From your post, I can see that Judas Iscariot did exactly what Jesus told him to do. He did not reject the Lord's goodwill. Jesus was making a symbol through the bread. Now after the piece of bread, Satan entered him, it says. Entered who? Hey? Judas or Jesus?

Then the Philemon reference, that's what Paul says to non-apostles and to gentiles. It also says that about God, but it does not say anything about what Satan cannot use us to do things.

Now, I learned to celebrate the birth of Jesus on 9/11, 3BC. It came around that way, seems relevant. I am happy to celebrate it differently because of the materialism around idolatry at Christmas with statues of things and other ideas in the way that saturate the minds of people into coveting and greed. already had my party.

The Lord's cup and the Lord's bread unworthy only matters when you're invited to the Lord's table. The bread and cup of that is not always the material bread and cup. Paul is talking about the responsibility of infinite actions and infinite perfections of those actions, positive or negative. It's something like karma.

Hearts dulled by carousing is not eating. It's watching TV and going to sports and drinking at the parties and clubs and things like that. Where nobody cares, that's dull heart. The worries of everyday living. wow. yeah, that's my problem.

Christmas wasn't around with Paul. in fact Paul as a talking apostle in the books, so he calls himself but you might want to read it more. Don't rewrite the verses to add Christmas to fit your argument Christ mass was not a feature of Paul's time. Lots of Roman holidays, Saturnalia for example, where there was carousing.

The Thessalonians argument was that most people plan a little while for a certain time of safety, but the Christians knew about eternity, nothing was forever with peace.