Evidence for the Crucifixion of Jesus: The Brutal Reality of Christ's Death

In this lecture Dr. Costa addresses the brutal facts about crucifixion and how Jesus would have suffered under this cruel form of execution.

From his own mind.

He thinks attributing that to AIOIA diminishes her, lmao.

This is what separates Jesus from Buddha, Mohammed, etc.

Jesus is the only one who willingly endured torture and death, FOR YOU.

No greater love.

One day I will kiss His feet.

He is coming back to kick some ass!

If you would be a Christian and follow Jesus, you would also die while you live, because this step from the flesh to the spirit frees you and the others from all sin as well.

But since you love your ego idolatrously and as flesh not only want to meet Jesus but even go to heaven, only hell is waiting for you and the many other pseudo-Christians on GLP.

No it does not.. each one has to free their own sin

In this lecture Dr. Costa addresses the brutal facts about crucifixion and how Jesus would have suffered under this cruel form of execution.

[link to youtu.be (secure)]

Was King Herod a descendant of Esau?

Embedded in the Christmas story and in the birth narrative of Jesus into this world is a dark story of loss and tragedy, of tears and pain. Matthew 2:16 has been traditionally called the “mass--acre of the innocents.” There we are told about the kil--ling of all boys two years old and younger in the region of Bethlehem. The event is deeply unsettling, but it’s also part of the historical record of the birth of Christ — or is it




Bible Answer:
Flavius Joephus (approx. A.D. 30 – 100), the J historian, tells us that Esau’s descendants inhabited the region of Idumea at least two times in The Antiquities... This is important since Herod Antipater, also called Herod Antipas. was a descendant of Esau, the father of the Edomites.

He was a remarkably successful politician in keeping the peace between Rome, which had conquered Judea ever since 63 BC, and he acted as a Roman governor overseas.

[link to www.desiringgod.org (secure)]

The thing is, I love Jesus but he is far from the only Avatar/example of someone actualizing their potential, although he is definitely one of the most famous.

Buddha, Krishna, Shankara, Lao Tzu are some others, and many whose names we don't know.

Many have been persecuted by the same archonic force sometimes called demons, Satan, Moloch, etc. This AI/virus feeds off humans at their worst (takes in human suffering/negativity as food), so of course it would want to kill anyone trying to help raise the vibration here and unleash human potential.

It can only come up through humans it possesses and is neutralized/healed by Love (and forgiveness, compassion, turning the other cheek, etc.)

The real us is an immortal Soul, not our finite human or this possessing force that sometimes takes people over. All can be transmuted/healed/optimized. All Is Source patterning in various ways, and all can be traced back to Source and changed to be more positive, a better version/timeline.

No it does not.. each one has to free their own sin

christ is fiction

he never died nor was he born

it is all myth

for fools who think they can live after death

[link to www.godlikeproductions.com]

[link to www.reviewofreligions.org (secure)]

Evidence of Jesus(as) in India

Well, you started out correctly. Even the bible says no man can atone for another man's sin.

Where ur wrong is your statement of afterlife is a delusion; consciousness doesn't die. It just moves to another "place."

A man with sin can not attone for another mans sin, that part is correct. But the Messiah is different, because Jesus is WITHOUT sin. Isaiah 53 says the Messiah will indeed attone for the sins of his people.

And we christians are Gods people. But you are not. Jesus said you have to be born again (John 3:3-8) to be a child of God.

Fake and a waste of time.

Gods word is the bible. Prophecy verifies the bible. History verifies the bible. Archeology verifies the bible. Science verifies the bible. Manuscripts verifies the bible. Internal evidence verifies the bible. People across the ancient world writes about Jesus of the bible and the crucifixion, pagans, romans and j apostates and historians. You can even go and see the places yourself mentioned in the bible. The quran is filled with easily verifiable lies.

So which would you rather believe in, the one with verifiable truths, or the one with verifiable lies?

God gave you a brain. I suggest you start using it!

How do you know he didn't spend time in India? You don't. And you can't prove it.

That's absurd.

Did God need to learn something from the filth of the men of India?!?

To believe Jesus went to India

is just evidence that you do not believe in the Jesus Christ of the Bible

but make another that tickles your ears...

why are you threatened by this idea? Why does it shake your faith if this is true?

You believe Jesus had the spikes removed from his wrists and ankles and walked a 2500 miles to India, right?