Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,203 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 368,792
Pageviews Today: 479,568Threads Today: 153Posts Today: 1,762
04:10 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Chinese Admiral Wants To "Sink Two US Aircraft Carriers" Over South China Sea

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 76809044
United States
01/01/2019 06:17 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chinese Admiral Wants To "Sink Two US Aircraft Carriers" Over South China Sea
We can also sink China’s aircraft carriers. And it can be done in a bunch of different ways.

[link to nationalinterest.org (secure)]
 Quoting: Fight The Power


it's always better to target the leaders.
Magna Cacca

User ID: 61268150
United States
01/01/2019 06:17 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chinese Admiral Wants To "Sink Two US Aircraft Carriers" Over South China Sea
Carriers just like boomers are strategic assets. Attacking one gets a response in kind (aka nukes). SOP since the Cold War.
Join the Red Team with me!

Turd a la Mode by Creme de la Crap

Kneel before Satan
KipKat

User ID: 76931537
Netherlands
01/01/2019 06:33 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chinese Admiral Wants To "Sink Two US Aircraft Carriers" Over South China Sea
The Chinese send 3 years olds to full time military boarding schools.

In the US 3 year olds are being asked what gender they are.
 Quoting: BohemianExile


sadpanda
:kkwapper:
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 76809044
United States
01/01/2019 06:35 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chinese Admiral Wants To "Sink Two US Aircraft Carriers" Over South China Sea
The Chinese send 3 years olds to full time military boarding schools.

In the US 3 year olds are being asked what gender they are.
 Quoting: BohemianExile


the U.S. is a nation of perverts.

:Bammy1:
Wookiee666

User ID: 62421844
United States
01/01/2019 06:39 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chinese Admiral Wants To "Sink Two US Aircraft Carriers" Over South China Sea
Right. The Chinese navy would cease to exist.
 Quoting: Where Eagles Dare


Years ago, maybe.

Now, we'll give 'em California if they promise not to do it again.
Warning: JustSomeGuy_42 is a publicly confessed unvaxxed neophiliac .

If the number 666 is considered evil.
then technically, 25.8069758 is the root
of all evil.
Bodi DocModerator
Forum Administrator

01/01/2019 06:43 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chinese Admiral Wants To "Sink Two US Aircraft Carriers" Over South China Sea
that American Military Umbrella Europe has prospered under
 Quoting: Bodi Doc


Yeah, how could Europe ever exist without American dumbasses.

epiclol
 Quoting: PumuckI


Pretty much....yeah.
“We have assembled the most extensive and inclusive Voter Fraud Organization in the history of America”—Joe “SippyCup” Biden

Joe Biden will never be the man Michelle Obama is

The worst thing about dying is that you become a democratic voter for eternity
WalrusRider

User ID: 77184743
United States
01/01/2019 06:49 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chinese Admiral Wants To "Sink Two US Aircraft Carriers" Over South China Sea
In China, when a person hits another person with a car, it costs more to pay for the person if they survive than if they die. So, people commonly finish the job (murder) those that they hit so that they can pay a one-time fee. The practice of intentionally prolonging the torture of animals is also accepted, because they think it makes the meat tastier. The Chinese have been caught putting plastics and other poisons in foods that they shipped overseas, in fact, there was an incident where poisons were put in baby food because it was cheaper - it ended up killing a bunch of babies. The entire culture of China is centered around deceit. They don't just scam outsiders, they scam each other. I won't even go into the details of their persecution of religious people, the organ harvesting, the genocide of the Tibetans, and other such things. The point is, the Chinese are a force for evil. As a people they lack empathy.

More on topic - they have no right to claim the South China sea as their own, when other neighboring countries also share that sea.

The Chinese send 3 years olds to full time military boarding schools.

In the US 3 year olds are being asked what gender they are.
 Quoting: BohemianExile


Yep... two different forms of brainwashing at any early age. One is being trained to be obedient to authority, and the other is being trained to be a fruity leftist.

China does have a numeric advantage but that means nothing because foot soldiers will be completely irrelevant in a direct confrontation. WW3 will be fought with nukes and it will conclude in mere hours. Nuclear war is exactly what would happen if two US aircraft carriers were destroyed by China. This Chinese general is off his rocker. If it does kick off, I hope at least that China gets turned into a parking lot. The world will be a much better place.
All billionaires, banksters, and people in high-ranking positions of power (both public and private) who have not openly and strongly come out against woke ideology and globalism are our enemies - as are their minions. They are the NWO.
ohnmar

User ID: 77245523
Myanmar
01/01/2019 09:32 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chinese Admiral Wants To "Sink Two US Aircraft Carriers" Over South China Sea
If that Chinese commie said that. He is already in the cross hairs of one of our boomers at this moment.
ohnmar
BohemianExile

User ID: 75477183
United States
01/01/2019 10:32 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chinese Admiral Wants To "Sink Two US Aircraft Carriers" Over South China Sea
If that Chinese commie said that. He is already in the cross hairs of one of our boomers at this moment.
 Quoting: ohnmar


You should check out Michael Fabey's book, Crashback, about an incident in the South China Sea where a Chinese ship went in front the USS Cowpens and forced it to come to a stop.

Honestly, the Chinese can mass produce new ships way faster than we can repair our old ones.

[link to www.zerohedge.com (secure)]
“Till shade is gone, till water is gone,
into the Shadow with teeth bared,
screaming defiance with the last breath,
to spit in Sightblinder’s eye on the Last Day.”
-Aiel Oath

Let the Dragon ride again on the Winds of Time
WoT WoT! Build that RedWall


Loose Lips Don't Sink Ships ~ Qanons DEW
EnD BLM

User ID: 73805232
United States
01/01/2019 11:20 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chinese Admiral Wants To "Sink Two US Aircraft Carriers" Over South China Sea
nopemacgunchina1rocket
Yin and yang is never ending because if it did so would everything.....
Agent MIB

User ID: 44079930
Philippines
01/02/2019 12:42 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chinese Admiral Wants To "Sink Two US Aircraft Carriers" Over South China Sea
If they actually did sink a carrier, I would not even want to be in one of Chins'a neighboring countries when the SHTF.
 Quoting: A Chosen


Why? Fukushima has spewed out more radiation than all above ground nuclear tests. It's the gift that keeps on giving, killing the entire Pacific Ocean.
You are born with the truth, then taught a lie.
Hermit 48

User ID: 68993491
Canada
01/02/2019 01:25 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chinese Admiral Wants To "Sink Two US Aircraft Carriers" Over South China Sea
Targeting the Nimitz/Ford class carriers would be like bombing a nuclear power station, each ship has two nuclear reactors on board, floating Fukushimas waiting to happen. Russians built over 200 nuclear powered ships/subs/cruisers/icebreakers , US navy still operates over 80 carriers/subs and french carriers are on same nuclear power.
Satan is the prince of this world, evil minds placed this dark energy at sea,on board of ship vulnerable to weather, tsunamis and human error; it's not really safe even on dry land.
Imagine a future war these ships/subs struck in bases in Russia , San Diego, Norfolk, Seattle burning, sinking leaking radiations for decades.
China DF21/31 could strike any warship anywhere around the world. [link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)]



Last Edited by Hermit 48 on 01/02/2019 01:27 AM
Housedad
GOD

User ID: 73158164
United States
01/02/2019 01:25 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chinese Admiral Wants To "Sink Two US Aircraft Carriers" Over South China Sea
China is all mouth. All it would take is ONE, count it, ONE SSBN sub to launch it's full load and China would be uninhabitable for a hundred years.
That would be 25 ballistic missiles with up to 14 nuclear MIRV warheads each. A total of 350 nuclear warheads. At even a low yield of 500 kilotons on each warhead, that is still enough to kiss China goodbye.


Remember, we have 14 Ohio class subs with full nuke boomer capability. The others are used for cruise missile platforms, Also nuclear tipped if desired.

Oh yes. America is the only country to ever use a nuclear weapon on an enemy. So the question is would America do it again? Well, Duh. Hell yes. That is what it is there for. The PROMISE that it will be used if someone fucks with us just a bit too far.

And we will do it to you close by and far away, too.

Don't forget that we have a load of land based ballistic missiles too, that can reach anywhere in the world. Those are the big nukes. Pray they never get used.

America has always had a special way of reaching out to touch someone.

Last Edited by Housedad on 01/02/2019 02:23 AM
There's always an Arquillian Battle Cruiser, or a Corillian Death Ray, or an intergalactic plague that is about to wipe out all life on this miserable little planet, and the only way these people can get on with their happy lives is that they DO NOT KNOW ABOUT IT!

-Men in Black
DONKEY LIPS  (OP)

User ID: 76357609
United States
01/03/2019 09:00 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chinese Admiral Wants To "Sink Two US Aircraft Carriers" Over South China Sea
US to hold missile drill in Japan's Okinawa
Big Duke6

User ID: 77214495
Canada
01/07/2019 04:16 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chinese Admiral Wants To "Sink Two US Aircraft Carriers" Over South China Sea
The reason the west can't beat China is due to the overwhelming amount of people they have. You could take out 1/2 billion of them and they would still have troops to fight a land battle. If they were to do only half the damage to America, the US would cease to exist as a country and as a nation.

Remember, China is a communist regime and half a billion of their people to them is a price they would be willing to pay to win a world war.

The "good news" (if you want to call it that) is that China has so much $ invested in America, they would be shooting themselves in the foot if they were to attack the US. I'm not saying they would never do it but only if there were no other alternative.
 Quoting: tcs


Guess what happens to all of their American investments once they attack? This includes China's 1.18 trillion in U.S. Treasuries.

byekitty
 Quoting: Chip


Worthless ... and they know it. Everybody and their dog is dumping US treasuries.
Big Duke6

User ID: 77214495
Canada
01/07/2019 04:20 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chinese Admiral Wants To "Sink Two US Aircraft Carriers" Over South China Sea
Good luck with that, China. Unless they want all out war, which they don't, they can STFU.

Quoted from a 2016 article.

"The United States now operates 10 Nimitz-class "supercarriers," aircraft carriers that dwarf all other flat-tops worldwide both in size and capability.

The Nimitz carriers are 1,092 feet long and weigh a whopping 101,600 tons—60 percent larger than their nearest counterparts, the Queen Elizabeth class. Each ship is propelled to speeds in excess of 30 knots by a pair of nuclear reactors, giving them nearly unlimited range. The ships are built with high-tensile steel for protection, with layers of Kevlar over vital spaces.

Each Nimitz typically carries an air wing consisting of 24 F/A-18C Hornets, 24 F/A-E/F Super Hornets, 4 to 5 E/A-18G Growler electronic warfare aircraft, 4 E-2D Hawkeye airborne early warning and control aircraft, 2 C-2 Greyhound transport aircraft, and 6 Seahawk helicopters.

In addition to the Nimitz-class, the United States Navy also operates nine landing helicopter dock ships of the Wasp and America classes. These ships are 843 feet long and displace roughly 40,000 tons. The ships are designed to carry air and land elements of a U.S. Marine corps landing force and have full-length carrier-like flight decks.

Each ship can carry 10 MV-22 Osprey tiltrotor transports, 4 CH-53E heavy transport helicopters, 3 UH-1 Huey helicopters, 4 AH-1Z attack helicopters, and 6 AV-8B Harrier jump jets. With minimal modification, each Wasp can carry 24 Harriers. The America class is optimized towards carrying Marine aviation units and can carry a few more Ospreys. In the near future the F-35B Joint Strike Fighter will replace the Harriers on a 1:1 basis, and the America class will be capable of supporting up to 20 F-35Bs at once.

Two new carriers, USS Gerald R. Ford and USS John F. Kennedy, are under construction, as well as an America-class ship, USS Tripoli."

[link to www.popularmechanics.com (secure)]

We have just slightly fewer aircraft carriers than the rest of the entire world combined:

[link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)]

We would pound them to dust.
 Quoting: Sinclair


Unknown if chicoms or russians have hypersonic missiles that can knock out carriers.

Maybe LAWS can counter the threat?
Big Duke6

User ID: 77214495
Canada
01/07/2019 04:33 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chinese Admiral Wants To "Sink Two US Aircraft Carriers" Over South China Sea
China is all mouth. All it would take is ONE, count it, ONE SSBN sub to launch it's full load and China would be uninhabitable for a hundred years.
That would be 25 ballistic missiles with up to 14 nuclear MIRV warheads each. A total of 350 nuclear warheads. At even a low yield of 500 kilotons on each warhead, that is still enough to kiss China goodbye.


Remember, we have 14 Ohio class subs with full nuke boomer capability. The others are used for cruise missile platforms, Also nuclear tipped if desired.

Oh yes. America is the only country to ever use a nuclear weapon on an enemy. So the question is would America do it again? Well, Duh. Hell yes. That is what it is there for. The PROMISE that it will be used if someone fucks with us just a bit too far.

And we will do it to you close by and far away, too.

Don't forget that we have a load of land based ballistic missiles too, that can reach anywhere in the world. Those are the big nukes. Pray they never get used.

America has always had a special way of reaching out to touch someone.
 Quoting: Housedad


Sure hope they are not relying on Chinese electronics like the F22s.
Tombstone

User ID: 77265273
South Africa
01/07/2019 04:36 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chinese Admiral Wants To "Sink Two US Aircraft Carriers" Over South China Sea
Not that easy to sink a carrier, because you have to find it first. Needle in a haystack.

Read this very interesting article.
[link to www.navweaps.com]
 Quoting: Tombstone


Yes, I would have to agree that it would be like finding a needle in a field full of hay.
 Quoting: A Chosen


This article is bullshit.

It is near impossible to find an aircraft carrier at sea and if you can't find it, you can't sink it.

Read the article about the US operating their carriers just offshore of the USSr and how the USSR tried and failed to find them.
Big Duke6

User ID: 77214495
Canada
01/07/2019 04:50 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Chinese Admiral Wants To "Sink Two US Aircraft Carriers" Over South China Sea
Not that easy to sink a carrier, because you have to find it first. Needle in a haystack.

Read this very interesting article.
[link to www.navweaps.com]
 Quoting: Tombstone


Yes, I would have to agree that it would be like finding a needle in a field full of hay.
 Quoting: A Chosen


This article is bullshit.

It is near impossible to find an aircraft carrier at sea and if you can't find it, you can't sink it.

Read the article about the US operating their carriers just offshore of the USSr and how the USSR tried and failed to find them.
 Quoting: Tombstone


Seems strange that satellite optics couldn't accomplish?





GLP