SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD! ... Athiests might cringe..

The universe not explaining its self and being infinite doesnt prove god.

the sentences:

- All codes we know the origin of are designed by conscious beings.

- Therefore whatever is outside the largest circle is a conscious being.

are made up imaginary sentences which prove nothing

this post is stupid.

The universe not explaining its self and being infinite doesnt prove god.

the sentences:

- All codes we know the origin of are designed by conscious beings.

- Therefore whatever is outside the largest circle is a conscious being.

are made up imaginary sentences which prove nothing

this post is stupid.


Short Bus Brigade to the rescue!

The universe not explaining its self and being infinite doesnt prove god.

the sentences:

- All codes we know the origin of are designed by conscious beings.

- Therefore whatever is outside the largest circle is a conscious being.

are made up imaginary sentences which prove nothing

this post is stupid.


Short Bus Brigade to the rescue!



youre attempting to claim an incoherent post is intelligent and the people who openly admit its incoherent are just not understanding it. quite simply, this is fraud and the post is in fact incoherent and imaginative:


"- All codes we know the origin of are designed by conscious beings.

- Therefore whatever is outside the largest circle is a conscious being. "

The universe not explaining its self and being infinite doesnt prove god.

the sentences:

- All codes we know the origin of are designed by conscious beings.

- Therefore whatever is outside the largest circle is a conscious being.

are made up imaginary sentences which prove nothing

this post is stupid.


Short Bus Brigade to the rescue!



youre attempting to claim an incoherent post is intelligent and the people who openly admit its incoherent are just not understanding it. quite simply, this is fraud and the post is in fact incoherent and imaginative:


"- All codes we know the origin of are designed by conscious beings.

- Therefore whatever is outside the largest circle is a conscious being. "


Don't forget your helmet.

What the OP posted is completely true. There will always be small and narrow minds that can't possibly comprehend it, however. I see a few have already posted here very determined to seem intelligent and failing miserably.

How to perform fraud:

1) Make a truly incoherent post and say it proves something

2) denounce all people who point out incoherence as just not understanding the really incoherent post, that is actually incoherent.

Fuck You.

youre attempting to claim an incoherent post is intelligent and the people who openly admit its incoherent are just not understanding it. quite simply, this is fraud and the post is in fact incoherent and imaginative:


"- All codes we know the origin of are designed by conscious beings.

- Therefore whatever is outside the largest circle is a conscious being. "

What the OP posted is completely true. There will always be small and narrow minds that can't possibly comprehend it, however. I see a few have already posted here very determined to seem intelligent and failing miserably.

OH YEAH?? Well I'm drawing a CIRCLE around your post, which according to the theory PROVES that you are BAD and WRONG!!!

How to perform fraud:

1) Make a truly incoherent post and say it proves something

2) denounce all people who point out incoherence as just not understanding the really incoherent post, that is actually incoherent.

Fuck You.


Are you confusing me with the OP? I read the post and understood it with perfect clarity. So now you have your panties in a bunch because you can't.

Learn to differentiate between arrogance and confidence. By debating me here on any level, does not prove your intellect or impresses any one that you seem to have a clearer view of reality. You have just proven your attitude to be uncivil and generically mediocre just like a lot of quick rant, close-minded people here.

Read the article again - it seems apparent that you are not following the stream of reasoning detailed. If that doesn't help..then forget it. Don't blame others, if you cant get the gist of what is being said. Your lack of understanding does not qualify that this article is stupid. It qualifies that you are.... :) sorry!

How to perform fraud:

1) Make a truly incoherent post and say it proves something

2) denounce all people who point out incoherence as just not understanding the really incoherent post, that is actually incoherent.

Fuck You.


Are you confusing me with the OP? I read the post and understood it with perfect clarity. So now you have your panties in a bunch because you can't.



Fuck you, these sentences are incoherent and you know it or you have schizophrenia and latched onto them with your own meaning:

- All codes we know the origin of are designed by conscious beings.

- Therefore whatever is outside the largest circle is a conscious being.


essentially these are made up bullshit sentences. and as for the other parts of the post, statements like "the universe doesnt explain its self" are nonsense bullshit sentences that have nothing to do with God

youre made because of how real these replies are exposing your intentional mind-game fraud/schizophrenia, which ever one it is

How to perform fraud:

1) Make a truly incoherent post and say it proves something

2) denounce all people who point out incoherence as just not understanding the really incoherent post, that is actually incoherent.

Fuck You.


Are you confusing me with the OP? I read the post and understood it with perfect clarity. So now you have your panties in a bunch because you can't.



Fuck you, these sentences are incoherent and you know it or you have schizophrenia and latched onto them with your own meaning:

- All codes we know the origin of are designed by conscious beings.

- Therefore whatever is outside the largest circle is a conscious being.


essentially these are made up bullshit sentences. and as for the other parts of the post, statements like "the universe doesnt explain its self" are nonsense bullshit sentences that have nothing to do with God

youre made because of how real these replies are exposing your intentional mind-game fraud/schizophrenia, which ever one it is


So hostile! I need not say anything more. Your ideology is broken. I'm just here to enjoy it. Have a Coke and a smile.

Read the article again - it seems apparent that you are not following the stream of reasoning detailed. If that doesn't help..then forget it. Don't blame others, if you cant get the gist of what is being said. Your lack of understanding does not qualify that this article is stupid. It qualifies that you are.... :) sorry!



the above reply was made up to try and discredit me because im exposing this post as incoherent. nothing in the OP proves God, at all.

anyone can make up a post for shits and giggles or be a slightly more functioning version of Zakk and Wio then simply claim "you dont understand you arent following the stream"

fuck you fraud

Gödel created his proof by starting with “The Liar’s Paradox” — which is the statement

“I am lying.”


“I am lying” is self-contradictory, since if it’s true, I’m not a liar, and it’s false; and if it’s false, I am a liar, so it’s true.

Well I was certainly cringing.

Only because you're so fucking stupid to believe any of that.

Next you'll be telling me that rather than evolving over millions of years, some nut case managed to pair up animals on a raft to survive a flood...

...Oh wait.

How to perform fraud:

1) Make a truly incoherent post and say it proves something

2) denounce all people who point out incoherence as just not understanding the really incoherent post, that is actually incoherent.

Fuck You.


Are you confusing me with the OP? I read the post and understood it with perfect clarity. So now you have your panties in a bunch because you can't.



Fuck you, these sentences are incoherent and you know it or you have schizophrenia and latched onto them with your own meaning:

- All codes we know the origin of are designed by conscious beings.

- Therefore whatever is outside the largest circle is a conscious being. Doctor sock is concerned!


essentially these are made up bullshit sentences. and as for the other parts of the post, statements like "the universe doesnt explain its self" are nonsense bullshit sentences that have nothing to do with God

youre made because of how real these replies are exposing your intentional mind-game fraud/schizophrenia, which ever one it is


So hostile! I need not say anything more. Your ideology is broken. I'm just here to enjoy it. Have a Coke and a smile.


Youd get hostile too if you were normal and for years every website you go to, every where you go on and offline, you run into incoherent people who are completely insane, albeit functional and can do things like drive a car and work their job.

What is the point of this post, its only a hobby and has no practicality, it does nothing to change the world or increase well-being. All it will do is attempt to fuck people in the head claiming something is scientific proof when its not.

this is a psyops fraud post - ignore all incoherent posts, they are designed to confuse and demoralize people mentally then make it look like its real but other people arent special enough to understand it

its psyops people, wake up, look at the original post and look at the defenders of it, all incoherent fraud

So if you put the circle around "god" then what is out side the circle? How can you say "god" is the one thing you can't put within a circle if you can't really define "god"? If "god" has to be a conscious being then who created "god"?

The Incompleteness of the universe isn’t proof that God exists. But… it IS proof that in order to construct a consistent model of the universe, belief in God is not just 100% logical… it’s necessary.

If nothing can be proved then all of your assumptions including your incompleteness theorem cannot be proved as well.

Thats like saying "all statements are false except this one."

Science works because it's not about proving things. Science is about finding out how things work for practical purposes. It may or may not be able to prove deep philosophical questions which may or may not have answers.

God can never be disproved as much as pink unicorns can't be disproved.

You made quite a few assumptions to make god exist completely negating your whole argument about the incompleteness theorem.


You've mede a few assumptions here. First I am not the author of this article. I posted it for reference.

Second, you did not comprehend the reasoning behind the article because it has the same logic and reasoning used by the scientific community. Science relies on proof and not just 'how things work for practical purposes'. Yet, there are scientific theorems (as mentioned above) that are solidy relied on without proof.

As a non-believer (athiest) one is expected to accept that the universe (world) just came into being without a source for its inception. Yet daily, in life, every change (creation, destruction, altercation) in a state of being or entity or atom has specific reasoning due to science. Basically, scientific laws exist that cause things to happen a certain way...but when it comes to the question of why do these laws exist? The answer generally in most cases ends up being "because they exists and that's that." No definitive proof of the 'why' is every addressed.

Looking at it scientifically as a believer in God (supreme being) the reason is simple. Because the world/universe works, changes/alters in a certain way due to interaction with other elements and scientific laws, it stands to reason that every change has purpose for the causality. Keeping that in mind, it is rather strange for me to just accept the fact that the universe/life came into being without a specific originator and a purpose and reason of origin. The universe life all exists based on complex scientific laws and theorems yet why these laws exists and not to address the question of who originated them is rather 'unscientific' in my view.