people are reading to much into the not guilty verdict

He's right, you know.



Like it or not.

Lol, in my opinion, people are happy that our court system appears to work in some places at least! It was obvious to those that watched the trial, that Kyle was only defending himself, and the jury agreed. End of story except for the butthurt libs, and we'll have to wait and see what they do.

No kidding dude.


No one is saying they want to take guns to protests or start shooting people. They just want to be able to defend themselves against evil people who want to harm other people or take their possessions.

Where do you see that, who would think this? People have to live with decisions Jurys make, for whatever side of the spectrum they may seem to stand. No?

You are such a puss that trolls this board.

Just go away!

Nobody cares what you think.

The fact that you can find some loon who says that means you found an outlier.

No one is suggesting anything other than it's legal to use force in self defense.

Despite all the lies used to prosecute this case the jury, which DID include a black gent as a juror, saw the facts and based their decision on reality instead of inflamed rhetoric from the prosecution and threats from the liberals.

ABC news makes the statement "It appears the verdict has polarized the country!"
More bullshit! They wanted to railroad the guy for defending himself, and they are just sore losers. Lying snakes that cry and whine when they don't get their way. Fuck em!

YEAH AND HES SKEERED TOO

The Rittenhouse jury included a man who appeared Hispanic but not black.

It is the Ahmad Arbery jury that has one black juror.

No shit idiot!

If people thought this was a license to go do whatever they wanted, then they would be as fucking stupid as you are.

We have the right to carry guns and defend ourselves. That is the last line of defense between a free society and total tyranny. Look at Australia.

Today's verdict was reassurance of that fact. I would never shoot anyone unless they were attempting to harm my family or myself.

At least the right is?

Would you like for me to post 5-6 headlines currently at MSNBC?

Personally, I wouldn’t get within 2 miles of a leftist pillage-fest disguised as a protest without a firearm after what I’ve seen in the past 18 months.

Let’s wait and see who “has a free-for-all with guns” in the coming days and weeks…they will probably be wearing khaki pants and carrying tiki torches.

The first thing I said to my wife, when the verdict came out. "Wow, some of the court systems still work! Thank God, the jury ruled properly on a clear case of self defense."


End of story. Never crossed my mind to think anything about taking guns to riots or protests and start shooting people until I read your post. But hey, you kinda remind me of MSM, in how you tell people what they should be thinking, instead of finding out how people think first.

No, that is false information. Taking a life over someone taking your possessions is dumb. Good luck convincing a jury that a human life is worth taking over a material object.

You or someone else must be in danger or fear for your life.

Bingo.

I havent heard anyone saying that but YOU. No person in their right mind would ever think or say your last sentence you wrote there.

What are you, 12?

I didn’t say that. I said “defend.” Preferably all lives could always be saved.

OP, speak for yourself.

That appears to be a large enough task....

Ego weighs about 4 megakilos per cubic meter.

Last Edited by beeches on 11/19/2021 08:06 PM

Not at all. We're just happy that a clear-cut self defense case was recognized by a jury of his peers and left-wing nut jobs didn't intimidate jurors from reaching the correct verdict.

maybe you should stop fucking with people,
just in case you're wrong.

actually, the verdict was a negation of the
prosecutor's tactics. most of the charges
were ridiculous and he's opened the city to
a huge lawsuit. Watch for him to be gone
next year.

.

Ok, youre right. But, when it comes to using firearms to defend yourself, once posessions come into play, you better make sure youre defending yourself and not a possession. Something like property, like land with a No Trespasing sign for instance, is different.

The point I was trying to make is something like this: You are away at work. You come home in the afternoon and as youre walking to your door, a man comes running out with your TV. Unless that person is a threat to your life, you cannot justify shooting this person for your “possession”.

Concealed carry or any use of a firearm opens yourself up to the legal system, so if you come, you better come correct.

And then you have to ask why he went to a riot/protest carrying a AR 15? He already said he got that rifle because he thought it was cool. He was young and dumb and definitely not a hero and had no business being there with a AR 15.

Also, this case was justified, im only leaving the above comment for others who are reading this thread and may have to make this decision in the future. Bottom line: know the laws in your state.

Then you have to ask yourself why the convicted pedophile/felon was also in possession of a weapon, no?

We all breathed a sigh of relief that at least there are honest jurors left

If there aren’t ... then what you (OP) said might happen

People have to have faith in juries

And hopefully the courts will reinstate faith in our elections too

Without impartial courts ... anyone with anything hasn’t much left to lose

That’s a dangerous game in an armed country

Australia is learning the true cost of giving up their guns

They have lost almost every freedom they ever took for granted since

SMH

Probably because he knew he was entering a riot?!?
Lol. Are you seriously THAT obtuse?
A handgun isnt gonna do a whole lot if you have the potential to be attacked by a mob.

Can tell youve never been in any kind of real shit. You and others that are against the kid have never been on the receiving end of violence from a group or have ever thought abkut what the dynamics of such an attack would involve?

Be honest, what you really see is a white kid that you think was trying to play real life Call of Duty. You see this as an opportunity to support your bias towards gun control because in your mind, if no one had firearms, we’d all live in peace.

Ever thought to yourself why the media and our current administration, as well as the democratic administrations before also encourage this suuporting narrative? Youre in for a rude awakening someday once you realize the government isnt here to help you.

If he was a convicted pedophile he should never been let out of jail. But I guess that's another issue.

I don't think people, especially conservatives, see this as a pass. I believe what you are stating that the Left are painting this as such.

You should stop trolling!

You should also watch over your shoulder because who you support can see you a mile away. You are easy pickins!