if he was born in Mombasa, Kenya,Obama

[link to noiri.blogspot.com]


Reports quote information that certified copies of a Kenyan Birth
Certificate (BC) for Obama were sent from Kenya, and have been received by
three separate individuals.
And that these documents are certified, with an embossed seal, and display
the name of the hospital where Obama was born, as well as witness
signatures.


Reportedly this BC reflects information filed Oct. 9 by Philip Berg.

See item #18 on this docket, page 10, the relevant language of which, underlined in red, is captured here in a screen shot:

Barack Hussein Obama II

By Judah Benjamin,

It has been asserted by a number of sources, including Andy Martin, that Barack Hussein Obama was born in Mombasa, Kenya and not in Hawaii.

Philip Berg's Latest Motion to the Court is more explicit since it gives an exact Place of Birth. I must assume that Berg did not simply pluck the Location out of thin air, Mombasa has more than one Hospital, though Coast
Provincial General was the best in 1961.
British Birth Certificates have a Standard Format which has been more or
less the same since 1837 and they can only be challenged in a British Court.
Kenyan Law is explicit and can only be challenged in a Kenyan Court.
Indonesian Law is explicit and can only be challenged in an Indonesian
Court. Be clear, if Obama was born in Kenya this is not simply a matter for
the US Courts, or US Law.
If he was born in Kenya, and his parents were Legally Married [which on the
Preponderance of Evidence they were, his father's first "Marriage" being a
Tribal, or Village, Marriage, which was not Legally Recognized] due to the
age of his mother he would NOT have been a US Citizen. The Immigration and
Nationality Act 1952, 8 U.S.C. 1401. Sec. 301 (g) [Effective November 14,
1986] does not apply, nor does Title III, Immigration and Nationality Act
Section 309. [8 U.S.C. 1409].
Unless he has taken the Oath of Allegiance as a Naturalized Citizen since he
was 18 years old, and if he was born in Mombasa, Kenya, Barack Hussein Obama
II would not be a US Citizen, period. The issue of whether or not he was
Natural Born under Article II of the Constitution of the United States would
cease to matter and he would need to be Deported as an Illegal Alien.
Impeachment as a Senator would seem not to be necessary since he would never
Legally have been one, but Diane Feinstein and the members of the Senate
Ethics and Rules Committee would be liable to Impeachment. So would their
opposite numbers in the Illinois Senate and the appropriate officials of the
Illinois State Supreme Court and Bar, so far as I can see.
If Senator Barack Hussein Obama II was born in The Coast Provincial General
Hospital at Mombasa in Kenya at 7.24 PM on August 4th 1961, or at any other
time, he is not a Natural Born Citizen of these United States and he never
was. Philip J Berg, Esq, is correct, under the Nationality Act of 1940, as
Revised June 1952 and in accord with United States of America vs
Cervantes-Nava 281 F 3d 501 (2002) and Drozd vs INS, 155 F 3d 81, 85-88 (2d
Circuit 1998) Senator Barack Hussein Obama II would not ever have been a
Legal US Citizen at all, unless he was Naturalized.

If he was born in The Coast Provincial General Hospital at Mombasa in Kenya any Certificate, or Certification of Live Birth, issued for him by the Stateof Hawaii is a Fraudulent and Illegal Document. At Birth he would have been
a UK and Colonies Citizen and in accord with the Kenyan Constitution he would have become a Kenyan Citizen in December 1963. He would not have been a US Citizen.


Alternatively, his UK and Colonies Birth Certificate issued in Mombasa in August 1961 could be a Fraudulent and Illegal Document. The two BCs would need to be compared.


By this I mean the Original Vault Copy of the Hawaiian Birth Certificate and not the Amended, Post Adoption, Copy, Legally available to the Senator, assuming he was, as indicated by the Preponderance of Evidence, Adopted by Lolo Soetoro.

This case might also need to go through the UK and Kenyan Courts and becomes a Matter of International Law and Controversy.

.....................................


Brian Frank
864-425-1161
"None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who
falsely believe they are free."

Johann Wolfgang von Goethe

This message (and any associated files) is intended only for the use of the
individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information
that is confidential, attorney-client and work product, subject to copyright
or constitutes a trade secret. If you are not the intended recipient you are
hereby notified that any dissemination, copying or distribution of this
message, or files associated with this message, is strictly prohibited. If
you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by
replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. Messages sent to
and from us may be monitored.

Internet communications cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as
information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or
incomplete, or contain viruses. Therefore, we do not accept responsibility
for any errors or omissions that are present in this message, or any
attachment, that have arisen as a result of e-mail transmission. If
verification is required, please request a hard-copy version. Any views or
opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
represent those of the firm.

WARNING: Due to Presidential Executive Orders the National Security Agency
(NSA) may have read this email without probable cause, warrant or notice.
And now the government is permitted to listen to you via your own cell phone
even when it is turned off. Under Executive Orders to the NSA, and US
District Court rulings for the FBI, either agency may do this without any
judicial or legislative review or oversight.

"Great accomplishments occur when a small group of individuals with
"laser-beam" focus work in harmonious cooperation with each other, with a
specific "vividly defined" goal written down!"
by Chris Lawton

All Common Law Rights are reserved explicitly without prejudice
UCC 1-103, 1-105, 1-207.
.