A Sure Sign of Weak and Yapping Christians, They Like "apostle" Paul.

Jesus never spoke the word "Grace," but Paul claimed it was core to The Gospel. Paul mixed his personal ideas into the Bible, proven by the example of him saying in 1 Cor. 7:12, "Speak I, not the Lord." Paul never personally met Jesus or learned from Him, and only claimed to have heard His Voice when Paul had a fainting spell while traveling in the heat. His companions did not hear any voice from Heaven.

Paul wrote the words "I/Me/My" far more often than "God/Jesus/Holy Spirit/Lord." In 1 Cor. 4 he speaks of himself literally three times more than The Divivity.

Paul was not an Apostle because he is not one of the Twelve Apostles spoken of in The Book of Revelation. Nobody called Paul an apostle except for himself and Luke, who was himself not qualified to identify Apostles.

Paul died by himself, stating "All have left me," and his burial site is unknown.

Paul's Theology is convoluted, not easily explained, far different than that of Jesus, and enables endless dissention among denominations. Jesus' Gospel is concise.

Paul violated Proverbs 10:19 by speaking multitudes of words, so much do that in Acts he caused a man to fall asleep and die by falling out of a window.

Paul had to send many corrective letters to his churches, while the True Apostles did not.

There is much more about Paul which church types have not the guts to admit. Lol.

it's not a perfect system, he was an important but flawed convert who introduced misogyny Christ never expressed, nor supported. Jesus said the corruption had started even when he was alive. Homos are big on hating on Paul becuase of Romans.

You can say what you want but the fact is that Jesus Christ, who knows all things choise Paul. So who are we to say different.

Peter (a direct disciple of Christ) was REBUKED by Paul, and Peter ACCEPTED that rebuke, and Paul's authority.

Or so Paul says. His words are contradictory of those of Yehoshua.

Paul was a pagan priest of mithras, why do you think all these illuminati shill radio stations and tv programs spend the majority of the time quoting Paul, revelations speaks of the false apostles, don't be fooled by these shills on glp telling Paul was not a fraud, him being a fraud is even hinted at by satanic shill authors, like in Isis unveiled by that moron hp Blavatsky.

Paul was a pagan priest of mithras, why do you think all these illuminati shill radio stations and tv programs spend the majority of the time quoting Paul, revelations speaks of the false apostles, don't be fooled by these shills on glp telling Paul was not a fraud, him being a fraud is even hinted at by satanic shill authors, like in Isis unveiled by that moron hp Blavatsky.

Paul alone claimed this, no doubt to try to make himself seem authoritative.
]

Or so Paul says. His words are contradictory of those of Yehoshua.

As he journeyed he came near Damascus, and suddenly a light shone around him from heaven.

Then he fell to the ground, and heard a voice saying to him, "Saul, Saul, why are you persecuting Me?"

And he said, "Who are You, Lord?" Then the Lord said, "I am Jesus, whom you are persecuting. It is hard for you to kick against the goads."

So he,

trembling and astonished,

said,

"Lord, what do You want me to do?"

Then the Lord said to him, "Arise and go into the city, and you will be told what you must do."

And the men who journeyed with him stood speechless, hearing a voice but seeing no one.

Then Saul arose from the ground, and when his eyes were opened he saw no one. But they led him by the hand and brought him into Damascus.

And he was three days without sight, and neither ate nor drank.


Acts 9:3-9

It seems your Biblical knowledge is lacking- Apostle means official message or messenger, nothing else.
Even of the 12 apostles, one was a replacement, put there by men.
The same men who judged Paul and believed him to be an Apostle.to the Gentiles. So you must only believe there are 11 Apostles also?
Because if they were wrong about Paul, they must have been wrong about making Matthias and apostle and who knows what else.

Without Paul, no Gentiles would have received the Gospel.
So there would be no Christian church, just Messianic Jewish ones.

My answer to that question has nothing to do with Paul.

Do you think you are a wise, Spirit Filled, church involved follower of Jesus? If you are, you would have the correct and verifiable view of Paul.

If I bear witness of myself, my witness is not true. John 5:31

Christs own words rebuking the false witness/testimony of Saul.

The 12 chosen Apostles of Christ were special messengers whom Christ gave Authority to.

Verily I say unto you, Whatsoever ye shall bind on earth shall be bound in heaven: and whatsoever ye shall loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven. Matthew 18:18

Whatever they decided on Earth would also be in heaven. So for you to compare them to disciples of Christ is ignorant and wrong. Saul of Tarsus was NOT part of this special group. He was at best a disciple of Christ and certainly had zero Authority to dictate anything. His words and writings are merely his own uninspired opinion.

Was Jesus of Nazareth the prophesied Messiah of the Tanakh 70990067 ?

It seems truly incongruous to me that you think you are a spiritual person. I have not used any ad hominem (i.e. -name calling) attacks against you. You call people idiots, and also imply that they are, even when you're not explicit about it. You flatter yourself as having a "clear mind", yet your thinking relative to others seems to be muddled. You're also obviously no scholar, or you wouldn't be capitalizing things like "Sure Sign" or "Apostles". You also misspelled "relevant", and had a typo in misspelling "special". You're certainly no genius, and you don't even bother to proofread. What, exactly, makes you think you're so smart or special? Yehoshua cautioned about mockeries such as saying "Raca" or "fool". Are you called and authorized by God to be contemptuous and snarky? But of course, because you're right and so smart, and everyone else is stupid. And, by the way, while we're being scholarly, when Yehoshua walked the earth, no one ever once called Him "Jesus". There wasn't even a "J" sound until about the sixteenth century.

Not even a nice try, Satan.

No sale.

Do you not know? Lol.

What of John?

For the law was given by Moses, but grace and truth came by Jesus Christ.
John 1:17


Or are you just anti-Paul and uneducated as to the whole of scripture?

What say you?

You are the one seeking an answer, not I. Step up like a Real Man of God with Wisdom, and correctly represent The Gospel. Flee from your favored Little Chit Chat Semantics.

Lol.

You just lied. None of The Twelve Apostles ever identified Saul as an Apostle. Are you strong enough to receve correction with the facts from Scripture?

I notice you cannot refute one point of my original post. Lol. More fun.