Harmed by a shedding vaxxed person? Didn't consent? Not informed? Violation of EAU rules. Gov't and manufacturers are liable for damages

EUA

Ummm they fired all the anti Vax Dr's who would not get the vaccine.

They closed the Dr down in TX who only saw poison free patients.

Good luck proving it medically.

See what just happened?

Twitter.com/KissMyG65519838/status/1460708042534797313

[link to imgur.com (secure)]

That is actually an interesting thesis and legal idea.

Only the person actually vaccinated gave their "consent" and waiver of liability.

If someone could actually prove this shedding transmission theory (that the spike protein from the vaxx (which is their product) sheds from a vaxxed person to a nonconsenting,unvaxxed person, minding their own business, who never contracted or engaged in any way with the manufacturer, I can see a product liability theory of such a claim.

Sure the manufacturers have already admitted in the pages upon pages of guff, that their product transmitted.

So whilst this is true and it sounds good on paper, the truth is they want us all dead, and will play fuckery like pros, to stop any recompense being admitted fully, let alone rewarded

i already said this along time ago.. and there is proof that "gene therapy" aka the mRNA vax sheds. gene therapy has never been done on a massive scale before because THEY KNOW the potential risks.