Trump was demanding justice for the Jeffrey Epstein victims in 2012 | |
IJumpInIt
(OP) User ID: 77587958 United States 07/09/2019 01:10 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Expecting the troll/shill 1-stars and any who do not want the truth out there. Bracing for red (hate) karma but this issue too important to so many. Quoting: IJumpInIt [link to twitter.com (secure)] [link to dcwhispers.com] Less than 10% of article: ....It should be noted that Epstein’s controversial deal with the DOJ was initiated by the former Bush-era DOJ and then later upheld by the then-Obama administration. And you want to know who the FBI Director was at the time who participated in that Epstein-friendly agreement? None other than Robert Mueller. (Again, the far-left media has said NOTHING about this.) Epstein’s many political ties, though largely Democrat Party-friendly, are politically interconnected and international in nature and many now feel he was the recipient of some very powerful Deep-State protection—the very same Deep State that has been working so hard to try and destroy President Trump. bull$hit, bitch. Prosecutor Acosta of Florida let Epstein WALK nearly a free man. Big scandal in FL when it happened. the Drumpster hired Acosta as Sec of Labor. Sounds like payback or honor among thieves. wtfu dunce 'Sounds like' and hard evidence are two different things. Hillary deleted 33k emails and smashed evidence.. even though that evidence resides elsewhere the fact remains those primary sources are gone. Big difference between your 'a$$uming' and fact. TDS is strong with you. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76871995 United States 07/09/2019 01:32 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It was reported by members and AC's here today (other threads) that Barr had recused himself from Epstein case in his senate hearing. That's not exactly true, He recused today and mentioned he might in the hearings. "If Trump or His Administration Wanted to Interfere in the Case, Could They? Yes. Attorney General William Barr could legally do so and has repeatedly shown a willingness to put loyalty to Trump above all else — though he did tell Congress he might recuse himself from Epstein-related cases since he worked for one of the firms behind Epstein’s controversial plea deal. On Monday, Bloomberg reported that Barr is reviewing whether or not he needs to recuse himself from the Epstein investigation. He has already recused himself from matters relating to Alex Acosta, a fellow member of Trump’s cabinet. And yes, Trump could pardon Epstein if he were so inclined." . "For some people at the ends of the political spectrum on social media, Epstein’s arrest has played out like a partisan Rorschach test. Many right-wing personalities and members of the MAGA crowd have speculated that Epstein will name or otherwise expose and ruin Bill Clinton. The former president, who has himself been credibly accused of sexual misconduct and was friends with Epstein, has been previously scrutinized for the numerous trips he took on the financier’s private plane. Accusations of sex crimes toward children have also been a central focus of some of the most bizarre (and contagious) conspiracy theories on the far right. And the fact that Robert Mueller led the FBI at the time of the original charges against Epstein has not gone unnoticed by those who still see the former special counsel as one of the president’s deep-state enemies. Speaking of which, there’s a Comey involved too:" As for the trash being written about Comey’s daughter being part of the Epstein case: Her career at SDNY has nothing to do with her dad. She started there before he was fired as FBI Dir. She’s one of the most talented prosecutors I’ve worked with (& I’m not alone in that view). - Mimi Rocah tweet Meanwhile, some #resistance diehards have suggested that Epstein’s arrest will lead to the surefire end, or at least the surefire justification for the end, of Trump’s presidency (thus succeeding where all of the previous scandals involving Trump have failed). I'm seeing lots of folks on the left and the right who seem absolutely sure that Epstein is going to give up their political enemies. Hot tip: he's just as likely to give up your allies. noah Schactman tweet" [link to nymag.com] less than 50% - long article . |
Big Duke6
User ID: 77566436 Canada 07/09/2019 01:32 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Expecting the troll/shill 1-stars and any who do not want the truth out there. Bracing for red (hate) karma but this issue too important to so many. Quoting: IJumpInIt [link to twitter.com (secure)] [link to dcwhispers.com] Less than 10% of article: ....It should be noted that Epstein’s controversial deal with the DOJ was initiated by the former Bush-era DOJ and then later upheld by the then-Obama administration. And you want to know who the FBI Director was at the time who participated in that Epstein-friendly agreement? None other than Robert Mueller. (Again, the far-left media has said NOTHING about this.) Epstein’s many political ties, though largely Democrat Party-friendly, are politically interconnected and international in nature and many now feel he was the recipient of some very powerful Deep-State protection—the very same Deep State that has been working so hard to try and destroy President Trump. bull$hit, bitch. Prosecutor Acosta of Florida let Epstein WALK nearly a free man. Big scandal in FL when it happened. the Drumpster hired Acosta as Sec of Labor. Sounds like payback or honor among thieves. wtfu dunce 'Sounds like' and hard evidence are two different things. Hillary deleted 33k emails and smashed evidence.. even though that evidence resides elsewhere the fact remains those primary sources are gone. Big difference between your 'a$$uming' and fact. TDS is strong with you. And Mueller was unable to bring conspiracy charges against thd Trumps because "evidence was destroyed" ... your point being? Trumps ... Clintons ... same sketchy and criminal shite, different piles |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 65063649 United States 07/09/2019 01:32 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ATTENTION: FOR ALL THE ANTI-TRUMPER SHILLS OUT THERE. [link to twitter.com (secure)] DOCUMENTATION OF WHAT HAPPENED IN THE CASE. I'll sum it up for you. Quickly. 1. PER EPSTEIN PLEA BARGING (WHICH IS DOCUMENTED IN THAT TWITTER FEED AND YOU CAN READ FOR YOURSELF) HE WAS NEVER REQUIRED TO TALK TO THE FBI. Yet, per the released FBI FILES, they stated that he DID talk to Muellers FBI at some point. Undocumented or yet to have been released. AKA, a side deal. 2. Epstein signed his plea bargain before all the victims had the opportunity to speak. 3. Epsteins lawyers were harassing and trying to silence the victims throughout his case. 4. Emails (SHOWN IN THAT FEED) confirm that A. The FBI still hadn't interviewed all the victims, nor seen all the physical evidence by the time Epstein signed his deal. It showed that they were trying to make this a federal case, and the FBI was NOT working with them. 5. Acostas letter he wrote in 2011 in regard to the case confirmed that evidence was "not known" and that victims didnt come out till after the plea agreement was signed. 6. The Miami Herald did its own investigation and found that, in fact, EPSTEIN TALKED TO THE FEDERAL FBI and was a "key witness" in bringing down 2 hedge fund managers, unrelated to Epstein's case. To sum it up: In order to avoid federal prosecution for his case, Epstein ratted out Hedge-Fund executives to Muellers FBI and got his ass out of serious trouble. All the while, suppressing his victims from coming out. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76871995 United States 07/09/2019 01:32 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 65063649 United States 07/09/2019 01:36 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ATTENTION: FOR ALL THE ANTI-TRUMPER SHILLS OUT THERE. [link to twitter.com (secure)] DOCUMENTATION OF WHAT HAPPENED IN THE CASE. I'll sum it up for you. Quickly. 1. PER EPSTEIN PLEA BARGING (WHICH IS DOCUMENTED IN THAT TWITTER FEED AND YOU CAN READ FOR YOURSELF) HE WAS NEVER REQUIRED TO TALK TO THE FBI. Yet, per the released FBI FILES, they stated that he DID talk to Muellers FBI at some point. Undocumented or yet to have been released. AKA, a side deal. 2. Epstein signed his plea bargain before all the victims had the opportunity to speak. 3. Epsteins lawyers were harassing and trying to silence the victims throughout his case. 4. Emails (SHOWN IN THAT FEED) confirm that A. The FBI still hadn't interviewed all the victims, nor seen all the physical evidence by the time Epstein signed his deal. It showed that they were trying to make this a federal case, and the FBI was NOT working with them. 5. Acostas letter he wrote in 2011 in regard to the case confirmed that evidence was "not known" and that victims didnt come out till after the plea agreement was signed. 6. The Miami Herald did its own investigation and found that, in fact, EPSTEIN TALKED TO THE FEDERAL FBI and was a "key witness" in bringing down 2 hedge fund managers, unrelated to Epstein's case. To sum it up: In order to avoid federal prosecution for his case, Epstein ratted out Hedge-Fund executives to Muellers FBI and got his ass out of serious trouble. All the while, suppressing his victims from coming out. HERE IS THE TWITTER THREAD. DUNNO WHY THE LINK ABOVE DIDNT WORK. [link to twitter.com (secure)] |
IJumpInIt
(OP) User ID: 77587958 United States 07/09/2019 01:43 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ATTENTION: FOR ALL THE ANTI-TRUMPER SHILLS OUT THERE. [link to twitter.com (secure)] DOCUMENTATION OF WHAT HAPPENED IN THE CASE. I'll sum it up for you. Quickly. 1. PER EPSTEIN PLEA BARGING (WHICH IS DOCUMENTED IN THAT TWITTER FEED AND YOU CAN READ FOR YOURSELF) HE WAS NEVER REQUIRED TO TALK TO THE FBI. Yet, per the released FBI FILES, they stated that he DID talk to Muellers FBI at some point. Undocumented or yet to have been released. AKA, a side deal. 2. Epstein signed his plea bargain before all the victims had the opportunity to speak. 3. Epsteins lawyers were harassing and trying to silence the victims throughout his case. 4. Emails (SHOWN IN THAT FEED) confirm that A. The FBI still hadn't interviewed all the victims, nor seen all the physical evidence by the time Epstein signed his deal. It showed that they were trying to make this a federal case, and the FBI was NOT working with them. 5. Acostas letter he wrote in 2011 in regard to the case confirmed that evidence was "not known" and that victims didnt come out till after the plea agreement was signed. 6. The Miami Herald did its own investigation and found that, in fact, EPSTEIN TALKED TO THE FEDERAL FBI and was a "key witness" in bringing down 2 hedge fund managers, unrelated to Epstein's case. To sum it up: In order to avoid federal prosecution for his case, Epstein ratted out Hedge-Fund executives to Muellers FBI and got his ass out of serious trouble. All the while, suppressing his victims from coming out. "6. The Miami Herald did its own investigation and found that, in fact, EPSTEIN TALKED TO THE FEDERAL FBI and was a "key witness" in bringing down 2 hedge fund managers, unrelated to Epstein's case." Turning in other big time folk for a lesser deal - plausible enough. All this needs to come out though so a thorough understanding of why things happened the way they did. Due process needs to be complete this time - not all the smoke/mirrors that is so common. I have to wonder - does anyone ever think to themselves 'If this were to go public would it hold up to scrutiny?'. SMH |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 65063649 United States 07/09/2019 01:53 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ATTENTION: FOR ALL THE ANTI-TRUMPER SHILLS OUT THERE. [link to twitter.com (secure)] DOCUMENTATION OF WHAT HAPPENED IN THE CASE. I'll sum it up for you. Quickly. 1. PER EPSTEIN PLEA BARGING (WHICH IS DOCUMENTED IN THAT TWITTER FEED AND YOU CAN READ FOR YOURSELF) HE WAS NEVER REQUIRED TO TALK TO THE FBI. Yet, per the released FBI FILES, they stated that he DID talk to Muellers FBI at some point. Undocumented or yet to have been released. AKA, a side deal. 2. Epstein signed his plea bargain before all the victims had the opportunity to speak. 3. Epsteins lawyers were harassing and trying to silence the victims throughout his case. 4. Emails (SHOWN IN THAT FEED) confirm that A. The FBI still hadn't interviewed all the victims, nor seen all the physical evidence by the time Epstein signed his deal. It showed that they were trying to make this a federal case, and the FBI was NOT working with them. 5. Acostas letter he wrote in 2011 in regard to the case confirmed that evidence was "not known" and that victims didnt come out till after the plea agreement was signed. 6. The Miami Herald did its own investigation and found that, in fact, EPSTEIN TALKED TO THE FEDERAL FBI and was a "key witness" in bringing down 2 hedge fund managers, unrelated to Epstein's case. To sum it up: In order to avoid federal prosecution for his case, Epstein ratted out Hedge-Fund executives to Muellers FBI and got his ass out of serious trouble. All the while, suppressing his victims from coming out. "6. The Miami Herald did its own investigation and found that, in fact, EPSTEIN TALKED TO THE FEDERAL FBI and was a "key witness" in bringing down 2 hedge fund managers, unrelated to Epstein's case." Turning in other big time folk for a lesser deal - plausible enough. All this needs to come out though so a thorough understanding of why things happened the way they did. Due process needs to be complete this time - not all the smoke/mirrors that is so common. I have to wonder - does anyone ever think to themselves 'If this were to go public would it hold up to scrutiny?'. SMH Exactly. He gaves Muellers FBI information on some other case they were investigating and so he walked. Muellers FBI would rather take down executives, than go after sick, demented pedophiles that has known ties to political leaders. And like I said the other day, Muellers set to testify about the Russian shit on the 17th. Coincidence? Trump is outsmarting all these fools. |
IJumpInIt
(OP) User ID: 77587958 United States 07/09/2019 02:05 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ATTENTION: FOR ALL THE ANTI-TRUMPER SHILLS OUT THERE. [link to twitter.com (secure)] DOCUMENTATION OF WHAT HAPPENED IN THE CASE. I'll sum it up for you. Quickly. 1. PER EPSTEIN PLEA BARGING (WHICH IS DOCUMENTED IN THAT TWITTER FEED AND YOU CAN READ FOR YOURSELF) HE WAS NEVER REQUIRED TO TALK TO THE FBI. Yet, per the released FBI FILES, they stated that he DID talk to Muellers FBI at some point. Undocumented or yet to have been released. AKA, a side deal. 2. Epstein signed his plea bargain before all the victims had the opportunity to speak. 3. Epsteins lawyers were harassing and trying to silence the victims throughout his case. 4. Emails (SHOWN IN THAT FEED) confirm that A. The FBI still hadn't interviewed all the victims, nor seen all the physical evidence by the time Epstein signed his deal. It showed that they were trying to make this a federal case, and the FBI was NOT working with them. 5. Acostas letter he wrote in 2011 in regard to the case confirmed that evidence was "not known" and that victims didnt come out till after the plea agreement was signed. 6. The Miami Herald did its own investigation and found that, in fact, EPSTEIN TALKED TO THE FEDERAL FBI and was a "key witness" in bringing down 2 hedge fund managers, unrelated to Epstein's case. To sum it up: In order to avoid federal prosecution for his case, Epstein ratted out Hedge-Fund executives to Muellers FBI and got his ass out of serious trouble. All the while, suppressing his victims from coming out. "6. The Miami Herald did its own investigation and found that, in fact, EPSTEIN TALKED TO THE FEDERAL FBI and was a "key witness" in bringing down 2 hedge fund managers, unrelated to Epstein's case." Turning in other big time folk for a lesser deal - plausible enough. All this needs to come out though so a thorough understanding of why things happened the way they did. Due process needs to be complete this time - not all the smoke/mirrors that is so common. I have to wonder - does anyone ever think to themselves 'If this were to go public would it hold up to scrutiny?'. SMH Exactly. He gaves Muellers FBI information on some other case they were investigating and so he walked. Muellers FBI would rather take down executives, than go after sick, demented pedophiles that has known ties to political leaders. And like I said the other day, Muellers set to testify about the Russian shit on the 17th. Coincidence? Trump is outsmarting all these fools. I wonder what Trump and the Queen talked about. She was all smiles with Trump. Anyone remember QE2 refusing to abdicate the throne to her hubby in the not-to-distant past? Makes one go 'Hmmz'. Interesting times.. |
DestinyAKA-Des
User ID: 77789034 United States 07/09/2019 02:19 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | “Epstein was barred from President Trump’s Mar-a-Lago Club in Palm Beach, Fla., ‘because Epstein sexually assaulted an underage girl at the club, according to court documents,’” The Washington Post reported. Quoting: Copperhead “I learned through a source that Trump banned Epstein from his Maralago [Mar-A- Lago] Club in West Palm Beach because Epstein sexually assaulted an underage girl at the club,” Fort Lauderdale lawyer Bradley Edwards’ said. [link to thefederalistpapers.org (secure)] Less than 50% Thank you for posting Copper. I reposted it to Farcebook with no problem. But, when I tried to post it to twatter, this is the message I got. This request looks like it might be automated. To protect our users from spam and other malicious activity, we can't complete this action right now. Please try again later. Crazy amount of censorship going on regarding the Epstein arrest. Googly is in full on redirect mode attempting to associate Trump with Epstein. This is going to be a many tentacled salacious clusterfrick as people turn on each other. It's going to take a huge bus to handle all those thrown under it. Karma is a bitch ain't it. Des Petite Southern Gun Toting Bubbette NO. Is a complete sentence. |
IJumpInIt
(OP) User ID: 77587958 United States 07/09/2019 02:35 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | “Epstein was barred from President Trump’s Mar-a-Lago Club in Palm Beach, Fla., ‘because Epstein sexually assaulted an underage girl at the club, according to court documents,’” The Washington Post reported. Quoting: Copperhead “I learned through a source that Trump banned Epstein from his Maralago [Mar-A- Lago] Club in West Palm Beach because Epstein sexually assaulted an underage girl at the club,” Fort Lauderdale lawyer Bradley Edwards’ said. [link to thefederalistpapers.org (secure)] Less than 50% Thank you for posting Copper. I reposted it to Farcebook with no problem. But, when I tried to post it to twatter, this is the message I got. This request looks like it might be automated. To protect our users from spam and other malicious activity, we can't complete this action right now. Please try again later. Crazy amount of censorship going on regarding the Epstein arrest. Googly is in full on redirect mode attempting to associate Trump with Epstein. This is going to be a many tentacled salacious clusterfrick as people turn on each other. It's going to take a huge bus to handle all those thrown under it. Karma is a bitch ain't it. Des Thats our Trump - as soon as he found out - banned him. Not surprising Twatter is censoring. I expect it from them so only use mine for business no personal posts beyond business related. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77799511 United States 07/09/2019 02:45 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | “Epstein was barred from President Trump’s Mar-a-Lago Club in Palm Beach, Fla., ‘because Epstein sexually assaulted an underage girl at the club, according to court documents,’” The Washington Post reported. Quoting: Copperhead “I learned through a source that Trump banned Epstein from his Maralago [Mar-A- Lago] Club in West Palm Beach because Epstein sexually assaulted an underage girl at the club,” Fort Lauderdale lawyer Bradley Edwards’ said. [link to thefederalistpapers.org (secure)] Less than 50% Thank you for posting Copper. I reposted it to Farcebook with no problem. But, when I tried to post it to twatter, this is the message I got. This request looks like it might be automated. To protect our users from spam and other malicious activity, we can't complete this action right now. Please try again later. Crazy amount of censorship going on regarding the Epstein arrest. Googly is in full on redirect mode attempting to associate Trump with Epstein. This is going to be a many tentacled salacious clusterfrick as people turn on each other. It's going to take a huge bus to handle all those thrown under it. Karma is a bitch ain't it. Des Thats our Trump - as soon as he found out - banned him. Not surprising Twatter is censoring. I expect it from them so only use mine for business no personal posts beyond business related. Neither Trump nor Mar a Lago have confirmed that at all. Ask him or whoever his new attorney is. |
Vicious Deplorable dollop
You ain't seen nothing yet! User ID: 29071125 United States 07/09/2019 02:45 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Expecting the troll/shill 1-stars and any who do not want the truth out there. Bracing for red (hate) karma but this issue too important to so many. Quoting: IJumpInIt [link to twitter.com (secure)] [link to dcwhispers.com] Less than 10% of article: ....It should be noted that Epstein’s controversial deal with the DOJ was initiated by the former Bush-era DOJ and then later upheld by the then-Obama administration. And you want to know who the FBI Director was at the time who participated in that Epstein-friendly agreement? None other than Robert Mueller. (Again, the far-left media has said NOTHING about this.) Epstein’s many political ties, though largely Democrat Party-friendly, are politically interconnected and international in nature and many now feel he was the recipient of some very powerful Deep-State protection—the very same Deep State that has been working so hard to try and destroy President Trump. Kamala Harris is not a Natural Born Citizen. She's illegally running. Used by the Founders... Book I of The Law of Nations, Chapter XIX, § 212 (Joseph Chitty numbering) – “Citizens and natives” reads: 'The citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights.' 1758 Emerich de Vattel Oh' What the Hell, do I look like I want to die in some nursing home one day... America must have 4 new Constitutional Amendments... 1. Drug Tests and Mental Evaluations on all politicians and judges randomly five times per year. 2. Term Limits for Federal politicians and judges. 3. Mental and health standards for Supreme Court Justices and retirement age set. 4. A 'Star Chamber' of elected Natural Born Citizens (no attorney's) to ivestigate, try, and prosecute the politicians and government employee's as they see fit. Mandatory death penalty by public hanging is the merciful sentence for pedos and their associates. Democrats are a WMD, literally. Let Justice Be Done Though The Heavens Fall. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 75942064 United States 07/09/2019 02:52 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Best defemse is an offense, right? If he had dirt on Trump, Trump was doubling down, playing hardball. Hey, remember that time when Steve Bannon went to Epstein's NYC mansion? [link to pagesix.com (secure)] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77003590 United States 07/09/2019 02:53 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77799511 United States 07/09/2019 02:56 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ATTENTION: FOR ALL THE ANTI-TRUMPER SHILLS OUT THERE. [link to twitter.com (secure)] DOCUMENTATION OF WHAT HAPPENED IN THE CASE. I'll sum it up for you. Quickly. 1. PER EPSTEIN PLEA BARGING (WHICH IS DOCUMENTED IN THAT TWITTER FEED AND YOU CAN READ FOR YOURSELF) HE WAS NEVER REQUIRED TO TALK TO THE FBI. Yet, per the released FBI FILES, they stated that he DID talk to Muellers FBI at some point. Undocumented or yet to have been released. AKA, a side deal. 2. Epstein signed his plea bargain before all the victims had the opportunity to speak. 3. Epsteins lawyers were harassing and trying to silence the victims throughout his case. 4. Emails (SHOWN IN THAT FEED) confirm that A. The FBI still hadn't interviewed all the victims, nor seen all the physical evidence by the time Epstein signed his deal. It showed that they were trying to make this a federal case, and the FBI was NOT working with them. 5. Acostas letter he wrote in 2011 in regard to the case confirmed that evidence was "not known" and that victims didnt come out till after the plea agreement was signed. 6. The Miami Herald did its own investigation and found that, in fact, EPSTEIN TALKED TO THE FEDERAL FBI and was a "key witness" in bringing down 2 hedge fund managers, unrelated to Epstein's case. To sum it up: In order to avoid federal prosecution for his case, Epstein ratted out Hedge-Fund executives to Muellers FBI and got his ass out of serious trouble. All the while, suppressing his victims from coming out. "6. The Miami Herald did its own investigation and found that, in fact, EPSTEIN TALKED TO THE FEDERAL FBI and was a "key witness" in bringing down 2 hedge fund managers, unrelated to Epstein's case." Turning in other big time folk for a lesser deal - plausible enough. All this needs to come out though so a thorough understanding of why things happened the way they did. Due process needs to be complete this time - not all the smoke/mirrors that is so common. I have to wonder - does anyone ever think to themselves 'If this were to go public would it hold up to scrutiny?'. SMH Exactly. He gaves Muellers FBI information on some other case they were investigating and so he walked. Muellers FBI would rather take down executives, than go after sick, demented pedophiles that has known ties to political leaders. And like I said the other day, Muellers set to testify about the Russian shit on the 17th. Coincidence? Trump is outsmarting all these fools. I wonder what Trump and the Queen talked about. She was all smiles with Trump. Anyone remember QE2 refusing to abdicate the throne to her hubby in the not-to-distant past? Makes one go 'Hmmz'. Interesting times.. Prince Andrew and the royal family will not be harmed - only Epstein gets thrown into the fire. That's why Trump's DOJ didn't rescind the original plea deal for Epstein, as it protects potential co-conspirators from prosecution. |
IJumpInIt
(OP) User ID: 77587958 United States 07/09/2019 03:27 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: IJumpInIt "6. The Miami Herald did its own investigation and found that, in fact, EPSTEIN TALKED TO THE FEDERAL FBI and was a "key witness" in bringing down 2 hedge fund managers, unrelated to Epstein's case." Turning in other big time folk for a lesser deal - plausible enough. All this needs to come out though so a thorough understanding of why things happened the way they did. Due process needs to be complete this time - not all the smoke/mirrors that is so common. I have to wonder - does anyone ever think to themselves 'If this were to go public would it hold up to scrutiny?'. SMH Exactly. He gaves Muellers FBI information on some other case they were investigating and so he walked. Muellers FBI would rather take down executives, than go after sick, demented pedophiles that has known ties to political leaders. And like I said the other day, Muellers set to testify about the Russian shit on the 17th. Coincidence? Trump is outsmarting all these fools. I wonder what Trump and the Queen talked about. She was all smiles with Trump. Anyone remember QE2 refusing to abdicate the throne to her hubby in the not-to-distant past? Makes one go 'Hmmz'. Interesting times.. Prince Andrew and the royal family will not be harmed - only Epstein gets thrown into the fire. That's why Trump's DOJ didn't rescind the original plea deal for Epstein, as it protects potential co-conspirators from prosecution. That means with Bill Clinton today claiming only 4 trips on the Lolita Express, and the following revealing 26 times... he would get off scot-free. [link to www.foxnews.com (secure)] 10% of article: --------------- "Former President Bill Clinton was a much more frequent flyer on a registered sex offender’s infamous jet than previously reported, with flight logs showing the former president taking at least 26 trips aboard the “Lolita Express” -- even apparently ditching his Secret Service detail for at least five of the flights, according to records obtained by FoxNews.com." |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77792237 United States 07/09/2019 03:31 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | “Epstein was barred from President Trump’s Mar-a-Lago Club in Palm Beach, Fla., ‘because Epstein sexually assaulted an underage girl at the club, according to court documents,’” The Washington Post reported. Quoting: Copperhead “I learned through a source that Trump banned Epstein from his Maralago [Mar-A- Lago] Club in West Palm Beach because Epstein sexually assaulted an underage girl at the club,” Fort Lauderdale lawyer Bradley Edwards’ said. [link to thefederalistpapers.org (secure)] Less than 50% Thank you for posting Copper. I reposted it to Farcebook with no problem. But, when I tried to post it to twatter, this is the message I got. This request looks like it might be automated. To protect our users from spam and other malicious activity, we can't complete this action right now. Please try again later. Crazy amount of censorship going on regarding the Epstein arrest. Googly is in full on redirect mode attempting to associate Trump with Epstein. This is going to be a many tentacled salacious clusterfrick as people turn on each other. It's going to take a huge bus to handle all those thrown under it. Karma is a bitch ain't it. Des Thats our Trump - as soon as he found out - banned him. Not surprising Twatter is censoring. I expect it from them so only use mine for business no personal posts beyond business related. Neither Trump nor Mar a Lago have confirmed that at all. Ask him or whoever his new attorney is. Not beneath a news outlet to say it was unconfirmed. Its an easy way to take some wind out the sail. Them post the retraction a month later. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77792237 United States 07/09/2019 03:34 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: IJumpInIt "6. The Miami Herald did its own investigation and found that, in fact, EPSTEIN TALKED TO THE FEDERAL FBI and was a "key witness" in bringing down 2 hedge fund managers, unrelated to Epstein's case." Turning in other big time folk for a lesser deal - plausible enough. All this needs to come out though so a thorough understanding of why things happened the way they did. Due process needs to be complete this time - not all the smoke/mirrors that is so common. I have to wonder - does anyone ever think to themselves 'If this were to go public would it hold up to scrutiny?'. SMH Exactly. He gaves Muellers FBI information on some other case they were investigating and so he walked. Muellers FBI would rather take down executives, than go after sick, demented pedophiles that has known ties to political leaders. And like I said the other day, Muellers set to testify about the Russian shit on the 17th. Coincidence? Trump is outsmarting all these fools. I wonder what Trump and the Queen talked about. She was all smiles with Trump. Anyone remember QE2 refusing to abdicate the throne to her hubby in the not-to-distant past? Makes one go 'Hmmz'. Interesting times.. Prince Andrew and the royal family will not be harmed - only Epstein gets thrown into the fire. That's why Trump's DOJ didn't rescind the original plea deal for Epstein, as it protects potential co-conspirators from prosecution. Pure speculation. The appeals courts are likely going to find the entire plea deal null and void. Now what do you have? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77799511 United States 07/09/2019 03:40 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 65063649 Exactly. He gaves Muellers FBI information on some other case they were investigating and so he walked. Muellers FBI would rather take down executives, than go after sick, demented pedophiles that has known ties to political leaders. And like I said the other day, Muellers set to testify about the Russian shit on the 17th. Coincidence? Trump is outsmarting all these fools. I wonder what Trump and the Queen talked about. She was all smiles with Trump. Anyone remember QE2 refusing to abdicate the throne to her hubby in the not-to-distant past? Makes one go 'Hmmz'. Interesting times.. Prince Andrew and the royal family will not be harmed - only Epstein gets thrown into the fire. That's why Trump's DOJ didn't rescind the original plea deal for Epstein, as it protects potential co-conspirators from prosecution. Pure speculation. The appeals courts are likely going to find the entire plea deal null and void. Now what do you have? They will do no such thing. The original plea deal will stand while the new federal charges will go forward and Epstein will go down - alone. The original plea deal assures no co-conspirators get touched, even as names of 'involvement' get dropped to keep the circus going for the gawking public. In the end, the co-conspirators worked to throw Epstein upon the altar in their place. That's how this plays out. When it does, you'll owe anyone left entertaining you on the forum an apology. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77799511 United States 07/09/2019 03:42 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 65063649 Exactly. He gaves Muellers FBI information on some other case they were investigating and so he walked. Muellers FBI would rather take down executives, than go after sick, demented pedophiles that has known ties to political leaders. And like I said the other day, Muellers set to testify about the Russian shit on the 17th. Coincidence? Trump is outsmarting all these fools. I wonder what Trump and the Queen talked about. She was all smiles with Trump. Anyone remember QE2 refusing to abdicate the throne to her hubby in the not-to-distant past? Makes one go 'Hmmz'. Interesting times.. Prince Andrew and the royal family will not be harmed - only Epstein gets thrown into the fire. That's why Trump's DOJ didn't rescind the original plea deal for Epstein, as it protects potential co-conspirators from prosecution. That means with Bill Clinton today claiming only 4 trips on the Lolita Express, and the following revealing 26 times... he would get off scot-free. [link to www.foxnews.com (secure)] 10% of article: --------------- "Former President Bill Clinton was a much more frequent flyer on a registered sex offender’s infamous jet than previously reported, with flight logs showing the former president taking at least 26 trips aboard the “Lolita Express” -- even apparently ditching his Secret Service detail for at least five of the flights, according to records obtained by FoxNews.com." It also means Trump gets off scot-free too. He can just as easily be named. Many can. But they won't be. Hence, the plea deal... |
IJumpInIt
(OP) User ID: 77587958 United States 07/09/2019 03:50 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: IJumpInIt I wonder what Trump and the Queen talked about. She was all smiles with Trump. Anyone remember QE2 refusing to abdicate the throne to her hubby in the not-to-distant past? Makes one go 'Hmmz'. Interesting times.. Prince Andrew and the royal family will not be harmed - only Epstein gets thrown into the fire. That's why Trump's DOJ didn't rescind the original plea deal for Epstein, as it protects potential co-conspirators from prosecution. That means with Bill Clinton today claiming only 4 trips on the Lolita Express, and the following revealing 26 times... he would get off scot-free. [link to www.foxnews.com (secure)] 10% of article: --------------- "Former President Bill Clinton was a much more frequent flyer on a registered sex offender’s infamous jet than previously reported, with flight logs showing the former president taking at least 26 trips aboard the “Lolita Express” -- even apparently ditching his Secret Service detail for at least five of the flights, according to records obtained by FoxNews.com." It also means Trump gets off scot-free too. He can just as easily be named. Many can. But they won't be. Hence, the plea deal... Either way - if it were lifted then Bill would have to answer to his conflicting statements vs flight logs and the NeverTrumpers would salivate over 'possibilities' of Trump being dragged in. So it's almost as if 'Drop the plea deal and both get dragged in to it' in a classis tet-a-tet. Not to mention Barr after recusing himself would not be the one ordering any lifting anyway, so all that is left is deepstate in the DOJ. High stakes at hand for sure. In the end I doubt the plea deal will be lifted but hard to say. Have to wait and see. |
IJumpInIt
(OP) User ID: 77587958 United States 07/09/2019 05:04 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Expecting the troll/shill 1-stars and any who do not want the truth out there. Bracing for red (hate) karma but this issue too important to so many. Quoting: IJumpInIt [link to twitter.com (secure)] [link to dcwhispers.com] Less than 10% of article: ....It should be noted that Epstein’s controversial deal with the DOJ was initiated by the former Bush-era DOJ and then later upheld by the then-Obama administration. And you want to know who the FBI Director was at the time who participated in that Epstein-friendly agreement? None other than Robert Mueller. (Again, the far-left media has said NOTHING about this.) Epstein’s many political ties, though largely Democrat Party-friendly, are politically interconnected and international in nature and many now feel he was the recipient of some very powerful Deep-State protection—the very same Deep State that has been working so hard to try and destroy President Trump. bull$hit, bitch. Prosecutor Acosta of Florida let Epstein WALK nearly a free man. Big scandal in FL when it happened. the Drumpster hired Acosta as Sec of Labor. Sounds like payback or honor among thieves. wtfu dunce 'Sounds like' and hard evidence are two different things. Hillary deleted 33k emails and smashed evidence.. even though that evidence resides elsewhere the fact remains those primary sources are gone. Big difference between your 'a$$uming' and fact. TDS is strong with you. And Mueller was unable to bring conspiracy charges against thd Trumps because "evidence was destroyed" ... your point being? Trumps ... Clintons ... same sketchy and criminal shite, different piles What evidence do you speak of? Bidens son and the Ukrainian Govt? Mueller's and Hillary's Uranium One attack on the Oregon farmers for their land so the BLM (Bureau of Land Management) could use it for strip mining? You mean the cover up by destroying all evidence by Arkenciding many of them? Trump had nothing to hide and did not. Heresay turned in to fact is what he did not want. So again - what evidence did Trump destroy? Still waiting... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 69889817 United States 07/09/2019 05:20 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Robert Mueller aka Alex Acosta? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76871995 Why is Acosta's name all over the non-prosecution agreement OP? Can you provide a link that ties Mueller directly to the plea agreement? ONLY in Bizarro/trump world would THAT be possible. . Yeah you fuckers on the left are guilty as fuck and you know it. And Trump did give evidence against epstein and did kick his ass off his property Video at 22:50, lol!!! |
IJumpInIt
(OP) User ID: 77587958 United States 07/09/2019 06:30 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Robert Mueller aka Alex Acosta? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76871995 Why is Acosta's name all over the non-prosecution agreement OP? Can you provide a link that ties Mueller directly to the plea agreement? ONLY in Bizarro/trump world would THAT be possible. . Yeah you fuckers on the left are guilty as fuck and you know it. And Trump did give evidence against epstein and did kick his ass off his property Video at 22:50, lol!!! LMAO!! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77742308 United States 07/09/2019 06:35 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77742308 United States 07/09/2019 06:38 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Appears former President Clinton can't remember he went to the island, the one he denied yesterday visiting... [link to nymag.com] What attracted Clinton to Epstein was quite simple: He had a plane (he has a couple, in fact – the Boeing 727, in which he took Clinton to Africa, and, for shorter jaunts, a black Gulfstream, a Cessna 421, and a helicopter to ferry him from his island to St. Thomas). Clinton had organized a weeklong tour of South Africa, Nigeria, Ghana, Rwanda, and Mozambique to do what Clinton does. So when the president’s advance man Doug Band pitched the idea to Epstein, he said sure. As an added bonus, Kevin Spacey, a close friend of Clinton’s, and actor Chris Tucker came along for the ride. |
IJumpInIt
(OP) User ID: 77587958 United States 07/09/2019 06:46 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Appears former President Clinton can't remember he went to the island, the one he denied yesterday visiting... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77742308 [link to nymag.com] What attracted Clinton to Epstein was quite simple: He had a plane (he has a couple, in fact – the Boeing 727, in which he took Clinton to Africa, and, for shorter jaunts, a black Gulfstream, a Cessna 421, and a helicopter to ferry him from his island to St. Thomas). Clinton had organized a weeklong tour of South Africa, Nigeria, Ghana, Rwanda, and Mozambique to do what Clinton does. So when the president’s advance man Doug Band pitched the idea to Epstein, he said sure. As an added bonus, Kevin Spacey, a close friend of Clinton’s, and actor Chris Tucker came along for the ride. Yep - the stress is getting to him. Wouldn't be surprised next to hear he has Alzheimer's so can avoid paying any price. |
ElleMira
User ID: 76494359 United States 07/09/2019 06:48 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Expecting the troll/shill 1-stars and any who do not want the truth out there. Bracing for red (hate) karma but this issue too important to so many. Quoting: IJumpInIt [link to twitter.com (secure)] [link to dcwhispers.com] Less than 10% of article: ....It should be noted that Epstein’s controversial deal with the DOJ was initiated by the former Bush-era DOJ and then later upheld by the then-Obama administration. And you want to know who the FBI Director was at the time who participated in that Epstein-friendly agreement? None other than Robert Mueller. (Again, the far-left media has said NOTHING about this.) Epstein’s many political ties, though largely Democrat Party-friendly, are politically interconnected and international in nature and many now feel he was the recipient of some very powerful Deep-State protection—the very same Deep State that has been working so hard to try and destroy President Trump. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77792237 United States 07/09/2019 06:52 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |