LVMPD Sheriff Lombardo admits for the FIRST TIME publicly a timeline change that includes Sep. 25 check-in date for Paddock

See Laura Loomer’s Twitter for up-to-the-minute updates: [link to mobile.twitter.com (secure)]

but his body language and stress in his voice is things that appear he is under duress. things we look for in interviews and interrogations ,when we can tell we are about to be fed a line of manure, we all know he was with other people, why claim he was with nobody ??? room service for two extra people, hooker. now who was it Campbell or paddock, notice the Campbell name slip ? anyone else feel the Sheriff was under duress ? my opinions on this matter

I read one theory that the undersheriff is the LVMPD Anon. He's dropped a few clues in his briefings.

they are pushing the loner went nuts line. because the simpler the crime the easier to cover, make it more complex the more wholes can be found. my opinions on this matter

and the quicker to close the case without a real or extensive investigation.
This one has Deep State written all over it!

Holy shit. How could they not have access to 1) Parking system data or 2) The front desk check-in data or 3) The room service data? That is inconceivable they were not aware of the information that Laura was able to discover.

They have flat out been caught in a huge lie. This is bombshell, smoking gun level evidence there is a coverup.

Now the question is, what was going on between 9/25 to 9/28 that would cause law enforcement to put out such an obvious lie?

Now they’re saying the security guard was shot PRIOR to to the massacre, sheriff says - [link to www.cbsnews.com (secure)]

Yes, a big fat lie. The question is why did they lie about this particular fact. There has to be a reason. They can't possibly be so incompetent that they couldn't find this same information as easy (or easier) than Laura Loomer did.

Anyone with the background to listen to this and see if it makes sense?



[link to youtu.be (secure)]

The reason is that there is something in the time-frame of 9/25 to 9/28 that they don't want tied to Paddock. Either they already had a backstory for him over that time period planned out, or he was involved in something in Vegas during that time period that they don't want him connected to.

Why not both?

FBI lied and Americans died

Thank you for posting this, haven't watched yet but these briefings are the strangest things I've ever seen.

:falseflag:

Great find makes perfect sense, now this shows the FBI is definitely covering up. because again like with Kennedy, witnesses are dismissed , and they push the story they want pushed, with kennedy some of the witnesses were combat veterans who stated the rounds came from the grassy knoll, this did not go with the Warren Commission report, so they dismissed those witnesses. just as these witnesses are being dismissed and we get the same old Oswald type story, only thing changes is the name of the patsy, next is we have missing muzzle flashes from paddocks window , but there is footage from the 4th floor it appears of muzzle flashes and weapons fire in sync., that covers the 600 yards shots. now we need to know the location of the 2nd shooter from 425 meters away, but the FBLIE with their line is telling us they guy walked on air and closed in to his targets by 175 yards and then walked on air back into his room. like I stated almost a week ago, the shooter was super man, flew down to the 4th floor and back to his room, while Cops were reporting on three different locations were the weapons fire was coming from. my opinions on this matter

Then wait until you watch this one.... I watched live. I was in shock when it ended. Wait until the end.. when you see the encounter with the woman....

This really deserves it's own thread.

Nail in the coffin for the FBI's story.

wtf, that's shit we all knew the day it happened...

Might have an alias.

Lots of undercover types do, including one of my family members. Even his department car license plate gets traced back to a shell company with a stotefront.

Hopefully someone will do a thread on it. I'm hoping a long range shooter or someone who is familiar with this type of analysis will give their opinion of it.

Is it up on YouTube yet? This link keeps freezing on me!!

Done: [link to www.godlikeproductions.com]

I found it in case anyone else has the same problem as me ........

[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]

No you have to watch the one in Twitter that laura and the guy broadcasted. The most interesting part was the encounter in the lobby after.... It was also weird that the Sheriff "slipped up" and called the shooter campos....

Thank you! Here is an embed:



[link to youtu.be (secure)]

You would think in reviewing those 200 "instances" of Paddock moving around they would have figured out before now his actual check in date. Why did they want to hide this information from the public?

Lombardo also revised the date on which police believe Paddock checked into Mandalay Bay. While initially they said he had checked in on Sept. 28, three days before the shooting, they now believe he checked in on Sept. 25.

They continue to believe he was operating without a partner.

Lombardo said investigators had compiled 200 “instances” of Paddock moving around Las Vegas before the attack, and he was always alone.


[link to www.latimes.com]

I have hearing loss and thought Campbell, Thanks for clearing that up , I like to get it correct. so who is the dead guy really ? my opinions on this matter