Trump was demanding justice for the Jeffrey Epstein victims in 2012 | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76448548 United States 07/08/2019 10:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77798856 United States 07/08/2019 10:05 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Those trying to protect the bigger fish - the real nasty child rapists, murderers, and 'leaders of men' have a vested interest in seeing only the likes of Epstein taken down and write the laws and pass the verdicts that do this. Those who think Trump isn't in on it - playing the 'left/right' game of charades - are either naïve, or are trying to protect their own favorite rapist. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77797522 Canada 07/08/2019 10:05 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Trump was given immunity as a potential co-conspirator and associate of Epstein as part of the original plea deal - which Trump's DOJ fought to keep. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77798856 Your a fucking lier and you better put up a link to support the trash spwewing from your mouth..... Trump wasn't given anything as he didn't need a fucking thing or protection because nothing he did would land him in trouble.... Trumps a lot of things but a pedo...never..... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76871995 United States 07/08/2019 10:05 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Yeah you fuckers on the left are guilty as fuck and you know it. And Trump did give evidence against epstein and did kick his ass off his property Now, now play fair. I'm not guilty of any legal or political malfeasance. If you are covering up for Pedophiles under God's law you are bearing false witness and are as guilty as the predator. If I am? are you accusing me of that ?? Or did you mean to say if anyone. I hope that's what you meant bc I'm growing tired of seeing fact finding exchanges turn into fingers being pointed which is absurd on the internet. . . |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76617833 United States 07/08/2019 10:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Expecting the troll/shill 1-stars and any who do not want the truth out there. Bracing for red (hate) karma but this issue too important to so many. Quoting: IJumpInIt [link to twitter.com (secure)] [link to dcwhispers.com] Less than 10% of article: ....It should be noted that Epstein’s controversial deal with the DOJ was initiated by the former Bush-era DOJ and then later upheld by the then-Obama administration. And you want to know who the FBI Director was at the time who participated in that Epstein-friendly agreement? None other than Robert Mueller. (Again, the far-left media has said NOTHING about this.) Epstein’s many political ties, though largely Democrat Party-friendly, are politically interconnected and international in nature and many now feel he was the recipient of some very powerful Deep-State protection—the very same Deep State that has been working so hard to try and destroy President Trump. BULLLLLSHIT The apologia is getting sickening, Trump has had connections to sleezy sexual predators and so many accusers at this point it’s not a partisan thing, he’s fucking the republican bill clinton and you cunts are looking like fools defending him , and his involvement... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77797522 Canada 07/08/2019 10:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Those trying to protect the bigger fish - the real nasty child rapists, murderers, and 'leaders of men' have a vested interest in seeing only the likes of Epstein taken down and write the laws and pass the verdicts that do this. Those who think Trump isn't in on it - playing the 'left/right' game of charades - are either naïve, or are trying to protect their own favorite rapist. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77798856 Idiot...Epstein is the big fish and he has the goods on everybody.... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77798856 United States 07/08/2019 10:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Trump was given immunity as a potential co-conspirator and associate of Epstein as part of the original plea deal - which Trump's DOJ fought to keep. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77798856 NO! Stupid fuck! DOJ argued for it and got it. The original deal stands and these new charges CANNOT be used to go after potential co-conspirators unless Epstein somehow provides substantial documented evidence and the government accepts it and goes after them. He won't do that. Since the new charges only apply to Epstein, it's clear that the fed government is simply trying to protect bigger fish than Epstein who, rightfully, is being taken down. Trump Admin isn't 'taking down the network' - his Admin is protecting it by sacrificing Epstein and others to protect themselves. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77798856 United States 07/08/2019 10:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Those trying to protect the bigger fish - the real nasty child rapists, murderers, and 'leaders of men' have a vested interest in seeing only the likes of Epstein taken down and write the laws and pass the verdicts that do this. Those who think Trump isn't in on it - playing the 'left/right' game of charades - are either naïve, or are trying to protect their own favorite rapist. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77798856 Idiot...Epstein is the big fish and he has the goods on everybody.... Epstein is part of the network but is in no way bigger than the British Royals, for example - or others that he may have the goods on but they're taking him out instead of them going down. That's how this works... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76871995 United States 07/08/2019 10:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Trump was given immunity as a potential co-conspirator and associate of Epstein as part of the original plea deal - which Trump's DOJ fought to keep. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77798856 NO! Stupid fuck! DOJ argued for it and got it. The original deal stands and these new charges CANNOT be used to go after potential co-conspirators unless Epstein somehow provides substantial documented evidence and the government accepts it and goes after them. He won't do that. Since the new charges only apply to Epstein, it's clear that the fed government is simply trying to protect bigger fish than Epstein who, rightfully, is being taken down. Trump Admin isn't 'taking down the network' - his Admin is protecting it by sacrificing Epstein and others to protect themselves. U.S. Labor Secretary Alexander Acosta, the U.S. attorney in Miami at the time, defended his handling of the case. Berman said federal prosecutors in New York did not sign that agreement and are not bound by it. [link to www.usatoday.com (secure)] . |
Jake
User ID: 76890717 United States 07/08/2019 10:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Trump was given immunity as a potential co-conspirator and associate of Epstein as part of the original plea deal - which Trump's DOJ fought to keep. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77798856 NO! Stupid fuck! DOJ argued for it and got it. The original deal stands and these new charges CANNOT be used to go after potential co-conspirators unless Epstein somehow provides substantial documented evidence and the government accepts it and goes after them. He won't do that. Since the new charges only apply to Epstein, it's clear that the fed government is simply trying to protect bigger fish than Epstein who, rightfully, is being taken down. Trump Admin isn't 'taking down the network' - his Admin is protecting it by sacrificing Epstein and others to protect themselves. So you are saying that Trump made sure that Comey's daughter the man he whom he fired. was put in charge of the Investigation?? Evil controls the ignorant... Climate change is a hoax so is the vax you have been fear-porned into compliance! Definition Satan from the bible: Satan (Rev 12:7) exercising his subtle (indirect) impact on heathen governments (powers) – i.e. accomplishing his hellish agenda from "behind the scenes." |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77620905 United States 07/08/2019 10:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Expecting the troll/shill 1-stars and any who do not want the truth out there. Bracing for red (hate) karma but this issue too important to so many. Quoting: IJumpInIt [link to twitter.com (secure)] [link to dcwhispers.com] Less than 10% of article: ....It should be noted that Epstein’s controversial deal with the DOJ was initiated by the former Bush-era DOJ and then later upheld by the then-Obama administration. And you want to know who the FBI Director was at the time who participated in that Epstein-friendly agreement? DAMN, you're fuckingly STUPID. The FBI has NOTHING to do with the disposition of a case after it has gone to trial, other than appearing as witnesses. And this case was WELL before Mueller was head of the FBI. . Yes it does? And no it wasn’t? Did you not read the article lol? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77022514 United States 07/08/2019 10:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Expecting the troll/shill 1-stars and any who do not want the truth out there. Bracing for red (hate) karma but this issue too important to so many. Quoting: IJumpInIt [link to twitter.com (secure)] [link to dcwhispers.com] Less than 10% of article: ....It should be noted that Epstein’s controversial deal with the DOJ was initiated by the former Bush-era DOJ and then later upheld by the then-Obama administration. And you want to know who the FBI Director was at the time who participated in that Epstein-friendly agreement? None other than Robert Mueller. (Again, the far-left media has said NOTHING about this.) Epstein’s many political ties, though largely Democrat Party-friendly, are politically interconnected and international in nature and many now feel he was the recipient of some very powerful Deep-State protection—the very same Deep State that has been working so hard to try and destroy President Trump. BULLLLLSHIT The apologia is getting sickening, Trump has had connections to sleezy sexual predators and so many accusers at this point it’s not a partisan thing, he’s fucking the republican bill clinton and you cunts are looking like fools defending him , and his involvement... :rere23: |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76448548 United States 07/08/2019 10:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Expecting the troll/shill 1-stars and any who do not want the truth out there. Bracing for red (hate) karma but this issue too important to so many. Quoting: IJumpInIt [link to twitter.com (secure)] [link to dcwhispers.com] Less than 10% of article: ....It should be noted that Epstein’s controversial deal with the DOJ was initiated by the former Bush-era DOJ and then later upheld by the then-Obama administration. And you want to know who the FBI Director was at the time who participated in that Epstein-friendly agreement? None other than Robert Mueller. (Again, the far-left media has said NOTHING about this.) Epstein’s many political ties, though largely Democrat Party-friendly, are politically interconnected and international in nature and many now feel he was the recipient of some very powerful Deep-State protection—the very same Deep State that has been working so hard to try and destroy President Trump. BULLLLLSHIT The apologia is getting sickening, Trump has had connections to sleezy sexual predators and so many accusers at this point it’s not a partisan thing, he’s fucking the republican bill clinton and you cunts are looking like fools defending him , and his involvement... Calm down! Your TDS is going to stroke you out. Tool. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76448548 United States 07/08/2019 10:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Trump was given immunity as a potential co-conspirator and associate of Epstein as part of the original plea deal - which Trump's DOJ fought to keep. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77798856 NO! Stupid fuck! DOJ argued for it and got it. The original deal stands and these new charges CANNOT be used to go after potential co-conspirators unless Epstein somehow provides substantial documented evidence and the government accepts it and goes after them. He won't do that. Since the new charges only apply to Epstein, it's clear that the fed government is simply trying to protect bigger fish than Epstein who, rightfully, is being taken down. Trump Admin isn't 'taking down the network' - his Admin is protecting it by sacrificing Epstein and others to protect themselves. NO! Stupid fuck! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77407419 United States 07/08/2019 10:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL! This is a joke!! READ THIS DOCKET: KATIE JOHNSON V. DONALD J, TRUMP, DEFENDANT AND JEFFEREY E. EPSTEIN DEFENDANT [link to www.courtlistener.com (secure)] |
IJumpInIt
(OP) User ID: 77587958 United States 07/08/2019 10:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Expecting the troll/shill 1-stars and any who do not want the truth out there. Bracing for red (hate) karma but this issue too important to so many. Quoting: IJumpInIt [link to twitter.com (secure)] [link to dcwhispers.com] Less than 10% of article: ....It should be noted that Epstein’s controversial deal with the DOJ was initiated by the former Bush-era DOJ and then later upheld by the then-Obama administration. And you want to know who the FBI Director was at the time who participated in that Epstein-friendly agreement? DAMN, you're fuckingly STUPID. The FBI has NOTHING to do with the disposition of a case after it has gone to trial, other than appearing as witnesses. And this case was WELL before Mueller was head of the FBI. . Clearly you do no accept the facts that show you are wrong. |
IJumpInIt
(OP) User ID: 77587958 United States 07/08/2019 10:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL! Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77407419 This is a joke!! READ THIS DOCKET: KATIE JOHNSON V. DONALD J, TRUMP, DEFENDANT AND JEFFEREY E. EPSTEIN DEFENDANT [link to www.courtlistener.com (secure)] One lib associate of mine showed me how Trump has his name in 3,500 or so court cases for all sorts of various reasons. The one you link was clearly from after Trump was a candidate and is an excellent example of the failed Brett Kavanaugh approach to derail his campaign. |
LOLITA User ID: 77407419 United States 07/08/2019 10:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77022514 United States 07/08/2019 10:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL! Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77407419 This is a joke!! READ THIS DOCKET: KATIE JOHNSON V. DONALD J, TRUMP, DEFENDANT AND JEFFEREY E. EPSTEIN DEFENDANT [link to www.courtlistener.com (secure)] One lib associate of mine showed me how Trump has his name in 3,500 or so court cases for all sorts of various reasons. The one you link was clearly from after Trump was a candidate and is an excellent example of the failed Brett Kavanaugh approach to derail his campaign. LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL! Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77407419 This is a joke!! READ THIS DOCKET: KATIE JOHNSON V. DONALD J, TRUMP, DEFENDANT AND JEFFEREY E. EPSTEIN DEFENDANT [link to www.courtlistener.com (secure)] One lib associate of mine showed me how Trump has his name in 3,500 or so court cases for all sorts of various reasons. The one you link was clearly from after Trump was a candidate and is an excellent example of the failed Brett Kavanaugh approach to derail his campaign. But,but, but.... the walls are closing in on Trump!!! |
Sikhed
User ID: 5898996 United States 07/08/2019 10:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77792237 United States 07/08/2019 10:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Expecting the troll/shill 1-stars and any who do not want the truth out there. Bracing for red (hate) karma but this issue too important to so many. Quoting: IJumpInIt [link to twitter.com (secure)] [link to dcwhispers.com] Less than 10% of article: ....It should be noted that Epstein’s controversial deal with the DOJ was initiated by the former Bush-era DOJ and then later upheld by the then-Obama administration. And you want to know who the FBI Director was at the time who participated in that Epstein-friendly agreement? None other than Robert Mueller. (Again, the far-left media has said NOTHING about this.) Epstein’s many political ties, though largely Democrat Party-friendly, are politically interconnected and international in nature and many now feel he was the recipient of some very powerful Deep-State protection—the very same Deep State that has been working so hard to try and destroy President Trump. BULLLLLSHIT The apologia is getting sickening, Trump has had connections to sleezy sexual predators and so many accusers at this point it’s not a partisan thing, he’s fucking the republican bill clinton and you cunts are looking like fools defending him , and his involvement... Fuck you Stor_m Front. If you are sickened, do something. You got 63,000,000 Trump patriots to go through first. I'm one of them. You fat fuck, blow hard. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77792237 United States 07/08/2019 10:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Expecting the troll/shill 1-stars and any who do not want the truth out there. Bracing for red (hate) karma but this issue too important to so many. Quoting: IJumpInIt [link to twitter.com (secure)] [link to dcwhispers.com] Less than 10% of article: ....It should be noted that Epstein’s controversial deal with the DOJ was initiated by the former Bush-era DOJ and then later upheld by the then-Obama administration. And you want to know who the FBI Director was at the time who participated in that Epstein-friendly agreement? DAMN, you're fuckingly STUPID. The FBI has NOTHING to do with the disposition of a case after it has gone to trial, other than appearing as witnesses. And this case was WELL before Mueller was head of the FBI. . Clearly you do no accept the facts that show you are wrong. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76871995 United States 07/08/2019 10:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Expecting the troll/shill 1-stars and any who do not want the truth out there. Bracing for red (hate) karma but this issue too important to so many. Quoting: IJumpInIt [link to twitter.com (secure)] [link to dcwhispers.com] Less than 10% of article: ....It should be noted that Epstein’s controversial deal with the DOJ was initiated by the former Bush-era DOJ and then later upheld by the then-Obama administration. And you want to know who the FBI Director was at the time who participated in that Epstein-friendly agreement? DAMN, you're fuckingly STUPID. The FBI has NOTHING to do with the disposition of a case after it has gone to trial, other than appearing as witnesses. And this case was WELL before Mueller was head of the FBI. . Clearly you do no accept the facts that show you are wrong. Mueller was FBI director from September 2001 to September 2013. To be fair about Trumps tweet back in 2012 he doesn't mention Epstein. "Got to do something about these missing chidlren grabbed by the perverts. Too many incidents--fast trial, death penalty." This could be in regards to runaways that go missing or children who are abducted like many native americans are in Canada - who may or may not become sex slave workers. In The Miami Herald's reporting they identified about 80 victims of Epstein and were able to locate 60 of them. . |
IJumpInIt
(OP) User ID: 77587958 United States 07/08/2019 10:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL! Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77407419 This is a joke!! READ THIS DOCKET: KATIE JOHNSON V. DONALD J, TRUMP, DEFENDANT AND JEFFEREY E. EPSTEIN DEFENDANT [link to www.courtlistener.com (secure)] One lib associate of mine showed me how Trump has his name in 3,500 or so court cases for all sorts of various reasons. The one you link was clearly from after Trump was a candidate and is an excellent example of the failed Brett Kavanaugh approach to derail his campaign. LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL! Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77407419 This is a joke!! READ THIS DOCKET: KATIE JOHNSON V. DONALD J, TRUMP, DEFENDANT AND JEFFEREY E. EPSTEIN DEFENDANT [link to www.courtlistener.com (secure)] One lib associate of mine showed me how Trump has his name in 3,500 or so court cases for all sorts of various reasons. The one you link was clearly from after Trump was a candidate and is an excellent example of the failed Brett Kavanaugh approach to derail his campaign. But,but, but.... the walls are closing in on Trump!!! lol - ok :D |
CSnow
User ID: 74827762 United States 07/08/2019 10:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Got to do something about these missing chidlren grabbed by the perverts. Too many incidents–fast trial, death penalty. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77792237 — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) October 8, 2012 And you want to know who the FBI Director was at the time who participated in that Epstein-friendly agreement? None other than Robert Mueller. I figure money/greed, loyalty to colleagues, loyalty to people who share your politics and good ol' sex motivates various people from all sides the spectrum. But the people who treat honesty and ethics as nuisances due to their creating obstacles to greed, camaraderie, "who gives a fuck?" liberalism and love of hookers/drugs/pedophilia are ones more likely to be in the Obama/Hillary/Mueller/Comey/Brennan/Shiff/Pelsoi/Waters/Schumer/Sanders/Biden/Gore crowd. Mueller was crooked for various reasons. Maybe more for money than out of loyalty? Maybe more for loyalty than money? Maybe more for protecting leftism than for protecting Epstein lovers? Maybe more for pedophilia than for liberalism? Who knows exactly what makes people so corrupt? . |
IJumpInIt
(OP) User ID: 77587958 United States 07/08/2019 10:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Expecting the troll/shill 1-stars and any who do not want the truth out there. Bracing for red (hate) karma but this issue too important to so many. Quoting: IJumpInIt [link to twitter.com (secure)] [link to dcwhispers.com] Less than 10% of article: ....It should be noted that Epstein’s controversial deal with the DOJ was initiated by the former Bush-era DOJ and then later upheld by the then-Obama administration. And you want to know who the FBI Director was at the time who participated in that Epstein-friendly agreement? DAMN, you're fuckingly STUPID. The FBI has NOTHING to do with the disposition of a case after it has gone to trial, other than appearing as witnesses. And this case was WELL before Mueller was head of the FBI. . Clearly you do no accept the facts that show you are wrong. Mueller was FBI director from September 2001 to September 2013. To be fair about Trumps tweet back in 2012 he doesn't mention Epstein. "Got to do something about these missing chidlren grabbed by the perverts. Too many incidents--fast trial, death penalty." This could be in regards to runaways that go missing or children who are abducted like many native americans are in Canada - who may or may not become sex slave workers. In The Miami Herald's reporting they identified about 80 victims of Epstein and were able to locate 60 of them. . Critical thinking at its finest - very true Epstein was not named in the 2012 tweet. Whatever was going through Trumps mind at the time I would think was influenced by the Epstein issue, however, Trumps empathy for the cause is clear. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77686546 United States 07/08/2019 10:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Trump was given immunity as a potential co-conspirator and associate of Epstein as part of the original plea deal - which Trump's DOJ fought to keep. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77798856 NO! Stupid fuck! DOJ argued for it and got it. The original deal stands and these new charges CANNOT be used to go after potential co-conspirators unless Epstein somehow provides substantial documented evidence and the government accepts it and goes after them. He won't do that. Since the new charges only apply to Epstein, it's clear that the fed government is simply trying to protect bigger fish than Epstein who, rightfully, is being taken down. Trump Admin isn't 'taking down the network' - his Admin is protecting it by sacrificing Epstein and others to protect themselves. Did Judge Marra rule on that? You did lie about Trump, so your credibility is at zero at this point. I will say that the NPA Acosta made in this case is disgusting, and beyond belief. That slug should be fired already. Trump is too loyal at times, and this is one of them. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77792237 United States 07/08/2019 10:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Trump was given immunity as a potential co-conspirator and associate of Epstein as part of the original plea deal - which Trump's DOJ fought to keep. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77798856 NO! Stupid fuck! DOJ argued for it and got it. The original deal stands and these new charges CANNOT be used to go after potential co-conspirators unless Epstein somehow provides substantial documented evidence and the government accepts it and goes after them. He won't do that. Since the new charges only apply to Epstein, it's clear that the fed government is simply trying to protect bigger fish than Epstein who, rightfully, is being taken down. Trump Admin isn't 'taking down the network' - his Admin is protecting it by sacrificing Epstein and others to protect themselves. So you are saying that Trump made sure that Comey's daughter the man he whom he fired. was put in charge of the Investigation?? This shill is spewing a fog of disinformation. Totally believable if you buy the bait that Trump was diddling with Epstein and then turn on Epstein in some sort of plea deal, that Mueller knew about but never used to take down Trump. Yeah. Believe that horse shit. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76872406 United States 07/08/2019 10:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
regenerated
User ID: 77776184 United States 07/08/2019 10:53 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I'm kinda disappointed of the shills on this thread. Quoting: Sikhed Before the election, the shill mills that employed them would keep an archive of fake news articles that the shill employees could link to. Now they just post un-backed attacks on the "bad orange man", one star the thread and leave. Do they even collect $3.50 anymore? It's not the shills anymore, their funding is almost dried up. Brock and his boyfriends are the ones posting now. |