The Ivermectin study you horse dewormer drug lovers like so much was flawed and retracted

So don't take it and go die in the hospital instead.

Nah. I'm fully vaccinated and just fine.

Human trials

Thread: Pandemic Over! Human Trial in Peru with Ivermectin cures fast 100% of patients.

there is no way you could ever catch or spread disease again?

Don't be so Cher.

We are all so happy for, and proud of, you.

It doesn’t take “VERY HIGH DOSES” dumbass.
The whole mantra is a lie.

Ivermectin saves people from covid and vaxxers gonna fucking die.

One study?

Please refute all the others.

18-24 months left. Make your final arrangements.

So you took the clotshot and think everything is fine?

When that witchesbrew starts showing symptoms, you'll probably never think it's to blame. It's the story of the vaxed.

You're as crazy as that guy that lost his leg due to clots caused by the vax (verified by doctor) and is now a spokesman for the shots. He claims it's "rare" but everybody should still get it.

Let the stupid bastards kill themselves. I don’t care if someone gets vaccinated, I won’t rip on them for it, unless they actively try to discredit the drug that cures covid.

My entire family had Covid 2 weeks ago, none of us had symptoms for more than 6 days, only two for me, because we took ivermectin.

It won a nobel prize for medicine, is considered one of the three wonder drugs (alongside acetaminophen and penicillin), and guess what -- it's already been through human trials. It was invented 40 years ago. It works and it's safe.

Human trials for your precious vaxxine won't be completed until 2025 ... and it's already killed and injured tens of thousands of people, with an efficacy of 39% and dropping.

If you want to be a retard, that's on you, but it looks to me like you're purposefully trying to steer people away from a drug that's proven to work. That makes you complicit in their murder scheme.

Honestly, I don't trust these people and their "studies".

I'm mainly concerned with my own personal experiences. I have found two things, from my own usage, that have truly helped.

1) Ivermectin
2) Nebulized hydrogen peroxide.

Should I refuse to believe my own positive experiences because of someone's "study"? I don't think so.

Well put. Say hi to Dory for me.

Ivermectin is the cure. IT’s also a preventative.

It works and that’s why Congress is taking it and trying to prevent us from getting it.

Which means you are MORE at risk. There are more vaccinated than non vaxed getting sick and dying in every Country of the world.

Spike spreader, eh? Watch any unvaccinated freinds or people you are around get sick now.

Like I'm supposed to believe you just because you have a blue name and chose a cool avatar?

Conspiratards think everyone is lying, except themselves.

Perhaps you ought to take a d-dimer test to really find out if you're "just fine." Since more than two-thirds of folks are showing micro-clotting, I'd guess you're not as "just fine" as you think you are. Friend, the odds are NOT in your favor. But keep being cocky anyway...

Last Edited by Nostros on 09/07/2021 10:34 AM

Retracted just as Pfizer is about to release a pill to take for Covid.

Golly jeepers, what a coincidence.

Ever heard of breakthrough cases? Probably not. Just take your boosters too.

Gosh, that's terrible. Guess I will just need to rely on the other 63 studies, 42 of which are peer reviewed---for confidence that this FDA-approved, Nobel prize winning drug is a smart choice.

Enjoy your elevated risk of serious disease, which is "non-theoretical, compelling, and significant" and greater than the unvaccinated.

Search the title below if you don't believe me. As a low info person, you've been seriously duped and treated unethically by the FDA, CDC, and whoever the robot was that stuck the needle in your arm. Enjoy.

"Informed consent disclosure to vaccine trial subjects of risk of COVID-19 vaccines worsening clinical disease" - NIH published December 2020 and again in March 2021

Quoting from the Report:

"Patient comprehension is a critical part of meeting medical ethics standards of informed consent in
study designs. The aim of the study was to determine if sufficient literature exists to require clinicians to
disclose the specific risk that COVID 19 vaccines could worsen disease upon exposure to challenge or
circulating virus.

Published literature was reviewed to identify preclinical and clinical evidence that COVID 19 vaccines
could worsen disease upon exposure to challenge or circulating virus. Clinical trial protocols for
COVID 19 vaccines were reviewed to determine if risks were properly disclosed.

Results of the study

COVID 19 vaccines designed to elicit neutralising antibodies may sensitise vaccine recipients to more
severe disease than if they were not vaccinated.

The specific and significant COVID 19 risk of ADE should have been and should be prominently and
independently disclosed to research subjects currently in vaccine trials, as well as those being recruited
for the trials and future patients after vaccine approval, in order to meet the medical ethics standard of
patient comprehension for informed consent.

The prior evidence that vaccine elicited, antibody dependent
enhancement (ADE) of disease is likely to occur to some degree with COVID 19 vaccines is vertically
consistent from controlled SARS studies in primates to clinical observations in SARS and COVID 19.
Thus, a finite, non theoretical risk is evident in the medical literature that vaccine candidates composed
of the SARS 2 viral spike and eliciting anti SARS CoV 2 antibodies, be they neutralising or not,
place vaccinees at higher risk for more severe COVID 19 disease when they encounter circulating
viruses.

In all, the evidence from the Pfizer, Moderna and Johnson &
Johnson protocols for their COVID 19 vaccine trials and the sample consent forms, when contrasted
with the evidence for antibody dependent enhancement of disease presented by this report and widely
available to any skilled practitioner in the field, establishes that patient comprehension of the specific
risk that receiving the COVID 19 vaccine could convert a subject from someone who experiences mild
disease to someone who experiences severe disease, lasting morbidity or even death is unlikely to be
achieved by the informed consent procedures planned for these clinical trials.

Medical ethics standards required that, given the extent of evidence in the medical literature reviewed
above, the risk of ADE should be clearly and emphatically distinguished in the informed consent from
risks observed rarely as well as the more obvious risk of lack of efficacy, which is unrelated to the
specific risk of ADE.

Based on the published literature, it should have been obvious to any skilled
medical practitioner in 2019 that there is a significant risk to vaccine research subjects that they may
experience severe disease once vaccinated, while they might only have experienced a mild, self limited
disease if not vaccinated. The consent should also clearly distinguish the specific risk of worsened
COVID 19 disease from generic statements about risk of death and generic risk of lack of efficacy of
the vaccine.

3. CONCLUSION
Given the strong evidence that ADE is a non theoretical and compelling risk for COVID 19 vaccines
and the “laundry list” nature of informed consents, disclosure of the specific risk of worsened
COVID 19 disease from vaccination calls for a specific, separate, informed consent form and
demonstration of patient comprehension in order to meet medical ethics standards. The informed
consent process for ongoing COVID 19 vaccine trials does not appear to meet this standard."

There are many trials regarding Ivermectin and you pick one single article that Forbes publishes to try and discredit its use?

Are you stupid?

Jesus Christ you’re a fucking idiot. Your simple minded dismissal of a Nobel prize winning medication removes any stance you have or argument you can make. Your stupidity is just embarrassing.
There’s more than 60 studies worldwide. Meta-analyses. Yet, you choose one that’s being harped on by Forbes. It’s fine if youve chosen the vax for yourself, but don’t be so daft, so fucking moronic as to use your simple tactics to try to discredit this medication.
By the way, your use of the phrase “horse dewormer” shows your incredible lack of independent critical thinking. You repeat phrases uttered but other morons and the ridiculously propaganda filled MSM. If you’re puny mind took the time to actually look at the data, you’d see the efficacy for yourself. Unless your little safety helmet protecting your soft skull obscures your vision.

Too bad your mother didn't retract you when you fell out of her vagina

Here are the randomized controlled studies that PROVE ivermectin is the cure for the China virus:

[link to ivmmeta.com (secure)]

The story of ivermectin

[link to rumble.com (secure)]

Can you point out which study that was? I'll go ahead and cross it out.

[link to c19ivermectin.com (secure)]

how many needles for you op?