How to use VAERS to get the REAL number of reports stored

Thank you for this.

I am following the directions given in the video. I do think the amount is alarming!

I am tinkering around with the data but keeping it very close to how the video presents it. I started looking at various age groups and have noticed that since the report is grouped by symptoms (as done in the video) there are multiple rows with the same VAERS ID. If the video wants us to group by symptoms they must understand that the report may contain multiple rows for the same patient because they experienced a variety of symptoms.

For example, if one person experienced vomiting and fainting, the adverse reaction and vaers id would be listed twice under each symptom.

Just for that reason, it is easy for me to pick apart the amount of deaths from the vaccine. I am concerned that if people are only looking at "rows" that they are assuming a lot of information.

I tried a different way than the video and changed only the group by to "vaccine, state and VAERS ID" instead of "symptom, vaccine and vaers ID". When I did that I got 11,000 rows.

It would take so much time to sit down and go through all the data and get a realistic number. That's what makes me nervous. I even went in and just looked at flu vaccines for a three year time frame and it was NO WHERE near what the Covid vaccine is causing.

Scary...


very scary...

I hope someone who's a great data person could chime in.

By following the directions and selecting ONLY Puerto Rico as state, you get the results because there are under 10.000 records...

Browse each case from top to bottom, read it.

They are different cases and the query is the same.

Select all the states and you know the number.

Last Edited by Brainsucker on 07/23/2021 11:55 AM

i WANT THE RESULTS?
NO PC GENIUS AROUND?

The results are in +51.000 dead on the VAERS database as of yesterday.

Update:

https://imgur.com/a/02KLwaJ

It has gone up by 1,921 deaths in three days.

Total recorderd on VAERS: 53,458.

Last Edited by Brainsucker on 07/23/2021 11:54 AM

Yikes!!

They really are LETHAL INJECTIONS!

Still under reported by a factor of at least 10x. Many people who prematurely died, their death was not attributed to the vax.

I have a friend who was 54 who "suddenly died in his sleep". His daughter told me in tears he had been vaxxed two months prior. Watch your own peer group of friends, co-workers and family. You know how many people normally die and when you start getting a lot of funeral invitations....you'll know!



Last Edited by Crypto-Tard on 07/23/2021 11:56 AM

Even if the group by is multiplying the recordset by three (we know is not the case because we checked with Puerto Rico only).

This gives +600 in three days. At a very moderate 10x for under reporting... That gives 6000 in three days. This is lowballing everything to the max.

I do not want to even write here the real number based on the totals given by VAERS right now.

Last Edited by Brainsucker on 07/23/2021 12:07 PM

Healthcare providers are required by law to report any major adverse events to VAERS for vaccines under Emergency Use Authorization(EUA)

This means that any person who received a COVID-19 vaccine and subsequently died must be reported to VAERS, regardless of the cause of death. This is not the case for the flu vaccines, which received a standard approval from the FDA. Consequently, there is an inherent reporting bias in VAERS towards increased reporting of deaths among people who received a COVID-19 vaccine compared to other vaccines.

[link to vaers.hhs.gov (secure)]

Statistical anomaly visualised:

https://imgur.com/a/IgotGEG

Last Edited by Brainsucker on 07/23/2021 12:39 PM

I'd laugh my ass off if I wasn't so furious.

Have u verified thesecare all deaths due to the vax?

That tallies with the federal lawsuit filed based on supposed whistleblower reports of 50k deaths being covered up. Several doctors like McCullough have spoken about this.

Last Edited by Dodger007 on 07/23/2021 12:44 PM

Of course not. But:

There are 50.000 deaths reported at a 1% rate.

That is 5.000.000 potential fatalities as of today.

Of course the five million did not die from the inoculation.

You get the idea right?

I have driven the underreporting to the max in this example BTW.

Last Edited by Brainsucker on 07/23/2021 12:51 PM

And the lawsuit obviously uses this information, somebody spilled the beans and explained some folks how to use the VAERS database.

Of course I'am expecting them to lower the amount soon, but the screen captures and the threads are here for all to see when that happens.

And then we will know for sure.

I too believe it is much higher.Just trying to verify is hard with all the bs.

I too believe it is much higher.Just trying to verify is hard with all the bs.

People affected by this vax report that hospitals and doctors are not willing to call deaths as vaxx related if they occur outside a window of a few days.

Strokes, heart attacks being attributed to “ natural causes” or “ preexisting conditions” they didnt know about, for the teenagers dying suddenly of clot induced infarcts weeks after the death prick

If you are over 60, forget it. You are a write off.

The change in reporting requirements will necessarily increase the number of reports.

From VAERS:

"VAERS data cannot be used to determine rates of adverse events"

[link to vaers.hhs.gov (secure)]

Your 5,000,000 figure is based on a small study done by Harvard Pilgrim, a health insurance company, on traditionally approved vaccines not vaccines approved for emergency use. The distinction you're ignoring is that Serious Adverse Events(SAE) are required to be reported to VAERS for EUA vaccines irregardless of the actual cause.

From the book Corona Bin Laden by George Orwell:

"An early warning database for adverse event control is not used to determine the adverse event rate."

That explains why the alarm circuit breaker has not been tripped.

Last Edited by Brainsucker on 07/23/2021 01:05 PM

I know that and that's why I stated that those figures where at 100x multipler for the under reporting.

Last Edited by Brainsucker on 07/23/2021 01:04 PM

I'm saying that your 100x multiplier is bullshit.

Sadly the real multiplier is not that far.

For context, some folks are getting data from Scotland via freedom from information requests.

5522 dead after 28 days as of this week.

[link to humansarefree.com (secure)]

VAERS had this public number just three weeks ago (for all the USA).

EUDRA had three times that number three weeks ago (for all the UE).

Anyone can spin this anyway they like... The mix is going to give the same alarming conclusion.

Last Edited by Brainsucker on 07/23/2021 01:31 PM

"Confirmation bias is the tendency to search for, interpret, favor, and recall information in a way that confirms or supports one's prior beliefs or values. People display this bias when they select information that supports their views, ignoring contrary information."

[link to en.m.wikipedia.org (secure)]

So true.

And I think that almost everybody around here knows that (and that's good).