Outside The Nazi Checkpoint (Capital Grounds Richmond, Va) 1/19/2020 | |
Ebolatard User ID: 76833714 United States 01/19/2020 10:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
TheLordsServant
User ID: 54948398 United States 01/19/2020 10:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76715453 United States 01/19/2020 10:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Krazed
User ID: 76847782 United States 01/19/2020 10:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | all the fencing going up at the virginia statehouse and not a peep from those who went apesh*t over a secure border fence... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 12854138 i am thinking this is a longer game trade off... 2a as a states rights issue in exchange for abortion losing its constitutional protection and also becoming a states right issue. personally the 2a is explicitly in the constitution while abortion rights is "read into" the 4a as a right to privacy... sure certain groups are cheering this challenge to 2a but once the 2a falls look out for attacks on the protections provided by the 1st and 4th amendments (and all the others) both as explicitly ennumerated and as read into the constitution... Perhaps there is a governor (utah) willing to pull what virginia's governor is doing in regards to abortion... now wouldn't that be something... 2A is clear that it mentions you have no right to specific types of firearms it's up to the state and federal law. SCOTUS already unanimously approved this and will not hear it again. Try to keep up if you think you know so much, try looking up the Federal Assault weapons ban and magazines too, was law for ten years if you were older than some millenial cuck you would already have known this is perfectly Constitutional. It already set precedent. Now the states can. Well, you are obviously a fucking tool, because there was no “assault rifle” ban, because for one, there is zero thing as an “assault rifle,” and, too, during that “ban,” you could still purchase an Arma Light Rifle. Keep up, son. Last Edited by Krazed on 01/19/2020 10:27 PM Krazed Freeman... ...a Freeman... Loved, Feared, and Dreaded... ...Fearless, Determined, and Unstoppable... Red is my favorite color, because it is the color of Lust, Sex, Vigor, Valor, Chaos, War, and Freedom... ...the color of a Warrior... ...the color of a Freeman. Freedom is the only way a Spirit evolves. Sun and Mercury conjunct in Aquarius 7th house; Leo Rising; Mars, Venus and Lilith conjunct in Aries 9th house; Rahu in Taurus 10th house; Chiron in Gemini 10th house; Aries Mid-Heaven; Saturn, Ketu, Pluto conjunct in Scorpio 4th house; Fortune in Capricorn 5th house; Uranus in Sagittarius 5th house; Neptune and Jupiter conjunct in Capricorn 6th house; Moon in Cancer 12th house; Jupiter Atma Karaka; and Destiny Point in Gemini 11th house—Ardra Nakshatra Pada 4—Mercury placed in 7th house. Comanche Native American [Chihuahua, Mexico]; British; French; German; Greek; Italian; Norwegian; Spanish; Portuguese; and Moroccan |
Deplorable Mary
User ID: 54919370 United States 01/19/2020 10:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Officer @3:30 will be walking around beating ( with batons on the back of the legs) those captured and taken to FEMA camps.. WTF with the drum sticks? I'm not a violent person buy I wanted to take them from her, break them in half and jab them in her ears. This is ridiculous. I've never seen a real officer act like they did. Had to have been mall cop rejects. Last Edited by The Empress on 01/19/2020 10:35 PM |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78120397 United States 01/19/2020 10:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78076561 01/19/2020 10:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
DeplorablePOS
User ID: 3315367 United States 01/19/2020 10:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The spirit of the times may alter, will alter. Our rulers will become corrupt, our people careless... From the conclusion of this war we shall be going downhill. It will not then be necessary to resort every moment to the people for support. They will be forgotten, therefore, and their rights disregarded. They will forget themselves, but in the sole faculty of making money, and will never think of uniting to affect a due respect for their rights. The shackles, therefore, will be made heavier and heavier, till our rights shall revive or expire in a convulsion. The Works of Thomas Jefferson" by Thomas Jefferson, vol. 4 (Notes on Virginia II, Correspondence 1782-1786), I believe Thomas Jefferson was wrong he could not foresee the full tyranny of today’s liberal leftist. People are uniting as evidenced in today’s Virginia and in States now openly advocating their citizens to arm themselves either with or without a license. State’s are witnessing the crime in the streets is overwhelming and their police cannot protect the citizens. Virginia is/has threatened gun confiscation as of a couple weeks ago, since then they have backed off somewhat. If the States governments refuse to stand by an Oath they themselves took in accepting that oath of Office, they are going against an Oath they swore to uphold. This is a criminal act. Last Edited by Lucky Strike on 01/19/2020 10:42 PM "I believe in the United States of America as a Government of the people, by the people, for the people; whose just powers are derived from the consent of the governed; a democracy in a republic; a sovereign nation of many sovereign states; a perfect union one and inseparable; established upon those principles of freedom, equality, justice and humanity for which American patriots sacrificed their lives and fortunes. I therefore believe it is my duty to my country to love it; to support its Constitution; to obey it laws; to respect its flag; and to defend it against all enemies." -William Page |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78118643 United States 01/19/2020 10:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78279735 United States 01/19/2020 10:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Nazis? LOL. VA democratically elected their legislature and Govenor... So ummm, who are you to tell them what they want? SCOTUS already unanimously agreed states have final say in firearm regulation and will not hear the subject again... If you were older than 20 you might want to look up the federal assault weapons and magazine ban because.. It's still on the books, it simply sun-setted.... derp Quoting: Topper the Grey Actually as a Virginia resident I can tell you money flowed in from Bloomberg and others to influence the election. Every town, moms demand action etc etc spent millions each averaging 6 million per organization to get these asshats elected. They also restored the voting rights to roughly 250k felons including sex offenders and sent registrations for the democrat party to them. We also have had an influx of democrat refugees from other failed states like California and New York move into northern VA. So did the people of va elect the democrats or did a few billionaires buy their elections. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78118643 United States 01/19/2020 10:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | all the fencing going up at the virginia statehouse and not a peep from those who went apesh*t over a secure border fence... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 12854138 i am thinking this is a longer game trade off... 2a as a states rights issue in exchange for abortion losing its constitutional protection and also becoming a states right issue. personally the 2a is explicitly in the constitution while abortion rights is "read into" the 4a as a right to privacy... sure certain groups are cheering this challenge to 2a but once the 2a falls look out for attacks on the protections provided by the 1st and 4th amendments (and all the others) both as explicitly ennumerated and as read into the constitution... Perhaps there is a governor (utah) willing to pull what virginia's governor is doing in regards to abortion... now wouldn't that be something... 2A is clear that it mentions you have no right to specific types of firearms it's up to the state and federal law. SCOTUS already unanimously approved this and will not hear it again. Try to keep up if you think you know so much, try looking up the Federal Assault weapons ban and magazines too, was law for ten years if you were older than some millenial cuck you would already have known this is perfectly Constitutional. It already set precedent. Now the states can. shall not be infringed Simple and easy language. If you would like to enforce it, by all means, please do. You're obviously a pencil necked, shit talker who couldn't lick a postage stamp. Hey, at least you can talk shit on this forum, right? I'll be happy to give you my home address if you're willing to personally come and take my guns. I know you won't since you're a cowardly candy ass that just spits venom on a site that allows it. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78361494 United States 01/19/2020 10:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76857890 United States 01/19/2020 10:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78118643 United States 01/19/2020 10:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | all the fencing going up at the virginia statehouse and not a peep from those who went apesh*t over a secure border fence... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 12854138 i am thinking this is a longer game trade off... 2a as a states rights issue in exchange for abortion losing its constitutional protection and also becoming a states right issue. personally the 2a is explicitly in the constitution while abortion rights is "read into" the 4a as a right to privacy... sure certain groups are cheering this challenge to 2a but once the 2a falls look out for attacks on the protections provided by the 1st and 4th amendments (and all the others) both as explicitly ennumerated and as read into the constitution... Perhaps there is a governor (utah) willing to pull what virginia's governor is doing in regards to abortion... now wouldn't that be something... 2A is clear that it mentions you have no right to specific types of firearms it's up to the state and federal law. SCOTUS already unanimously approved this and will not hear it again. Try to keep up if you think you know so much, try looking up the Federal Assault weapons ban and magazines too, was law for ten years if you were older than some millenial cuck you would already have known this is perfectly Constitutional. It already set precedent. Now the states can. shall not be infringed Simple and easy language. If you would like to enforce it, by all means, please do. You're obviously a pencil necked, shit talker who couldn't lick a postage stamp. Hey, at least you can talk shit on this forum, right? I'll be happy to give you my home address if you're willing to personally come and take my guns. I know you won't since you're a cowardly candy ass that just spits venom on a site that allows it. I forgot to mention that I'll pay for your travel here. I won't pay for your travel home since it's likely you won't make it back. C'mon tough guy, I'll pay your way! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 12854138 United States 01/19/2020 10:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | all the fencing going up at the virginia statehouse and not a peep from those who went apesh*t over a secure border fence... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 12854138 i am thinking this is a longer game trade off... 2a as a states rights issue in exchange for abortion losing its constitutional protection and also becoming a states right issue. personally the 2a is explicitly in the constitution while abortion rights is "read into" the 4a as a right to privacy... sure certain groups are cheering this challenge to 2a but once the 2a falls look out for attacks on the protections provided by the 1st and 4th amendments (and all the others) both as explicitly ennumerated and as read into the constitution... Perhaps there is a governor (utah) willing to pull what virginia's governor is doing in regards to abortion... now wouldn't that be something... 2A is clear that it mentions you have no right to specific types of firearms it's up to the state and federal law. SCOTUS already unanimously approved this and will not hear it again. Try to keep up if you think you know so much, try looking up the Federal Assault weapons ban and magazines too, was law for ten years if you were older than some millenial cuck you would already have known this is perfectly Constitutional. It already set precedent. Now the states can. thanks kindly for the education. US vs Miller (1939) established the collective rights approach (i.e 2a applies to a "well regulated militia" essentially the federal govt cannot disarm a state's right to defend itself) which stood until 2008 in DC vs Heller when the court took the 2a in an individual rights direction (i.e. "shall not infringe upon the right to keep and bear arms" meaning local jurisdictions cannot wholesale disarm citizens) by striking down DC's handgun ban. Re: the federal assault weapons ban, i believe it sunsetted (expired) 09-13-2004 - it was the law of the land for 10 years as you wrote and though it has been brought up several times since then it has never been renewed so i disagree with your points re: precedent. the federal assault weapons ban was never challenged vis-a-vis the 2a. its constitutionality was only challenged under the 9th amendment, the commerce clause and the equal protection clause. it is currently unknown how a renewed assault weapons ban would fare, if it were to be passed and then challenged under the 2a in light of 2004's DC vs Heller decision and the move from collective to individual rights. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78118643 United States 01/19/2020 10:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
TheLordsServant
User ID: 54948398 United States 01/19/2020 10:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The spirit of the times may alter, will alter. Our rulers will become corrupt, our people careless... From the conclusion of this war we shall be going downhill. It will not then be necessary to resort every moment to the people for support. They will be forgotten, therefore, and their rights disregarded. They will forget themselves, but in the sole faculty of making money, and will never think of uniting to affect a due respect for their rights. The shackles, therefore, will be made heavier and heavier, till our rights shall revive or expire in a convulsion. The Works of Thomas Jefferson" by Thomas Jefferson, vol. 4 (Notes on Virginia II, Correspondence 1782-1786), I believe Thomas Jefferson was wrong he could not foresee the full tyranny of today’s liberal leftist. People are uniting as evidenced in today’s Virginia and in States now openly advocating their citizens to arm themselves either with or without a license. State’s are witnessing the crime in the streets is overwhelming and their police cannot protect the citizens. Virginia is/has threatened gun confiscation as of a couple weeks ago, since then they have backed off somewhat. If the States governments refuse to stand by an Oath they themselves took in accepting that oath of Office, they are going against an Oath they swore to uphold. This is a criminal act. "State’s are witnessing the crime in the streets is overwhelming and their police cannot protect the citizens." "Police cannot..."? In many places - they are being told to "stand down". Some places they are more interested in finding civil forfeitures than they are arresting criminals. I am a humble Servant of the one True Living God. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78118643 United States 01/19/2020 10:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | all the fencing going up at the virginia statehouse and not a peep from those who went apesh*t over a secure border fence... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 12854138 i am thinking this is a longer game trade off... 2a as a states rights issue in exchange for abortion losing its constitutional protection and also becoming a states right issue. personally the 2a is explicitly in the constitution while abortion rights is "read into" the 4a as a right to privacy... sure certain groups are cheering this challenge to 2a but once the 2a falls look out for attacks on the protections provided by the 1st and 4th amendments (and all the others) both as explicitly ennumerated and as read into the constitution... Perhaps there is a governor (utah) willing to pull what virginia's governor is doing in regards to abortion... now wouldn't that be something... 2A is clear that it mentions you have no right to specific types of firearms it's up to the state and federal law. SCOTUS already unanimously approved this and will not hear it again. Try to keep up if you think you know so much, try looking up the Federal Assault weapons ban and magazines too, was law for ten years if you were older than some millenial cuck you would already have known this is perfectly Constitutional. It already set precedent. Now the states can. thanks kindly for the education. US vs Miller (1939) established the collective rights approach (i.e 2a applies to a "well regulated militia" essentially the federal govt cannot disarm a state's right to defend itself) which stood until 2008 in DC vs Heller when the court took the 2a in an individual rights direction (i.e. "shall not infringe upon the right to keep and bear arms" meaning local jurisdictions cannot wholesale disarm citizens) by striking down DC's handgun ban. Re: the federal assault weapons ban, i believe it sunsetted (expired) 09-13-2004 - it was the law of the land for 10 years as you wrote and though it has been brought up several times since then it has never been renewed so i disagree with your points re: precedent. the federal assault weapons ban was never challenged vis-a-vis the 2a. its constitutionality was only challenged under the 9th amendment, the commerce clause and the equal protection clause. it is currently unknown how a renewed assault weapons ban would fare, if it were to be passed and then challenged under the 2a in light of 2004's DC vs Heller decision and the move from collective to individual rights. Shall not be infringed. Fuck the courts and fuck those who think they're above a very simple statement that was made 250+ years ago. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 12854138 United States 01/19/2020 11:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | all the fencing going up at the virginia statehouse and not a peep from those who went apesh*t over a secure border fence... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 12854138 i am thinking this is a longer game trade off... 2a as a states rights issue in exchange for abortion losing its constitutional protection and also becoming a states right issue. personally the 2a is explicitly in the constitution while abortion rights is "read into" the 4a as a right to privacy... sure certain groups are cheering this challenge to 2a but once the 2a falls look out for attacks on the protections provided by the 1st and 4th amendments (and all the others) both as explicitly ennumerated and as read into the constitution... Perhaps there is a governor (utah) willing to pull what virginia's governor is doing in regards to abortion... now wouldn't that be something... 2A is clear that it mentions you have no right to specific types of firearms it's up to the state and federal law. SCOTUS already unanimously approved this and will not hear it again. Try to keep up if you think you know so much, try looking up the Federal Assault weapons ban and magazines too, was law for ten years if you were older than some millenial cuck you would already have known this is perfectly Constitutional. It already set precedent. Now the states can. thanks kindly for the education. US vs Miller (1939) established the collective rights approach (i.e 2a applies to a "well regulated militia" essentially the federal govt cannot disarm a state's right to defend itself) which stood until 2008 in DC vs Heller when the court took the 2a in an individual rights direction (i.e. "shall not infringe upon the right to keep and bear arms" meaning local jurisdictions cannot wholesale disarm citizens) by striking down DC's handgun ban. Re: the federal assault weapons ban, i believe it sunsetted (expired) 09-13-2004 - it was the law of the land for 10 years as you wrote and though it has been brought up several times since then it has never been renewed so i disagree with your points re: precedent. the federal assault weapons ban was never challenged vis-a-vis the 2a. its constitutionality was only challenged under the 9th amendment, the commerce clause and the equal protection clause. it is currently unknown how a renewed assault weapons ban would fare, if it were to be passed and then challenged under the 2a in light of 2004's DC vs Heller decision and the move from collective to individual rights. Shall not be infringed. Fuck the courts and fuck those who think they're above a very simple statement that was made 250+ years ago. sorry i was so long winded but i think we are in agreement re: individual right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. one of my favorite sayings is heinlein's "an armed society is a polite society" of course my spouse always makes it a point to add "that depends on your definition of polite" to which i reply, "if polite means mortally afraid to be rude, then that works for me" |
BirdMom
User ID: 77853541 Panama 01/19/2020 11:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Nazis? LOL. VA democratically elected their legislature and Govenor... So ummm, who are you to tell them what they want? SCOTUS already unanimously agreed states have final say in firearm regulation and will not hear the subject again... If you were older than 20 you might want to look up the federal assault weapons and magazine ban because.. It's still on the books, it simply sun-setted.... derp Quoting: Topper the Grey The USA is a republic for this very reason. The majority is not allowed to vote away anyone's rights even if it's the rights of an unpopular minority. The Virginia Constitution has its own version of the 2nd Amendment, which makes it very clear that's it's a right that shall not be infringed. Northam's gun control laws are unlawful according to Virginia's Constitution as well. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78118643 United States 01/19/2020 11:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Topper the Grey 2A is clear that it mentions you have no right to specific types of firearms it's up to the state and federal law. SCOTUS already unanimously approved this and will not hear it again. Try to keep up if you think you know so much, try looking up the Federal Assault weapons ban and magazines too, was law for ten years if you were older than some millenial cuck you would already have known this is perfectly Constitutional. It already set precedent. Now the states can. thanks kindly for the education. US vs Miller (1939) established the collective rights approach (i.e 2a applies to a "well regulated militia" essentially the federal govt cannot disarm a state's right to defend itself) which stood until 2008 in DC vs Heller when the court took the 2a in an individual rights direction (i.e. "shall not infringe upon the right to keep and bear arms" meaning local jurisdictions cannot wholesale disarm citizens) by striking down DC's handgun ban. Re: the federal assault weapons ban, i believe it sunsetted (expired) 09-13-2004 - it was the law of the land for 10 years as you wrote and though it has been brought up several times since then it has never been renewed so i disagree with your points re: precedent. the federal assault weapons ban was never challenged vis-a-vis the 2a. its constitutionality was only challenged under the 9th amendment, the commerce clause and the equal protection clause. it is currently unknown how a renewed assault weapons ban would fare, if it were to be passed and then challenged under the 2a in light of 2004's DC vs Heller decision and the move from collective to individual rights. Shall not be infringed. Fuck the courts and fuck those who think they're above a very simple statement that was made 250+ years ago. sorry i was so long winded but i think we are in agreement re: individual right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. one of my favorite sayings is heinlein's "an armed society is a polite society" of course my spouse always makes it a point to add "that depends on your definition of polite" to which i reply, "if polite means mortally afraid to be rude, then that works for me" 6/21/1788 Burn it all down after that |
BirdMom
User ID: 77853541 Panama 01/19/2020 11:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Constitution of Virginia Article I. Bill of Rights Section 13. Militia; standing armies; military subordinate to civil power That a well regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, trained to arms, is the proper, natural, and safe defense of a free state, therefore, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed; that standing armies, in time of peace, should be avoided as dangerous to liberty; and that in all cases the military should be under strict subordination to, and governed by, the civil power. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78118643 United States 01/19/2020 11:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78118643 United States 01/19/2020 11:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Constitution of Virginia Quoting: BirdMom Article I. Bill of Rights Section 13. Militia; standing armies; military subordinate to civil power That a well regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, trained to arms, is the proper, natural, and safe defense of a free state, therefore, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed; that standing armies, in time of peace, should be avoided as dangerous to liberty; and that in all cases the military should be under strict subordination to, and governed by, the civil power. I appreciate your take on quoting the law. The law means nothing to the lawless. It's time to hit the Reset button. |
BirdMom
User ID: 77853541 Panama 01/19/2020 11:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Constitution of Virginia Quoting: BirdMom Article I. Bill of Rights Section 13. Militia; standing armies; military subordinate to civil power That a well regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, trained to arms, is the proper, natural, and safe defense of a free state, therefore, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed; that standing armies, in time of peace, should be avoided as dangerous to liberty; and that in all cases the military should be under strict subordination to, and governed by, the civil power. I appreciate your take on quoting the law. The law means nothing to the lawless. It's time to hit the Reset button. Sadly true, too many people in power are lawless. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78118643 United States 01/19/2020 11:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 26445039 United States 01/19/2020 11:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Officer @3:30 will be walking around beating ( with batons on the back of the legs) those captured and taken to FEMA camps.. This guys!!! So interesting but this is better watch this guy trying to sell shit seriously!! We need to take this virgina thing seriously!! This guy I’m posting is from the common man in Virginia!!! Listen up America!!! [link to m.youtube.com (secure)] |
WhoPooted
User ID: 77272713 United States 01/19/2020 11:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78350120 United States 01/19/2020 11:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
WhoPooted
User ID: 77272713 United States 01/19/2020 11:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |