ATTN Pro Vax shills - please explain how these supposed "Variants" work | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 83948032 United States 09/01/2022 12:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Viruses are real, and the covid virus has been identified and isolated over and over. [link to www.jeremyrhammond.com (secure)] Quit making us look stupid! |
Dr. Feelgood
(OP) User ID: 77957964 United States 09/01/2022 01:05 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Viruses are real, and the covid virus has been identified and isolated over and over. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 83948032 [link to www.jeremyrhammond.com (secure)] Quit making us look stupid! Computer sequencing. Read your own link. Check out this thread for important statistics which have showed (since early summer 2021) that Covid “Vaccine” is more likely to KILL YOU than save you: Thread: COVID JAB statistically more likely to KILL YOU per official CDC DATA. You’re 3.87x more likely to die from the Pfizer vax than save your life!! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77266842 Netherlands 09/01/2022 01:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79229108 United States 09/01/2022 01:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 83948032 United States 09/01/2022 01:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Viruses are real, and the covid virus has been identified and isolated over and over. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 83948032 [link to www.jeremyrhammond.com (secure)] Quit making us look stupid! Computer sequencing. Read your own link. DNA is completely defined by computer sequencing. It's not new. How can you trust these MORONS Kaufman and and Cowan? FFS I gave them an hour of my time and that was enough for me. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79229108 United States 09/01/2022 01:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Viruses are real, and the covid virus has been identified and isolated over and over. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 83948032 [link to www.jeremyrhammond.com (secure)] Quit making us look stupid! Computer sequencing. Read your own link. DNA is completely defined by computer sequencing. It's not new. AND? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 83948032 United States 09/01/2022 01:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | All this recently, after 'covid', got me wondering - why are there no examples of animals being wiped out by 'viruses'? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79229108 After all, what is there defense and what is to stop a 'virus' from anhialating them? A species ALWAYS has enough genetic diversity to survive a virus. In the 14th century millions of people walked through the Black Death and nothing...or got over it. A virus never gets everybody. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 74903264 United States 09/01/2022 01:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Just like the Flu Covid is developing mutations and different strains. Vaccines only prevent or lessen certain strains. Just like you need a flu shot each year to protect against the strain they predict will go around that year. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 83948032 United States 09/01/2022 01:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Viruses are real, and the covid virus has been identified and isolated over and over. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 83948032 [link to www.jeremyrhammond.com (secure)] Quit making us look stupid! Computer sequencing. Read your own link. DNA is completely defined by computer sequencing. It's not new. AND? Neanderthal DNA completely exists entirely 100% on computers. So does the covid virus. Kaufman, Cowan, and OP are idiots. |
Dr. Feelgood
(OP) User ID: 77957964 United States 09/01/2022 01:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Viruses are real, and the covid virus has been identified and isolated over and over. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 83948032 [link to www.jeremyrhammond.com (secure)] Quit making us look stupid! Computer sequencing. Read your own link. DNA is completely defined by computer sequencing. It's not new. AND? I have played this game before, which you can reference in the thread linked in the OP. Here is how it works: Everything returns back to computer sequenced "proof" everything. When asked to provide actual physical proof, shills will present links to articles which site computer sequenced $¢ien¢e as "proof". All the shills and sheeple and $¢ienti$t$ all pretend that because some official source says that computer sequencing is infallible "proof" that there is no reason to actually pursue anything further as actually thinking and reasoning for yourself is not how these sheeple operate. It is somewhat similar to an "emporer's new clothes" phenomenon. When they can't debate their point with facts they resort QUICKLY to insults about how people who don't blindly "trust the $¢ien¢e" are stupid. And round and round it goes. Thankfully,.this type of thread, if it catches on, also draws some very intelligent people who are able to contribute and often bring new and useful information to people like me who genuinely would like to understand the subject better. Check out this thread for important statistics which have showed (since early summer 2021) that Covid “Vaccine” is more likely to KILL YOU than save you: Thread: COVID JAB statistically more likely to KILL YOU per official CDC DATA. You’re 3.87x more likely to die from the Pfizer vax than save your life!! |
MountainTux NLI
User ID: 82778438 Canada 09/01/2022 01:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Viruses are real, and the covid virus has been identified and isolated over and over. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 83948032 [link to www.jeremyrhammond.com (secure)] Quit making us look stupid! Oh, you do a great job of that all by yourself - even though this was a troll comment LOL. ad ignorantiam - The assumption of a conclusion or fact based primarily on lack of evidence to the contrary. Usually best described by, “absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.” |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 83948032 United States 09/01/2022 01:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | AND? I have played this game before, which you can reference in the thread linked in the OP. Here is how it works: Everything returns back to computer sequenced "proof" everything. When asked to provide actual physical proof, shills will present links to articles which site computer sequenced $¢ien¢e as "proof". All the shills and sheeple and $¢ienti$t$ all pretend that because some official source says that computer sequencing is infallible "proof" that there is no reason to actually pursue anything further as actually thinking and reasoning for yourself is not how these sheeple operate. It is somewhat similar to an "emporer's new clothes" phenomenon. When they can't debate their point with facts they resort QUICKLY to insults about how people who don't blindly "trust the $¢ien¢e" are stupid. And round and round it goes. Thankfully,.this type of thread, if it catches on, also draws some very intelligent people who are able to contribute and often bring new and useful information to people like me who genuinely would like to understand the subject better. Fuck you, idiot. [link to merylnass.substack.com (secure)] I don't have the patience for your bullshit. |
Dr. Feelgood
(OP) User ID: 77957964 United States 09/01/2022 01:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Just like the Flu Covid is developing mutations and different strains. Vaccines only prevent or lessen certain strains. Just like you need a flu shot each year to protect against the strain they predict will go around that year. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74903264 "Just like the Flu Covid is developing mutations and different strains." That's what "they" say. Seems plausible "Vaccines only prevent or lessen certain strains. " Again, that is the story "they" want you to believe. If you actually research it becomes increasingly likely that vaccines are doing way more harm than good, especially vaccines against something as trivial as influenza which presents minimal mortality risk to anyone that wasnt likely to die anyway. "Just like you need a flu shot each year" No you don't. "to protect against the strain they predict will go around that year." Correct that it won't protect from different strains, debatable if it "protects" from anything. Check out this thread for important statistics which have showed (since early summer 2021) that Covid “Vaccine” is more likely to KILL YOU than save you: Thread: COVID JAB statistically more likely to KILL YOU per official CDC DATA. You’re 3.87x more likely to die from the Pfizer vax than save your life!! |
MountainTux NLI
User ID: 82778438 Canada 09/01/2022 01:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Also, to OP I'd just like to point out that there is no NEED to "rejig" the original PCR test in order to achieve a desired result. As I'm sure you're aware, in light of no ACTUAL isolation and sequencing of the alleged COVID or any variant strains, the PCR test was designed using a model that consisted of samples of a wide RANGE of similar sequences, including many that were animal based with no human crossover, guaranteeing that almost ANYTHING could test positive for "covid." They then INSISTED that, unlike ANY other similar test, the number of cycles should be SO high and magnify SO far past background that it's almost impossible to NOT identify "covid." Utter foolishness. ad ignorantiam - The assumption of a conclusion or fact based primarily on lack of evidence to the contrary. Usually best described by, “absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.” |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79229108 United States 09/01/2022 01:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | All this recently, after 'covid', got me wondering - why are there no examples of animals being wiped out by 'viruses'? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79229108 After all, what is there defense and what is to stop a 'virus' from anhialating them? A species ALWAYS has enough genetic diversity to survive a virus. In the 14th century millions of people walked through the Black Death and nothing...or got over it. A virus never gets everybody. Show examples of this. Show examples of 'viruses' affecting animals (NON HUMANS) and then disappearing after 'genetic diversity' stopped it. You will notice they claim these viruses often com from animals right? Should be easy. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 83948032 United States 09/01/2022 01:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Two papers show viruses that are large enough to be seen with an optical microscope. A third paper shows all of Koch's postulates satisfied for SARS-CoV-2 published in Nature. We're done. [link to stevekirsch.substack.com (secure)] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 83899792 United States 09/01/2022 01:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Viruses are real, and the covid virus has been identified and isolated over and over. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 83948032 [link to www.jeremyrhammond.com (secure)] Quit making us look stupid! You do that for yourself. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 83948032 United States 09/01/2022 01:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Dr. Feelgood
(OP) User ID: 77957964 United States 09/01/2022 01:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 83948032 DNA is completely defined by computer sequencing. It's not new. AND? I have played this game before, which you can reference in the thread linked in the OP. Here is how it works: Everything returns back to computer sequenced "proof" everything. When asked to provide actual physical proof, shills will present links to articles which site computer sequenced $¢ien¢e as "proof". All the shills and sheeple and $¢ienti$t$ all pretend that because some official source says that computer sequencing is infallible "proof" that there is no reason to actually pursue anything further as actually thinking and reasoning for yourself is not how these sheeple operate. It is somewhat similar to an "emporer's new clothes" phenomenon. When they can't debate their point with facts they resort QUICKLY to insults about how people who don't blindly "trust the $¢ien¢e" are stupid. And round and round it goes. Thankfully,.this type of thread, if it catches on, also draws some very intelligent people who are able to contribute and often bring new and useful information to people like me who genuinely would like to understand the subject better. Fuck you, idiot. [link to merylnass.substack.com (secure)] I don't have the patience for your bullshit. You may not have the patience but you also don't have the proof of non computer sequenced isolation. From the methods of your link: we performed confirmatory testing by using real-time reverse transcription PCR (CDC) and full-genome sequencing (1). The CDC molecular diagnostic assay targets 3 portions of the nucleocapsid gene, and results for all 3 portions must be positive for a sample to be considered positive They found something that matched a computer generated sequence. You can call me whatever names you want. That doesn't change the status of the subject being discussed. Check out this thread for important statistics which have showed (since early summer 2021) that Covid “Vaccine” is more likely to KILL YOU than save you: Thread: COVID JAB statistically more likely to KILL YOU per official CDC DATA. You’re 3.87x more likely to die from the Pfizer vax than save your life!! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79229108 United States 09/01/2022 01:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Two papers show viruses that are large enough to be seen with an optical microscope. A third paper shows all of Koch's postulates satisfied for SARS-CoV-2 published in Nature. We're done. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 83948032 [link to stevekirsch.substack.com (secure)] Questions: Why cant they be seen without a microscope? If a virus by itself is not visible\too small then what about numerous ones together? Cant this be done with bacteria? How would a person know they are looking at a 'virus' through a microscope when someone tells them they are? |
MountainTux NLI
User ID: 82778438 Canada 09/01/2022 01:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Viruses are real, and the covid virus has been identified and isolated over and over. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 83948032 [link to www.jeremyrhammond.com (secure)] Quit making us look stupid! Computer sequencing. Read your own link. DNA is completely defined by computer sequencing. It's not new. How can you trust these MORONS Kaufman and and Cowan? FFS I gave them an hour of my time and that was enough for me. You're PARTIALLY correct, but not in the way you think. DNA is SEQUENCED using biological samples and processing them using a very powerful computer. I won't go into the details, but there is a reason that they call it sequencing and NOT modeling. So insofar as they are using a computer to create a representation of a physical DNA chain, you're mostly correct. COVID, however, has never been ISOLATED. What that MEANS is that they have NEVER SEQUENCED COVID. THey have generated a MODEL, based on conjecture and what they BELIEVE the "covid virus" should look like - they haven't isolated a sample and sequenced actual genectic code. In simple terms for you - they made up a picture of covid based on their ideas and what other covid virii look like, not on actual samples of a live virus, which should be simple to do, as they've done so many times before. So then if this process is so simple, and millions upon millions of Americans alond were dreadfully infected, WHY RELY ON A MADE UP MODEL? Which, by the way, both the WHO and your own CDC admit to. Don't be a simpleton. ad ignorantiam - The assumption of a conclusion or fact based primarily on lack of evidence to the contrary. Usually best described by, “absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.” |
Dr. Feelgood
(OP) User ID: 77957964 United States 09/01/2022 01:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Two papers show viruses that are large enough to be seen with an optical microscope. A third paper shows all of Koch's postulates satisfied for SARS-CoV-2 published in Nature. We're done. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 83948032 [link to stevekirsch.substack.com (secure)] As shown in Fig. 1b, viral loads were detectable by quantitative PCR with reverse transcription (RT–qPCR) $$$$$$$ In every single one of these, the PROOF if the PCR test based on a computer sequence. They made a PCR test which will pop as positive then claim this as proof. As Kary Mullis said, PCR is not made to diagnose anything because you can find anything in anyone with enough replications. Check out this thread for important statistics which have showed (since early summer 2021) that Covid “Vaccine” is more likely to KILL YOU than save you: Thread: COVID JAB statistically more likely to KILL YOU per official CDC DATA. You’re 3.87x more likely to die from the Pfizer vax than save your life!! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 83948032 United States 09/01/2022 01:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | All this recently, after 'covid', got me wondering - why are there no examples of animals being wiped out by 'viruses'? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79229108 After all, what is there defense and what is to stop a 'virus' from anhialating them? A species ALWAYS has enough genetic diversity to survive a virus. In the 14th century millions of people walked through the Black Death and nothing...or got over it. A virus never gets everybody. Show examples of this. Show examples of 'viruses' affecting animals (NON HUMANS) and then disappearing after 'genetic diversity' stopped it. You will notice they claim these viruses often com from animals right? Should be easy. Fuck you, moron. It's just a fact that viruses travel from animals to humans. I'm not going to try educate your dumb brain. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79229108 United States 09/01/2022 01:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
MountainTux NLI
User ID: 82778438 Canada 09/01/2022 01:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Two papers show viruses that are large enough to be seen with an optical microscope. A third paper shows all of Koch's postulates satisfied for SARS-CoV-2 published in Nature. We're done. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 83948032 [link to stevekirsch.substack.com (secure)] As shown in Fig. 1b, viral loads were detectable by quantitative PCR with reverse transcription (RT–qPCR) $$$$$$$ In every single one of these, the PROOF if the PCR test based on a computer sequence. They made a PCR test which will pop as positive then claim this as proof. As Kary Mullis said, PCR is not made to diagnose anything because you can find anything in anyone with enough replications. Which I've already pointed out... :) ad ignorantiam - The assumption of a conclusion or fact based primarily on lack of evidence to the contrary. Usually best described by, “absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.” |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79229108 United States 09/01/2022 01:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | All this recently, after 'covid', got me wondering - why are there no examples of animals being wiped out by 'viruses'? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79229108 After all, what is there defense and what is to stop a 'virus' from anhialating them? A species ALWAYS has enough genetic diversity to survive a virus. In the 14th century millions of people walked through the Black Death and nothing...or got over it. A virus never gets everybody. Show examples of this. Show examples of 'viruses' affecting animals (NON HUMANS) and then disappearing after 'genetic diversity' stopped it. You will notice they claim these viruses often com from animals right? Should be easy. Fuck you, moron. It's just a fact that viruses travel from animals to humans. I'm not going to try educate your dumb brain. OH, here it is. No answers, no proof - only vulgarity. |
MountainTux NLI
User ID: 82778438 Canada 09/01/2022 01:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | All this recently, after 'covid', got me wondering - why are there no examples of animals being wiped out by 'viruses'? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79229108 After all, what is there defense and what is to stop a 'virus' from anhialating them? A species ALWAYS has enough genetic diversity to survive a virus. In the 14th century millions of people walked through the Black Death and nothing...or got over it. A virus never gets everybody. Show examples of this. Show examples of 'viruses' affecting animals (NON HUMANS) and then disappearing after 'genetic diversity' stopped it. You will notice they claim these viruses often com from animals right? Should be easy. Fuck you, moron. It's just a fact that viruses travel from animals to humans. I'm not going to try educate your dumb brain. Ahh, there we go... foul language, definitive points but no facts to back it up, and of course the requisite pouting. We definitely have an intellectual with a strong medical background here, folks! ad ignorantiam - The assumption of a conclusion or fact based primarily on lack of evidence to the contrary. Usually best described by, “absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.” |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 83948032 United States 09/01/2022 01:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Two papers show viruses that are large enough to be seen with an optical microscope. A third paper shows all of Koch's postulates satisfied for SARS-CoV-2 published in Nature. We're done. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 83948032 [link to stevekirsch.substack.com (secure)] As shown in Fig. 1b, viral loads were detectable by quantitative PCR with reverse transcription (RT–qPCR) $$$$$$$ In every single one of these, the PROOF if the PCR test based on a computer sequence. They made a PCR test which will pop as positive then claim this as proof. As Kary Mullis said, PCR is not made to diagnose anything because you can find anything in anyone with enough replications. Why are your heroes afraid to take up Kirsch on his offer of a debate? |
Dr. Feelgood
(OP) User ID: 77957964 United States 09/01/2022 01:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Why do you accuse people of being "pro-vax" when they disagree with your stupid opinions? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 83948032 I haven't been vaxxed and never will but that doesn't change the fact that the chinese bioweapon is real. Seriously, FUCK YOUUUUU! The term "Pro Vax Shills" was meant to be an inflammatory remark to draw out discussion. If you choose to find a way to be offended by that, even though you even state that you don't consider yourself to be in that group, that is pretty bizarre but ultimately really your issue to resolve. Perhaps you should reread the OP. I specifically reference the spike protein, which it would appear was either created or modified in laboratories such as the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Check out this thread for important statistics which have showed (since early summer 2021) that Covid “Vaccine” is more likely to KILL YOU than save you: Thread: COVID JAB statistically more likely to KILL YOU per official CDC DATA. You’re 3.87x more likely to die from the Pfizer vax than save your life!! |
Red John
User ID: 70783084 Canada 09/01/2022 01:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | All this recently, after 'covid', got me wondering - why are there no examples of animals being wiped out by 'viruses'? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79229108 After all, what is there defense and what is to stop a 'virus' from anhialating them? A species ALWAYS has enough genetic diversity to survive a virus. In the 14th century millions of people walked through the Black Death and nothing...or got over it. A virus never gets everybody. bubonic plague is bacterial not viral oh hai! |