Taxpayers pay $101,000 for Pelosi's in-flight 'food, booze'. Trips are more about partying than anything else. $1k weekly bar tab | |
Matrix User ID: 870575 Australia 01/29/2010 05:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Only Me
Strawberry Girl User ID: 725691 United States 01/29/2010 05:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Taxpayers pay $101,000 for Pelosi's in-flight 'food, booze'. Trips are more about partying than anything else. $1k weekly bar tab She loves to entertain. :4pud: Goodbye, halcyon days... There is a theory which states that if ever anyone discovers exactly what the Universe is for and why it is here, it will instantly disappear and be replaced by something even more bizarre and inexplicable. There is another theory mentioned, which states that this has already happened. |
AC User ID: 859194 United States 01/29/2010 05:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
P.P.T
User ID: 841848 United States 01/29/2010 05:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Taxpayers pay $101,000 for Pelosi's in-flight 'food, booze'. Trips are more about partying than anything else. $1k weekly bar tab While I in no way condone this waste of money, I do have a question. Quoting: Art DecoSince you're so keen to key in on this figure, perhaps you could tell me how much others either are spending, of have spent in the past? The cost means nothing to me if I don't have anything to compare it against. This is the basic liberal fall back argument when a liberal cant defend the actions of his leaders. They go back as far as the crusades to find an example of someone who was worse and say that what their guy did is somehow canceled out because some conservative fucked a goat in 1787. You'll notice not only did I not make a defense for this ridiculous spending, but I said that in my very first sentence, This is what someone does when they either can't answer the question, or won't because the full facts won't support their argument. It's called deflection. It doesn't answer the question, it just tries to more the debate away from an indefensible position. Nice try, too bad it didn't work. Wanna try again? You are not supposed to question any of this stuff Art. You should just take it at full face value, as the gods honest truth.(I mean why would PNACguy er PNWguy not tell the truth, or have any reason to not post all the facts? ) The best thing to do, from what i have seen..Is just post a funny picture of obama, and then post the Oops i meant this.... |
powerstroke
User ID: 877330 United States 01/29/2010 05:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 877486 Australia 01/29/2010 06:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 877486 Australia 01/29/2010 06:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Taxpayers pay $101,000 for Pelosi's in-flight 'food, booze'. Trips are more about partying than anything else. $1k weekly bar tab George W. Bush spent more tax dollars on overnight male hookers staining the furniture at the White House than Pelosi's weekly bar tab. Quoting: AC 859194Not to mention the Cheney-Bush snr pedophile "parties after the party". |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 877660 United Arab Emirates 01/29/2010 10:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Taxpayers pay $101,000 for Pelosi's in-flight 'food, booze'. Trips are more about partying than anything else. $1k weekly bar tab Have some MERCY, folks. If you looked like her, and sucked like her, you'd NEED to stay drunk, too. Hope she's home in Frisco , IF the big one hits. Not wishing it on anyone else even though you are the assholes who forced her on the rest of us. |
real conservative User ID: 877559 Canada 02/09/2010 08:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Independent User ID: 956239 United States 04/29/2010 11:03 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |