Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,210 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 349,991
Pageviews Today: 528,153Threads Today: 202Posts Today: 2,589
06:11 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Wednesday, January 21, 2009 Obama has been in power only one day and they are already playing games with the Supreme Court

 
playing games
User ID: 599138
United States
01/23/2009 09:25 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Wednesday, January 21, 2009 Obama has been in power only one day and they are already playing games with the Supreme Court
Wednesday, January 21, 2009



Obama has been in power only one day and they are already playing games with the Supreme Court.

Obama has been in power only one day. Suddenly today my case has disappeared from the docket. The case was not dismissed. It is supposed to be heard on the 23rd of January. Each and every American Citizen needs to call the Supreme court and demand decency from these Justices. They have violated all principles of judicial integrity and ethics by inviting Obama and Biden to the closed door meeting only a few days before the hearing. They have inaugurated him in from of millions of people, when 3 days after the inauguration they are supposed to hear my case, where I state that Obama is not eligible for presidency and never was eligible. They were supposed to recuse themselves from the inauguration. What is going on? Is Chicago mafia influencing the Supreme Court? If we don't have integrity with our elected officials and the whole system is corrupt, then it is time to revolt and change the system.
Posted by Orly Taitz, DDS Esq. at 3:09 PM 0 comments Links to this post
THE MATTER IS NOW CLEARED UP AND THE SUPREME COURT SAY THEY DO NOT KNOW WHAT HAPPENED TO THE DOCKET
IT JUST DISAPPEARED AND IS NOW BACK .

ALSO DR ORLY'S WIKI PEDIA PAGE WAS DELETED AT THE SAME TIME.

The article below was posted on wikipedia. Later this article was mysteriously deleted. Can someone call people running wikipedia and check, who deleted this article and why?
At the same time all info about my case disappeared from Supreme Court Docket and only after a large number of people called the Supreme Court and complained (reportedly there was a meltdown of the phones at SCOTUS)information reappeared. Supreme court had no info, why did it happen.
At the same time Lisa Ostella called me in TX and stated that someone deleted my membership info with the attorney's bar and people were calling and questioning if Orly Taitz is my real name and if I really exist.
It is my real name and I really exist, though it looks like some people would rather I don't exist.

Orly Taitz - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Orly Taitz is a California attorney and Orange County dentist who is active among people who doubt Barack Obama is eligible to be president of the United States. Dr. Taitz represents nurse and Libertarian Party politician Gail Lightfoot in a case filed at the United States Supreme Court questioning Obama's eligibility. Dr. Taitz is also the lead attorney in...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orly_Taitz - Cached
Posted by Orly Taitz, DDS Esq. at 4:42 AM 0 comments Links to this post
From reader Steve Holloway
Good lady I hope you will pray with me and I pray before the throne of God. Dear Lord...please hear this prayer.... open the eyes and ears of the Justices. Make there hearts hurt to do your will Father. To follow the laws of this Great Land that exists because you willed it. We have lost our way as a nation Father and I pray you will forgive us. Please find another way to bring us as a nation closer to you. This person Obama will destroy us as a nation and your Christian followers. Please protect us and give us strength. Be with Dr. Orly and her family. Dear Lord pour out great blessing on her and give her a peace of mind. She is standing in the gap for this nation. Be with her Lord. In you mighty Son's name Jesus Christ we pray....Amen. Steve Holloway
Posted by Orly Taitz, DDS Esq. at 4:39 AM 0 comments Links to this post

[link to drorly.blogspot.com]








The SCOTUS docket system seems to be up and running again:

[link to origin.www.supremecourtus.gov]

As you can see below, this docket schedule is not showing that a supplemental brief was delivered last night and a copy resent this morning to the justices for review for this conference tomorrow.

This supplemental brief is important. It was filed and had subpoenas issued based on President Bush's last Executive Order to have Individuals in Positions of Public Trust provide copies of any and all records in regards to their level of character, conduct and fitness for investigation.

I called the Supreme Court twice now. They cannot confirm if these briefs were delivered to the justices. Dan Bickell routes my calls to his voice mail. The schedule below is not showing these briefs as distributed.

The Supreme Court Clerk's Office is 202-479-3011

Maybe if more made phone calls, these briefs will get distributed? Thanks!

Take a look at The Hill today to see the heartburn President Bush's Executive Order is causing!

[link to mobile.thehill.com]
Bush leaves his successor nasty surprise

I guess Orly Taitz making a case from it didn't help either! (Thank you Orly!)


~~~Date~~~
~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dec 12 2008
Application (08A524) for a stay pending the filing and disposition of a petition for a writ of certiorari, submitted to Justice Kennedy.
Dec 17 2008
Application (08A524) denied by Justice Kennedy.
Dec 29 2008
Application (08A524) refiled and submitted to The Chief Justice.
Jan 7 2009
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 23, 2009.
Jan 7 2009
Application (08A524) referred to the Court.
Jan 13 2009
Suggestion for recusal received from applicant.
-------------------------------------------------------------​------

And we are still on conference for tomorrow.
Posted by CalperniaUSA at 10:04 AM 0 comments Links to this post
Today at the Williamson County TX Courthouse
Yesterday Dr. Orly Taitz flew down to Texas to assist in a suit filed in Georgetown, TX in a case against the Texas Secretary of State for not verifying that Obama was elgible for POTUS.

The case was heard this morning at the Williamson County courthouse.

In short, Dr. Taitz just told me that we, as citizens, have no standing.

They were only give 3 minutes to speak and that was done begrudgingly.

The information she just told me was pretty distressing. I'm going to let her tell the story herself; but she asked me to post this.

Check back for her full story when she is back at a computer.
Posted by CalperniaUSA at 8:33 AM 0 comments Links to this post
RE: A raft of subpoenas
The subpoenas referenced in previous post

[link to drorly.blogspot.com]

Can be reviewed at these links:

[link to defendourfreedoms.org]

[link to defendourfreedoms.org]
Posted by CalperniaUSA at 5:07 AM 0 comments Links to this post
Wednesday, January 21, 2009
A raft of subpoenas
Dr. Orly sent out many subpoenas in the last day or so, associated with Bush's executive order on Friday afternoon:




















For example, the subpoena sent to the FBI is:



An attachment included was

Attachment 3


As per Executive Order: Granting Reciprocity on Excepted Service and Federal Contractor Employee Fitness and Reinvestigating Individuals in Positions of Public Trust, see attached, please provide copies of any and all records in regards to level of character and conduct necessary pertaining to Barack H. Obama, a/k/a Barack H. Obama, II a/k/a Barry Obama, a/k/a Barry Soetoro. These documents have direct relation to holding a Position of Public Trust.

Documents to include:

Certified copy of original long vault birth certificate
Certified copies of any and all passports and passport applications held in the U.S., Indonesia, Great Britain and Kenya.
Certified copies of any and all school applications, school registrations, grant or student loan applications or funding received for Occidental College, Columbia University, Columbia College, Harvard University
Certified copies of any U.S. Port of Entry Records
Certified copies of any documentation pertaining to Social Security. Documentation showing multiple social security numbers being held
Certified copies of documentation showing a social security number being applied for in the state of Connecticut
Certified copies of immigration and naturalization records
Certified copies of any records showing legal name and name change



Orly also sent subpoenas to the Social Security Administration, Department of Education, Department of State, Department of Defense, CIA, Office of Personnel Management, Department of the Interior, IRS, Department of Health and Human Services, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and the Secret Service.
Posted by Robert Stevens at 5:52 PM 0 comments Links to this post
Supreme Court hottest potato
The New Media Journal | The Supreme Court’s Hottest Potato by Paul R. Hollrah [link to www.newmediajournal.us] The Supreme Court’s Hottest PotatoPaul R. Hollrah, NMJ.us Recent polls tell us that from 55-60 percent of the American people now believe that the question of Barack Obama’s eligibility to serve as President of the United States has at least some merit.



To review the bidding, more than a dozen lawsuits have been filed in federal courts alleging that Obama cannot serve as president by reason of the fact that he is not a “natural born” U.S. citizen, as required by Article II, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution.



A number of suits have made their way to the U.S. Supreme Court where, to date, all have been denied certiorari. Essentially all of the lawsuits allege that Obama fails to meet the “natural born” citizen requirement based on one or both of the following counts:



1) Barack Obama is not a “natural born” citizen by reason of the fact that he was born in Kenya, not in Hawaii. His paternal grandmother, a half sister, and a half brother in Kenya have testified that they were present at his birth in Mombasa on August 4, 1961. If that is the case, in order for Obama’s mother to pass on her U.S. citizenship to him, automatically, the law required that she must have been a U.S. resident for at least five years after her 14th birthday. Inasmuch as she was only 18 years, 8 months, and 6 days old when Obama was born, she did not technically meet that standard. If Obama was born in Kenya, as charged, he would have been born a British subject, his father’s nationality, and remains a British subject today.



2) When his mother married Indonesian Lolo Soetoro and moved to Jakarta in 1967, Obama was subsequently adopted by his stepfather. In renouncing her U.S. citizenship, Obama’s mother also renounced his U.S. citizenship. At that time Obama became an Indonesian citizen because Indonesian law did not recognize dual citizenships. In order for him to attend school in Indonesia, which he did, he had to be a citizen of that country.



Obama was sent back to Hawaii at age 10 to live with his grandparents. However, at age 20, while transferring from Occidental College to Columbia, Obama traveled to Indonesia to see his mother and from there to Pakistan for three weeks. Unfortunately for Obama, Pakistan was then on the U.S. State Department’s no-travel list, making it impossible to travel to Pakistan on a U.S. passport. The only reasonable alternative is that Obama traveled on an Indonesian passport, a document that could be obtained only by an Indonesian citizen. In that event, Obama would be an Indonesian citizen today.



There is no evidence that Obama’s mother or his grandparents made any effort to have his U.S. citizenship reinstated or that he took an oath of allegiance when he reached the age of 18. What makes these cases so intriguing is that Obama could end all speculation regarding his eligibility by simply making his birth records and his college records available for inspection by plaintiffs or by the courts. However, he has steadfastly refused to do so. Instead, he spends a small fortune on legal fees to keep from having to prove that he is, in fact, a “natural born” citizen.



So where do all of these cases stand, legally? Given that there appears to be credible evidence to support one or both of the alleged scenarios, how can the courts fail to adjudicate the matter? And what must be going through the minds of the justices as these cases are laid before them?



In each instance, the cases have been denied by the lower courts based on the question of “standing,” a ruling that has been consistently upheld by the Supreme Court... in some cases by individual justices; in other cases following a conference attended by all nine justices. In other words, the plaintiffs have failed to provide sufficient proof that they would be injured if Obama were to be elected and installed in office as a usurper.



However, given the charges as outlined above, the justices must have known in their own minds that the question of Obama’s eligibility would sooner or later have to be answered. After all, the U.S. Constitution is not merely a list of suggestions; it is a document containing hard and fast imperatives.



Even if we were a fly on the wall during the court’s conferences, we probably could not be sure exactly how the individual justices feel about these cases. If we had to guess, we’d say that there were two primary considerations on the minds of the justices:



1) As the ultimate defenders of the U.S. Constitution, they understand that they cannot allow a usurper, an impostor, to serve as President of the United States. Therefore, the question of Obama’s status as a “natural born” citizen absolutely must be settled, sooner or later.



2) After intervening in Florida in 2000 to prevent an outlaw Florida Supreme Court from interfering in the selection of the Florida electors, where they had absolutely no jurisdiction, the Court absolutely cannot be seen as interfering in the seating of a president in 2008... especially a black president. To do so would be an open invitation to insurrection.



It leaves the justices in a totally untenable situation. So what must they be thinking now?



The liberals on the court... Breyer, Ginsburg, Souter, and Stevens ... have probably convinced themselves, as we might expect liberals to do, to simply ignore the constitutional considerations surrounding Obama’s eligibility. After all, the Constitution is a “living” document; it means whatever liberals want it to mean on any given day. They’ll be thinking, “The election is over, the people have spoken, they’ve made their choice, so we’ll simply look the other way and act as if nothing happened.”



The centrist on the court, Justice Kennedy, has probably decided to wait and see what the conservatives do.



The conservatives on the court... Alito, Roberts, Scalia, and Thomas... are probably thinking that it’s best to wait until a case arises that absolutely demands to be heard. Until then, the conservative justices have probably justified in their own minds an argument to support the notion that, since Obama was not yet president when the suits were filed, the plaintiffs did, in fact, lack standing.



What they are likely waiting for is a case to be filed, post-inauguration, that even the liberals on the court cannot ignore. For example, if President Obama should decide in March 2009 that four additional brigades of U.S. troops should be sent to bolster our forces in Afghanistan... and one of those individuals refused to deploy based on a sincere belief that the commander in chief who ordered his/her deployment was, in fact, not eligible to serve as commander in chief... what then? Such a case would have to make its way through the courts and the plaintiff’s counsel would have every right to demand proof that Obama is eligible to serve as president.



Millions of Americans would immediately have standing to sue because of credible doubts that he lacks the authority to serve as president.

Barack Obama is set to take the Oath of Office on the west front of the U.S. Capitol at the stroke of noon tomorrow, January 20, 2009. It should take roughly a nanosecond or two after he says, “I do,” before the first challenge is filed. Then, even the most liberal members of the Court will be unable to dodge the issue. They will finally come face to face with the reality that the only thing that stands between the rule of law and the barrel of a gun is the U.S. Supreme Court. It promises to be the hottest potato the Court has ever handled.


-------------------------------------------------------------​-------------------
From Wall Street to Main Street and everywhere in between, stay up-to-date with the latest news.
Posted by Orly Taitz, DDS Esq. at 3:35 PM 0 comments Links to this post
Obama has been in power only one day and they are already playing games with the Supreme Court
Obama has been in power only one day. Suddenly today my case has disappeared from the docket. The case was not dismissed. It is supposed to be heard on the 23rd of January. Each and every American Citizen needs to call the Supreme court and demand decency from these Justices. They have violated all principles of judicial integrity and ethics by inviting Obama and Biden to the closed door meeting only a few days before the hearing. They have inaugurated him in from of millions of people, when 3 days after the inauguration they are supposed to hear my case, where I state that Obama is not eligible for presidency and never was eligible. They were supposed to recuse themselves from the inauguration. What is going on? Is Chicago mafia influencing the Supreme Court? If we don't have integrity with our elected officials and the whole system is corrupt, then it is time to revolt and change the system.
Posted by Orly Taitz, DDS Esq. at 3:09 PM 0 comments Links to this post
The Obama Ambush by Tom Kovach


From: Tom Kovach, author
Subject: HACKED -- the Obama ambush
To: "Tom Kovach"
Date: Wednesday, January 21, 2009, 8:15 AM

In the military, we were taught to "charge the ambush".

It would take awhile to explain all the technical reasons, but charging directly into an ambush is the best way to defeat it and live to tell about it.

For a long time, I've asked friends to SPREAD THE WORD.

Some have. Some have not.

Well... this morning, the center-column text of my blog DISAPPEARED.
[link to tomkovach.us]

For those of you that actually read it, you might recall that my last blog entry presented a cogent argument -- supported by the Uniform Code of Military Justice, and by military-security rules -- for why members of the military should DISOBEY any order issued by Barack Obama. And, specifically, I suggested that its guardians should REFUSE to hand over to Obama the nuclear "football".

Intentionally, I back-channeled that blog entry to someone that was previously
well-placed in the military intelligence community (but, "officially", no longer is).

My hope was that he would help to spread the word among patriotic, law-abiding military members -- who could then act as an unofficial "First Team" to slow down the erosion of our country from the White House outward.
[link to en.wikipedia.org]

Instead, he apparently passed it along to military cyber-warriors (most likely
the 83rd Network Operations Squadron out of Langley AFB, Virginia). And, apparently, they erased my blog.

They didn't erase all of it, though -- just the center column of the main page. You know, the place where most people would find my latest blog entry -- especially if they were subscribers.

So, YOUR MISSION, should you choose to accept it, is to SPREAD THE WORD.
(here's a link to the one they missed ... so far)
[link to tomkovach.us]

If this is what happens on DAY ONE of an Obama administration, then it won't be long before outspoken people like me are silenced by more "direct" methods.

The only way to overcome such high-tech censorship is to "go viral" -- meaning that EVERY ONE of you needs to notify EVERY ONE on your e-mail list of what is happening.

If you think that this is a joke, think back to the plight of Rev. Martin Niemoller at the hands of the Nazis. Sadly, he became famous for "not speaking out". No one can accuse me of that. [link to en.wikipedia.org]

If you agree that this is serious, you can join the "resistance". (No, I'm not asking people to take up arms against the government. Hopefully, it won't come to that. But, given Obama's obvious disdain for the Constitution so far, don't be surprised if THEY decided to take up arms against US. What will you do then??) How can you join the resistance? There are links to most everything you need to get started -- already on my Web site.

Please... spread the word, before the word is gone.

CHARGE THE AMBUSH.

Thank you.


Tom Kovach
[link to tomkovach.us]
Mount Juliet TN
(near Nashville)
Posted by USA Today Ad For Obama Records at 9:53 AM 0 comments Links to this post
Labels: obama birth school records citizenship eligibility constitution immigration illegal alien oath of office truth justice declaration of independence crimes freedom liberty america
Cover art
Posted by Robert Stevens at 5:32 AM 0 comments Links to this post
Older Posts
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)
Donate
.How to help

We are getting to the final rounds of our lawsuits. Please help by contributing to defray our expenses.






Visit our new Foundation:

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation


Action
What else you can do right now

Sign up to become a plaintiff if you are active or retired military

View this video and email to your friends and family:

Exactly What is a Natural Born Citizen?

If you are an attorney and would like to assist Dr. Orly Taitz, please feel free to contact her at [email protected].

Even if you are not an attorney, you can help by

1. signing petitions

2. writing to your state and federal elected representatives to express your concern

3. contacting your state governor

4. contacting the media.

5. contacting the authorities:

FBI Chicago Division:
(312) 421-6700 [email protected]

United States Secret Service:
WASHINGTON, D.C.
202-406-8000
CHICAGO
312-353-5431

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE):
1-866-347-2423

Honolulu Special Agent Wayne Wills
808-532-3746

IRS:
Steven Whitlock,
IRS whistle blower office SE:WO
1111 Constitution Ave., NW Washington DC 20224
Eligibility controversy search
DrOrlyTV
DrOrlyTV
Dr. Orly's YouTube Channel
Dr. Orly Taitz
Dr. Orly Taitz
If you want to contact me, send me an email at [email protected].
Blog Archive

* ▼ 2009 (219)
o ▼ January (219)
+ ORLY'S RETRACTION REQUEST AGAINST MICHAEL MEDVED
+ IBD Vague Rhetoric will suffice only so long
+ Released Guantanamo detainee reemerged as an Al-Qa...
+ Obama documentation activists - - not conspiracy t...
+ Yesterday, the 22nd a record number of 22,664 read...
+ More details on the trip to Pakistan, from a reade...
+ Dispatch from Nairobi "Obama funded foreign thug w...
+ Article about my case Lightfoot v Bowen, published...
+ from ea Leo
+ Somebody got to wikipedia
+ From reader Steve Holloway
+ The truth will out
+ Lynn Stuter -- SCOTUS message to the American peop...
+ Yesterday a record number of 21,500 people visited...
+ Supplemental Brief has been Distributed!
+ SCOTUS Docket System Backonline
+ Today at the Williamson County TX Courthouse
+ RE: A raft of subpoenas
+ A raft of subpoenas
+ Supreme Court hottest potato
+ Obama has been in power only one day and they are ...
+ The Obama Ambush by Tom Kovach
+ Cover art
+ Muslims in Chicago Plead Guilty to Conspiracy to M...
+ I wonder why?
+ The Bread and Circuses Presidency
+ from Lt Col Earl Graef
+ Letter from reader Mr. Warren
+ We need volunteers to serve subpoenas on BO and go...
+ Ohio SOS Jennifer Brunner's Attack on Carol Greenb...
+ Will you hand over 1 trillion dollars to someone t...
+ from reader Mr. Warren
+ from reader Pete Barry
+ A new action filed by Orly Taitz, ESQ based on the...
+ For Immediate release
+ Underground Journal
+ Great thanks to Teresa Ward, Theresa Padget, HHB, ...
+ From reader Old Glory
+ I wanted to thank Caren Hale from Plains Radio for...
+ Unsealing divorce records from reader Laura
+ Obama AG approves library and bookstore searches, ...
+ From reader Karen
+ Present cartoon
+ Letter from a reader
+ WND article about two of my cases
+ Obama prayer leader from a group linked to Hamas
+ Do you recognize this medallion?
+ Washington Times-Letter to the Editor
+ another letter from a reader of this blog
+ From reader Mr. Carl Swenssen
+ Excerpt from Vattel
+ List of all 31 cases, need help
+ I got hundreds of e-mails like this, thank you all...
+ I got hundreds of e-mails like this, thank you all...
+ Find from KS+ what does that medalion signify
+ John Roberts Confirmation
+ WND-King Obama -President for life
+ Thank you
+ what should be done?
+ In February of last yearObama and Clair McCaskill ...
+ I am looking for people experienced with subpoenas...
[link to drorly.blogspot.com]





GLP