| Users Online Now: 2,352 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 2,183,714 | |
| Pageviews Today: 3,035,038 | Threads Today: 713 | Posts Today: 14,372 |
| 10:53 PM | ||
| Users Online Now: 2,352 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 2,183,714 | |
| Pageviews Today: 3,035,038 | Threads Today: 713 | Posts Today: 14,372 |
| 10:53 PM | ||
This is why the electoral college votes can be thrown out..... | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 79240094  United States01/05/2021 06:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Every person in Congress is sworn by oath to uphold the laws and KNOWINGLY allowing any states electors to count after violating it's own laws is CRIMINAL..... Quoting: SEVENFOURSIXTYEIGHT UPDATE: Forgot to add..... Most if not all swing states changed their laws prior to the election....BUT...they did it WITHOUT their legislature....ONLY their legislature is allowed to change election law......therefore by then certifying while including questionable ballots makes their results VOID by law.... well said! to the point! why cant people understand this? . |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 77724013 United States01/05/2021 07:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Every person in Congress is sworn by oath to uphold the laws and KNOWINGLY allowing any states electors to count after violating it's own laws is CRIMINAL..... Quoting: SEVENFOURSIXTYEIGHT UPDATE: Forgot to add..... Most if not all swing states changed their laws prior to the election....BUT...they did it WITHOUT their legislature....ONLY their legislature is allowed to change election law......therefore by then certifying while including questionable ballots makes their results VOID by law.... well said! to the point! why cant people understand this? . I understand that it happened and that assholes want to exploit that it happened. Now show me how changing what was changed as far as the election process goes, during the pandemic was why Trump lost. |
milehighmike
 User ID: 66211107 United States01/05/2021 08:16 PM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: milehighmike As opposed to the party of perpetual cheaters? I can handle the feigned insult... Nope That's just the paranoid crybaby in you, again... "You cheated! BOO-HOO!" Pathetic. You are SO cute when you try to be witty, butt.... YOU.SHOULD.TRY.HARDER. Same to you... You think )f that all on your own??? "Successful people are always looking for opportunities to help others. Unsuccessful people are always asking, 'What's in it for me?'" — Brian Tracy: Personal and business training author, speaker, and consultant "We are all, right now, living the life we choose." -- Peter McWilliams, Author "The bad news is time flies. The good news is you're the pilot." -- Michael Altshuler |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 77724013 United States01/06/2021 04:44 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77382331 Nope That's just the paranoid crybaby in you, again... "You cheated! BOO-HOO!" Pathetic. You are SO cute when you try to be witty, butt.... YOU.SHOULD.TRY.HARDER. Same to you... You think )f that all on your own??? No, some asshole taught me. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 77724013 United States01/06/2021 04:49 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: ToSeek Real statisticians understand that election results don't necessarily follow Benford's Law because they're not random numbers - precincts are of a certain size, for one thing: If his claim about precinct size were correct and he was intellectually honest, he would have to ask why Trump’s distribution didn’t follow the same pattern as Biden’s. He goes through a lot of machinations to make the analysis showing fraud look invalid to the uneducated, it’s not even a good attempt. But at 10:49 in he does say: “You cannot use only Benford’s Law to look for fraud in elections.” If only there wasn’t plenty of easily available evidence of the mathematical impossibilities, of which Benford’s law is only one. But I’ll again state an easy example for the non-mathematically inclined: In Michigan, Biden got over 60,000 more ballots (with no down-ballot votes) than Obama did in 2008. No down-ballot votes means the ballot only had Biden marked on the ballot. Your choice is to believe that Biden inspired more people than Obama and that there were 60k voters who didn’t bother to vote in congressional or senate races...or on any issues. There are those who choose to turn a blind eye, there are those who just don’t have the intelligence to understand easy mathematics, then there are those who try to deceive others because they have an evil agenda. . So what if Biden got 60,000 more votes than Obama! A lot of people are sick of Trump, and came out to vote! I know plenty of right wingers who had enough! You act as if there couldn't possibly be that many people who voted to remove Trump. You haven't adequately shown that! Trump is a national embarassment and more people understood this in 2020 than understood it in 2016! Trump has ALWAYS been an embarassment in the north east....its good to know that more people, in other parts of the country, understand that now! Once again, like a rabid dog you grab onto one piece of evidence out of the body of evidence available and act as if it’s the only factor. And you give an emotional argument rather than looking at the body of evidence and using logic to determine its merit. If you’d like to dig into the evidence, it’s here. I did and my conclusion, based on logical analysis, shows overwhelming evidence of fraud: [link to stateofthenation.co] You can choose to do the same, otherwise, this won’t be a logical debate based on the data but a whack-a-mole game against an emotional person who can only appeal with subjective emotion. . It's funny how morons insist on continuing to use debunked bullshit to push their agenda. Experts in Benford's law say it's being misused by idiots...and idiots continue to misuse it. I wonder why that is. |
