Notes from an "alternate universe": The Revelation of the Real World

Doing without sugar should be enough to get you near your flow, whereby you can figure out what foods and drinks work for you.

The effect of sugar is instant, whereas the effect of things like grains and skin creams takes a bit longer. As long as you're minimising your intake of toxins you should be fine to have as much bread as you want.(Though most bakery and factory breads seem to contain sugars.)

I'm not much of a cook, either. For lunch I just bake some fresh salmon and steam vegetables. I often skip dinner, however, or just have something lite. My body makes everything else I need for itself. Pretty much everything you might eat has some kind of toxin, so just focus on the ones that will have a more immediate effect on your flow.

This is weird you say that, because I find myself eating, and wanting, less food than the people around me.
Could it be the bodies develop towards getting energy from other sources?

(Maybe they already do)

Well, the iraq - iran war did start later that year -- though I assume that was a fake war hiding real wars. CNN was the first 24 news agency, also started after the erruption. That seems more a part of real wars

Hello The Builder. Do you know what metals used in Jewelry can be least conductive for electromagnetic signals?

Such as platinum, for example. Thanks.

When you 'awaken' into physicality you rapidly lose the logic of the dream world, but by that time you've all ready translated the metaphysical geometry into something your waking mind is familiar with.

Everything is a translation, in a way, of something that has no original tongue. You can work with your interpretation of your dream in order to affect what the dream represents in physicality, if that makes any sense.

You weren't 'really doing' anything in your dream, since what you were 'really doing' is also an interpretation of something else.

You would have to know how it's processed.

Sweeteners aren't needed, of course.

When you eat and ingest cleanly and properly, you are able to better-process the structures of your exoself (e.g., the sun) and less food is needed.

Eat and ingest crap and those functions are greatly diminished.

Once, when the masses began to lose this ability in the West (around the late 1700's) they started eating more like pigs.

This one?


It's amasing what people believe.

I would say that out of 1,000 major events portrayed in the mass media over the past 100 years, perhaps 400 were half-truths and 5-10 were at least mostly true.

I have not noticed any differences. Was this too ambitious or vague?

Last Edited by Sabai_ on 06/26/2022 05:06 PM

Neuronics and Ecsys are different and are not meant to be used together :)

Also, the Book of Life Systems is for discovering the general principles of your perspective via your everyday actions.

If you could clarify your intention with one sentence, perhaps I could point you to a more useful direction.

How are the markets looking in 2022. With the agenda Dissolve Faith In Institutions live, do we continue to see 20% - 40%+ loss in stock market?

Crypto, stocks, and now focus on real estate. How does urban real estate play out in 2022- 23~. Is a 20-40% loss coming to real estate owners in 2022? As urban real estate was your most recommended advice of investment 4~ years ago. Has it peaked in value and is the pendulum swing about to sway as much aoc agenda seems in play? Any thoughts on black rock or Tricon Residential Inc.

How does silver, gold, lithium, nickel, etc play out this year? Paper markets still run supreme in 2022?

Ah, that's fair. When making words with neuronics I felt there needed to be more distinction between whether a mapped perception is experienced as a symbol, possibility, interaction, or logic element, but I guess not since the "inversions" of the word sort of take care of that



I see. I was wanting to use it to learn how to "do" "new" things, but I guess it's more of a distillation of principles, the principles being what can then be applied to "new" things





In one sentence: I intend to understand (that is, be able to apply) focus to neuronic sets

When I said:



I had more in mind the fact that "focus" has never been a strong suit of mine, it's never really needed to be. But the kind of "focus" that's referring to is, like, the focus needed to study or to follow through on tasks. I never needed to "focus" on studying and the like, as the current education model came easily to me without much thought. In terms of completing tasks, most things got done eventually through piecemeal focus, doing a little here and there (though I struggle more with that these days but that's not the issue at hand).

But really, I know that I'm "focusing" on what I'm perceiving as fully as is able at any given moment. But that's the focus I'm not sure how to direct, and I'm not sure how to "focus" on a neruonic set to "manipulate reality"

On the site, it says

"Everything you sense has four aspects, of which we normally sense only one at a time. Identifying the other physical aspect would be like sensing yourself inhaling and exhaling your breath at the same time. Identifying an additional one or two metaphysical aspects would be like sensing everything about it at once. From this new vocabulary of perspective of something, you can choose which aspect of something you want to experience by focusing on its neuronic set."

And I'm not sure how to ... "do" that.

Taking a trivial, cosmetic example: my nail shape. As is interpreted now, the nails on my pointer fingers and thumbs grow in a nice oval shape. The rest of the fingernails grow in a square shape. I would interpret them as all growing in the oval shape.

So I'd go through the steps and define it as HRH,JRJ. But then I don't understand how to focus on the set to experience the "change"

Last Edited by Sabai_ on 06/26/2022 10:21 PM

I assume that sunblock is an inhibitor to natural functions. Problem is, I burn after about 10 minutes in the sun. Thohts on this?

So if someone was paraplegic or had missing limbs, if they had the right Logic they could recover from these deficiencies?

'Dissolving Faith In Institutions' has been live ever since the Church published an anti-Biblical model of the solar system (the heliocentric theory of Copernicus), but now the target is the fat cow that is the US. I would think an other 30% drop for US markets is due before they begin with CBDCs. It is very unlikely that there will be a 'big crash', because it is not needed.


I'm not sure about these kinds of markets, as they're mostly manipulated by several different factions.


Quite a few of the largest are proxies for other artificial governments.

As I mentioned a few years ago, regarding hundred-year cycles.

UK --> US
US --> China


I couldn't say, as I haven't thought about it.

More information will come with the Genius update.

But when you learn a new concept, where does any potential change come from?

Last Edited by The Builder on 06/28/2022 05:39 AM

Yes, very much.


You could cover up, like our ancestors did.

Yes. However, it may not even be a deficiency (but something that benefits them). They may also never know their limbs were not there the day before but are there now. (In that case, their entire reality would be re-structured around it.)

If they wanted to 'regrow' limbs they would need to work out how it would be logical, then take the first step towards that. They may end up with 'artificial' limbs that, for them, work just as well, depending on how it unfolds.

got a map of the real world? in the next mag issue

I think in one of your previous replies.You talked about some birds ability to convert sun rays into energy through their eyes, for prolonged flight.

Is the danger of looking at the sun, a lie?

Is the fact that they label everything with medicinal use that were used in the past as toxic, cancerous, dangerous a way in which they try to disconnect us even more from our environment to the profit of their cures which are generally pricy and are generally found out to be poison after some time?

Do you know anything about the comfrey plant, I want to use/ingest it to strengthen/heal bones, but it seems that it is now considered to be toxic while it seems to have been used quite extensively in the past?

If you had to interpret the gold situation and the 20000 evaluation, what year could you come up with?

Russia has most of gold/ruble headlines. G-7 gold ban recent article.

Russia plays bad guy while China fixes the problem eventually?

Would china implement CBCD first? And is it related to the discovery of gold non paper price?

Such as for example I would like to make shipments to another continent. How should I study the map and which vehicles should I use?

These are questions I must answer for myself however you contend the model of the world is distorted and thus I infer the map in common use on the internet today is also fake somehow.

I don't know how all these businesses and institutions are able to ship all this stuff all over the world without an accurate map.

For example getting coffee from Africa, which is metaphysical to the USA (and same way in reverse, they are shipping physical beans to a metaphysical destination).

It gets kind of weird in trying to understand how these physical objects dematerialize and rematerialize elsewhere. I suppose it could be called tele-portation if taken literally to mean "moved long distances".

However I dont think anyone means that when they say "teleportation".

An explanation of supply chain activities that work across these long distances of and/or to metaphysical and physical locations would be handy.

Thanks

It wouldn't be possible to have such a map that would make any sense to your physical eyes.

The 'edge' of the physical world is a more obviously metaphysical world.

That is to say, as a crude example, if you get on a boat and 'take a trip' north to Antarctica (not south) then you will shift between waking and dreaming reality until you are no longer able to tell the difference.

There are many metaphysical structures where the two worlds meet that look to be made of ice (like bridges, arches, buildings, etc.) but are more representative of structures in the dream world.

Just in case you didn't know I wrote that comment there (too rushed to log in).

Then can it be safe to say the physical world can be navigated reasonably well with the flawed map commonly shown?

That is, obviously it wouldn't work for encountering the threshold of metaphysical and physical, but for sending freight across the ocean, it should be okay, right?

It's on the Revelations One website:

The powerhouse of each cell in your body, mitochondrion, has an electric field strength of 30 million volts per meter, equal to that discharged by a bolt of lightning. [Nature; 'The energetics of genome complexity'] It synthesises this energy from the environment using melanin.

Migrating birds such as the albatross, for example, have extra melanin cells in their eyes, allowing them to travel 10,000 miles in a single flight using melanin to convert light to metabolic energy. Humans absorb electromagnetic radiation everywhere melanin is found on their bodies, and use this energy to break down the water molecules in our bodies, converting them to energy. In past, this mechanism allowed our bodies to make use of extra energy to grow our cerebral cortex and other parts of the brain rather than spend all of our energy hunting and foraging for food.

When this system functions normally, it allows us to feel connected with the world around us and sense more electromagnetic energies (much like other animals can) as melanin absorbs them. When its function is disrupted with toxins, we become more disconnected with our reality and, in confusion, submit to external authority more easily.

This isn't by looking at the sun, just looking at a world that is illuminated by the sun and inverting that as a reflection or map in your pineal gland, and vice versa.


We are mostly responsible for this. They just take advantage of the opportunities that our desire for ignorance presents.


I don't know anything about that one.

I'd prefer not to focus on such things, as it just builds ore of the same.

That is why you see so many headlines and media stories on such things. The Cult uses the mind of the populace, so to speak, to build reality.

Now we build the future we 'want', not the one we don't.

For how long have you been building the decouple paper dream for the 'proper' evaluation.

I can only imagine once process hits, that more could have been had.

Comfrey is an amazing herbal ally. Here’s what Susan Weed, a published American Herbalist says about it:

“Every time I mention comfrey, someone asks if it isn't "unsafe." When I identify with comfrey, I feel like a persecuted witch wrongly accused of evil-doing. Comfrey has so much to offer as an aid to health and healing. How did such a wonderful green ally come to have such a terrible reputation?
Perhaps it starts with confusion, aided by imprecise language. There are two species of comfrey: wild comfrey, Symphytum officinale, and cultivated comfrey, Symphytum uplandica x. (The "x" means it is a hybrid, a cross.)Wild comfrey (S. off.) is a small plant--up to a meter tall--with yellow flowers. Cultivated comfrey (S. uplandica x.) is a large plant--often surpassing two meters--with blue or purple flowers.”

“Drinking comfrey infusion has benefitted me in many ways: It keeps my bones strong and flexible. (An old country name for comfrey is "knit bone.") It strengthens my digestion and elimination. It keeps my lungs and respiratory tract healthy. It keeps my face wrinkle-free and my skin and scalp supple. And, please don't forget, comfrey contains special proteins needed for the formation of short-term memory cells.”

[link to www.susunweed.com]

More information at the link. She tells you how to make an infusion using the leaves and flowering stalk. You never use the root internally. She is a wise woman with an amazing knowledge of all things herbal :)

Is there an ETA on the Genius update? Just curious, apologies for the impatience -- this stuff is all just so exciting :p

Since there's no real "new" concepts, every thing is just the same thing (no-thing-in-particular) re-presented, potential change after learning a new concept comes from integrating it and interacting with everything else "from" that concept. The level at which you integrate and interact from something corresponds to how much "change" you would see, I think.

This makes sense to me, and is why Neville Goddard appeals to me. With his method, you assume (verb.: "take or begin to have") the state of that which you'd like to perceive. So, if you want to be rich, you assume the state of being rich -- whatever that means to you -- you feel that you are rich, and interact with everything else as if it were true. The relationships then reform around that new state, which is really a new interpretation, confirming the state which was assumed. Or -- you relate to an interpretation and interact from it.

I don't think his method is the most accurate all things considered, but that seems to be how it works (using the imaginative faculty to "assume" as a sort of genius model, or at least from what I understand of the genius model from previous iterations of this content). It's also not terribly defined or measurable. It is what led to the first time I "time traveled" (interpreted the present as 2015 instead of 2020), though the experience wasn't repeatable doing the same thing twice

It could also be said that potential change comes from utilizing language differently. Again not really new, but differently at the very least. That much I understand. What frustrates me about Neuronics, I think, is that it is an entirely different way of utilizing language than I'm accustomed to, that being alphabetically. I believe you recommended The Alphabet vs The Goddess back in the day, and I gave that a listen (audiobook). I found it incredibly intriguing but also incredibly frustrating because I simply cannot (as of now) fathom thinking or communicating symbolically, or in any way that isn't alphabetical. My dependence on the alphabet is somewhat lamented, now.

Like, I get how other natural languages work and how to use them. English is my only language, but I learned some French back in school. It didn't come entirely easily to me, but it's simple enough to learn the vocabulary and the syntax, because it is really similar to English. The two are highly related, both being natural language.

From what I understand, a "vocabulary" in Neuronics isn't really needed, since a cat isn't a cat isn't a cat, each of the three can serve different functions of perception -- or, be interpreted entirely differently. Using ecsys, a cat could be a symbol, a possibility, an interaction, or a logic element, depending on what you're "going for." It was also said on the ecsys site re: ec that

"8 symbols in a string, for example, can be used for up to 200 trillion states. (With English, 8 letters can be used in a string for only a handful of states.) You need not remember all 200 trillion states, of course. You have only to remember the symbols (and thus, automatically understand their value).

This indicates, to me, that a solid "lexicon" isn't necessary, just an understanding of the value of the symbols. I'd assume this would hold true for Neuronics, as well. Developing a small codex I see is useful for connecting the Neuronic symbols to their interpretations to subconsciously make connections (defining "blue" and "bike" would show the "subconscious" the similarity or overlapping symbols to be able to see how they relate), but the definitions aren't "fixed," as it were. Not that they are in English, either, everyone has a different image of a "cat," but we're under the impression that definitions are fixed

If we think of vocabulary as data, or, symbol, for a language, the actual use is in transmitting the data (internally or externally) which comes from the syntax of a language and the method of transmission (vocal cords or writing for external transmission of natural language from one person to an other, thought structure for internal -- which is effectively the same as syntax). I assume that the transmission of Neuronics is similar to natural language since there's different methods of notation and set verbal pronunciations. What trips me up with neuronics is the syntax of the language.

To get an idea fluently across in a natural language, you have the vocabulary (data) in a certain order. In english, to describe a noun with adjectives, the order is

"...opinion-size-age-shape-colour-origin-material-purpose Noun. So you can have a lovely little old rectangular green french silver whittling knife. But if you mess with that word order in the slightest you'll sound like a maniac." (and be more difficult to understand from others' perspective, because that order is what is used so deviation may cause a "processing error" or somesuch, it gives pause at the least).

When it comes to Neuronics or even ec, I haven't the foggiest on syntax. There was a hint back in the day that strings are built around the intended perception, but I don't know what that means practical-ly or really how to use what I guess would "translate" into adjectives or adverbs.

I can think of how to define "knife" and "green," but don't know how to combine those definitions in order to perceive specifically a green knife. Or, I think that's focusing too much on the object and doesn't use the 'building around' idea, where the definition is more about what isn't "seen" about a perception (the relationships). It seems a relationship-definition is more about what "isn't" there than what "is," whereas natural language definitions of things are definitely about what "is" there. A dog in a natural language is the furry quadraped thing that barks. A dog in ec or neuronics is everything that is what is different to everything around it that isn't a dog. I don't know, this is difficult to think about much less articulate

Any idea what will happen with GameStop and that whole debacle? The majority opinion in in-groups is that it will massively squeeze, and a lot project that it will either cause a crash or be caused by a crash. Since a big crash is unlikely, that renders those projections not as likely.

I'm interested to see what happens if it does squeeze and the squeeze leads to some success for the company (or is in conjunction to company success), bc the market they seem to be pushing for is closer to a creator market (that I conceptualize the market of the NooWorld to be). It's not the NooNet or NooWorld, obviously, but I could see it being one of those things that brings the metaphysical closer