Chinese Admiral Wants To "Sink Two US Aircraft Carriers" Over South China Sea | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76809044 United States 01/01/2019 06:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | We can also sink China’s aircraft carriers. And it can be done in a bunch of different ways. Quoting: Fight The Power [link to nationalinterest.org (secure)] it's always better to target the leaders. |
Magna Cacca
User ID: 61268150 United States 01/01/2019 06:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
KipKat
User ID: 76931537 Netherlands 01/01/2019 06:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76809044 United States 01/01/2019 06:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Wookiee666
User ID: 62421844 United States 01/01/2019 06:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Years ago, maybe. Now, we'll give 'em California if they promise not to do it again. Warning: JustSomeGuy_42 is a publicly confessed unvaxxed neophiliac . If the number 666 is considered evil. then technically, 25.8069758 is the root of all evil. |
Bodi Doc
Forum Administrator 01/01/2019 06:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Pretty much....yeah. “We have assembled the most extensive and inclusive Voter Fraud Organization in the history of America”—Joe “SippyCup” Biden Joe Biden will never be the man Michelle Obama is The worst thing about dying is that you become a democratic voter for eternity |
WalrusRider
User ID: 77184743 United States 01/01/2019 06:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | In China, when a person hits another person with a car, it costs more to pay for the person if they survive than if they die. So, people commonly finish the job (murder) those that they hit so that they can pay a one-time fee. The practice of intentionally prolonging the torture of animals is also accepted, because they think it makes the meat tastier. The Chinese have been caught putting plastics and other poisons in foods that they shipped overseas, in fact, there was an incident where poisons were put in baby food because it was cheaper - it ended up killing a bunch of babies. The entire culture of China is centered around deceit. They don't just scam outsiders, they scam each other. I won't even go into the details of their persecution of religious people, the organ harvesting, the genocide of the Tibetans, and other such things. The point is, the Chinese are a force for evil. As a people they lack empathy. More on topic - they have no right to claim the South China sea as their own, when other neighboring countries also share that sea. The Chinese send 3 years olds to full time military boarding schools. Quoting: BohemianExile In the US 3 year olds are being asked what gender they are. Yep... two different forms of brainwashing at any early age. One is being trained to be obedient to authority, and the other is being trained to be a fruity leftist. China does have a numeric advantage but that means nothing because foot soldiers will be completely irrelevant in a direct confrontation. WW3 will be fought with nukes and it will conclude in mere hours. Nuclear war is exactly what would happen if two US aircraft carriers were destroyed by China. This Chinese general is off his rocker. If it does kick off, I hope at least that China gets turned into a parking lot. The world will be a much better place. All billionaires, banksters, and people in high-ranking positions of power (both public and private) who have not openly and strongly come out against woke ideology and globalism are our enemies - as are their minions. They are the NWO. |
ohnmar
User ID: 77245523 Myanmar 01/01/2019 09:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
BohemianExile
User ID: 75477183 United States 01/01/2019 10:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If that Chinese commie said that. He is already in the cross hairs of one of our boomers at this moment. Quoting: ohnmar You should check out Michael Fabey's book, Crashback, about an incident in the South China Sea where a Chinese ship went in front the USS Cowpens and forced it to come to a stop. Honestly, the Chinese can mass produce new ships way faster than we can repair our old ones. [link to www.zerohedge.com (secure)] “Till shade is gone, till water is gone, into the Shadow with teeth bared, screaming defiance with the last breath, to spit in Sightblinder’s eye on the Last Day.” -Aiel Oath Let the Dragon ride again on the Winds of Time WoT WoT! Build that RedWall Loose Lips Don't Sink Ships ~ Qanons DEW |
EnD BLM
User ID: 73805232 United States 01/01/2019 11:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Agent MIB
User ID: 44079930 Philippines 01/02/2019 12:42 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If they actually did sink a carrier, I would not even want to be in one of Chins'a neighboring countries when the SHTF. Quoting: A Chosen Why? Fukushima has spewed out more radiation than all above ground nuclear tests. It's the gift that keeps on giving, killing the entire Pacific Ocean. You are born with the truth, then taught a lie. |
Hermit 48
User ID: 68993491 Canada 01/02/2019 01:25 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Targeting the Nimitz/Ford class carriers would be like bombing a nuclear power station, each ship has two nuclear reactors on board, floating Fukushimas waiting to happen. Russians built over 200 nuclear powered ships/subs/cruisers/icebreakers , US navy still operates over 80 carriers/subs and french carriers are on same nuclear power. Satan is the prince of this world, evil minds placed this dark energy at sea,on board of ship vulnerable to weather, tsunamis and human error; it's not really safe even on dry land. Imagine a future war these ships/subs struck in bases in Russia , San Diego, Norfolk, Seattle burning, sinking leaking radiations for decades. China DF21/31 could strike any warship anywhere around the world. [link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)] Last Edited by Hermit 48 on 01/02/2019 01:27 AM |
Housedad
GOD User ID: 73158164 United States 01/02/2019 01:25 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | That would be 25 ballistic missiles with up to 14 nuclear MIRV warheads each. A total of 350 nuclear warheads. At even a low yield of 500 kilotons on each warhead, that is still enough to kiss China goodbye. Remember, we have 14 Ohio class subs with full nuke boomer capability. The others are used for cruise missile platforms, Also nuclear tipped if desired. Oh yes. America is the only country to ever use a nuclear weapon on an enemy. So the question is would America do it again? Well, Duh. Hell yes. That is what it is there for. The PROMISE that it will be used if someone fucks with us just a bit too far. And we will do it to you close by and far away, too. Don't forget that we have a load of land based ballistic missiles too, that can reach anywhere in the world. Those are the big nukes. Pray they never get used. America has always had a special way of reaching out to touch someone. Last Edited by Housedad on 01/02/2019 02:23 AM There's always an Arquillian Battle Cruiser, or a Corillian Death Ray, or an intergalactic plague that is about to wipe out all life on this miserable little planet, and the only way these people can get on with their happy lives is that they DO NOT KNOW ABOUT IT! -Men in Black |
DONKEY LIPS
(OP) User ID: 76357609 United States 01/03/2019 09:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Big Duke6
User ID: 77214495 Canada 01/07/2019 04:16 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The reason the west can't beat China is due to the overwhelming amount of people they have. You could take out 1/2 billion of them and they would still have troops to fight a land battle. If they were to do only half the damage to America, the US would cease to exist as a country and as a nation. Quoting: tcs Remember, China is a communist regime and half a billion of their people to them is a price they would be willing to pay to win a world war. The "good news" (if you want to call it that) is that China has so much $ invested in America, they would be shooting themselves in the foot if they were to attack the US. I'm not saying they would never do it but only if there were no other alternative. Guess what happens to all of their American investments once they attack? This includes China's 1.18 trillion in U.S. Treasuries. Worthless ... and they know it. Everybody and their dog is dumping US treasuries. |
Big Duke6
User ID: 77214495 Canada 01/07/2019 04:20 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Good luck with that, China. Unless they want all out war, which they don't, they can STFU. Quoting: Sinclair Quoted from a 2016 article. "The United States now operates 10 Nimitz-class "supercarriers," aircraft carriers that dwarf all other flat-tops worldwide both in size and capability. The Nimitz carriers are 1,092 feet long and weigh a whopping 101,600 tons—60 percent larger than their nearest counterparts, the Queen Elizabeth class. Each ship is propelled to speeds in excess of 30 knots by a pair of nuclear reactors, giving them nearly unlimited range. The ships are built with high-tensile steel for protection, with layers of Kevlar over vital spaces. Each Nimitz typically carries an air wing consisting of 24 F/A-18C Hornets, 24 F/A-E/F Super Hornets, 4 to 5 E/A-18G Growler electronic warfare aircraft, 4 E-2D Hawkeye airborne early warning and control aircraft, 2 C-2 Greyhound transport aircraft, and 6 Seahawk helicopters. In addition to the Nimitz-class, the United States Navy also operates nine landing helicopter dock ships of the Wasp and America classes. These ships are 843 feet long and displace roughly 40,000 tons. The ships are designed to carry air and land elements of a U.S. Marine corps landing force and have full-length carrier-like flight decks. Each ship can carry 10 MV-22 Osprey tiltrotor transports, 4 CH-53E heavy transport helicopters, 3 UH-1 Huey helicopters, 4 AH-1Z attack helicopters, and 6 AV-8B Harrier jump jets. With minimal modification, each Wasp can carry 24 Harriers. The America class is optimized towards carrying Marine aviation units and can carry a few more Ospreys. In the near future the F-35B Joint Strike Fighter will replace the Harriers on a 1:1 basis, and the America class will be capable of supporting up to 20 F-35Bs at once. Two new carriers, USS Gerald R. Ford and USS John F. Kennedy, are under construction, as well as an America-class ship, USS Tripoli." [link to www.popularmechanics.com (secure)] We have just slightly fewer aircraft carriers than the rest of the entire world combined: [link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)] We would pound them to dust. Unknown if chicoms or russians have hypersonic missiles that can knock out carriers. Maybe LAWS can counter the threat? |
Big Duke6
User ID: 77214495 Canada 01/07/2019 04:33 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | China is all mouth. All it would take is ONE, count it, ONE SSBN sub to launch it's full load and China would be uninhabitable for a hundred years. Quoting: Housedad That would be 25 ballistic missiles with up to 14 nuclear MIRV warheads each. A total of 350 nuclear warheads. At even a low yield of 500 kilotons on each warhead, that is still enough to kiss China goodbye. Remember, we have 14 Ohio class subs with full nuke boomer capability. The others are used for cruise missile platforms, Also nuclear tipped if desired. Oh yes. America is the only country to ever use a nuclear weapon on an enemy. So the question is would America do it again? Well, Duh. Hell yes. That is what it is there for. The PROMISE that it will be used if someone fucks with us just a bit too far. And we will do it to you close by and far away, too. Don't forget that we have a load of land based ballistic missiles too, that can reach anywhere in the world. Those are the big nukes. Pray they never get used. America has always had a special way of reaching out to touch someone. Sure hope they are not relying on Chinese electronics like the F22s. |
Tombstone
User ID: 77265273 South Africa 01/07/2019 04:36 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Not that easy to sink a carrier, because you have to find it first. Needle in a haystack. Quoting: Tombstone Read this very interesting article. [link to www.navweaps.com] Yes, I would have to agree that it would be like finding a needle in a field full of hay. This article is bullshit. It is near impossible to find an aircraft carrier at sea and if you can't find it, you can't sink it. Read the article about the US operating their carriers just offshore of the USSr and how the USSR tried and failed to find them. |
Big Duke6
User ID: 77214495 Canada 01/07/2019 04:50 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Not that easy to sink a carrier, because you have to find it first. Needle in a haystack. Quoting: Tombstone Read this very interesting article. [link to www.navweaps.com] Yes, I would have to agree that it would be like finding a needle in a field full of hay. This article is bullshit. It is near impossible to find an aircraft carrier at sea and if you can't find it, you can't sink it. Read the article about the US operating their carriers just offshore of the USSr and how the USSR tried and failed to find them. Seems strange that satellite optics couldn't accomplish? |