This is how 911 might've been visually manipulated in realtime. Scientific... You decide. VERY long read but synopsis in OP bullet points

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
JIDF UNIT MUDDIES WATER

I have a floppy disk that explains it all better but I would have to kill you first.

Only idiots are still in denial about what went down at 911

Dude. They don't care. They don't even care that you wrote that.

mossad.

This. They might care about. They're thinking about drafting all Seniors and Useless Eaters, and sending them to the Ukraine Meat Grinder. If you don't go, you're a draft dodger.

Putos.

I was there and there were no planes.

Entirely too much for a Friday night during doom days (yes, I'm having a bit of scotch), but given the fact that you have a long history of touching good souls here I'm gonna save this read for Sunday morning over easy with my coffee, and biscuits-n-gravy.

I have no doubt there's some interesting tidbits that'll replace the sausage I couldn't afford to go with the breakfast.

Last Edited by Devoid Altar on 02/24/2023 11:10 PM

People who still have the ability to read really should read this. Even if you don't agree with o.p.'s conclusions about the event, etc. There is good information there especially in the quoted post.

read it all. extremely well done. i do believe dark forces did the attack on america. and it was NOT bin laden . he was the scape goat

Y'all know millions of people were in NYC on a Tuesday morning at rush hour, right?

You water down the true lying fuckery (Pentagon & PA) with this horseshit. If you want to focus on NYC, by all means, there's 10x more fuckery there that's real, but this resurgence of no-planes stuff...get the fuck out.

The OP was a good read, but slightly a revisionist take on an era in which the author clearly wasn't an adult yet, or even around at all. It's like a 30 year old telling you what the 80s was like.

Thanks OP!!!!
I'm all outta stars, so here are five bumps.
I plan to read in the morning.

The millions of people are why i don't believe in "no planes". I think there had to be some physical objects that people saw and they looked like planes.

I remember a woman in NYC, as it happened, (she was on the street, and saw what collided into the twin tower(s)) exclaiming something like "That is not a United Airlines plane!" (in other words, she said, paraphrasing "That is not a commercial jet plane!").

So, I believe SOMETHING PHYSICAL flew into the twin towers, and it might have been a drone or some kind of missle that was painted to look similar to commercial aircraft.

And I believe this story Building 7 well that is another story altogether

Interesting...

So many experts from different fields have examined 9-11 with their particular skillset and concluded it was a government operation, myself included.

We have Professor Niels Harrit who had deep technical knowledge of particulate chemistry, who analyzed the WTC dust and gave us his proof that there was this new military tech nanothermite throughout the dust. (The proof being the magnified images of the sol gel produced reactants, the in lab witnessed exothermic reaction of some unreacted chips,
and the photographic evidence of the iron microspheres, which the thermite reaction produces. The reaction makes molten iron as a product. Issuing forth from microscopic scale reactants, it is spit through the air, achieving a near weightless trajectory for the moment needed for the iron to solidify into microspheres. A truly beautiful proof.
Not theory. Proof. Unfortunately most Americans lack the background to understand the proof, or there would be no more debate).


[link to podcasts.apple.com (secure)]

We have myself, with deep chemical engineering knowledge that further proved a thermitic material was used to bring down the towers. (The persistence of the molten temperatures in the rubble pile for 30+ days can only be explained by a highly exothermic thermitic reaction. The rubble pile becomes it's own bounded environment which increased in temperature from the forward progress of the thermite reaction, until a certain critical temperature was reached, at which point Le Chatelier's principle stabilized the reaction (dynamic reaction equilibrium). This dynamic equilibrium temperature is near the melting point of iron obviously. The principle states that increases in reaction products will slow the reaction. Since heat is a reaction product, increased temperatures slow the forward reaction progress until it stabilizes at a certain temperature. Like a great chemical thermostat! Until the excess thermite reactants are consumed it will continue to hold that temperature.
Again, this is Proof. Unfortunately most Americans lack the background to understand the proof, or there would be no more debate).

Then we have a gentleman from Holland (Danny Jowenko) who was a world class expert in building demolition. He viewed the 9-11 footage and said that this was controlled demolition. Absolutely. He gave his proofs which again were over the heads of 99.9% of humanity. But with his particular skill set, he proved the 3 buildings were dropped by controlled demolition. They at first falsified news that he recanted his on video comments that it was a controlled demolition. A few years went by and a random guy called him on a youtube video and he reiterated that it was definitely a controlled demolition. Poor Danny died in an auto accident right after that. Obviously murdered to shut him up.

Then we have the Wil-E Coyote experimental engineer (David Chandler) who actually made the simple version of a steel cutting thermite, invented and tests methods that small amounts of it could be used to cut through the WTC beams. Brilliant demonstration in a video only a few minutes long.
And it makes explosive puff blasts while it reacts, the same as was seen at the WTC. and it also shows the molten iron being produced from the reaction.




Then we have all the fire fighters who
may not be chemical geniuses, but they certainly knew that they had been blown up by a bomb in the lobby before the collapse. ANd others that saw the rivers of molten iron issuing forth from the reactions, running along the channel rails of the building, and making the beautiful molten iron "waterfalls" we all saw pouring out of the buildings.

And we have testimonies that 3 windowless vans visited the WTC nightly around 3 am for at least 30 days before 9-11, no doubt bringing in the nanothermite. Probably between 100 and 200 tons of it in total, to be planted in the locations needed to cut the massive steel supports to accomplish step 1 of the professional demolition process, and then step 2, the sequential times blasts that progress from the upper parts to the lower parts of the towers.

And we have the pilots and other aviation experts who viewed the problem with their skill sets. And their revelations that the speeds clocked on the local radar towers showed flight speeds that were simply impossible for the 767/757 class of Boeing airliners to achieve in the dense air of near ground level flight. (The planes did not have nearly the power required to push those craft at those speeds through the dense air near sea level. And even if they did, the plane could not survive or be navigated at those speeds.
Panels would rip off the planes, control surfaces would flutter and become useless. Control surfaces may also be enveloped by the air zone of convergence which develops in high flow regimes. if this zone of convergence occurs at a control surface, you have NO CONTROL. The US learned this lesson the hard way during the development of the P-38 in WWII. They had to install "dive brakes" to slow the plane in a dive, or it would lose control and crash. Later they extended the twin booms to put the tail of the planes further aft, outside of the zone of convergence.

The pilots of these airliners also point out that flying one of these jets has a very different "glass HMI cockpit" that someone with brief training in a Cessna would be unable to operate. "this ain't like dusting crops kid", comes to mind.

I am probably missing a few of the proofs.

Last Edited by JustmeTX on 02/25/2023 02:02 AM

That's definitely a possibility i have considered.

For one thing, missiles would for sure hit the towers. Planes... Maybe not. Maybe they just randomly crash in Manhattan.

Good point OP - Nice write-up btw, thanks

when you realize the footage you are seeing had to be RECORDED from it's original format and device to one that can be shared with others

Remember the pools of hot molten material, that was still piping red hot, weeks after 9-11....as they cleared the rubbish?

This is about the Pentagon, but a group of experienced airline pilots in Europe all said if they wanted to crash into the Pentagon they would crash into the middle. Easiest way, does the most damage.

But somehow, the hardest way that does the least damage happened. Really same with NYC...

If you're jihadist, maybe you want to crash into the towers, but the middle of Manhattan would be okay (to a jihadist).

I guess the whatever it was in Pennsylvania was supposed to hit building 7 which why it had to go.

Hit them right in the budget office where they lost 2+ trillion dollars! What tragic luck! :)

Last Edited by JustmeTX on 02/25/2023 01:48 AM

Eyewitness is what I am. Jet fuel and screaming jetliners is what I saw and smelled, and you will never ever get any where with this fucking psyop. Now shove off back to hell whence you came. Jets were used and you OP are trying to impress with a psyop that is so insulting to all of us that were there and saw it and heard it and smelled it. Just stop it now. You are demeaning the over 3000 dead and some of them will come to haunt you mark my words, Chumley.

People can die is psyops. Yes, even thousands of people can die.

Psychological operations can be fake or REAL. But, lies will be told about the event in order to manipulate people.

We invaded Iraq over 9/11. We forgot about all the missing money. Etcetera.

I remember 9/11. It was awful, awful. But, i do not believe i have been told the truth about it.

If jets were used, I can tell you that they were not commercial 767/757 jets, and they were not flown by amateur terror-aviators.

A military grade plane perhaps, or a cruise missile might have been used, at least they are not physical impossibilities, but a commercial 767/757? Impossible.
Impossible means it didn't happen no matter how much you scrunch up your feelings and shout.

And don't even bring up the Pentagon. All the video recording devices that could have captured the mythical plane that hit the Pentagon were immediately seized by the government. Where are the hundreds of video camera clips showing the plane impacting the Pentagon? Ah yes, national security secret! Fuck off.

Last Edited by JustmeTX on 02/25/2023 02:13 AM

I have a car that might become a Porsche.