Spike Proteins Cause Vascular Damage

From the study referenced in the article in the OP:

These changes of pACE2, ACE2, MDM2 expression, and AMPK activity in endothelium were recapitulated by in vitro experiments using pulmonary arterial ECs infected with Pseu-Spike which was rescued by treatment with N-acetyl-L-cysteine, a reactive oxygen species inhibitor (Figure , ii).

[link to www.ahajournals.org (secure)]

Is this saying that the damage done by the spike proteins was mitigated by the treatment with NAC?

Also from the same paper:

We next studied the impact of S protein on mitochondrial function. Confocal images of ECs treated with S1 protein revealed increased mitochondrial fragmentation, indicating altered mitochondrial dynamics.

[link to www.ahajournals.org (secure)]

These clot shots are fricking up people's mitochondrial dna. That's serious.

Newer paper from August 2021:

Risk of thrombocytopenia and thromboembolism after covid-19 vaccination and SARS-CoV-2 positive testing: self-controlled case series study

What this study adds

Increased risk of thrombocytopenia, venous thromboembolism, and other rare arterial thrombotic events were found after a first dose of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine and of arterial thromboembolism and ischaemic stroke after a first dose of the BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) vaccine

Increased risk of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis was found after a first dose of both vaccines—a week later with BNT162b2 than with ChAdOx1 nCoV-19

The risks of these outcomes after vaccination were much lower than those associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection in the same population

[link to www.bmj.com (secure)]

Thanks for work. This does sound serious, messing around with ones vision is enough reason by itself to stay away from this jab. Time will tell. I've taken Lutein and a couple other herbs for years with the intentions of keeping my eyes healthy.

Yep, I made this thread back in May.

Nasty business.

Thread: BREAKING:The spike protein created by the vaccine damages blood vessels

Thanks for the link to your thread!

They sneak that last bit in to justify the injury and death from taking the jabs using their old *the benefits outweigh the risks*.

In that study the three groups were those:
Who were hospitalised or died from the conditions within 28 days of:
A positive covid test
An injection of AZ
An injection of Pfizer

1. By excluding anyone post 28 days they skew the study results, if the jabs cause the injury and death at a higher percentage on day 30 none of that is factored in to the end stats.

2. There is no isolated and purified sample of the sars Cov 2 virus anywhere to be found adding further evidence that none of the positive test group ever were infected with the virus to begin with. And if they weren't ever infected by the alleged virus it would be something else causing their increased injury and death from these clotting conditions.

3. The actual control geoup that should have been used are the clinical trial control geoup. That's who the events of blood clotting should have been compared with. But oh wait, they no longer exist so we get these easily manipulated anecdotal studies instead.

4. This study actually argues that the risks of the jabs needs to be compared to the risks of the alleged virus itself. No. You must first establish the adverse events of the jab itself and that is done through the clinical trial control group. They literally are hoodwinking and changing scientific study.

666
vav vav vav

Reminder that the mRNA injections instruct your own cellular machinery to flood your body with these spike proteins. A recent autopsy of vaccinated found spike proteins in every organ of the body.

This is diabolical and evil. The vaccines should have been halted months ago. Actually they should have never been approved. Not even close.

Let's keep it simple: The S protein is NOT dangerous to the body at all. Your own body produces it and it is essential for the proper functioning of your body.

It is instrumental in keeping the circulatory and vascular processes functioning optimally and it plays a critical role during virual production periods to clear those systems when necessary.

Now, what happens when a foreign source delivers synthetic MRNA instructions to your body to produce its own protein?

That's correct, your body reads the protein as foreign and begins to attack it.

Because there's no 'off switch' to those instructions once delivered, all of the cells in the various systems that the MRNA instructions were delivered begin to produce the S protein - which your body then attacks, cells and all - which then causes those systems and processes to malfunctioning causing dysfunction.

Your body is being tricked into reading its own protein as foreign because your body reads the MRNA instructions that told it to produce it as foreign, thus attacking whatever those instructions give rise to - namely the S protein of your own body.

It's insidious. And by attacking the protein, in terms of vascular/circulatory damage, it's a sort of S protein deficiency - not the protein, itself.

This is because without S protein doing what it`s supposed to in the vascular and circulatory systems, toxicity and inflammation occur - leading to many of the problems we're seeing post-vax.

Protein S deficiency is a disorder of blood clotting. People with this condition have an increased risk of developing abnormal blood clots.

[link to medlineplus.gov (secure)]

The protein isn't even the problem.

S protein - regardless of its 'shape' depdnding ont he function its performing - is your own body's protein!

Your body is being tricked via the foreign MRNA instructions into attacking it.

The misleading nature of that bmj study

They first tell you that there were three groups that were compared
- those who took AZ
-those who took Pfizer
-those who had a positive test result

Now like me, most would ASSume that the third group were unjabbed.

Nope.
The third group were jabbed.

rosemary and thyme can help.

Blood Protein S...also called Spike Protein.
In 2018, it was demonstrated that hypoxia disregulates blood clotting via Protein S.

We swear masks do not cause hypoxia! You'd have to be a conspiracy theory to believe that!
We swear a mask on the plane is for your health and safety! We just need you not to realise that the flying increased risk of blood clots is due to hypoxia onboard aircraft not sitting. Then you will not see we are driving your body into even greater hypoxia!

My brother in law was rushed to A&E several months ago with multiple blood clots on the lungs. No jab at the time,
Of course they told him it was covid.

He wore n95s religiously.

My husband asked him does he know what causes an increased risk of blood clots whilst flying. He of course said sitting for long periods.
My husband shared with him that it's actually the hypoxia in the passengers, and that his n95 mask was equivalent to the pressurised altitude of aircraft cabins.

He chose to believe in covid,

We were all told this would be a time of lying signs and wonders.

Read the comment from Switzerland on 29 August at that link.
Every person in this study was jabbed. And therefore the results actually show the deadly combination of being jabbed then testing positive.

[link to www.bitchute.com (secure)]

666 vav vav vav
"spike hook"

I'm finding that most published studies are doing this. It makes no sense to me. Is this the only way scientists can get their research published right now? I assume the editors are blocking most research that does not conform to the official narrative.

Very interesting and horrifying.

I call



Not the same protein. pls prove

Thanks so much for referring to the comments. I had not reviewed those last night. Here is another interesting one;

A patient under 45 with no health conditions receiving the Covid-19 vaccine has a right to know:

(1) If I get vaccinated, what is my risk of hospitalization and death from complications of the vaccine?
(2) If I don't get vaccinated, what is my risk of hospitalization and death from complications of SARS Cov-2 infection that would be prevented by the vaccine?

We need to compare (1) and (2), and we should only advise vaccination if (2) is greater than (1).

[link to www.bmj.com (secure)]

Worth reading the rest of that rapid response to the article.

Multiple comments to the paper are pointing out this fact, that every person in the study had gotten the shot. No control group looking at the outcomes of unvaccinated versus vaccinated after testing positive.

Thanks again for your post directing me to the comments.

yea, there are many reasons for not getting injected. here are some more:


American Scientists Confirm Toxic Graphene Oxide, and More, in Covid Injections

[link to theexpose.uk (secure)]

You are most welcome.
I find today that we must fact check everything ourselves.
It’s tragic that the media ran with this alleged study here in the UK and used it to convince people that the risk of blood clots by the jabs was less than the risk of blood clots by covid.
When in actuality the study only led people to believe that and actually shows what many of those responses picked up on.

Sickle cell disease:

Proteins C and S are vitamin K-dependent proteins with an essential anti-coagulant function. Protein C exists in an inactive form and is activated by a thrombin-thrombomodulin complex. Protein S combines with protein C and forms a stoichiometric complex which regulates coagulation in the presence of calcium. As patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) bear a high risk of developing thrombo-embolic disorders....

Fauci name means **sickle**

Protein S, Vitamin K dependent
Also called... “spike protein”

covid is so super deadly you must take untested vaccines for it, because it super duper deadly

99.8% survival rate.

let's lock down the world

super deadly!

How do you exercise your vascular system?
Repeated cycles of hot and cold.
Expansion / Contraction

it appears to say that if someone takes the medicine, they may require taking another medicine to ensure the first medicine doesnt damage cells in the body, but perhaps i am reading it wron