SHOCK: Sharia-Compliant Judge Rules Country’s Law Against Female Genital Mutilation is Somehow ‘Unconstitutional,’ | |
MissCleo
User ID: 76541118 United States 11/20/2018 10:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: SHOCK: Sharia-Compliant Judge Rules Country’s Law Against Female Genital Mutilation is Somehow ‘Unconstitutional,’ Judge dismisses female genital mutilation charges in historic case Quoting: Bread Crumb In a major blow to the government, a federal judge in Detroit has declared America's female genital mutilation law unconstitutional, thereby dismissing the key charges against two Michigan doctors and six others accused of subjecting at least nine minor girls to the cutting procedure in the nation's first FGM case. The historic case involves minor girls from Michigan, Illinois and Minnesota, including some who cried, screamed and bled during the procedure and one who was given Valium ground in liquid Tylenol to keep her calm, court records show. The judge's ruling also removed three mothers from the case, including two Minnesota women whom prosecutors said tricked their 7 -year-old daughters into thinking they were coming to Metro Detroit for a girls' weekend, but instead had their genitals cut at a Livonia clinic as part of a religious procedure. [link to www.freep.com (secure)] The article does state: “Currently, 27 states have laws that criminalize female genital mutilation, including Michigan, whose FGM law is stiffer than the federal statute, punishable by up to 15 years in prison, compared with five under federal law. Michigan's FGM law was passed last year in the wake of the historic case and applies to both doctors who conduct the procedure, and parents who transport a child to have it done. The defendants in this case can't be retroactively charged under the new law.” So if I’m reading it right Michigan now has an “FGM” law that bars this practice and the defendants in this case can’t be prosecuted. (they should be prosecuted, but another activist judge has bowed to the religion of terror) So does that mean that 23 states allow it? It should just fall under the same laws that chopping off any other part of a child would be under. ^^^^It seems that the prosecutor in the case messed up- maybe intentionally- by not prosecuting under other child abuse/human abuse laws on the books. And this is Phase 7 of the Caliphate. We will be overwhelmed with 1.5 billion Muslims that our legal system will get bogged down by the numbers and we cannot enforce the LAW of the US, and Sharia takes over. We haven't educated our judges, local law enforcement, we haven't made sure that everyone is on the same page and Islam wins. |
Lost Pottawatomie
User ID: 72822103 United States 11/20/2018 10:38 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: SHOCK: Sharia-Compliant Judge Rules Country’s Law Against Female Genital Mutilation is Somehow ‘Unconstitutional,’ The easy way to solve this argument is to make circumcision illegal for both male and females. But women will fight against this, along with circumcised men. Quoting: CaveMan220 Whoever did my snip was overzealous, leaving me little sensation. I won't fight against making all non-medically necessary circumcision s illegal until age 21. Just as noted in FGM, there are various levels of amputation and nerve destruction with male mutilation, in many cases largely eliminating pleasurable sensations. But that's the whole point of any genital mutilation. Isn't it? Why didn't we pick ears to mutilate? Giwani-Mek Translates as: Wandering Beaver Nothing shall be so certain as to permit confusion |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77095110 United States 11/20/2018 10:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76772883 United States 11/20/2018 10:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: SHOCK: Sharia-Compliant Judge Rules Country’s Law Against Female Genital Mutilation is Somehow ‘Unconstitutional,’ The easy way to solve this argument is to make circumcision illegal for both male and females. But women will fight against this, along with circumcised men. Quoting: CaveMan220 Whoever did my snip was overzealous, leaving me little sensation. I won't fight against making all non-medically necessary circumcision s illegal until age 21. Just as noted in FGM, there are various levels of amputation and nerve destruction with male mutilation, in many cases largely eliminating pleasurable sensations. But that's the whole point of any genital mutilation. Isn't it? Why didn't we pick ears to mutilate? Thank you for being brave enough to speak up. What was done to use is a human right abuse. The goal of both surgeries is the same. Even if today we do it for so called 'medical reasons' the end result is the same. We know that male circumcision reduces sexual pleasure for men and the women having sex with them. Even women who have slept with both types will tell you that circumcised men seem to have less fun during sex. Why is it ok to reduce sexual pleasure for men, but not women? Redundant question to you, I know. |
Victor Vectors
User ID: 71388910 United States 11/20/2018 10:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: SHOCK: Sharia-Compliant Judge Rules Country’s Law Against Female Genital Mutilation is Somehow ‘Unconstitutional,’ I am sick of what this country is still becoming. Quoting: Adytum Yeah, Trump is trying to stem the TIDE, but he's just one man unfortunately. And after him the deluge, I fear. Considering what you say and the mini-ice age coming, it seems South America or Australia are the only countries to be in? Islands are too vulnerable to the bad weather coming to this planet. Why do you think all those underground bases and homesteads are being built? |
Hadriana
User ID: 74461487 United States 11/20/2018 10:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: SHOCK: Sharia-Compliant Judge Rules Country’s Law Against Female Genital Mutilation is Somehow ‘Unconstitutional,’ Can we make a religion where we can cut off a baby's left arm too? The govt. would have to think that ok too, right? Last Edited by Hadriana on 11/20/2018 10:48 PM |
The Patriot Mind
User ID: 76943752 United States 11/20/2018 10:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: SHOCK: Sharia-Compliant Judge Rules Country’s Law Against Female Genital Mutilation is Somehow ‘Unconstitutional,’ Well it's against the "law" but death is even to good for that so called "federal judge" Death to him and all his ilk .... not fucking acceptable in any way Fighting and triggering liberals and SJW's in the trenches of their safe spaces since 2014 Signed, The Patriot Mind |
Gallowglassie
User ID: 75638309 United States 11/20/2018 10:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
The Patriot Mind
User ID: 76943752 United States 11/20/2018 10:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
a follower of the way
User ID: 22847021 United States 11/20/2018 10:53 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Victor Vectors
User ID: 71388910 United States 11/20/2018 10:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: SHOCK: Sharia-Compliant Judge Rules Country’s Law Against Female Genital Mutilation is Somehow ‘Unconstitutional,’ |
The Patriot Mind
User ID: 76943752 United States 11/20/2018 10:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77115340 United States 11/20/2018 11:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: SHOCK: Sharia-Compliant Judge Rules Country’s Law Against Female Genital Mutilation is Somehow ‘Unconstitutional,’ Judge dismisses female genital mutilation charges in historic case Quoting: Bread Crumb In a major blow to the government, a federal judge in Detroit has declared America's female genital mutilation law unconstitutional, thereby dismissing the key charges against two Michigan doctors and six others accused of subjecting at least nine minor girls to the cutting procedure in the nation's first FGM case. The historic case involves minor girls from Michigan, Illinois and Minnesota, including some who cried, screamed and bled during the procedure and one who was given Valium ground in liquid Tylenol to keep her calm, court records show. The judge's ruling also removed three mothers from the case, including two Minnesota women whom prosecutors said tricked their 7 -year-old daughters into thinking they were coming to Metro Detroit for a girls' weekend, but instead had their genitals cut at a Livonia clinic as part of a religious procedure. [link to www.freep.com (secure)] This sickens and angers me just to read that. I knew I didn't want to click on this thread. We have laws. If these people wont abide by them, THEN DEPORT THEM. WE DON'T NEED THEM INSTITUTING THEIR OWN FORM OF GOVERNMENT, HERE, OVER OURS. THEY CAN'T JUST CHANGE THE LAW, THAT ISN'T ASSIMILATION, WHICH MEANS THESE PEOPLE DON'T CONSIDER THEMSELVES CITIZENS OR THIS ISN'T THE UNITED STATES ANYMORE. |
The Patriot Mind
User ID: 76943752 United States 11/20/2018 11:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Red John
User ID: 40145039 Canada 11/20/2018 11:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: SHOCK: Sharia-Compliant Judge Rules Country’s Law Against Female Genital Mutilation is Somehow ‘Unconstitutional,’ Look man, you can't make that illegal and yet allow circumcision - mutilation is mutilation Quoting: Hermit Seb no comparison whatsoever circumcision is a completely different thing FGM is removal of everything labia chopped completely off clitoris - Completely cut out and the vagina is then sewn shut tighter than the eye of a needle sexual penetration for a woman who has been destroyed by FGM is extremely painful and no pleasure is ever felt a circumcised penis is not painful during intercourse to make a comparison you would have to chop the penis completely off and remove the scrotum and testes leaving only a portion of the urethra poking out that's the same level of damage done in FGM oh hai! |
The Patriot Mind
User ID: 76943752 United States 11/20/2018 11:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: SHOCK: Sharia-Compliant Judge Rules Country’s Law Against Female Genital Mutilation is Somehow ‘Unconstitutional,’ Not a word about circumcision of male babies though, huh? Quoting: hardscrabble farmer Weird little set of standards people have in these times. God dammit I'm tired of ignorant fucking fools comparing the two,procedures without so much as an god damn inkling of the difference Fighting and triggering liberals and SJW's in the trenches of their safe spaces since 2014 Signed, The Patriot Mind |
The Patriot Mind
User ID: 76943752 United States 11/20/2018 11:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: SHOCK: Sharia-Compliant Judge Rules Country’s Law Against Female Genital Mutilation is Somehow ‘Unconstitutional,’ There are a lot of misinformed people here about the subject. Saying that FGM would be like chopping of the head. Not true. There are WAY more nerve receptors in the foreskin than the head. Also, females who undergo FGM can still orgasm, it just takes more work. SAME AS MEN WHO ARE CIRCUMCISED. There are stories of men who lost the whole head and they claim sex still feels the same and they still orgasm. Are they telling the truth? Who knows. Quoting: CaveMan220 The point is that both are mutilations and one is legal and one is not. Because men are not protected at birth like women are. Many of the men arguing on this page have been cut, and unless they have actually done the research they are arguing out of ignorance. Many circumcised men will defend circumcision until their death. That is because it is a trauma that was inflicted at such a young age that they have to justify it. It's like saying 'I was raped as a baby and I turned out just fine'. Ridiculous. I could rant all day and go into the science, psychological, and spiritual aspects but that will not change what has been done. I can only hope there is justice in the next life. One poster on here pointed out the link to ancient Egypt and he was right. The pharaoh even wears the tool used to perform circumcision as his crown. It's a blood sacrifice to satan. The 'Beast' is the Sphinx. The 'Mark of the Beast' is circumcision. When the 'Lord' (ruler of the house, not GOD) appeared to Moses and demanded his life or his son's foreskin that is what was going on. The law at the time demanded that all sons be circumcised. Moses refused so the 'Lord' was there for Moses's life. Moses's wife could not stand for Moses to be killed so she circumcised her son right there, saving Moses's life. Many people misinterpret the story as actually GOD being there. Lord means ruler of the house. not 'GOD'. Women posting here that justify male circumcision are sick. Men posting here that justify male circumcision are victims of trauma that impose their own abuse on others as a way of justifying what happened to them. Men are trapped into not talking about it because men who complain about circumcision are not seen as good sexual partners. And everybody knows men want sex. Especially if they are sex deprived because the nerve endings that are responsible for full pleasure have been amputated at birth. God dammit your an ignorant fucking fool ... Fighting and triggering liberals and SJW's in the trenches of their safe spaces since 2014 Signed, The Patriot Mind |
The Patriot Mind
User ID: 76943752 United States 11/20/2018 11:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: SHOCK: Sharia-Compliant Judge Rules Country’s Law Against Female Genital Mutilation is Somehow ‘Unconstitutional,’ Look man, you can't make that illegal and yet allow circumcision - mutilation is mutilation Quoting: Hermit Seb Two medically different things all together. They cannot be compared. When the girls get old enough they can sue the parents for doing it to them. It's not different. Its sexual mutilation. Shows how sick and brainwashed muslims and Christians and other religions are. Piss off yiu uninformed ignorant fool ... piss off and die Fighting and triggering liberals and SJW's in the trenches of their safe spaces since 2014 Signed, The Patriot Mind |
randir14
User ID: 73722498 United States 11/20/2018 11:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Red John
User ID: 41190134 Canada 11/20/2018 11:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: SHOCK: Sharia-Compliant Judge Rules Country’s Law Against Female Genital Mutilation is Somehow ‘Unconstitutional,’ ... Quoting: Super Crayton The article does state: “Currently, 27 states have laws that criminalize female genital mutilation, including Michigan, whose FGM law is stiffer than the federal statute, punishable by up to 15 years in prison, compared with five under federal law. Michigan's FGM law was passed last year in the wake of the historic case and applies to both doctors who conduct the procedure, and parents who transport a child to have it done. The defendants in this case can't be retroactively charged under the new law.” So if I’m reading it right Michigan now has an “FGM” law that bars this practice and the defendants in this case can’t be prosecuted. (they should be prosecuted, but another activist judge has bowed to the religion of terror) So does that mean that 23 states allow it? It should just fall under the same laws that chopping off any other part of a child would be under. ^^^^It seems that the prosecutor in the case messed up- maybe intentionally- by not prosecuting under other child abuse/human abuse laws on the books. And this is Phase 7 of the Caliphate. We will be overwhelmed with 1.5 billion Muslims that our legal system will get bogged down by the numbers and we cannot enforce the LAW of the US, and Sharia takes over. We haven't educated our judges, local law enforcement, we haven't made sure that everyone is on the same page and Islam wins. saw this yesterday [link to www.tapainfo.com (secure)] oh hai! |
The Rickest Rick Sanchez
User ID: 52110766 United States 11/20/2018 11:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: SHOCK: Sharia-Compliant Judge Rules Country’s Law Against Female Genital Mutilation is Somehow ‘Unconstitutional,’ No The universe is basically an animal. It grazes on the ordinary. It creates infinite idiots just to eat them. The Rickest Rick Sanchez comments are meant for entertainment purposes only and should not be construed to reflect the feelings and opinions, implied or expressed, of the author. |
Red John
User ID: 41190134 Canada 11/20/2018 11:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: SHOCK: Sharia-Compliant Judge Rules Country’s Law Against Female Genital Mutilation is Somehow ‘Unconstitutional,’ There are a lot of misinformed people here about the subject. Saying that FGM would be like chopping of the head. Not true. There are WAY more nerve receptors in the foreskin than the head. Also, females who undergo FGM can still orgasm, it just takes more work. SAME AS MEN WHO ARE CIRCUMCISED. There are stories of men who lost the whole head and they claim sex still feels the same and they still orgasm. Are they telling the truth? Who knows. Quoting: CaveMan220 The point is that both are mutilations and one is legal and one is not. Because men are not protected at birth like women are. Many of the men arguing on this page have been cut, and unless they have actually done the research they are arguing out of ignorance. Many circumcised men will defend circumcision until their death. That is because it is a trauma that was inflicted at such a young age that they have to justify it. It's like saying 'I was raped as a baby and I turned out just fine'. Ridiculous. I could rant all day and go into the science, psychological, and spiritual aspects but that will not change what has been done. I can only hope there is justice in the next life. One poster on here pointed out the link to ancient Egypt and he was right. The pharaoh even wears the tool used to perform circumcision as his crown. It's a blood sacrifice to satan. The 'Beast' is the Sphinx. The 'Mark of the Beast' is circumcision. When the 'Lord' (ruler of the house, not GOD) appeared to Moses and demanded his life or his son's foreskin that is what was going on. The law at the time demanded that all sons be circumcised. Moses refused so the 'Lord' was there for Moses's life. Moses's wife could not stand for Moses to be killed so she circumcised her son right there, saving Moses's life. Many people misinterpret the story as actually GOD being there. Lord means ruler of the house. not 'GOD'. Women posting here that justify male circumcision are sick. Men posting here that justify male circumcision are victims of trauma that impose their own abuse on others as a way of justifying what happened to them. Men are trapped into not talking about it because men who complain about circumcision are not seen as good sexual partners. And everybody knows men want sex. Especially if they are sex deprived because the nerve endings that are responsible for full pleasure have been amputated at birth. I highly doubt anyone here is "defending" or "justifying" circumcision we are simply saying there is no comparison between FGM and circumcision oh hai! |
Lost Pottawatomie
User ID: 72571257 United States 11/20/2018 11:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: SHOCK: Sharia-Compliant Judge Rules Country’s Law Against Female Genital Mutilation is Somehow ‘Unconstitutional,’ There are a lot of misinformed people here about the subject. Saying that FGM would be like chopping of the head. Not true. There are WAY more nerve receptors in the foreskin than the head. Also, females who undergo FGM can still orgasm, it just takes more work. SAME AS MEN WHO ARE CIRCUMCISED. There are stories of men who lost the whole head and they claim sex still feels the same and they still orgasm. Are they telling the truth? Who knows. Quoting: CaveMan220 The point is that both are mutilations and one is legal and one is not. Because men are not protected at birth like women are. Many of the men arguing on this page have been cut, and unless they have actually done the research they are arguing out of ignorance. Many circumcised men will defend circumcision until their death. That is because it is a trauma that was inflicted at such a young age that they have to justify it. It's like saying 'I was raped as a baby and I turned out just fine'. Ridiculous. I could rant all day and go into the science, psychological, and spiritual aspects but that will not change what has been done. I can only hope there is justice in the next life. One poster on here pointed out the link to ancient Egypt and he was right. The pharaoh even wears the tool used to perform circumcision as his crown. It's a blood sacrifice to satan. The 'Beast' is the Sphinx. The 'Mark of the Beast' is circumcision. When the 'Lord' (ruler of the house, not GOD) appeared to Moses and demanded his life or his son's foreskin that is what was going on. The law at the time demanded that all sons be circumcised. Moses refused so the 'Lord' was there for Moses's life. Moses's wife could not stand for Moses to be killed so she circumcised her son right there, saving Moses's life. Many people misinterpret the story as actually GOD being there. Lord means ruler of the house. not 'GOD'. Women posting here that justify male circumcision are sick. Men posting here that justify male circumcision are victims of trauma that impose their own abuse on others as a way of justifying what happened to them. Men are trapped into not talking about it because men who complain about circumcision are not seen as good sexual partners. And everybody knows men want sex. Especially if they are sex deprived because the nerve endings that are responsible for full pleasure have been amputated at birth. I highly doubt anyone here is "defending" or "justifying" circumcision we are simply saying there is no comparison between FGM and circumcision I would politely suggest you accept some credibility on the part of those who have been genitally mutilated. There is no comparison, you are right. They are the very same thing. Intentional destruction of what the Creator intended. Have you any personal experience living with mutilated genitals and how well they work or satisfy? Giwani-Mek Translates as: Wandering Beaver Nothing shall be so certain as to permit confusion |
Lost Pottawatomie
User ID: 72571257 United States 11/21/2018 12:08 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: SHOCK: Sharia-Compliant Judge Rules Country’s Law Against Female Genital Mutilation is Somehow ‘Unconstitutional,’ I will addendum. Even with very little sensation, I was able to naturally Father children. But with little else to bring me to orgasm, it was required that I be in full Love and trust, not wear "protection", be ready to support any children, and more or less be begged to come to orgasm, which was in no way guaranteed for me. Maybe that's the definition of equality in sex. Giwani-Mek Translates as: Wandering Beaver Nothing shall be so certain as to permit confusion |
Red John
User ID: 41269261 Canada 11/21/2018 12:09 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: SHOCK: Sharia-Compliant Judge Rules Country’s Law Against Female Genital Mutilation is Somehow ‘Unconstitutional,’ There are a lot of misinformed people here about the subject. Saying that FGM would be like chopping of the head. Not true. There are WAY more nerve receptors in the foreskin than the head. Also, females who undergo FGM can still orgasm, it just takes more work. SAME AS MEN WHO ARE CIRCUMCISED. There are stories of men who lost the whole head and they claim sex still feels the same and they still orgasm. Are they telling the truth? Who knows. Quoting: CaveMan220 The point is that both are mutilations and one is legal and one is not. Because men are not protected at birth like women are. Many of the men arguing on this page have been cut, and unless they have actually done the research they are arguing out of ignorance. Many circumcised men will defend circumcision until their death. That is because it is a trauma that was inflicted at such a young age that they have to justify it. It's like saying 'I was raped as a baby and I turned out just fine'. Ridiculous. I could rant all day and go into the science, psychological, and spiritual aspects but that will not change what has been done. I can only hope there is justice in the next life. One poster on here pointed out the link to ancient Egypt and he was right. The pharaoh even wears the tool used to perform circumcision as his crown. It's a blood sacrifice to satan. The 'Beast' is the Sphinx. The 'Mark of the Beast' is circumcision. When the 'Lord' (ruler of the house, not GOD) appeared to Moses and demanded his life or his son's foreskin that is what was going on. The law at the time demanded that all sons be circumcised. Moses refused so the 'Lord' was there for Moses's life. Moses's wife could not stand for Moses to be killed so she circumcised her son right there, saving Moses's life. Many people misinterpret the story as actually GOD being there. Lord means ruler of the house. not 'GOD'. Women posting here that justify male circumcision are sick. Men posting here that justify male circumcision are victims of trauma that impose their own abuse on others as a way of justifying what happened to them. Men are trapped into not talking about it because men who complain about circumcision are not seen as good sexual partners. And everybody knows men want sex. Especially if they are sex deprived because the nerve endings that are responsible for full pleasure have been amputated at birth. I highly doubt anyone here is "defending" or "justifying" circumcision we are simply saying there is no comparison between FGM and circumcision I would politely suggest you accept some credibility on the part of those who have been genitally mutilated. There is no comparison, you are right. They are the very same thing. Intentional destruction of what the Creator intended. Have you any personal experience living with mutilated genitals and how well they work or satisfy? muh dick is cut still feels good maybe not as good as it could / should doesn't hurt though oh hai! |
Peach Head
User ID: 76780739 United States 11/21/2018 12:11 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: SHOCK: Sharia-Compliant Judge Rules Country’s Law Against Female Genital Mutilation is Somehow ‘Unconstitutional,’ Well it's against the "law" Quoting: The Patriot Mind but death is even to good for that so called "federal judge" Death to him and all his ilk .... not fucking acceptable in any way Why is his house not being visited like they did Tucker? Should drag his ass out by his ball sack and then cut it off like he allowing them to do to the little girls. People who invoke "our democracy" really mean "their power." We are not now, nor have we ever been, a democracy. That's deliberate Communist word shifting. We are a constitutional republic. |
Peach Head
User ID: 76780739 United States 11/21/2018 12:14 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: SHOCK: Sharia-Compliant Judge Rules Country’s Law Against Female Genital Mutilation is Somehow ‘Unconstitutional,’ There are a lot of misinformed people here about the subject. Saying that FGM would be like chopping of the head. Not true. There are WAY more nerve receptors in the foreskin than the head. Also, females who undergo FGM can still orgasm, it just takes more work. SAME AS MEN WHO ARE CIRCUMCISED. There are stories of men who lost the whole head and they claim sex still feels the same and they still orgasm. Are they telling the truth? Who knows. Quoting: CaveMan220 The point is that both are mutilations and one is legal and one is not. Because men are not protected at birth like women are. Many of the men arguing on this page have been cut, and unless they have actually done the research they are arguing out of ignorance. Many circumcised men will defend circumcision until their death. That is because it is a trauma that was inflicted at such a young age that they have to justify it. It's like saying 'I was raped as a baby and I turned out just fine'. Ridiculous. I could rant all day and go into the science, psychological, and spiritual aspects but that will not change what has been done. I can only hope there is justice in the next life. One poster on here pointed out the link to ancient Egypt and he was right. The pharaoh even wears the tool used to perform circumcision as his crown. It's a blood sacrifice to satan. The 'Beast' is the Sphinx. The 'Mark of the Beast' is circumcision. When the 'Lord' (ruler of the house, not GOD) appeared to Moses and demanded his life or his son's foreskin that is what was going on. The law at the time demanded that all sons be circumcised. Moses refused so the 'Lord' was there for Moses's life. Moses's wife could not stand for Moses to be killed so she circumcised her son right there, saving Moses's life. Many people misinterpret the story as actually GOD being there. Lord means ruler of the house. not 'GOD'. Women posting here that justify male circumcision are sick. Men posting here that justify male circumcision are victims of trauma that impose their own abuse on others as a way of justifying what happened to them. Men are trapped into not talking about it because men who complain about circumcision are not seen as good sexual partners. And everybody knows men want sex. Especially if they are sex deprived because the nerve endings that are responsible for full pleasure have been amputated at birth. I highly doubt anyone here is "defending" or "justifying" circumcision we are simply saying there is no comparison between FGM and circumcision I would politely suggest you accept some credibility on the part of those who have been genitally mutilated. There is no comparison, you are right. They are the very same thing. Intentional destruction of what the Creator intended. Have you any personal experience living with mutilated genitals and how well they work or satisfy? muh dick is cut still feels good maybe not as good as it could / should doesn't hurt though No comparison... The clit is the same as your penis head and sex would be impossible without the nerve filled best part missing. People who invoke "our democracy" really mean "their power." We are not now, nor have we ever been, a democracy. That's deliberate Communist word shifting. We are a constitutional republic. |
Lost Pottawatomie
User ID: 72571257 United States 11/21/2018 12:17 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: SHOCK: Sharia-Compliant Judge Rules Country’s Law Against Female Genital Mutilation is Somehow ‘Unconstitutional,’ ... Quoting: Red John I highly doubt anyone here is "defending" or "justifying" circumcision we are simply saying there is no comparison between FGM and circumcision I would politely suggest you accept some credibility on the part of those who have been genitally mutilated. There is no comparison, you are right. They are the very same thing. Intentional destruction of what the Creator intended. Have you any personal experience living with mutilated genitals and how well they work or satisfy? muh dick is cut still feels good maybe not as good as it could / should doesn't hurt though No comparison... The clit is the same as your penis head and sex would be impossible without the nerve filled best part missing. The nerves to the glans are severed! What part about that don't you understand? Giwani-Mek Translates as: Wandering Beaver Nothing shall be so certain as to permit confusion |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77115340 United States 11/21/2018 12:18 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
MaxwellSmart007
User ID: 76803147 United States 11/21/2018 12:36 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: SHOCK: Sharia-Compliant Judge Rules Country’s Law Against Female Genital Mutilation is Somehow ‘Unconstitutional,’ The judge needs to be removed and thrown in prison for advocating child abuse and inciting the public to riot. Plenty of religious ideas are against the law in this country and we dont cater to it . All my post are theatrical artistic writing . |