BREAKING - 6 mth Pfizer vax study shows no reduction in deaths !

But, the reason the OP used this study is to show there is "no reduction of deaths" from Covid-19 in vaccinated people, based on this study, which doesn't actually say any such thing.

I guess death isn't only thing to look at

They think it reduced infection

Did they use PCR? That can be manipulated

The data does not lie, it speaks for itself. It makes no difference if you are vaccinated or not, you'll still get infected. But if you are vaccinated and get infected, you will not die of Covid-19 but you'll later die of blood clot related crap.

Basically that's how the deception works. Although subtle, it is very potent in its arrogance. Fear is when we are spiritually deceived by the Darkside.

Fear is the path to the Darkside. Fear leads to anger, anger leads to pain, and pain leads to suffering.

You are such a moronic shill. "It was looking at the safety". So if a study is looking at the safety it can't possibly divulge ANY OTHER INFORMATION according to you.

Yes it is. Just like the common cold. With no more innocents to kill in nursing homes, they are now pushing, "it's more infectious" as a scare tactic.

All the numbers fall in the random range except cardiac arrests which is just over two sigma higher (95% confidence).

Correct .. The cherry-picked propaganda Pfizer got out their study was Table S6. It prevents severe COVID-19 disease. HOWEVER, 28 out of 30 people who got severe COVID recovered anyway, 2 died. The 1 who got severe COVID and was vaccinated is likely the one who died of COVID19 pneumonia from Table S4.

Their takeaway is it prevents severe COVID. 1 with severe COVID was vaccinated , 30 with severe COVID were placebo/unvaccinated

My takeaway : A 1 extra person died from COVID in the study in the placebo group than vaccinated group, BUT B) 3 extra people died in the vaccine group from heart attacks than the same cause in the placebo group. Therefore C) I'll take my chances with COVID

I'm not saying it couldn't. I'm saying it DIDN'T!

That's an opinion. It happens to be wrong, but that's your opinion.


This shows a further study of heart problems related to the vaccine needs to be done, however it will not happen. No one in power wants to see or pay for that.

nope

The UK data is just like the US data...it's garbage.

The CDC has finally admitted that they included practically every death in 2020 as a COVID death, regardless of other serious health conditions being the primary cause of death.

They used flawed PCR testing to get a positive COVID test result, and applied that to a 86 year old patient with stage-4 pancreatic cancer, and labeled that as a COVID death, just as one example.

When they stripped away the people who had 2 or more serious comorbidities, most of whom were already near death before SARS-COV2 came around, they were left with 13,944 deaths, meaning only 13,944 deaths could be definitively attributed to COVID.

If you apply that same math to the UK totals, the UK most likely has had ~ 2,000 deaths due to COVID, where COVID was present (at least based on a flawed PCR test) and no other life-threatening comorbidities were present.

The vaccinated are scared and freaking out. When they heard experimental they should have stepped away from it all. So many natural things they could be doing to combat viruses.

This graph that you posted does not support your claim.
The study found at your link does not support your claim
"Conclusion With up to 6 months of follow-up and despite a gradually declining trend in vaccine efficacy, BNT162b2 had a favorable safety profile and was highly efficacious in preventing COVID-19. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04368728)"

Notice the 4:1 cardiac arrest.

It is. Like a bad cold if that for some.

And that's cardiac arrest that caused death. We don't even know the numbers of people in each group that had heart attacks that didn't kill them. I'd like to see that - my bet is it's even worse than the 4:1 death ratio.