court order to furnish Business Activity Statements



Ms DREVER for the Informant

Accused appeared in person



HIS HONOUR: Sir are you John Williams?



ACCUSED: That’s me.



HIS HONOUR: Would you just stand behind the tall microphone please. Do you have anybody representing you here today sir?



ACCUSED: What’s your name?



HIS HONOUR: I’m magistrate Jameson. Do you have anybody representing you here today?



ACCUSED: NO I’m here to challenge the jurisdiction of the court. I have it in written form and I’d like the stamp by the court and the court keep one copy and one copy to the opposition and I’ll keep the other two.



HIS HONOUR: All right so just before we get onto that Mr Williams –



ACCUSED: Well you can’t get on with anything because I’m challenging the jurisdiction of the court. All proceedings cease. There is a peremptory stay of proceedings until the jurisdiction is determined by a special jury. That is the law.



HIS HONOUR: Do you want to swap places? Do you want to sit up here? Guess what?



ACCUSED: Do you know the law?



HIS HONOUR: Guess what?



ACCUSED: Do you know the law?



HIS HONOUR: Just listen to me. I run this court, not you.



ACCUSED: No, the people run this court, you’re only a servant of the people. You’re only a servant.



HIS HONOUR: I don’t dispute that, but it’s my court –



ACCUSED: It’s not your court, it’s the people’s court.



HIS HNOUR: -- and I’ll run proceedings.



ACCUSED: Where’s your name on the door? This is a court of the people. Not you.



HIS HONOUR: Now listen to me. I’ll listen to you but there’s one condition, you listen to me. Understood?



ACCUSED: Do you understand?



HIS HONOUR: What?



ACCUSED: Do you understand that I have a right for a trial by jury and that I am –



HIS HONOUR: No you don’t.



ACCUSED: Do you understand?

HIS HONOUR: No you don’t bu anywau listen to me.



ACCUSED: You’re saying I don’t have the right, you mean our right to trial by jury has beenextinguished? By who?



HIS HONOUR: Will you listen to me r I’ll have you removed. It’s that simple.



ACCUSED: I’m challenging the jurisdiction of the court, it’s simple.



HIS HONOUR: Will you listen to me. We are not at that point, right?



ACCUSED: Are we getting there?

HIS HONOUR: Well if you give me an opportunity to speak we might. Finish at 4 o’clock. There are a number of allegations before the court, there are ten allegations of failing to comply with a court order

to furnish a Business activity Statement for the periods September 04, December 04, March 05, June 05, September 05, December 05, March 06, June 06, September 06, December 06. Do you challenge the jurisdiction of the court in respect to those matters?



ACCUSED: Yes.



HIS HONOUR: There is a second set of proceedings –



ACCUSED: That is called subject matter. I challenge the jurisdiction. There are three basic grounds for challenging, one is subject matter, the other is relationship, the other one is competence. I’m challenging on all grounds. Now I’d like those papers stamped and returned to me please.



HIS HONOUR: There is a second set of proceedings, 19 allegations of failing to comply with the requirements to lodge GST returns for the period ending 30 June 2002. Do you challenge the jurisdiction of the court?



ACCUSED: I challenge the jurisdiction of the court to deal with those matters.



DREVER: Sir if I just may interrupt the defendant here. Your Honour in relation to the first set of offences the first charge is – I seek leave to withdraw that charge you Honour so there should be nine offences under s 8H of the taxation Administration Act, and the second set of offences your Honour I have no knowledge of.



HIS HONOUR: In fact –



DREVER: I believe they may be – the offences your Honour referring to in the second set may be the initial conviction which has led to this matter coming before the court again. They related to – were they in court your Honour on 17 December last year?



HIS HONOUR: Yes.



DREVER: Yes your Honour. The defendant was convicted on that occasion and failure to comply with an order made on that occasion means that the matters have come back to court today on a new Court Attendance Notice.



HIS HONOUR: So they’re the allegations under s 8G and s 8H.



DREVER: That’s right your Honour and in relation to the first charge I seek leave to withdraw that first charge, so the matters before the court –



HIS HONOUR: Which is on or about 18 February 2008 at North Rocks, is that right, is that sequence 1?



DREVER: They all start in that fashion your Honour but it relates to the BAS for the period between 1 July 2004 and 30 September 2004.



HIS HONOUR: All right so, 1(i).



DREVER: That’s right your Honour yes.



HIS HONOUR: Why don’t you come and have a seat at the bar table sir. Have a seat over there. Now the prosecutor wants to withdraw sequence number 1 sir, which is 1 (i) on the Court attendance Notice. Do you have any objection to that?

ACCUSED: I’m objecting to the jurisdiction of the court.



HIS HONOUR: I understand that but do you have any objection to that charge being withdrawn? How can I determine jurisdiction –



ACCUSED: You can’t detemine anything, you’ve got no jurisdiction.



HIS HONOUR: All right –



ACCUSED: Do you understand? You have no jurisdiction because I have not signed a Memorandum of Consent to say that I would be without a jury. It’s the law. No parliament can take away the rights of the people. Our most important right, the glory of English law, as Blackstone said, the glory of English law is trial by jury.



HIS HONOUR: Have a seat, if you’d like to of course.



ACCUSED: Thank you.



HIS HONOUR: Now where’s these documents you want me to look at?



ACCUSED: Why do you want to look at it, you’ve got no jurisdiction. You have no – there is a peremptory stay of proceedings. It’s in that document. Read it.



HIS HONOUR: I just asked to read it and you said I’m not going to.



ACCUSED: Then you are denying not only my rights, legal rights, but also you are denying legal procedure. This is the definition of a kangaroo court. Do you understand that this is a kangaroo court?



HIS HONOUR: No



ACCUSED: It is a kangaroo court because you are disregarding legal rights and you are disregarding legal procedures. My right to trial by jury, you’re disregarding that, this is a legal procedure, challenging

the jurisdiction of the court, you are disregarding that. That is the definition of a kangaroo court.



HIS HONOUR: Do you want me to read your documents or not?

ACCUSED: No. You’ve got no jurisdiction.



HIS HONOUR: Proceed.



DREVER: Yes your Honour.



ACCUSED: You’ve got no authority to proceed. You are in violation of the law.



HIS HONOUR: You just watch it happen around you sir.



ACCUSED: I can’t hear – what?



HIS HONOUR: I said you just watch this all happen around you, you can participate if you want to—



ACCUSED: And you are defying justice, justice is the protection of right and the punishment of wrongs. You are going against justice. You are in contempt of court because contempt of court is interfering with the administration of justice.



DREVER: Your Honour I’ll just get my documents.



HIS HONOUR: Hm-mm.



ACCUSED: We all must know our rights otherwise we have none.



DREVER: Your Honour I have a statement from the ATO office, does your Honour—



ACCUSED: You are not taught in schools—



DREVER: --I’m not sure if the defendant objects—



ACCUSED: --they are relying upon your ignorance. They are getting away with these..(not transcribable).. reports, it is all totally illegal. It is treason in fact. Treason. What these people are doing is treason. They are denying democracy. They are denying trial by jury, that is treason.



HIS HONOUR: One more outburst—



ACCUSED: I’m trying to help you.



HIS HONOUR: One more outburst and I’ll have you removed.



ACCUSED: I’m trying to help you.



HIS HONOUR: No, no, no.



ACCUSED: Yes you are, you’re doing wrong. Do you know the wording of the Bill of Rights? It says, “Even counselor, judges and ministers endeavouring—



HIS HONOUR: Are you going to allow the prosecutor to present her case?

ACCUSED: No because there is no jurisdiction in this court. It’s simple. We have the – there was even a case back in 1824 against the magistrates of Sydney and it came down heavily against the magistrates of Sydney because they were denying ordinary people the right to trial by jury. Have you read that case?



HIS HONOUR: Mr Williams I just activated the duress alarm. You’ll be removed in a moment. You are interfering with the processes of this court.



ACCUSED: No I’m not. You are interfering the court—



HIS HONOUR: You just turned your back and addressed the gallery while a prosecutor was speaking—



ACCUSED: Because this is a public court.



HIS HONOUR: I’ve invited you to allow the prosecutor to present her case, she will not do so, I’m going to have you removed.



ACCUSED: I’m denying because they have no jurisdiction. Are you going to get the sheriffs, because the role of the sheriff is to protect our rights and allow us to exercise those rights in safety. That’s the role of the sheriff. Are you going to get the sheriff to disobey his duty.



HIS HONOUR: Mr Williams, the sheriffs are behind you, I’m going to ask them to remove you—



ACCUSED: Do you know your job?

SPEAKER: You’ll have to come out sir.



ACCUSED: See, a simple question.



HIS HONOUR: I’ve given you many warnings, I’ve given you the opportunity to cease interfering with the processes of this court, you are refusing to do so—



ACCUSED: There is no court of proper jurisdiction. It is a kangaroo court.



SPEAKER: Let’s go out.



ACCUSED: I’ve been in communication with the Sheriff of New South Wales, I got a call – Chris Allen, trying to help him, showing him his own duty of care and he is to protect our rights and what you are doing is denying those rights. It’s a simple case of justice.



SPEAKER: Let’s go, let’s go.



ACCUSED: See they do this all the time, there’s only two sheriffs, normally about five or six. Contact me any time.



HIS HONOUR: Ms Drever?



DREVER: Yes your Honour I have--



HIS HONOUR: You might be able to present your case now.



DREVER: I have my witness here your Honour but would your Honour allow me to tender her statement?



HIS HONOUR: Yes



DREVER: I tender a statement of Elizabeth Vestos(?) of the ATO dated 2 June 2008 and does your Honour wish me to tender a statement of facts at this point?



HIS HONOUR: Yes



DREVER: And the defendant’s record. I tender those documents your Honour.



HIS HONOUR: Thanks. Just pardon me while I read that material.



THE MATTER OF COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION AND JOHN WILLIAMS I GRANT LEAVE TO WITHDRAW SEQUENCE 1(i).



I FIND EACH OF THE OTHER ALLEGATIONS PROVED, S 196.

S 25(2) WARRANT TO ISSUE.

removed double post caused by GLP glitch.

I was looking for keith livingway for upcoming conference. How do I get there. Maybe this site will get me in.

Thanks