| Users Online Now: 2,140 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 2,119,481 | |
| Pageviews Today: 2,944,567 | Threads Today: 697 | Posts Today: 13,954 |
| 10:16 PM | ||
| Users Online Now: 2,140 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 2,119,481 | |
| Pageviews Today: 2,944,567 | Threads Today: 697 | Posts Today: 13,954 |
| 10:16 PM | ||
12 pictures of the sun, each month, same place, same time. No flat earth tards | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 76040208  Puerto Rico01/08/2023 06:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 76040208 Puerto Rico01/08/2023 07:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
An Uncarved Block
 User ID: 77016277  Ireland01/09/2023 03:15 PM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I am no flat earth tard hence why I said not flat earth tards idiot Again, for the morans here, this proves nothing. Doesnt prove earth is flat and it doesn't prove earth is a globe. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Forget the red or the blue pill. Take the Gold Elixir. “How can there be a God, when there is nothing but God.” - Laozi “Naturalness is called the Way. The Way has no name or form; it is just essence, just the primal spirit.” - The Secret of the Golden Flower. |
| Dimzin
User ID: 53438013  Canada01/09/2023 04:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Why are so many aeronautical calculations based on a flat, non-rotating plane rather than a linear traveling, rotating sphere?  Last Edited by Dimzin on 01/09/2023 04:01 PM If man weren't supposed to eat animals, Why are they made outta MEAT? *****LETS GO JUSTIN!!***** |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 79009989  United States01/09/2023 04:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | NASA Ref Pub 1207 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80440232 1988 Derivation and Definition of Linear Aircraft Model Introduction - Go to Second Paragraph, it says "This report detail the development of linear model of a rigid aircraft of constant mass, flying over a flat, non-rotating earth. www.nasa.g_o_v/centers/dryden/pdf/88104main_H-1391.pdf There are countless other documents but you globetards cant read, for some reason. By CIA, NASA, Flight Manuals so on..... No aircraft is constant mass either, fuel is used. When I read the part in red, what I understand is that the calculations and the development have not been adjusted for earth curvature, because at those scales it's a moot point. Is this beyond your comprehension? |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 84790968 United States01/09/2023 04:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Why are so many aeronautical calculations based on a flat, non-rotating plane rather than a linear traveling, rotating sphere? Quoting: Dimzin Because our whole f****** universe is flat.... Not to our planet and not to us... We are 3d beings trapped in a 2d plain.... On the topic of the picture... Adding daylight savings it makes my head hurt.. If you add pictures from the southern hemisphere it would look like a DNA strand Why? |
| R(r) User ID: 79009989 United States01/09/2023 04:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Why are so many aeronautical calculations based on a flat, non-rotating plane rather than a linear traveling, rotating sphere? Quoting: Dimzin You really think it would make an appreciable difference? Like adjusting the speed of your automobile to compensate for rotation and celestial movements for what.....safety? |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 80916233 United States01/09/2023 04:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | NASA Ref Pub 1207 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80440232 1988 Derivation and Definition of Linear Aircraft Model Introduction - Go to Second Paragraph, it says "This report detail the development of linear model of a rigid aircraft of constant mass, flying over a flat, non-rotating earth. www.nasa.g_o_v/centers/dryden/pdf/88104main_H-1391.pdf There are countless other documents but you globetards cant read, for some reason. By CIA, NASA, Flight Manuals so on..... You can read, but can you comprehend what you read? It doesn't look like it, because that doesn't read what you're interpreting it to. Some scientific experimentation or hypotheses supposes an ideal but unrealistic condition to gauge results in that environment. That's what that out of context passage refers to, not a flat earth. I spent a decade sailing the open oceans. I've also worked on satellite tech. There are no walls, no keep out signs, no corners, and no navigational charts with the phrase "here there be dragons". The sun is round, the moon is round, Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune and even Pluto are round and all their respective moons are round. Why would the earth NOT be round? When I am baffled by how people in 2023 can think the earth is flat, I realize that 99% of them probably have never left the 200 radius of their houses, and that they are also probably covid vaxxed. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 80916233 United States01/09/2023 04:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Why are so many aeronautical calculations based on a flat, non-rotating plane rather than a linear traveling, rotating sphere? Quoting: Dimzin Which ones? Do tell. I want to see if you actually know. And is it just possible that those calculations depend on your present location, altitude, air speed, ect? |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 47667357 United States01/09/2023 04:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | NASA Ref Pub 1207 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80440232 1988 Derivation and Definition of Linear Aircraft Model Introduction - Go to Second Paragraph, it says "This report detail the development of linear model of a rigid aircraft of constant mass, flying over a flat, non-rotating earth. www.nasa.g_o_v/centers/dryden/pdf/88104main_H-1391.pdf There are countless other documents but you globetards cant read, for some reason. By CIA, NASA, Flight Manuals so on..... You can read, but can you comprehend what you read? It doesn't look like it, because that doesn't read what you're interpreting it to. Some scientific experimentation or hypotheses supposes an ideal but unrealistic condition to gauge results in that environment. That's what that out of context passage refers to, not a flat earth. I spent a decade sailing the open oceans. I've also worked on satellite tech. There are no walls, no keep out signs, no corners, and no navigational charts with the phrase "here there be dragons". The sun is round, the moon is round, Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune and even Pluto are round and all their respective moons are round. Why would the earth NOT be round? When I am baffled by how people in 2023 can think the earth is flat, I realize that 99% of them probably have never left the 200 radius of their houses, and that they are also probably covid vaxxed. See the video posted earlier in this thread for how it’s not too wild to think and know that the Earth is flat. The key is that the sun and moon are round, like a dinner plate, but flat like a dinner plate. So is the Earth. |
| R(r) User ID: 79009989 United States01/09/2023 04:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Why are so many aeronautical calculations based on a flat, non-rotating plane rather than a linear traveling, rotating sphere? Quoting: Dimzin You really think it would make an appreciable difference? Like adjusting the speed of your automobile to compensate for rotation and celestial movements for what.....safety? Or adjusting your mileage stats to compensate for wind and hills. Moot. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 80916233 United States01/09/2023 04:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | NASA Ref Pub 1207 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80440232 1988 Derivation and Definition of Linear Aircraft Model Introduction - Go to Second Paragraph, it says "This report detail the development of linear model of a rigid aircraft of constant mass, flying over a flat, non-rotating earth. www.nasa.g_o_v/centers/dryden/pdf/88104main_H-1391.pdf There are countless other documents but you globetards cant read, for some reason. By CIA, NASA, Flight Manuals so on..... You can read, but can you comprehend what you read? It doesn't look like it, because that doesn't read what you're interpreting it to. Some scientific experimentation or hypotheses supposes an ideal but unrealistic condition to gauge results in that environment. That's what that out of context passage refers to, not a flat earth. I spent a decade sailing the open oceans. I've also worked on satellite tech. There are no walls, no keep out signs, no corners, and no navigational charts with the phrase "here there be dragons". The sun is round, the moon is round, Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune and even Pluto are round and all their respective moons are round. Why would the earth NOT be round? When I am baffled by how people in 2023 can think the earth is flat, I realize that 99% of them probably have never left the 200 radius of their houses, and that they are also probably covid vaxxed. See the video posted earlier in this thread for how it’s not too wild to think and know that the Earth is flat. The key is that the sun and moon are round, like a dinner plate, but flat like a dinner plate. So is the Earth. No, it is not round like a dinner plate. I have circumnavigated the earth. It is a globe. I don't need a video some rando posted on the internet to prove or disprove something I've experienced myself. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 48831848 United States01/09/2023 04:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | NASA Ref Pub 1207 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80440232 1988 Derivation and Definition of Linear Aircraft Model Introduction - Go to Second Paragraph, it says "This report detail the development of linear model of a rigid aircraft of constant mass, flying over a flat, non-rotating earth. www.nasa.g_o_v/centers/dryden/pdf/88104main_H-1391.pdf There are countless other documents but you globetards cant read, for some reason. By CIA, NASA, Flight Manuals so on..... You can read, but can you comprehend what you read? It doesn't look like it, because that doesn't read what you're interpreting it to. Some scientific experimentation or hypotheses supposes an ideal but unrealistic condition to gauge results in that environment. That's what that out of context passage refers to, not a flat earth. I spent a decade sailing the open oceans. I've also worked on satellite tech. There are no walls, no keep out signs, no corners, and no navigational charts with the phrase "here there be dragons". The sun is round, the moon is round, Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune and even Pluto are round and all their respective moons are round. Why would the earth NOT be round? When I am baffled by how people in 2023 can think the earth is flat, I realize that 99% of them probably have never left the 200 radius of their houses, and that they are also probably covid vaxxed. See the video posted earlier in this thread for how it’s not too wild to think and know that the Earth is flat. The key is that the sun and moon are round, like a dinner plate, but flat like a dinner plate. So is the Earth. No, it is not round like a dinner plate. I have circumnavigated the earth. It is a globe. I don't need a video some rando posted on the internet to prove or disprove something I've experienced myself. Lol, what does your circumnavigation have to do with anything? You can circumnavigate a flat, round object too. You’re not getting anywhere with your purported proof. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 85072699  Germany01/09/2023 04:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This thread is a perfect example of someone “seeing” something as “proof” of something he believes, even though the evidence he presents proves absolutely nothing whatsoever. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 45686535 . Proof of what Can't read your posts OP, the earth spin so fast today I feel dizzy. Hahahaha, calls flat earther tards but think we live on a figet ball. Moraaaaaaan. |
| R(r) User ID: 79009989 United States01/09/2023 04:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80916233 You can read, but can you comprehend what you read? It doesn't look like it, because that doesn't read what you're interpreting it to. Some scientific experimentation or hypotheses supposes an ideal but unrealistic condition to gauge results in that environment. That's what that out of context passage refers to, not a flat earth. I spent a decade sailing the open oceans. I've also worked on satellite tech. There are no walls, no keep out signs, no corners, and no navigational charts with the phrase "here there be dragons". The sun is round, the moon is round, Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune and even Pluto are round and all their respective moons are round. Why would the earth NOT be round? When I am baffled by how people in 2023 can think the earth is flat, I realize that 99% of them probably have never left the 200 radius of their houses, and that they are also probably covid vaxxed. See the video posted earlier in this thread for how it’s not too wild to think and know that the Earth is flat. The key is that the sun and moon are round, like a dinner plate, but flat like a dinner plate. So is the Earth. No, it is not round like a dinner plate. I have circumnavigated the earth. It is a globe. I don't need a video some rando posted on the internet to prove or disprove something I've experienced myself. Lol, what does your circumnavigation have to do with anything? You can circumnavigate a flat, round object too. You’re not getting anywhere with your purported proof. Sounds like you may have confused circumnavigation with navigating a perimeter. That's actually called circling. If the Earth was flat, one could simply fly past the ice wall at any point, and gain evidence of undiscovered lands or an edge. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 85072699 Germany01/09/2023 05:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 47667357 See the video posted earlier in this thread for how it’s not too wild to think and know that the Earth is flat. The key is that the sun and moon are round, like a dinner plate, but flat like a dinner plate. So is the Earth. No, it is not round like a dinner plate. I have circumnavigated the earth. It is a globe. I don't need a video some rando posted on the internet to prove or disprove something I've experienced myself. Lol, what does your circumnavigation have to do with anything? You can circumnavigate a flat, round object too. You’re not getting anywhere with your purported proof. Sounds like you may have confused circumnavigation with navigating a perimeter. That's actually called circling. If the Earth was flat, one could simply fly past the ice wall at any point, and gain evidence of undiscovered lands or an edge. The ice wall is highly protected moran. I tried to do an expedition in this area without any providers, guess who awaited me with guns? Soldiers! |
| R(r) User ID: 79009989 United States01/09/2023 05:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80916233 No, it is not round like a dinner plate. I have circumnavigated the earth. It is a globe. I don't need a video some rando posted on the internet to prove or disprove something I've experienced myself. Lol, what does your circumnavigation have to do with anything? You can circumnavigate a flat, round object too. You’re not getting anywhere with your purported proof. Sounds like you may have confused circumnavigation with navigating a perimeter. That's actually called circling. If the Earth was flat, one could simply fly past the ice wall at any point, and gain evidence of undiscovered lands or an edge. The ice wall is highly protected moran. I tried to do an expedition in this area without any providers, guess who awaited me with guns? Soldiers! Cool post some pics sounds fun. I know about Antarctica, hell look on the globe. Queen Maude land. Germany. Remember them? They moved. Military does not prove flat. Very illogical. Are you weird? |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 85072699 Germany01/09/2023 05:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 48831848 Lol, what does your circumnavigation have to do with anything? You can circumnavigate a flat, round object too. You’re not getting anywhere with your purported proof. Sounds like you may have confused circumnavigation with navigating a perimeter. That's actually called circling. If the Earth was flat, one could simply fly past the ice wall at any point, and gain evidence of undiscovered lands or an edge. The ice wall is highly protected moran. I tried to do an expedition in this area without any providers, guess who awaited me with guns? Soldiers! Cool post some pics sounds fun. I know about Antarctica, hell look on the globe. Queen Maude land. Germany. Remember them? They moved. Military does not prove flat. Very illogical. Are you weird? I'm not familiar with your gibberish. If you would know about antarctica, like you claim you would know that there is no way to make any expeditions on the ice wall for yourself and indepentend by any providers which offer tours. |
| R(r) User ID: 79009989 United States01/09/2023 05:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: R(r) 79009989 Sounds like you may have confused circumnavigation with navigating a perimeter. That's actually called circling. If the Earth was flat, one could simply fly past the ice wall at any point, and gain evidence of undiscovered lands or an edge. The ice wall is highly protected moran. I tried to do an expedition in this area without any providers, guess who awaited me with guns? Soldiers! Cool post some pics sounds fun. I know about Antarctica, hell look on the globe. Queen Maude land. Germany. Remember them? They moved. Military does not prove flat. Very illogical. Are you weird? I'm not familiar with your gibberish. If you would know about antarctica, like you claim you would know that there is no way to make any expeditions on the ice wall for yourself and indepentend by any providers which offer tours. All 26 thousand miles of it?  |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 85072699 Germany01/09/2023 05:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 48831848 Lol, what does your circumnavigation have to do with anything? You can circumnavigate a flat, round object too. You’re not getting anywhere with your purported proof. Sounds like you may have confused circumnavigation with navigating a perimeter. That's actually called circling. If the Earth was flat, one could simply fly past the ice wall at any point, and gain evidence of undiscovered lands or an edge. The ice wall is highly protected moran. I tried to do an expedition in this area without any providers, guess who awaited me with guns? Soldiers! Cool post some pics sounds fun. I know about Antarctica, hell look on the globe. Queen Maude land. Germany. Remember them? They moved. Military does not prove flat. Very illogical. Are you weird? But go for it and try it for yourself. My incident happened 83, would like to know if the military there still wears green camouflage, I tought later that white would make much more sense. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 77423859  Netherlands01/09/2023 05:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| New Atlantis
User ID: 84864168 United States01/10/2023 11:05 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Flat earth has nothing to do with when the rise the “Sun Simulator.” If you personally research, you will find a dozen plus issues & inconsistencies that should not be. Chart the sunrise & sunsets... Where the sun is located, the times, the additional planetary like objects (Nibiru / Planet X). Buy a professional camera with a 200mm lens. The camera catches images not seen by the human eye. That sun simulator is extremely bright white & not the warm yellow soft sun of the past. Per the Holy Spirit: “You are surrounded by lies & liars... Nothing is as it seems.” Globe worshippers often bring up extraneous things like this as "proof" the Earth is not flat, probably as misdirection. Long distance proofs are all you really need. INFINITE examples of missing curvature because -- well, there is no curve. https://imgur.com/a/Ea7OqU9"What you think, you become." - Buddha |
| 11Pythagoras11
User ID: 83625568 United States01/10/2023 12:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 73953700 United States01/10/2023 12:05 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Flat earth has nothing to do with when the rise the “Sun Simulator.” If you personally research, you will find a dozen plus issues & inconsistencies that should not be. Chart the sunrise & sunsets... Where the sun is located, the times, the additional planetary like objects (Nibiru / Planet X). Buy a professional camera with a 200mm lens. The camera catches images not seen by the human eye. That sun simulator is extremely bright white & not the warm yellow soft sun of the past. Per the Holy Spirit: “You are surrounded by lies & liars... Nothing is as it seems.” . INFINITE examples of missing curvature because -- well, there is no curve. light bends.... it is a lensing affect Flat earthers piss me off so bad...Find boats that look like they are not touching the water......... Same thing.... Assholes |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 80373605  Finland01/10/2023 12:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 85070130  United Kingdom01/10/2023 12:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
