Holy shit- evolution bebunked by scientists- Humans lived before monkeys | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 890462 Australia 02/14/2010 08:08 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
sceptical
User ID: 886841 Brazil 02/14/2010 09:02 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 875926 United States 02/14/2010 09:17 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 856896 United States 02/14/2010 09:20 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 890694 United Kingdom 02/14/2010 09:25 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [liveleak] [link to www.liveleak.com] |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 652522 United Kingdom 02/14/2010 09:27 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | But surely they can't have it both ways? If God created the Earth 5 or 6000 years ago, how can they argue the case made above? Quoting: scepticalLook,evolution might have been acceptable 200 years ago but it is not acceptable to science today. If I chop of my leg, will my kids be born with one leg too ?. |
Andromeda
User ID: 852424 United States 02/14/2010 09:27 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 885151 United States 02/14/2010 09:34 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 873251 United States 02/14/2010 09:37 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
sceptical
User ID: 886841 Brazil 02/14/2010 09:44 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | But surely they can't have it both ways? If God created the Earth 5 or 6000 years ago, how can they argue the case made above? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 652522Look,evolution might have been acceptable 200 years ago but it is not acceptable to science today. If I chop of my leg, will my kids be born with one leg too ?. OK OP, it's obvious you have your beliefs based on this post and I'm not gonna try and change your opinion, but seriously, what sort of argument is that?? The theory of evolution revolves around genetic changes. If this fits with your world view, great, but don't expect others to buy into it merely based on some flimsy research. Personally, I challenge all accepted wisdom and belief systems and accept that evolution could be a crock of shit, but it seems to me to be a coherent theory that accords with MY belief system. Doesn't make it right, but it's far more coherent than the God created the world in 7 days theory! Don't accept the shackles of your government |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 856896 United States 02/14/2010 09:47 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | But surely they can't have it both ways? If God created the Earth 5 or 6000 years ago, how can they argue the case made above? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 652522Look,evolution might have been acceptable 200 years ago but it is not acceptable to science today. If I chop of my leg, will my kids be born with one leg too ?. Your misread of science and evolutionary theory is staggering. Perhaps you should read something besides that bible. Or you can just keep being a mindless Jesus-sheep. Doesn't matter. The world is ending and you will end up as fertilizer, willfully ignorant or not. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 848712 Canada 02/14/2010 09:53 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | But surely they can't have it both ways? If God created the Earth 5 or 6000 years ago, how can they argue the case made above? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 652522Look,evolution might have been acceptable 200 years ago but it is not acceptable to science today. If I chop of my leg, will my kids be born with one leg too ?. Why is it only a choice of evolution or creation (the biblical version). How about intervention? [link to www.lloydpye.com] That makes a whole lot more sense than the other 2 options and it is also backed by ancient knowledge out of Sumeria (Sumerian Tablets) and from the Mayan Popol Vuh. |
sceptical
User ID: 886841 Brazil 02/14/2010 10:08 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | But surely they can't have it both ways? If God created the Earth 5 or 6000 years ago, how can they argue the case made above? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 848712Look,evolution might have been acceptable 200 years ago but it is not acceptable to science today. If I chop of my leg, will my kids be born with one leg too ?. Why is it only a choice of evolution or creation (the biblical version). How about intervention? [link to www.lloydpye.com] That makes a whole lot more sense than the other 2 options and it is also backed by ancient knowledge out of Sumeria (Sumerian Tablets) and from the Mayan Popol Vuh. Another interesting theory that bears contemplation, but then we cycle back to where did these original life forms come from? Now, to say from outer space, is just another convolution in this cyclical thinking. These are, after all, nothing more than theories, but interesting nonetheless. Thanks for the link! Don't accept the shackles of your government |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 848712 Canada 02/14/2010 10:30 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | But surely they can't have it both ways? If God created the Earth 5 or 6000 years ago, how can they argue the case made above? Quoting: scepticalLook,evolution might have been acceptable 200 years ago but it is not acceptable to science today. If I chop of my leg, will my kids be born with one leg too ?. Why is it only a choice of evolution or creation (the biblical version). How about intervention? [link to www.lloydpye.com] That makes a whole lot more sense than the other 2 options and it is also backed by ancient knowledge out of Sumeria (Sumerian Tablets) and from the Mayan Popol Vuh. Another interesting theory that bears contemplation, but then we cycle back to where did these original life forms come from? Now, to say from outer space, is just another convolution in this cyclical thinking. These are, after all, nothing more than theories, but interesting nonetheless. Thanks for the link! Yes you're absolutely right. It's like telling a 4 year old that "god" created the Universe and everything in it. In all innocence the child will ask "Who created "god?" IMO the answer to that is Infinite Consciousness. |
sceptical
User ID: 886841 Brazil 02/14/2010 10:33 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Why is it only a choice of evolution or creation (the biblical version). How about intervention? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 848712[link to www.lloydpye.com] That makes a whole lot more sense than the other 2 options and it is also backed by ancient knowledge out of Sumeria (Sumerian Tablets) and from the Mayan Popol Vuh. Another interesting theory that bears contemplation, but then we cycle back to where did these original life forms come from? Now, to say from outer space, is just another convolution in this cyclical thinking. These are, after all, nothing more than theories, but interesting nonetheless. Thanks for the link! Yes you're absolutely right. It's like telling a 4 year old that "god" created the Universe and everything in it. In all innocence the child will ask "Who created "god?" IMO the answer to that is Infinite Consciousness. But doesn't that also then revert back to cyclical thinking? At least, what is infinite consciousness and where/how/why did that originate? Don't accept the shackles of your government |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 878598 Ireland 02/14/2010 10:40 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | But surely they can't have it both ways? If God created the Earth 5 or 6000 years ago, how can they argue the case made above? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 652522Look,evolution might have been acceptable 200 years ago but it is not acceptable to science today. If I chop of my leg, will my kids be born with one leg too ?. Yes evolution is bullshit backed up by nothing other than frauds and fairground composites such as Lucy and the other few bones they throw together to defend the Fundementalist Religion of Dawwist/Eugenics/Racial Hygene. The great tragedy is the only ones standing up against the psychopaths who defend Darwin's racist crackpot guesses are equally crazy Christians. We need to find the truth beyond the hoaxes of Creationism and Natural Selection which is not in the hands of either of these agendas. Personally I think the NWO has a vested interest in keeping the debate ragpng between religious crazies and the evolution crazies to stop a serious exploration of the facts that neither side are nowhere near the truth. |
THE FIRST HORSEMAN
User ID: 880572 United Kingdom 02/14/2010 10:43 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | A group of Christian scientists triumphantly announced their discovery of archaeological evidence that could disprove the theory of evolution once and for all during a news conference at the Creation Museum in Petersburg, Kentucky yesterday. Quoting: why do things have to change 652522Although careful to disclaim the conclusions they’ve begun extrapolating from the brittle, pre-historic artifacts harvested from a recovery site located deep within the Ozarks of northern Arkansas, the researchers claim that they are very, very old, pre-dating the point evolutionists claim humans branched off from their primate family tree by a very long time – likely as many as many, many centuries. “Despite the fact that the area's uncommonly rigid soil and humid climate kept this exceptional site very well preserved and above ground for millions of years, the puzzle will take some time to completely assemble," commented Travis Turley, the project’s team leader, "But from the analysis we’ve conducted so far one thing is for certain – there were men before there were monkeys.” According to Turley’s team’s findings, including the physical remains of an entire family unit consisting of a father, mother, a male child and a four legged monkey presumed to be their pet, pre-historic humans living in the southern region of what is now the United States walked upright, subsisted from an omnivorous diet consisting of a variety of microwaveable and pre-packaged foods, watched television, and were predominately Christian. "Incredibly, these extraordinary people reached a commensurate level of technological and cultural sophistication with modern man millions of years ago. Evidence demonstrates that the pre-historic Christian lived in motorized and mobile homes which could be moved from place to place, enjoyed watching television - especially professional wrestling matches they preserved using their own primitive equivalents of contemporary video recording devices, and had invented gun powder and firearms," Turley reported, adding: "In fact, one could argue they were more advanced than us in some regards as they presaged the eventual coming of Christ." So what became of this ancient, precocious civilization of man? “Pre-historic Christians flourished under a framework of strong family values and a free market system of commerce for thousands of years before falling out of God’s good graces somehow, possibly by adopting a tolerance for homosexual lifestyles, precipitating an invasion by liberal hordes from the northeast,” Turley explained. “Overrun, the heretics attempted to stamp out pre-Christian society by stifling their economy with a multitude of onerous taxes and imposing mandatory abortions. Furthermore, facial and other anatomical features observed in the child suggests the barbarian invaders had sex with the pre-Christians’ pet monkeys – an abomination that accounts for the emergence of those simian creatures whose fossils would give rise to the flawed theory of evolution while, at the time, constituted another source of anguish so profound that many pre-Christians, including the family in question here, were driven to breach the edicts of their faith and tragically turn their guns on themselves.” he he he , awsome post op NOW I know what it feels like to be a horse ,Because these days I'm constantly being groomed Donald Dewar (Father of the nation ) :saltire: |
nomind
User ID: 705130 Canada 02/14/2010 10:44 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The chinese used to teach their kids that they came from a different source of humanity than other modern humans, specifically certain neanderthal tribes that were discovered in the area. Relatively recently new studies examined the fossils and it was determined that they actually weren't the chinese ancestors. In other words, be wary of "scientific evidence" that serves a group's purposes in trying to contradict accepted theories. My Interesting Karma messages: - "You are an idiot. This post proves it." -"GLP MEMBERS BEWARE!!! THIS IS A GOVERNMENT SHILL." - Most moranic one given to me: When you type ".." you need to put three dots instead of two. Thread: Nibiru, or how to appear like you know what you are talking about |
zombieintraining
User ID: 839757 United States 02/14/2010 10:47 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This is the same Creation Museum that shows animatroninc baby T-Rexs living alongside animatroninc baby humans? The same Creation Museum that shows a Tryceritops with a SADDLE so humans could ride it? This is the same Creation Museum that would have you belive that Dinosaurs and Humans co-existed? Yeah.... they're a very credible source. Thank you for bebunking that for me. Last Edited by zombieintraining on 02/14/2010 10:49 AM |
cloud.neko
User ID: 651711 United States 02/14/2010 11:01 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | <snip> Quoting: why do things have to change 652522United States walked upright, subsisted from an omnivorous diet consisting of a variety of microwaveable and pre-packaged foods, watched television, and were predominately Christian. "Incredibly, these extraordinary people reached a commensurate level of technological and cultural sophistication with modern man millions of years ago. Evidence demonstrates that the pre-historic Christian lived in motorized and mobile homes which could be moved from place to place, enjoyed watching television - especially professional wrestling matches they preserved using their own primitive equivalents of contemporary video recording devices, and had invented gun powder and firearms," Turley reported, adding: "In fact, one could argue they were more advanced than us in some regards as they presaged the eventual coming of Christ." Furthermore, facial and other anatomical features observed in the child suggests the barbarian invaders had sex with the pre-Christians’ pet monkeys – an abomination that accounts for the emergence of those simian creatures whose fossils would give rise to the flawed theory of evolution while <snip> Hahaha, funny satire here OP, where did you get this, the Onion? "It is not the strongest of the species that survives, nor the most intelligent, but the one most responsive to change." -Charles Darwin |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 652522 United Kingdom 02/14/2010 11:09 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | let's say a baby is born with an extra flap of skin, that over the next million years becomes functional for gliding from a tree, and another million has feathers for better gliding (forget lift, because that would require lighter bones and less muscle weight. . . . .while increasing 10 fold in strength). Would that flap of skin result in better breading potential? Well, today they'd remove it but in the animal kingdom the other animals would probably attack and kill the weaker and uglier mutant. Now that's survival of the fittest my friends. That extra flap of skin would look horendous and would only get in the way. I hear a lot about transitional species. So what!! If land animals share ancestry with the fishes, this does not mean that land life was a slow and gradual progression. What's that one animal? The tick. . . .tak. .ticktak . . .tilac, or something? First, we don't know what da hell that animal was and even so, it wouldn't prove anything. Most of those so called transitional species are found with duplicates 100s of miles apart. If gradual transition is true, why do we find the same thing without slightly greater or less transition? They may be transitional, but I'll bet the farm they ain't gradually transitioning into anything. Besides, has any one a yas ever wondered why the lung fish are not considered transitional? I think it's because they exist today and science has ruled out transition because of their DNA and other traits. Again, I'm not ruling out common ancestry and transition. I'm just saying, take a break guys. You know next to nothing of these fossils' original anatomies. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 890461 United States 02/14/2010 11:16 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | But surely they can't have it both ways? If God created the Earth 5 or 6000 years ago, how can they argue the case made above? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 652522Look,evolution might have been acceptable 200 years ago but it is not acceptable to science today. If I chop of my leg, will my kids be born with one leg too ?. If you were born with one leg theres a heightened chance your children would be born with one leg, however. |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 652522 United Kingdom 02/14/2010 11:21 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 890940 Ireland 02/14/2010 11:22 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
zombieintraining
User ID: 839757 United States 02/14/2010 11:31 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Former NASA engineer and inventor, Adam Kissiah wrote an excellent book on Genesis/science. This guy was well up the ladder at NASA and knows his stuff. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 652522NASA= Never A Straight Answer Again, OP with those credible sources!! |
paranoid eyes User ID: 875886 United States 02/14/2010 11:47 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
hoot no more/hasheater User ID: 891009 United Kingdom 02/14/2010 11:50 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 882117 United States 02/14/2010 11:50 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 848712 Canada 02/14/2010 11:51 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Yes you're absolutely right. It's like telling a 4 year old that "god" created the Universe and everything in it. In all innocence the child will ask "Who created "god?" IMO the answer to that is Infinite Consciousness. Quoting: scepticalBut doesn't that also then revert back to cyclical thinking? At least, what is infinite consciousness and where/how/why did that originate? The word 'infinite' explains it all. |
paranoid eyes User ID: 875886 United States 02/14/2010 11:52 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |