Employers' guide to religious exemption for covid vaccine

Pinned.

...and 5 stars AND green for you, OP.

This is absolutely excellent information for us to know.

.

Last Edited by Zovalex on 07/30/2021 01:48 PM

Great info. but......

If we are to believe what S.h.e.r.r.i T.e.n.p.e.n.n.y says the Depopulation COVID Vaccines Will Start Working In 3-6 Months!

If that's the case, there won't be any jobs to go to.



Strange!! I tried to reply twice but it would not post?? I think if you put anything with S.h.e.r.r.i T.e.n.p.e.n.n.y you will get censored.

Last Edited by Wake Up on 07/30/2021 01:52 PM

There was that lady who runs an employment service for the oil industry, where some companies expect to have to replace 100% of their vaccinated employees soon. There could be lots of jobs for survivors.

Amazing but scary!! If the vaccinated start getting sick and dropping it will be nearly impossible to replace them. Companies are having a hard time right now hiring people, wait till fall or winter.

of course, the Christians are forced to be stabbed with d jab

while the illegal immigrants, and JIHADIST ARMIES LOL are being exempt

the wonders of Liberalism

Why is it that when I click an embedded link it circulates me around back to the GLP entrance page? What the fuck. This happens a lot.

“For example, an employer does not have to accommodate an employee's religious beliefs if the accommodation is costly, infringes on other employees' job rights or benefits, compromises workplace safety, decreases workplace efficiency, or requires other employees to do more than their share of potentially hazardous or burdensome work.”

They will toss your exemption request on grounds it compromises “workplace safety”

Thanks for sharing so I can report this scheme. Its not like it will work anyway. Almost all the anti vax idiots are Christian and it says nothing in their teachingsthat they cant take a shot. Hell the Pope s telling you to get it!

Anyone that even tries this bs should be arrested immediately.

I don’t think it will be that easy. If masks work (lol) then the employee can continue to wear them, check temps, abs verify no C19 symptoms (maybe even do a weekly c19 test). Either way, the employer must work with the employee instead of flat denying. However, with all of that said, I imagine many business will make this very difficult.

Did vaccines exist when the Bible was written?

Christians and those of other faiths believe their body is sacred, and as such, don’t want to modify their genes with man made tech. I personally, have more faith in my nutrition and my own immune system and the subsequent natural immunity after beating c19 back. Lastly, I live this life for what’s to come after my physical death. My physical life is not the end all be all.

Good luck with your materialist short sided views.

Thanks OP. I was hoping a religious exemption might be possible, and this is very important information!

Not if the employee can work from home.

i received religious exemption (i did have to fight for it, manager and supervisor used coercion before it came to a head) last year late summer to not have to wear a mask since it is a dress code as it is not regulated PPE and has religious implications.

also just got out of jury duty for the same reason, since they "require" jurors to wear them in the courthouse.

also.. importantly, i am a sincere believer. this is not just a convenient excuse to get out of it.

not believing in anything has its price. if you don't have rights that come from God, then you have no argument when government asserts itself as god.

Gee wonder why this isn't super pinned for a week?

Isn’t there a verse in Isaiah 51 about people dropping like gnats??

The pope is neither catholic nor Christian.
You are very, very uninformed.

My body, my choice. Try to stick me and I will stick you back.

More so jobs for the group coming in through the southern border!

Order Out of Chaos.

Covid and the elite bring the needed chaos, then subsequent Worldwide economic collapse (via mass-Vaxx-genocide) compels mankind to demand a New Order and their longplanned Great ReSet..

All one has to do is listen a few times to globalists like Henry Kissinger, to see what their ultimate plans are for you and for the rest of the human race...

Vaccine Mandate Protest Letter

Dear Boss,

Compelling any employee to take any current Covid-19 vaccine violates federal and state law, and subjects the employer to substantial liability risk, including liability for any injury the employee may suffer from the vaccine. Many employers have reconsidered issuing such a mandate after more fruitful review with legal counsel, insurance providers, and public opinion advisers of the desires of employees and the consuming public. Even the Kaiser Foundation warned of the legal risk in this respect. ( [link to www.kff.org (secure)]

Three key concerns: first, while the vaccine remains unapproved by the FDA and authorized only for emergency use, federal law forbids mandating it, in accordance with the Nuremberg Code of 1947; second, the Americans with Disabilities Act proscribes, punishes and penalizes employers who invasively inquire into their employees' medical status and then treat those employees differently based on their medical status, as the many AIDS related cases of decades ago fully attest; and third, international law, Constitutional law, specific statutes and the common law of torts all forbid conditioning access to employment upon coerced, invasive medical examinations and treatment, unless the employer can fully provide objective, scientifically validated evidence of the threat from the employee and how no practicable alternative could possible suffice to mitigate such supposed public health threat and still perform the necessary essentials of employment.

At the outset, consider the "problem" being "solved" by vaccination mandates. The previously infected are better protected than the vaccinated, so why aren't they exempted? Equally, the symptomatic can be self-isolated. Hence, requiring vaccinations only addresses one risk: dangerous or deadly transmission, by the asymptomatic or pre-symptomatic employee, in the employment setting. Yet even government official Mr. Fauci admits, as scientific studies affirm, asymptomatic transmission is exceedingly and "very rare." Indeed, initial data suggests the vaccinated are just as, or even much more, likely to transmit the virus as the asymptomatic or pre-symptomatic. Hence, the vaccine solves nothing. This evidentiary limitation on any employer's decision making, aside from the legal and insurance risks of forcing vaccinations as a term of employment without any accommodation or even exception for the previously infected (and thus better protected), is the reason most employers wisely refuse to mandate the vaccine. This doesn't even address the arbitrary self-limitation of the pool of talent for the employer: why reduce your own talent pool, when many who refuse invasive inquiries or risky treatment may be among your most effective, efficient and profitable employees?
First, federal law prohibits any mandate of the Covid-19 vaccines as unlicensed, emergency-use-authorization-only vaccines. Subsection bbb-3(e)(1)(A)(ii)(III) of section 360 of Title 21 of the United States Code, otherwise known as the Emergency Use Authorization section of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, demands that everyone give employees the "option to accept or refuse administration" of the Covid-19 vaccine. ( [link to www.law.cornell.edu (secure)] This right to refuse emergency, experimental vaccines, such as the Covid-19 vaccine, implements the internationally agreed legal requirement of Informed Consent established in the Nuremberg Code of 1947. ( [link to www.cirp.org]

As the Nuremberg Code established, every person must "be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision" for any medical experimental drug, as the Covid-19 vaccine currently is. The Nuremberg Code prohibited even the military from requiring such experimental vaccines. (Doe #1 v. Rumsfeld, 297 F.Supp.2d 119 (D.D.C. 2003).

Second, demanding employees divulge their personal medical information invades their protected right to privacy, and discriminates against them based on their perceived medical status, in contravention of the Americans with Disabilities Act. (42 USC §12112(a).) Indeed, the ADA prohibits employers from invasive inquiries about their medical status, and that includes questions about diseases and treatments for those diseases, such as vaccines. As the EEOC makes clear, an employer can only ask medical information if the employer can prove the medical information is both job-related and necessary for the business. ( [link to www.eeoc.gov (secure)]

An employer that treats an individual employee differently based on that employer’s belief the employee’s medical condition impairs the employee is discriminating against that employee based on perceived medical status disability, in contravention of the ADA. The employer must have proof that the employer cannot keep the employee, even with reasonable accommodations, before any adverse action can be taken against the employee. If the employer asserts the employee’s medical status (such as being unvaccinated against a particular disease) precludes employment, then the employer must prove that the employee poses a “safety hazard” that cannot be reduced with a reasonable accommodation. The employer must prove, with objective, scientifically validated evidence, that the employee poses a materially enhanced risk of serious harm that no reasonable accommodation could mitigate. This requires the employee's medical status cause a substantial risk of serious harm, a risk that cannot be reduced by any another means. This is a high, and difficult burden, for employers to meet. Just look at the all prior cases concerning HIV and AIDS, when employers discriminated against employees based on their perceived dangerousness, and ended up paying millions in legal fees, damages and fines.

Third, conditioning continued employment upon participating in a medical experiment and demanding disclosure of private, personal medical information, may also create employer liability under other federal and state laws, including HIPAA, FMLA, and applicable state tort law principles, including torts prohibiting and proscribing invasions of privacy and battery. Indeed, any employer mandating a vaccine is liable to their employee for any adverse event suffered by that employee. The CDC records reports of the adverse events already reported to date concerning the current Covid-19 vaccine.( [link to www.cdc.gov (secure)]

Finally, forced vaccines constitute a form of battery, and the Supreme Court long made clear "no right is more sacred than the right of every individual to the control of their own person, free from all restraint or interference of others." ( [link to www.law.cornell.edu (secure)]

With Regards,
Employee of the Year

Weird...I was just mentioning that practice in another thread.

Attorney talks about Religious exemption @ 53:47



Truth tellers, doctors and attorneys talk about the covid hoax. And what the shot does.
Thread: Calling All Keyboard Commandos! (Do your part!) Redo

Ha all they have to say is it’s an undue hardship because you might spread the virus and shut down their business

The US Civil Rights Act is not a scheme. Take it up with your US Rep. if you have a problem with it, and are actually a US citizen.

Who would you report it to anyway? The DNC? Your shill employer?

The 'idiots' are those who are sadly dropping dead after taking an experimental GMO therapy loosely called a "COVID vaccine". Tick-tock, you're on borrowed time if you took the jab.

And yes, the Christians do have a religious grief about the vaxx' as they are made with the derivatives of aborted fetal cells, which is absolutely against their religion. Catholicism is arguably not really Christianity, but even among their numbers, many will tell you that this current anti-Pope is a NWO shill, much like yourself.

Why are you calling for the arrest of someone who is exercising their Civil Rights? Are you a lawless tyrant?

Good luck with that.
They'll say the greater public good Trumps bullshit fairy tales. Just wait & see. In the mean time e joy being ostrizaized & a virtual pariah.

Not unless they do away with the first amendment.

Plus it's discrimination.

Not even getting into the fact this covid jab doesn't even fit their legal definition to call it a vaccine.

The clot-shot doesn't fit the FDA's legal definition of a vaccine. Neither does it fit the US Patent Office's technical definition of a vaccine. Nor does it fit the medical community's established definition of a vaccine.

It's nothing more than an mRNA bi0weapon, to be honest. The latest incarnation of a "universal vaccine" that Fauci's been pushing as his gain-of-function 'unholy grail' since his screw-up of the AIDS Epidemic back in the 1990's. It's been Fauci behind this forced jab push for over 2 decades. This is his opus vitae, and the reason he was put into that position. The NWO has been chasing this dream of chemical control for a very long time.

The Fauci Dossier (pdf)
[link to www.davidmartin.world (secure)]