NATURAL VIRUS: This virus was not created by China

The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2

"SARS-CoV-2 is the seventh coronavirus known to infect humans; SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 can cause severe disease, whereas HKU1, NL63, OC43 and 229E are associated with mild symptoms6. Here we review what can be deduced about the origin of SARS-CoV-2 from comparative analysis of genomic data. We offer a perspective on the notable features of the SARS-CoV-2 genome and discuss scenarios by which they could have arisen. Our analyses clearly show that SARS-CoV-2 is not a laboratory construct or a purposefully manipulated virus."

[link to www.nature.com (secure)]

There it is right there, why would they lie?

How Huxley's X-Club Created Nature Magazine & Sabotaged Science For 150 Years

"Authored by Matthew Ehret via The Strategic Culture Foundation,

Amidst the storm of controversy raised by the lab-origin theory of COVID-19 extolled by such figures as Nobel prize winning virologist Luc Montagnier, bioweapons expert Francis Boyle, Sri Lankan Cardinal Malcolm Ranjith and the head of Iran’s Revolutionary Guard, an elaborate project was undertaken under the nominal helm of NATURE Magazine in order to refute the claim once and for all under the report ‘The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2’."

[link to www.zerohedge.com (secure)]

Just look at reality. Wuhan had a bioweapons lab. The outbreak started in Wuhan. You get extra IQ points if you figure this out.

Nature.com?

Their whole article can be discredited by :

Event 201
Bill gates in 2015
Fauci in 2017
Rockefeller document in 2010

NEXT

They always say the same thing. There's 'no evidence' yet if you do just simple searches, you'll see people have gathered up this 'no evidence' and it's pretty big

the 'wet market' crap is what there's no evidence for. All they do is smirk and roll their eyes as if faggy eye rolls are some kind of court accepted proof.

Richard H. Ebright
@R_H_Ebright
Replying to
@DrEricDing
WIV constructed a series of novel chimeric viruses encoding different receptor binding domains--with different receptor binding affinities--in an otherwise constant genomic context. And did so using "seamless ligation" procedures that leave no signatures of human manipulation.

[link to twitter.com (secure)]

Out of curiosity, those of you who are still declaring this was created by China, how many of you are Trump supporters?

Communist china created this virus a and deliberately so so read the virus around the world.

No doubt we will be at war with communist china.

Australia will not tolerate communist china,

Australians have boycotted communist chinas products.

[link to www.Fake (secure)] News/news/2020/05/13/how-huxleys-x-club-created-nature-magazi​ne-sabotaged-science-150-years/

[link to gnews.org (secure)]

RaTG13 – the Undeniable Evidence That the Wuhan Coronavirus Is Man-Made

What is the true origin of the Wuhan coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2, 2019nCoV, the CCP virus)? Many scientific publications seem to tell you that the virus was born from nature. How reliable are these publications? While, before I comment on that, I would like to bring out an important fact: all of such publications rely on a single evidence – the sequence of a bat coronavirus named RaTG13.

'Authoritative Scientific Opinion' is simply bought and paid for today - just like the News.

Especially when huge Geopolitical and financial stakes are riding on it - not to mention prized agendas of the 'elites'.


This looks mighty like an engineered virus to me - and top virologists say the same. Still there can be no doubt that China purposely let the world catch this when it could have been contained, no doubt that it came from their Wuhan Lab.

I think that Chip made it.

The Trump cult will say this is fake news.

CHINA VIRUS
CHINA VIRUS

CHINA VIRUS
CHINA VIRUS

CHINA VIRUS
CHINA VIRUS

CHINA VIRUS
CHINA VIRUS

A question: Why the researcher that has made a report about Ft. Detrick has been killed?

This might be a clue

The OP is doing a great job for the Communist Party of China.