Notes from an "alternate universe". Introduction to a new way of thinking.

Also OP, I think that the general interpretation for the four elements that you mention (ion, axon, chaon, elementon) may correspond to four of the Thirteen Intentions of Creation, as I call them in my model. Or maybe you guys have simplified the 13 principles into five/four elements. I recognize that this is possible.

Great stuff.

That is how works the Caret Language and Drones -Google it-

Thanks OP

PS: Timenot 0 we "dislike":

the Rainmantime Mod...
that had Square Mind

We are the Benders of RMT`s Mind

Quite simple really when you have the ability to sit and listen

Interesting!

But why do you sell the content?

In the part that I could access it is said, "One of the reasons why there is no scientifically acceptable definition or interpretation of consciousness is because it can mean several things to different people."

How about that consciousness is not related to science?

Science, as we know it today, cannot define consciousness because consciousness is not scientific.

What do you think?

Thanks.

Hello!

As is quoted on the website, "A theory is more impressive the greater is the simplicity of its premise,
the more different are the kinds of things it relates and the more extended its range of applicability…" -Albert Einstein

It could be careful that when a "theory of everything" is created that it applies to everything and not just scientific things.

Science today is busy working on a theory that applies to an ever-smaller slice of the universe (and accessible to an ever-shrinking scientific body).

A universal theory must be truly universal and have the ability to be applied to everything, not just today's science.

What do you think?

Thanks.

well. that is pretty much what is written later on that section. lol.

as you said yourself: "When the totality of something cannot be grasped, it appears infinite."

equations break down or stop making sense with infinite values, hence science not being able to include consciousness in their models.

Hello!

I did not know that Alienware computers had such iconography.

Interestingly, it is when humans adopt new symbols for their concepts that they truly transform into civilizations.

You could "double your IQ" in one year, so to speak, simply by creating and using your own language. (As long as it represented new concepts for which you did not previously have words.)

Thanks.

cant believe there are no s

I couldn't agree more... We lack a true universal theory.

Yes!

It might be found one day that a new maths is.

The kind of maths that represent new concepts. Beyond base-10.

We assume that our maths is universal, when it is not the case. I'm reminded of Star Trek episodes where no matter where in the galaxy they are, English is widely spoken.

There is an advanced civilization that I know about that would not be able to readily solve "What is 1+5?"

Our cognitive framework works for us, right now. But it is not the end-all-be-all.

Thanks.

Hello!

Here is one more.

The funny thing is is that if 10 persons from the year 2520 started to post in this forum, they'd still get the same flags.

And if they told you they could receive communications from their devices in real time from the year 2520, they'd get a couple of more.

Thanks.

Yes!

But if it could be applied to any field...

it would not appear to be scientific at all, would it?

Thanks.

I guess not. A theory that cannot be disproved..nor ever proved in its entirety is certainly not scientific. To be proved, a theory of everything would have to be experimented on everything.

Hello!

Other sciences could take a hint from computer science.

Today we have specialists who spend lengthy hours writing code. Their program (hopefully) performs the desired result.

Tomorrow we have people who write what they want. Quickly and efficiently.

"Natural language" programming is the future of your computer sciences.

Instead of a *specialist* spending hours writing in a language few understand, we will have *anyone* communicating in their own language.

The ability for anyone being able to perform an activity that only a specialist could before has a transformative effect on society. We take these for granted, but there are countless instances in our history where you simply could not do the simplest of things without much trouble. (Imagine having to fill out a form and get approval every time you wanted to use a computer and only IF you had the proper authority THEN you could use it.)

Why not extend this evolution to all sciences?

Thanks.

Fighting for my Peugeot 403 at the moment :)

Fingers Crossed TuuuR!

Good luck! :)

Yes!

But to be proven useful, it would only have to be used once.

The more it is then used, the more useful it becomes.

Scientists here waste a lot of time doing what the general population could be doing. It requires a shift in thinking about "proof" and why scientific proof is necessary.

Why spend a long time proving (and arguing over the finer points of) something when it could just be used, instead?

The big difference is that only a few people can perform these tasks. So, the process is a lot more inefficient.

Thanks.

In this world we look at something and ignore most of what we see, thinking "that does not apply to me".

In my world we can form relationships with everything, thinking: how can I translate that into something useful to me?

Helps,

Thanks.

One more thing!

Science would fail its own test.

"Science", as you know it, is not scientific.

So much emphasis is put on scientific proof of something but the foundation of science rests on shaky ground.

Some 'rigorous method' is needed, of course. But it is probably not science as we currently understand it.

Thanks.

How can I change my perspective to go where you came from?

Or anywhere for that matter.

Although, wouldn't it be easier for me to learn these concepts there?

Are there exercises I can do to practice this language to fully understand the concepts involved?

This is one of the best threads I've ever stumbled across here.

You mentioned that you were in Canada visiting your girlfriend, is she from here or your world?

You are the most beautiful and wondrous thing that could ever be imagined.

You are Something born of nothing-in-particular.

How amazing is that!?

You are that which takes an infinity of perceptions to try and reproduce.

All of the sonnets, birds, poems, clouds, hats, and swords in the world try, time and time again, to capture your essence. But cannot.

You are the life of life. The beauty of beauty. The wonder of wonder. That which things things try to be but cannot. That is how awesome you are.

They try through all manner of drama, seemingly to create a universe of things that, sadly, cannot capture even a small fragment of the impossible-to-perceive.

Although these things can be beautiful and not, happy and sad, at times thrilling or entirely boring, and everything in between, it is really just a distraction from your essence.

Who are you? You are whomever you are, whomever is possible to be.

But these things are confusing. Who wants to be nothing-in-particular when we can have the illusion of something-in-particular.

And so here you are. Impossible to define, impossible to perceive, impossible to merely think of.. but how wonderfully awesome is it that we can try.

And "try" is this essence. It is all we can do, and it is enough to create an endless universe of yourself, exploding at every moment and filling it again with an entirely new outlook of yourself.

But this "yourself" is not the you that wears clothes and eats food. It is YOU. The most relative thing to you. Your clothes do not illustrate this. The dishes on the table do not capture this. It is so wonderfully hidden because it is this nothing-in-particular, yet everything that could possibly be.

Are you alone? It would seem from my description that you are. What else is there when you are everything?

But the secret of this nothing-in-particular is that you have created an entire universe of perspective because this "alone" is irrelevant!

As soon as "nothing" is irrelevant it 'creates' SOMETHING. How can something be irrelevant when there is nothing else with which to compare?

So here you are.

"Alone in the universe..." is only something to be sad about if there was once two and now one.

Now there is an infinity of you so that it is impossible. And this beauty, these hats, these endless swords, and all the poems that will ever be written are a part of something entirely wondrous and beautiful.

Think of it as a gift from nowhere. It is only an illusion if there is something 'real' with which to compare it. So this story, these epic dramas we call existence is all that needs to be and is the most real thing that could ever possibly be.

You are all that you need to be right now. When I say that everything exists here and now I mean that there is no need to be anyone else, go anyplace else, do anything else, other than what you are doing right now.

Until this YOU perceives something else.

In one word, the you I have illustrated is Perfection.

Hello!

One's perspective is endlessly flexible.

However, we usually keep within a certain 'range' that is comfortable for us.

Changing your perspective is as simple as changing the representations that make up your world.

It is like asking ourselves every moment, "What is my world?". We usually decide our world is the one we're used to.

The idea, then, is to get out of your perceptual comfort zone.

For example, if you were to tape a magnet to your hand for 3 weeks you would feel strange at first but after some time the magnet would become a part of you. You have thus expanded your perspective and would be able to sense more electromagnetic energies than you did before. You could probably even navigate via your internal sense of cardinal points. This is because you would have a new sense of what represents you.

We create representations to 'define' our self all the time. It is this group of representations that create the world you see. (Ecsys defines consciousness as the relationship between representations.)

So, very basically and practically-speaking:

1) find something that represents what it is you want to experience
2) interact with it
3) find something that better represents it
4) repeat

As I previously mentioned, someone from year 2000 cannot just appear in year 1000 and expect to experience much. They must first change their 'internal' representations for things. Because when they go to year 1000 everything is completely different and beyond what they'd expect.

They could:

1) gradually change their perspective to continuously embody new representations
2) intensely study the years 700-1200 (for example) so that they develop the internal flexibility to conceptualize what it means to perceive year 1000

Thanks.

OP,
could we easily understand the code of someone else's natural language programming? I imagine that we would experience the output, but the language itself would appear as a black box system? Does that mean that only the originator would be able to modify it?

Can you explain the timing of your appearance in our world/ Why now and why on this forum (or have you appeared before)?

Does it have anything to do with the upcoming shift of this sphere to Fourth Density?

Thanks!
I would be falling in the same trap again right now, so will be making other decisions.