GAME OVER!!! Pelosi is guilty of breaking 18 U.S. Code 2071.Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally

Exactly, it is a matter of important historical record.

My stalker walked into our local courthouse records, impersonated me, proceeded to request a court file of importance, after receiving right there and then removed and put in her bag some of the copies of records and ripped up others not aware she was being filmed and watched by clerk recorder.

My documents were of minor relevance, the SOTU address is profoundly important history, all copies. This lunatic chick, from a very wealthy family, got thrown in jail for this, among other things, but that charge stuck and it was serious time and years of probation.

I think Nancy deserves some kind of punishment for her very public crime.

She did it twice ...6 years

This makes us look weak.

We just had 2 huge wins and don't need to get petty like this.

willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys, or attempts to do so, or, with intent to do so takes and carries away any record, proceeding, map, book, paper, document, or other thing, filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of any court of the United States, or in any public office, or with any judicial or public officer of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.
(b)Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book, document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States. As used in this subsection, the term “office” does not include the office held by any person as a retired officer of the Armed Forces of the United States.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 795; Pub. L. 101–510, div. A, title V, § 552(a), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1566; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(I), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

[link to www.law.cornell.edu (secure)]


We all saw her do it on camera, the whole nation did!

Throw her in prison!

This makes us look weak.

We just had 2 huge wins and don't need to get petty like this.

She did this right in front of Attorney General William Barr. If the Attorney General does not follow through with prosecuting her for this there is no rule of law in America.

We want equal justice for all!

willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys, or attempts to do so, or, with intent to do so takes and carries away any record, proceeding, map, book, paper, document, or other thing, filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of any court of the United States, or in any public office, or with any judicial or public officer of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.
(b)Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book, document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States. As used in this subsection, the term “office” does not include the office held by any person as a retired officer of the Armed Forces of the United States.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 795; Pub. L. 101–510, div. A, title V, § 552(a), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1566; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(I), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

[link to www.law.cornell.edu (secure)]


We all saw her do it on camera, the whole nation did!

Throw her in prison!

"Her copy of the State of the Union address is not a government record or government property at all," said Douglas Cox, professor of law at the City of New York University School of Law and an expert in the laws governing the preservation of government records. "It is personal property."

further...

Under House rules, members of Congress are encouraged to preserve records or donate them to a research institution for historical study, Cox said. Unlike congressional committees, members are not legally required to hold onto their office’s files.

"They can keep them private, they can destroy them, or they can rip them up," he said.

[link to www.politifact.com (secure)]

She can be censured for violating rules of decorum.


Gingrich: Censure Nancy Pelosi for Tearing Up Trump's SOTU Speech
[link to www.breitbart.com (secure)]

It was deposited by Trump with Nancy, when he handed it to her and failed to shake her hand.

Her copy of the speech was neither filed or deposited. Nice try tho.

I agree let's not be as petty as them.

Her copy of the speech was neither filed or deposited. Nice try tho.

Considering what Trump just got away with, and the GOP siding with him like fucking morons, i think you're a little late on the No Rule Of Law In Amerikkka thing...

I agree let's not be as petty as them.

Are you serious?? He was charged without commiting a Crime!

This was my first thought as well. 200+ (? Did SOTU start that long ago?) years of tradition down the drain.

It's on Laura Ingraham about the crime but the rumor she was told is that its a copy of the document the president signed.

I wonder what the truth is about this.

Put her ass in jail for 3 years!

This.

Who gives a fuck if that Old Troll ripped up a copy of a speech. This has been a SUCCESSFUL attempt to bring us down to their level.