Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 2,269 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 509,422
Pageviews Today: 838,107Threads Today: 282Posts Today: 4,717
10:00 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

1,000 YEAR REIGN OF CHRIST REFUTED - DIFFERENT VIEWS

 
Lotus Feet
Offer Upgrade

User ID: 776324
United Kingdom
12/29/2009 09:09 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
1,000 YEAR REIGN OF CHRIST REFUTED - DIFFERENT VIEWS
INVIOLATE BIBLICAL EVIDENCE WHICH REFUTES THE LITERAL THOUSAND YEAR REIGN THEORY!


One of the most crucial hermeneutical principles is the interpretation of the obvious. Many times theologians glance at something and believe they understand something by simply glancing at it. This is totally illogical. We saw, in this study, that the binding of Satan was a past action, yet, theologians insist it will be a future event. This is what I mean by the glance method of interpretation. It sounds future but it is past.

This reminds me of a cartoon called the Far Side which I have in my possession The scene opens up with a murder in a bowling pin factory and the detective is leaning over the body stating that his preliminary investigation shows that this person was murdered with a large, blunt object. Meanwhile the cartoon shows the detective in the middle of the warehouse with open boxes and a conveyor filled with bowling pins. The detective was overlooking the obvious in his investigation and sometimes we do that.

Sometimes Christians purchase new versions with the belief they will have instant understanding of a passage. What they will have is instant confusion. As we continue in our study of the millennium, I wish to introduce some biblical passages which totally refute a literal thousand year reign of Christ on earth. I
wish to introduce a biblical phrase which has been totally neglected by proponents of a literal thousand year reign.

That phrase is "last days."

We must first establish what the last days are according to the Bible and the time period this represents. This will open our understanding of this important subject.
[link to www.scionofzion.com]

Another view

Revelation 3:21


He who overcomes, I will grant to him to sit down with Me on My throne, as I also overcame and sat down with My Father on His throne.

Although the passages in Revelation is from the "visionary" book, it is clear from these two passages (Acts 2/Rev. 3) that when Jesus ascended to heaven, He began to reign at the right hand of God. My question is simple: Is Jesus king now? The Scriptures say yes! Over what, then does He now rule? The Scriptures teach He rules over the hearts of those who have accept His rule. Consider:

1. God does not dwell in physical temples, Acts 7:48, 17:24.

2. God does dwell in people, through His Spirit, Romans 8:9–11, 1 Cor. 6:19 ("do you not know that your body is a temple of the Holy Spirit")

3. Where Christ dwells, there He rules. Hence "the kingdom of God is within you" (also rendered "in your midst" or "among.")
[link to www.biblesearch.com]

1,000 years can also be a 1,000 days and 1,000 days is 2.73 months. It is also written that the mission of Christ was three years. In biblical times there were 360 days in the year and this then gives you 2.77 months. In a lunar year it could also be 354 days = 2.82 years.

Lotus

Last Edited by Lotus Feet on 12/29/2009 09:17 PM
i love satan
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 852636
United States
12/29/2009 10:09 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 1,000 YEAR REIGN OF CHRIST REFUTED - DIFFERENT VIEWS
I sometimes wonder how you come up with the posts that totaly are against scripture. If you notice, those spoken of reigning with Jesus in the Millenial Time, are those killed in the Great Tribulation. This clearly puts the time in the future.
If you can't refute the following, please check into what God says about false teachers and those who spread falsehoods.........

'And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them, and judgment was given unto them: and I saw the souls of them that had been beheaded for the testimony of Jesus, and for the word of God, and such as worshipped not the beast, neither his image, and received not the mark upon their forehead and upon their hand; and they lived, and reigned with Christ a thousand years. The rest of the dead lived not until the thousand years should be finished. This is the first resurrection. Blessed and holy is he that hath part in the first resurrection: over these the second death hath no power; but they shall be priests of God and of Christ, and shall reign with him a thousand years' (Rev 20:4-6).



The following Bible passages will help in understanding the Millennial Kingdom and surrounding events. Please read the following Bible passages in the provided order:

1. Romans 11
2. Ezekiel 38
3. Joel 2
4. Jeremiah 30
5. Psalm 2
6. Ezekiel 39
7. Revelation 19
8. Joel 3
9. Zephaniah 1
10. Zechariah 12
11. Zechariah 14
12. Zechariah 10
13. Zechariah 13
14. Isaiah 11
15. Micah 7
16. Isaiah 49
17. Jeremiah 31
18. Zechariah 2
19. Isaiah 66
20. Zephaniah 3
21. Zechariah 8
22. Jeremiah 33
23. Ezekiel 34
24. Ezekiel 36
25. Ezekiel 37
26. Ezekiel 47
27. Ezekiel 48
28. Isaiah 60
29. Isaiah 62
30. Micah 4
31. Ezekiel 40
32. Ezekiel 41
33. Ezekiel 42
34. Ezekiel 43
35. Ezekiel 44
36. Ezekiel 45
37. Ezekiel 46
38. Revelation 20
Lotus Feet  (OP)

User ID: 776324
United Kingdom
12/30/2009 12:28 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 1,000 YEAR REIGN OF CHRIST REFUTED - DIFFERENT VIEWS
Read the links provided and come back with an intelligent response to them.

Can you refute them with your own response?

I can tell you this that Micah 4 doesn't mention 1,000 years or Christs reign although it does mention yours truly.

Joel 2 doesn't mention 1,000 years either and it is about God and his Teacher of Righteousness. Yours truly!

Lotus

Last Edited by Lotus Feet on 12/30/2009 12:38 AM
i love satan
Lotus Feet  (OP)

User ID: 776324
United Kingdom
12/30/2009 10:36 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 1,000 YEAR REIGN OF CHRIST REFUTED - DIFFERENT VIEWS
The dawn that Peter refers to may be understood as the future dawning of the "day of the Lord." It is not a literal day. A "day" is as a thousand years to God (2 Peter 3:8):

But, beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day.

[link to www.sentex.net]

Lotus
i love satan
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 852852
United Kingdom
12/30/2009 10:50 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 1,000 YEAR REIGN OF CHRIST REFUTED - DIFFERENT VIEWS
I sometimes wonder how you come up with the posts that totaly are against scripture.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 852636


It's not so much how she does it, it's that she is doing it on purpose.
Lotus Feet  (OP)

User ID: 776324
United Kingdom
12/30/2009 08:28 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 1,000 YEAR REIGN OF CHRIST REFUTED - DIFFERENT VIEWS
It's not so much how she does it, it's that she is doing it on purpose.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 852852


We have provided you with the scriptures and the links.

Can you respond to it with an intelligent response or are you ADD?

Lotus
i love satan
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 852908
United States
12/30/2009 08:31 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 1,000 YEAR REIGN OF CHRIST REFUTED - DIFFERENT VIEWS
I sometimes wonder how you come up with the posts that totaly are against scripture.


It's not so much how she does it, it's that she is doing it on purpose.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 852852
it's downright creepy.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 853168
United States
12/30/2009 08:32 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 1,000 YEAR REIGN OF CHRIST REFUTED - DIFFERENT VIEWS
STOP POSTING THIS ENDLESS SPAMMING RELIGIOUS ASSININE CULT JACKASS AGENDA RIDDEN DELUSIONAL PSYCHOTIC SOCIOPATH ARROGANT ECCENTRIC BORING USELESS SHIT .
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 852908
United States
12/30/2009 08:32 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 1,000 YEAR REIGN OF CHRIST REFUTED - DIFFERENT VIEWS
It's not so much how she does it, it's that she is doing it on purpose.


We have provided you with the scriptures and the links.

Can you respond to it with an intelligent response or are you ADD?

Lotus
 Quoting: Lotus Feet
nobody asked you. you come out and show your butt all the time, ya got to expect us to laugh.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 836255
United States
12/30/2009 08:35 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 1,000 YEAR REIGN OF CHRIST REFUTED - DIFFERENT VIEWS
DECEIVER
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 852908
United States
12/30/2009 08:35 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 1,000 YEAR REIGN OF CHRIST REFUTED - DIFFERENT VIEWS
about the name lotus feet...it's like a joke, the feet/roots, are stuck in the mud, and there they stay.
lotus feet is not a lotus flower. it will never be the flower.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 800472
United States
12/30/2009 08:39 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 1,000 YEAR REIGN OF CHRIST REFUTED - DIFFERENT VIEWS
From what I understood from Matthew Henry's commentary, this 1000 year millenial reign already occured in the 500-600's or so. Other views have it as symbolic(i.e. Peter said that 1 day with the Lord is as a 1000 years, and 1000 years is as 1 day with him).

I mean, really - does this 1000 year mil. reign on earth after the tribulation make sense? And then add to this that Satan will be unbound from the pit and deceive some more?

I mean I thought by the end of the tribulation, believers who endured unto the end and didn't take the mark of the beast would be rewarded with eternal life? And now they say how it's only for another 1000 years, and make sure you're not deceived thereafter? Again - this doesn't make sense at all.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 853299
United States
12/30/2009 09:06 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 1,000 YEAR REIGN OF CHRIST REFUTED - DIFFERENT VIEWS
I sometimes wonder how you come up with the posts that totaly are against scripture. If you notice, those spoken of reigning with Jesus in the Millenial Time, are those killed in the Great Tribulation. This clearly puts the time in the future.
If you can't refute the following, please check into what God says about false teachers and those who spread falsehoods.........

'And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them, and judgment was given unto them: and I saw the souls of them that had been beheaded for the testimony of Jesus, and for the word of God, and such as worshipped not the beast, neither his image, and received not the mark upon their forehead and upon their hand; and they lived, and reigned with Christ a thousand years. The rest of the dead lived not until the thousand years should be finished. This is the first resurrection. Blessed and holy is he that hath part in the first resurrection: over these the second death hath no power; but they shall be priests of God and of Christ, and shall reign with him a thousand years' (Rev 20:4-6).








 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 852636

It's pretty clear in context that it's talking about the redirection after the 2nd coming

so let's see the people included in this 1000 years time will have been:

1. Persecuted because of their beliefs in Jesus
2. Did not worship the beast
3. Did not receive the mark of the beast
4. Did not worship the image of the first beast
5. They will live with Jesus for a thousand years

so if these people have died and the thousand years represents the 3 years he was earth. Then how can dead people who had their heads chopped off BeFoRe Jesus started his ministry could spenD time with Jesus without resurrecting. And how could they die for following Jesus testimony if they died before he even started. Thus would further mean people received the mark of the beast before Jesus came. Doesn't make sense

yet again lotus combining a bunch of beliefs to meet her own wants

lotus religion= peterist theology + sprinkle of futurism + new age + with a little of Islam on top.

Hey to each there own but nothing was refuted here just another opinion based on different foundational principles
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 853299
United States
12/30/2009 09:10 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 1,000 YEAR REIGN OF CHRIST REFUTED - DIFFERENT VIEWS
Up above

Meant to say ressurection not redirection

my iPhone guessed the wrong word
Lotus Feet  (OP)

User ID: 776324
United Kingdom
12/30/2009 11:30 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 1,000 YEAR REIGN OF CHRIST REFUTED - DIFFERENT VIEWS
From what I understood from Matthew Henry's commentary, this 1000 year millenial reign already occured in the 500-600's or so. Other views have it as symbolic(i.e. Peter said that 1 day with the Lord is as a 1000 years, and 1000 years is as 1 day with him).

I mean, really - does this 1000 year mil. reign on earth after the tribulation make sense? And then add to this that Satan will be unbound from the pit and deceive some more?

I mean I thought by the end of the tribulation, believers who endured unto the end and didn't take the mark of the beast would be rewarded with eternal life? And now they say how it's only for another 1000 years, and make sure you're not deceived thereafter? Again - this doesn't make sense at all.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 800472


Well I was never led into any of the tribulation theories by the Christ so the fact that someone has gone to great lengths to completely refute the 1,000 reign is in interesting topic for people to ponder upon as you have obviously done.

Following the tax discussion and the post above we also know that the beast/money is a part of these last days. I would not be surprised if there is a new coin or note in the USA with OBAMA on it.

Lotus
i love satan
Lotus Feet  (OP)

User ID: 776324
United Kingdom
12/30/2009 11:34 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 1,000 YEAR REIGN OF CHRIST REFUTED - DIFFERENT VIEWS
LOL

Get Obama Dollar Bills

Get the President Barack Obama uncirculated, authentic $2 Dollar Bills enhanced in Gold Leaf by The New England Mint for only $9.95+s/h. These one-of-a-kind, limited edition, legal tender $2 Dollar Bank Notes are now available to the American public for the first time ever through this special offer. Now, You Can Own a Piece of American History! Plus, order now and receive a BONUS President Barack Obama Gold-Laser-Line $1 Dollar Bill!
Get the President Barack Obama uncirculated, authentic $2 Dollar Bills from The New England Mint. These one-of-a-kind, limited edition, $2 Dollar Bank Notes are now available to the American public for the first time ever through this special offer. Now you can own a piece of American history.
• Enhanced in gold leaf
• Genuine, authentic U.S. Legal Tender
• Includes Certificate of Authenticity
• This exclusive edition is only available for 65 days
• Only $9.95+s/h. – that’s $20.00 off the set issue price!
Order now and receive a Bonus Barack Obama Gold-Laser-Line $1 Dollar Bill!
[link to mergemedia.com]
i love satan
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 831369
United States
12/31/2009 05:36 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 1,000 YEAR REIGN OF CHRIST REFUTED - DIFFERENT VIEWS
Locust, you really should move to a warmer climate and start getting used to the heat honey.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 853581
Israel
12/31/2009 05:45 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: 1,000 YEAR REIGN OF CHRIST REFUTED - DIFFERENT VIEWS
Jesus has not reined over anything

since his time things have got darker and darker



what kind of reign or messiah is that


its a silly story


wonder anyone believes it

You say

"God does not dwell in physical temples"


God says
:

"And of this measure shall you measure a length of twenty five thousand, and a width of ten thousand; and in it shall be the sanctuary and the most holy place.
4. The holy portion of the land shall be for the priests, the ministers of the sanctuary, who come near to minister to the Lord; and it shall be a place for their houses, and a holy place for the sanctuary."


( Ezekiel Chapter 46 )


You are either very stupid

or very Evil

many times they are one in the same


give up speaking about spirituality

and look into cleaning floors or something





GLP