The LDS Church abandoned the Book of Mormon and now teaches idolatry and Americanism. All members are now cursed reprobates.

[link to discussmormonism.com (secure)]

“No” means “no”. What part of “no” (n + o) do u not understand? Is Jesus Christ a sinner? No, he is not! Is there more than one Heavenly Father? No, there is one Heavenly Father only!


"Brother Joseph! Shulem here, hear me, please. I’m not here to tell you that you’ve fallen but I have a problem with you teaching the plurality of Gods when that is something you did NOT teach prior to 1835. You always maintained the teachings of the bible and Book of Mormon with regard to the Father and Son being one God manifesting in their respective roles. How can you begin to wonder how so many of the brethren have fallen away from the Church ever since you’ve been preaching this strange doctrine of the plurality of Gods?"

"Just how long is a long time? You didn’t preach these things in 1830, 1831, 1832, 1833, and 1834! The doctrine of plurality of Gods is causing quite a stir, even today, is it not?"

"No sir, you have not always declared these things. You came up with these ideas much later. The Lectures on Faith teach that the Father is a Spirt but the Son is made flesh."
(which contradicts what they teach nowadays that the Father is flesh and blood)

[link to zelophehadsdaughters.com (secure)]

"I’ll grant that the very strong majority view (or at least assumption) in the church is that we have only one Heavenly Father. But there still remains room for members to envision a plurality of fathers in certain parameters. For example, it could be that in the eternities Christ will be formally known as the ‘Father’ but that many exalted men who have been saved through him will participate in ongoing creation of worlds and children, and that all such children will fall within Christ’s stewardship and know Him as ‘father.’ Likewise, while church doctrine does state that HF is the ‘father of our spirits,’ there may be room to conclude that His fatherhood is adoptive rather than literal (in the biological procreation sense that we tend to project)."

Versus


Gramps,

I’m not sure our institution wants to own the teaching that our Heavenly Father has a father who has a father, and so on, infinitely. I know this teaching was passionately held, taught, and defended by presiding leaders, but hardly touched today. I know also that Pres Hinckley dismissed it during a TV interview, but that later speaking to the faithful, he affirmed it.

[link to askgramps.org (secure)]

So why are there contradictions in their Church about how many Heavenly Fathers there are? I don't know what percent of them believe that either...

I am Mormon. I have no clue what you are talking about.

I have my Book of Mormon and read it daily.

My church does not teach idolatry and I don’t even know what Americanism is.

It gets kind of boring having to defend my faith on a conspiracy website.

How about attacking the Presbyterians for a while?

test

Why don't you read the Bible daily? Honest question, no hate.

The Mormon church is cursed because they reversed their position on colored people.

We promote sodomy now.

Openly homosexual missionaries. Homosexuals who "dated" before their missions-but didn't break the LoC. MPs giving diversity and inclusion training to their missionaries. Missionaries wearing PRIDE pins on their nametags.

Stick a fork in it.

Mormons are like everyone else, some are great, awesome people, some of the finest humans you may have ever met, and some SUCK ass, will eff you over in business deals, some are drug addicted, some are gay. You shouldnt paint them all with the same brush.

"dated" as in they openly admit they went on romantic dates with members of the same-sex, held hands, kissed, etc. That there is nothing wrong with that and the SPs, Bishops and MPs say "yeah sure that's fine go on a mission!!"

People really do not understand how far LDS has shifted; many members can't even fathom it.

Sure there are bad people in every group. The problem is that mormons now PROMOTE and I do mean PROMOTE homosexuality.

Sure, same-sex marriage is still condemned, but that's about it. A young girl wants to go to youth camp to find her next girlfriend-sure go ahead.

Youth dances 14-18 with girls slow dancing with girls and boys slow dancing with boys . . .sure go ahead. No leader stops it.

Same-sex sexual activity is bad . . .everything else-it's a free for all. Boys who believe they are girls-there is an official policy that says it's acceptable for Bishops to call Brother Bob, Sister Suzy.

^This

Are you an Elder? They are doing exactly what the OP said.

Can't we just leave this world and go back to planet elohim?

The LDS Church has helped to construct another Babylonian Nephite-Jeredite abomination, just as spelled out in the Book of Mormon. And their fate? Also spelled out clearly in the BoM - slaughtered like bloated cattle for mocking and abandoning the Lord, His Laws, and attempting to be 'natural men' taking the Throne for themselves. Prepare to be cast into Outer Darkness and eradicated.

Joseph Smith was a con man.

He scored.

Remember when an earthquake knocked the trumpet out of Moroni's hand?

"Well, it was under repairs!"

Just like when the fire at Notre Dame destroyed the modern altar, but left the old altar.

"Well, the old altar wasn't in a location that was destroyed by the fire!"

I'm not catholic or mormon, but an obvious sign should be obvious.

“Each patriarchal blessing is sacred, confidential, and personal . … Church members should not compare blessings and should not share them except with close family members. Patriarchal blessings should not be read in Church meetings or other public gatherings”

although I don't understand the subject line without more details, I can say that the LDS church is about to split into pieces. It's losing members like it hit an iceberg. People bailing because the 'prophet' is more concerned about $illions, image and PC than anything else. Those that don't see it have a thick glaze over their eyes. Blind.

that certainly pertains to .... what?

Perhaps they can reach even more people by renaming themselves the LSD church.

Personally i always thought that that demon moronii was not given more credit. Shouldnt it have been called the book of Moron. And most followers could then claim for mental health reparations as morons

Sounds like BS, OP. Sounds nothing like the Mormon friends I have.

You'll have better luck dragging Catholics through the dirt, but what do I know as a Lutheran.