"the virus is fully an EXOSOME in every sense of the word" COVID-19 isn't what you think it is

I've asked the same question! Any vaccine for that matter. There was one paper, posted here, that said the people in Wuhan had been given a SARS vaccine last year (2019) and we know how flue vaccines are pushed so hard in the west. The elderly are particularly targeted and I'll bet all of the ones in nursing homes have had it forced on them.

Of course, you're lying shill but I'll put this here for the benefit of everyone else.

Exosomes were discovered decades but their function is still not fully understood by science:

[link to bmcbiol.biomedcentral.com (secure)]

Not fishing. I’m on the electrical engineering side of things, so my clinical knowledge isn’t that good. At BCI I worked with Urinalysis and Hematology instruments so I know that science much better. In depth detail of how the selection reagents for PCR are created is way out of my lane. Ill eventually learn it, but it takes time. Just because I work for a company that does PCR doesn’t mean I can know everything. These companies are large and have multiple departments and disciplines. I’m just trying to figure things out like everyone else with what little time I have. I have way too many interests so yeh my knowledge is lacking. Hell the more I learn on a host of things the more ignorant I feel. Thanks for the communication.

5* Old Timer!

Now begs the question, what was the massive insult to the system that triggered the body's response?

No doubt about that.

Yes.

The text in bold red is very important to understand. They don't test to find specific virus particles related to so-called COVID-19.

As Pasteur (pioneer of vaccines) said himself, the germ is nothing, the terrain is everything.

Germs, bacteria, chemicals and detrimental frequencies contribute to disturb the physical terrain and therefore pave the way to an increased production of exosomes where a person's body is most vulnerable.

COVID-19 is a means to an end....vaccinate most people with nano particles used to identify and track them.

RF radiation huh. Well how come the technician’s and engineers that are installing, turning up, & testing these 5G’s are not dropping dead like flies?
Uh yeah. At this rate there won’t be anyone left trained to work on it....but...that just isn’t happening is it?

So, if he does not have the answer, what IS the answer?

If you cannot produce the factual answer (rather than your opinion) you have no proof that his answer is not the right one.

Knowing this, the Deagle forecast for 2025 projects a large net loss of population for US, China, Canada, Japan, Germany, etc. Correct?

Oh great another video with no synopsis

1*

This is the best explanation i have seen and it makes much more sense than the lies main stream media have been pushing for months on end!

This must be trending!

Everybody must know this

Best

I think he’s a quack.

QUACK

QUACK

He’s saying there’s no SARS2 virus but the pandemic is being caused by 5G radiation combined with other mysterious somethings.

Well, that doesn’t explain why nursing homes are being ravaged by a contagious disease.

And the image of the virus does not look like an exosome to me.

Why would you choose to believe this stuff?

oh yes hold that nobel prize for medicine gotta internet guy here aukems razer simplest is the best they have seen it from electron microsope it is a virus

It’s a quack psychiatrist babbling about exosomes and 5G.

Don’t waste your time.

Vaccines are now mandatory in China. For everybody.

Yep, lots of unkowns still.... Great vid OT 5*'s mate and be well

When you get to be my age you might not have time/energy to spoon feed things to people!

When my grandmother in law was admitted to a hospice care facility they required a flu shot.

This woman was dying, had weeks to live... This was about 2 years ago in the Midwest. I imagine it's only gotten trickier since.

I stumbled across similar info.

It has to do with diet - what we consume must be balanced.
Not just calories, but good nutrition.


Very importantly, the PH balance.

Using 1 - 14,human blood shou be slightly alkaline
ph (7:35 - 7:45).

Our modern eating habits include foods that are in the acidic range, so a careful balance must be maintained.


[link to trans4mind.com (secure)]


Also, I believe many suffer from zinc deficiency.

Has anyone correlated recent flu vaccine data and overlapped it with those that have coronavirus?

Yeah no doubt... why you trying to buy some?

[link to www.atcc.org (secure)]


No but really this makes sense.

I haven't read the thread in its entirety but are you presuming perhaps that through exosomes they engineered this?

Check that link, LOOK at what they specialize in.

Get the basic garbage.

Inject their custom code.

BOOM it's like virological raspberry pi.

I mean..... I feel like the success of Antibiotic and Antiviral drugs have kind of proven that these are the agents responsible for the diseases... Not that anyone is doubting that helping the body fight off the infection is also helpful, but things like Antibiotics wouldn't work if (Bacterial) infections weren't a thing, and the same for Anti-virals...

yes i did had sumpin that sound like that got over it

He's wrong from the beginning. It was created in a lab. It did not originate from a seafood market.

But I will listen for the conclusions because those could be correct even if his origination cause is wrong.

He was right. It's called Viral Latency, and various systemic stressors can wake a virus up like springtime brings a bear out of hibernation.

Here's his contact page. Ask him and report back what you find out:

[link to www.andrewkaufmanmd.com (secure)]

Psychiatrist

Are you aware that in 1983 Barbara McClintock proved that cells can actually alter after a shock? She won a nobel prize for it. She proved that a large portion of 'antigens' these dolts claim to 'discover' just natural pieces of a own cell rebuilding after a 'shock' (i.e. toxin/stress/agitation/pollution/whatever). That's why they aren't present before you get sick, and that's why these boneheads will never 'map the entire human genome' as they arrogantly, and stupidly claim to do.

[link to geneticliteracyproject.org (secure)]

[link to www.nobelprize.org (secure)]

The virus isn't proven, it's not there, it's a piece of your own cell fixing itself after you've already damaged it. This was proven in 1983 by a Nobel Prize winner. Do you think there is a reason you've never heard of her?

Therefore, if people are sick, it's not from some magic virus floating through the air - that is an utterly absurd theory given the fact that it has never been isolated or proven to replicate, being pathogenic.

People want an easy fix, so they sell it up to you.

Here's even more studies showing the PCR test doesn't work to detect these microscopic viruses, because it's only 'amplifying' a piece of RNA, which could, and likely does, include tons of other pieces of RNA that they wrongly claim is viral.

Studies:

"Only one of 27 qPCR-positive samples was confirmed to be positive by NGS. Conversely, 10 of 15 samples with low qPCR-detected MRD positivity from 13 patients who subsequently relapsed were also confirmed to be positive by NGS (P=0.002). These data show that NGS has a better specificity in post-SCT ALL management and indicate that TREATMENT
interventions aimed at reverting impending relapse SHOULD NOT BE BASED ON A q PCR ONLY." (CAPS MINE).

Translation: PCR has ALOT of false positives, don't bother to use it.

[link to www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov (secure)]

"Among 190 patients diagnosed with PTB, 16 (8.4%) showed positivity on either TB/NTM PCR or Xpert MTB/RIF assay, i.e., false positivity. A majority of them (14 patients, 87.5%) showed false positivity in real-time TB/NTM PCR assay"

Translation: Why did we even bother with a PCR test?

[link to www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov (secure)]

or

False positive studies:

[link to www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov (secure)]

"Here we show that in both subjects, this reverse transcription PCR test for HIV gave positive results early after gene transfer. Despite extensive search for presence of wild-type infectious HIV-1 or vector-derived replication-competent virus, none was detected. Our data demonstrate that the Roche COBAS AmpliPrep HIV-1 test gave false-
positive results for our two patients; this finding has important social, economic, and informed-consent implications for the subjects of other LV-based clinical studies."

OR
[link to www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov (secure)]

"Results: When the infection rate of the close contacts and the sensitivity and specificity of reported results were taken as the point estimates, the positive predictive value of the active screening was only 19.67%, in contrast, the false-positive rate of positive results was 80.33%. The multivariate-probabilistic sensitivity analysis results
supported the base-case findings, with a 75% probability for the false-positive rate of positive results over 47%. Conclusions: In the close contacts of COVID-19 patients, nearly half or even more of the 'asymptomatic infected individuals' reported in the active nucleic acid test screening might be false positives.

Even more false positive studies:

[link to www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov (secure)]

[link to nccc.ucsf.edu (secure)]

Even the CDC and WHO admit they don't know what they're testing for, and the test doesn't work:

[link to www.fda.gov (secure)]

From “CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR

Diagnostic Panel” [1]:

“Detection of viral RNA may not indicate the presence of infectious virus or that 2019-nCoV is the causative agent for clinical symptoms.”

From the World Health Organization (WHO): “Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) technical guidance: Laboratory testing for 2019-nCoV in humans”

[2]:

[link to www.who.int (secure)]

“Several assays that detect the 2019-nCoV have been and are currently under development, both in-house and commercially. Some assays may detect only the novel virus [COVID] and some may also detect other strains (e.g. SARS-CoV) that are genetically similar.”

TRANSLATION: We REALLY DON'T HAVE A CLUE WHAT WE'RE FINDING HERE, BUT WE'LL CALL IT COVID19 ANYWAY.

“Protocol use limitations: Optional clinical specimens for testing has [have] not yet been validated.”

Translation: We’re not sure which tissue samples to take from the patient in order for the test to have any validity.


[link to www.fda.gov (secure)]

From the FDA: “LabCorp COVID-19RT-PCR test EUA Summary: ACCELERATED EMERGENCY USE AUTHORIZATION (EUA) SUMMARYCOVID-19 RT-PCR TEST (LABORATORY CORPORATION OF AMERICA)” [3]:

“…The SARS-CoV-2RNA [COVID virus] is generally detectable in respiratory specimens during the ACUTE phase of infection. Positive results are indicative of the presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA; clinical correlation with patient history and other diagnostic information is necessary to determine patient infection status…THE AGENT DETECTED MAY NOT BE THE DEFINITE CAUSE OF DISEASE (CAPS are mine).

Laboratories within the United States and its territories are required to report all positive results to the appropriate public health authorities.”

TRANSLATION: Even though the 'virus' can only be detectable in people with symptoms, we're testing people without symptoms and claiming they're 'infected'. Further, we're not really sure that's what making anyone sick, because it might not be the actual cause of disease, so just play along.


[link to www.creative-diagnostics.com (secure)]

From a manufacturer of PCR test kit elements, Creative Diagnostics, “SARS-CoV-2 Coronavirus Multiplex RT-qPCR Kit” [4]:

“Regulatory status: For research use only, not for use in diagnostic procedures.”

Translation: Don’t use this test alone to diagnose infection or disease. Oops. We do anyway.

“non-specific interference of Influenza A Virus (H1N1), Influenza B Virus (Yamagata), Respiratory Syncytial Virus (type B), Respiratory Adenovirus (type 3, type 7), Parainfluenza Virus (type 2), Mycoplasma Pneumoniae, Chlamydia Pneumoniae, etc.”

Translation: This test will show a false-positive for ANY virus, including the FLU. What is the test proving, then? Who knows? Flip a coin.

“Application Qualitative”

Translation: This means the test is not suited to detect how much virus is in the patient’s body. A PCR test DOES NOT test the 'amount' of virus, or prove it has spread throughout the body, like the quacks are claiming.

Thread: LOUIE PASTEUR’S DEATHBED WORDS: “BERNARD WAS RIGHT; THE PATHOGEN IS NOTHING; THE TERRAIN IS EVERYTHING.”