people are reading to much into the not guilty verdict

Add today 600,000 hunters in woods for opening day of deer hunting in Wisconsin and there won't be any problems.

That's the point, it's the job of the police and national guard in a riot. Not a wannabe kid militia man who wants to show off his "cool gun". He wasn't at his home defending his life and property now was he?

The Jury says you're an imbecile.

The prosecution has already proven that Kyle had the same right as anyone else to be there, the prosecution also has proven the gun possession was legally obtained and to have. The prosecution did not prove provocation with a purposely altered blurry faulty photo that the prosecution has based their whole case on with misrepresented evidence, mid-trial evidentiary gifts from the evidence fairy. That evidence was proven to be definitely inaccurate. Therefore it is proven by a jury of Kyle's piers that there was not provocation and "Dismissed with prejudice".

Maybe if you write up a six thousand word response detailing the extent of your feelings rather than what has been proven by the law, someone might find you more believable. Right now by the "Dismissed with Prejudice" means that it is dismissed permanently and many find your feelings stupid. And guess what, there are no grounds for any federal prosecution.

He's right, you know.

No, he's not. I carry a gun on me all the time. I'm not looking for an excuse to kill. This verdict vindicates my right to defend myself if I'm attacked, even if you personally think I shouldn't be where I want be, even if it's not my property.

You ever shot an AR-15 NDFARM?

It's exactly the type of rifle a young man should have.

It's very mechanically accurate, affordable, easy to use, easy to maintain, and easy to put your rounds only into your target with.

The AR-15 is a masterpiece of American engineering that everyone from your kid brother to your grandma can pick up and shoot both SAFELY and WELL!

Had Kyle had a different rifle or a pistol the chances of him hitting people that weren't a direct threat to his life would have dramatically raised to say nothing of Kyle potentially being successfully killed by the mob.

Instead, we have an incident where an absolutely minimal amount of life was lost, the two wild shots went high and didn't hurt bystanders, and Kyle neutralized his attacker's before they could kill him.

His attacker's could have lived to burn loot and murder another day had they not CHOSE to gang up on one kid they successfully isolated from his buddies so they could wold pack attack him and attempt to murder him.

The only shitty part here is the VIOLENT FELON known as jump kick man didn't get shot too.

As far as the he shouldn't have even been there assertion goes, bitch that goes doubly so for the pedos domestic abusers and losers that attacked him!

If they hadn't been there looting attacking people and starting fires Kyle could have had a peaceful night.

Nope he was helping and protecting his community which is OUR RIGHT TO DO, some would even call it a responsibility.

So what bothers you more?

That Kyle shot your pedo friends

Or

That at 17 Kyle is a better man than you'll ever be?


You're trying to tar the image of a kid who spent earlier that day painting over graffiti and helping with damage from the previous nights.

Also, just so we're clear, the supreme court has ruled TWICE that it's not actually the police or national guard's job to protect you or your community.

They aren't even LEGALLY OBLIGATED to do so much less actually inclined to do it in the real world.

What this means is that your entire argument falls entirely flat

It only vindicated people in certain areas and states. We all know what the verdict would of been in places like NYC. Btw I have plenty of rifles and pistols on my farm.

You still have time for your mail-in vote, boxes of these mail-in votes will arrive in a truck at the courthouse at around 3:00 am. But you will be shocked that the mail-in votes are superseded by a jury of 12 of Kyle's peers, and Kyle Rittenhouse will awake tomorrow morning as he has today to discover that he had been acquitted after all.

In Texas you can. You can even shoot the assholes for breaking into your neighbors house and stealing their s possessions.

Last Edited by 9below6 on 11/20/2021 03:09 PM

Is that supposed to be intimidating? Just take the L my dude. Rittenhouse was acquitted, you're obviously sore about it. States like mine also have a stand your ground law, he'd have been just as justified here as he was there. Pretty much none of my guns would even be legal in New York state, which is why I will never enter that state for any reason. You can stay in your authoritarian hell hole, I'm never going there.

I certainly wasn't trying to intimate anyone. Just stating I'm hardly anti gun, I own many and support the 2nd amendment.

wow you're a fucking dumbass

whew

Do you support an assault weapons ban? Do you support a ban on 80% lowers? Do you support mandatory background checks for private transfers or ammunition purchases? Do you support politicians who support these things?

[imgur] [link to imgur.com (secure)]

Seeing there's an assault weapon on my farm I'm hardly for a ban. they are highly over rated in my opinion, Bill Cooper more or less said the same thing.
I'm for background checks for buying a gun to weed out the crazies. does anyone really want people with mental issues and crazy people having a gun so they can go out and start shooting? And I really don't support any politician, they are all corrupt.

And I'm against denying rights because some authoritarian like you thinks they get to decide who is crazy.