Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,386 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 420,280
Pageviews Today: 543,884Threads Today: 168Posts Today: 1,933
04:46 AM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPORT COPYRIGHT VIOLATION IN REPLY
Message Subject Where did God come from?
Poster Handle Anonymous Coward
Post Content
...


No, you're just confused. Unfortunately for you, evolution isn't that easy to debunk. Scientists have been trying for a century, but all we do is find more evidence for it.

RNA (the likely precursor to DNA) is capable of forming naturally, and replicating without a modern cell.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80131628


Youre misrepresenting science, and thats what you need to do to try to make the lie of evolution sound credible to people here. Article on what youre actually talking about for those interested:

[link to answersingenesis.org (secure)]

So youre back to deal with what James Tour says, the exact same dilemmas, youre just trying to throw dust in peoples faces leading them down a road going nowhere.

So, to repeat James Tours points: how did the information in DNA and these molecules supposedly spontaniously pop out of the blue, in a cell body that could replicate itself, take in nutrition etc, which all needed to be in place the second life arose?
 Quoting: Just†Me


If you paid attention, you'd see I already answered your question. It didn't spontaneously appear. RNA existed before DNA, and RNA can form naturally outside of cells.

And for the fifth time, evolution only happens AFTER life appears. Evolution is change in heritable traits of a population over generations. Please, pay attention this time.

The origin of life (abiogenesis) and evolution are two separate processes. Even if we prove that a god snapped his fingers and caused the first life to appear supernaturally, that doesn't mean it didn't evolve AFTER appearing.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80131628


You are misrepresenting science AGAIN. Heres the article ONE MORE TIME, now READ IT, and try again:

[link to answersingenesis.org (secure)]
 Quoting: Just†Me


Your Creationist propaganda sites are irrelevant. Creationism isn't science. Creationists openly admit that they will ignore any evidence that conflicts with their Biblical literalism. Here's the proof, the answers in genesis 'statement of faith':

[link to answersingenesis.org (secure)]
 
Please verify you're human:




Reason for copyright violation:







GLP